Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
MacB

Bronze
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by MacB » Thu Mar 07, 2013 10:49 am

Jaqen wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:In the e-mail asking us to schedule an interview time, they said they plan on sending out decisions this Friday so an interview would help. So, do you or anyone else think that they'll make the decision for ALL the people that were interviewed from this last batch of interviews by Friday, even the ones that interviewed today or maybe tomorrow (I think tomorrow was the last day to set it up)?
Their last batch of decisions was Feb 15th and they gave decisions to people who interviewed as late as Feb 14th.
Did anyone who interviewed prior to Feb 15th NOT get a decision in that batch? I don't recall anyone complaining of that.

User avatar
cwid1391

Bronze
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by cwid1391 » Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:09 am

Anecdotal evidence: I interviewed last week and my status checker updated two days later to Application Under Review and that date. My guess is that they make their decision two or so days after the interview and that's what the status checker update is. So my guess is that if you interviewed yesterday they would make your decision today or tomorrow and then communicate it to you during the presumptive wave tomorrow. Again, complete speculation, but keep your hopes alive for being included tomorrow.

Volforlife

Bronze
Posts: 140
Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:22 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Volforlife » Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:54 am

cwid1391 wrote:Anecdotal evidence: I interviewed last week and my status checker updated two days later to Application Under Review and that date. My guess is that they make their decision two or so days after the interview and that's what the status checker update is. So my guess is that if you interviewed yesterday they would make your decision today or tomorrow and then communicate it to you during the presumptive wave tomorrow. Again, complete speculation, but keep your hopes alive for being included tomorrow.
My status updated yesterday after my interview. Did you get one or two post-interview updates?

04102014

Gold
Posts: 1695
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by 04102014 » Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:54 am

I want an UR for eff's sake.

User avatar
cwid1391

Bronze
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by cwid1391 » Thu Mar 07, 2013 11:55 am

Volforlife wrote:
cwid1391 wrote:Anecdotal evidence: I interviewed last week and my status checker updated two days later to Application Under Review and that date. My guess is that they make their decision two or so days after the interview and that's what the status checker update is. So my guess is that if you interviewed yesterday they would make your decision today or tomorrow and then communicate it to you during the presumptive wave tomorrow. Again, complete speculation, but keep your hopes alive for being included tomorrow.
My status updated yesterday after my interview. Did you get one or two post-interview updates?
I'm pretty sure just one. It was two days after my interview

Edit: Nope, I was wrong. There was one immediately after my interview and then one two days later. So maybe yours will update today or early tomorrow to help give credence to this theory.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Inconceivable!

Bronze
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:35 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Inconceivable! » Thu Mar 07, 2013 12:16 pm

ohpobrecito wrote:I want an UR for eff's sake.
+1

User avatar
bernaldiaz

Gold
Posts: 1674
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by bernaldiaz » Thu Mar 07, 2013 5:57 pm

Just got finaid package. Half scholly

User avatar
applemaroon

Bronze
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by applemaroon » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:00 pm

bernaldiaz wrote:Just got finaid package. Half scholly
Merit??? Need??

User avatar
Dany

Diamond
Posts: 11559
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Dany » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:00 pm

applemaroon wrote:
bernaldiaz wrote:Just got finaid package. Half scholly
Merit??? Need??
I don't think Chicago differentiates.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


shntn

Platinum
Posts: 5319
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by shntn » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:01 pm

$60k of meritneedwhatever.

User avatar
Dany

Diamond
Posts: 11559
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Dany » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:02 pm

shntn wrote:$60k of meritneedwhatever.
! Congrats!

Anonymous4444

Silver
Posts: 631
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Anonymous4444 » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:02 pm

omg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 120k scholarship im losing my mind here

User avatar
clouded.memory

Bronze
Posts: 325
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by clouded.memory » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:03 pm

Are these scholly offers coming through email?

ETA: And congrats on the awesome offers so far, guys!
Last edited by clouded.memory on Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


shntn

Platinum
Posts: 5319
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by shntn » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:04 pm

clouded.memory wrote:Are these scholly offers coming through email?
Yup.

User avatar
applemaroon

Bronze
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by applemaroon » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:04 pm

.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
bernaldiaz

Gold
Posts: 1674
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by bernaldiaz » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:07 pm

Dany wrote:
applemaroon wrote:
bernaldiaz wrote:Just got finaid package. Half scholly
Merit??? Need??
I don't think Chicago differentiates.
Yeah it doesn't say. Is there any precedent of negotiating up to a Ruby?

User avatar
Lavitz

Gold
Posts: 3402
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Lavitz » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:14 pm

Anonymous4444 wrote:omg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 120k scholarship im losing my mind here
Congrats!

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Eichörnchen

Silver
Posts: 1114
Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:51 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Eichörnchen » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:33 pm

$75K scholarship via email...I was pretty damn set on UVA but wasn't expecting this. :shock:

User avatar
cwid1391

Bronze
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by cwid1391 » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:36 pm

Perhaps my theory a few pages back about the Rubenstein/small class size allowing them to be extra generous this year will hold water.

Congrats all! I hope to be able to join your ranks soon. Chicago is the dream. Hopefully it is not crushed tomorrow.

User avatar
WhiteyCakes

Silver
Posts: 1390
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by WhiteyCakes » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:44 pm

Bad sign if no email?

User avatar
Crowing

Gold
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Crowing » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:49 pm

WhiteyCakes wrote:Bad sign if no email?
I'm wondering the same. I think in previous years Chicago has sent an e-mail even if you're not getting anything, but as to whether or not getting a blank today means we're getting a $0 e-mail, I dunno.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


WalkingPlato

Bronze
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by WalkingPlato » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:50 pm

Now that everyone should've had their interview, did anyone think she was cold and uninterested? I remember her yawning during mine.

User avatar
clouded.memory

Bronze
Posts: 325
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by clouded.memory » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:50 pm

Crowing wrote:
WhiteyCakes wrote:Bad sign if no email?
I'm wondering the same. I think in previous years Chicago has sent an e-mail even if you're not getting anything, but as to whether or not getting a blank today means we're getting a $0 e-mail, I dunno.
I think it was mentioned in the Class of 2016 thread that February admits should expect an email at the end of next week. So, maybe this is applicable...?

User avatar
Crowing

Gold
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Crowing » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:51 pm

clouded.memory wrote:
Crowing wrote:
WhiteyCakes wrote:Bad sign if no email?
I'm wondering the same. I think in previous years Chicago has sent an e-mail even if you're not getting anything, but as to whether or not getting a blank today means we're getting a $0 e-mail, I dunno.
I think it was mentioned in the Class of 2016 thread that February admits should expect an email at the end of next week. So, maybe this is applicable...?
Whitey and I are both Jan admits.

User avatar
WhiteyCakes

Silver
Posts: 1390
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by WhiteyCakes » Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:51 pm

Crowing wrote:
WhiteyCakes wrote:Bad sign if no email?
I'm wondering the same. I think in previous years Chicago has sent an e-mail even if you're not getting anything, but as to whether or not getting a blank today means we're getting a $0 e-mail, I dunno.
At least its reassuring to know I'm not the only January admit to miss the first wave


ETA: Starting to get paranoid and wonder if there was a fin aid application step I missed
Last edited by WhiteyCakes on Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”