Did anyone who interviewed prior to Feb 15th NOT get a decision in that batch? I don't recall anyone complaining of that.Jaqen wrote:Their last batch of decisions was Feb 15th and they gave decisions to people who interviewed as late as Feb 14th.WalkingPlato wrote:In the e-mail asking us to schedule an interview time, they said they plan on sending out decisions this Friday so an interview would help. So, do you or anyone else think that they'll make the decision for ALL the people that were interviewed from this last batch of interviews by Friday, even the ones that interviewed today or maybe tomorrow (I think tomorrow was the last day to set it up)?
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- cwid1391
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Anecdotal evidence: I interviewed last week and my status checker updated two days later to Application Under Review and that date. My guess is that they make their decision two or so days after the interview and that's what the status checker update is. So my guess is that if you interviewed yesterday they would make your decision today or tomorrow and then communicate it to you during the presumptive wave tomorrow. Again, complete speculation, but keep your hopes alive for being included tomorrow.
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:22 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My status updated yesterday after my interview. Did you get one or two post-interview updates?cwid1391 wrote:Anecdotal evidence: I interviewed last week and my status checker updated two days later to Application Under Review and that date. My guess is that they make their decision two or so days after the interview and that's what the status checker update is. So my guess is that if you interviewed yesterday they would make your decision today or tomorrow and then communicate it to you during the presumptive wave tomorrow. Again, complete speculation, but keep your hopes alive for being included tomorrow.
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I want an UR for eff's sake.
- cwid1391
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm pretty sure just one. It was two days after my interviewVolforlife wrote:My status updated yesterday after my interview. Did you get one or two post-interview updates?cwid1391 wrote:Anecdotal evidence: I interviewed last week and my status checker updated two days later to Application Under Review and that date. My guess is that they make their decision two or so days after the interview and that's what the status checker update is. So my guess is that if you interviewed yesterday they would make your decision today or tomorrow and then communicate it to you during the presumptive wave tomorrow. Again, complete speculation, but keep your hopes alive for being included tomorrow.
Edit: Nope, I was wrong. There was one immediately after my interview and then one two days later. So maybe yours will update today or early tomorrow to help give credence to this theory.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Inconceivable!
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:35 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1ohpobrecito wrote:I want an UR for eff's sake.
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just got finaid package. Half scholly
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Merit??? Need??bernaldiaz wrote:Just got finaid package. Half scholly
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I don't think Chicago differentiates.applemaroon wrote:Merit??? Need??bernaldiaz wrote:Just got finaid package. Half scholly
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
$60k of meritneedwhatever.
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
! Congrats!shntn wrote:$60k of meritneedwhatever.
-
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
omg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 120k scholarship im losing my mind here
- clouded.memory
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Are these scholly offers coming through email?
ETA: And congrats on the awesome offers so far, guys!
ETA: And congrats on the awesome offers so far, guys!
Last edited by clouded.memory on Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yup.clouded.memory wrote:Are these scholly offers coming through email?
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah it doesn't say. Is there any precedent of negotiating up to a Ruby?Dany wrote:I don't think Chicago differentiates.applemaroon wrote:Merit??? Need??bernaldiaz wrote:Just got finaid package. Half scholly
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congrats!Anonymous4444 wrote:omg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 120k scholarship im losing my mind here
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Eichörnchen
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:51 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
$75K scholarship via email...I was pretty damn set on UVA but wasn't expecting this. 

- cwid1391
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Perhaps my theory a few pages back about the Rubenstein/small class size allowing them to be extra generous this year will hold water.
Congrats all! I hope to be able to join your ranks soon. Chicago is the dream. Hopefully it is not crushed tomorrow.
Congrats all! I hope to be able to join your ranks soon. Chicago is the dream. Hopefully it is not crushed tomorrow.
- WhiteyCakes
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Bad sign if no email?
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm wondering the same. I think in previous years Chicago has sent an e-mail even if you're not getting anything, but as to whether or not getting a blank today means we're getting a $0 e-mail, I dunno.WhiteyCakes wrote:Bad sign if no email?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 171
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 10:51 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Now that everyone should've had their interview, did anyone think she was cold and uninterested? I remember her yawning during mine.
- clouded.memory
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I think it was mentioned in the Class of 2016 thread that February admits should expect an email at the end of next week. So, maybe this is applicable...?Crowing wrote:I'm wondering the same. I think in previous years Chicago has sent an e-mail even if you're not getting anything, but as to whether or not getting a blank today means we're getting a $0 e-mail, I dunno.WhiteyCakes wrote:Bad sign if no email?
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Whitey and I are both Jan admits.clouded.memory wrote:I think it was mentioned in the Class of 2016 thread that February admits should expect an email at the end of next week. So, maybe this is applicable...?Crowing wrote:I'm wondering the same. I think in previous years Chicago has sent an e-mail even if you're not getting anything, but as to whether or not getting a blank today means we're getting a $0 e-mail, I dunno.WhiteyCakes wrote:Bad sign if no email?
- WhiteyCakes
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
At least its reassuring to know I'm not the only January admit to miss the first waveCrowing wrote:I'm wondering the same. I think in previous years Chicago has sent an e-mail even if you're not getting anything, but as to whether or not getting a blank today means we're getting a $0 e-mail, I dunno.WhiteyCakes wrote:Bad sign if no email?
ETA: Starting to get paranoid and wonder if there was a fin aid application step I missed
Last edited by WhiteyCakes on Thu Mar 07, 2013 6:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login