tempted to just drive from l.a. to palo alto, but don't have that kind of time.ru1ess wrote:After meeting and speaking with Dean Deal, and considering she has a child in College-- I would say she's closer to 50, if not older. SOOOOO pregnancy is definitely not in the picture. However, I do think that we will get some news today-- as flights to Preview Weekend are soaring.. Not like they care-- but I'm just sayin'
Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:32 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- Elendil
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Maybe I'll just drive from New York to Palo Alto...Geneva wrote:tempted to just drive from l.a. to palo alto, but don't have that kind of time.ru1ess wrote:After meeting and speaking with Dean Deal, and considering she has a child in College-- I would say she's closer to 50, if not older. SOOOOO pregnancy is definitely not in the picture. However, I do think that we will get some news today-- as flights to Preview Weekend are soaring.. Not like they care-- but I'm just sayin'
- Doorkeeper
- Posts: 4869
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
TLS Soft Hold Road Trip 2012!Elendil wrote:Maybe I'll just drive from New York to Palo Alto...Geneva wrote:tempted to just drive from l.a. to palo alto, but don't have that kind of time.ru1ess wrote:After meeting and speaking with Dean Deal, and considering she has a child in College-- I would say she's closer to 50, if not older. SOOOOO pregnancy is definitely not in the picture. However, I do think that we will get some news today-- as flights to Preview Weekend are soaring.. Not like they care-- but I'm just sayin'
WOOOOOOOOOO
-
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:32 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Make it happen!Doorkeeper wrote:TLS Soft Hold Road Trip 2012!Elendil wrote:Maybe I'll just drive from New York to Palo Alto...Geneva wrote:tempted to just drive from l.a. to palo alto, but don't have that kind of time.ru1ess wrote:After meeting and speaking with Dean Deal, and considering she has a child in College-- I would say she's closer to 50, if not older. SOOOOO pregnancy is definitely not in the picture. However, I do think that we will get some news today-- as flights to Preview Weekend are soaring.. Not like they care-- but I'm just sayin'
WOOOOOOOOOO
- Elendil
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
If we all get travel stipends, we can pool our money and stop at Vegas on the way.Geneva wrote:Make it happen!Doorkeeper wrote:TLS Soft Hold Road Trip 2012!Elendil wrote: Maybe I'll just drive from New York to Palo Alto...
WOOOOOOOOOO

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- hypothalamus
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:11 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Count me in!!! Where would we get the travel stipends from, though?Elendil wrote:If we all get travel stipends, we can pool our money and stop at Vegas on the way.Geneva wrote:Make it happen!Doorkeeper wrote:TLS Soft Hold Road Trip 2012!
WOOOOOOOOOO

-
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:32 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
2 weeks until asw
Last edited by Geneva on Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:32 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
time to figure out where we will go to law school...
Last edited by Geneva on Fri Apr 06, 2012 11:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Elendil
- Posts: 516
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2011 12:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just as a disclaimer, I do not in any way ACTUALLY endorse this hypothetical but terrible idea! 

-
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:32 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
haha me neither. i'm just dying of boredom and starvation while i wait for my coworker to send me the document i need to edit *before i eat lunch* trying to redirect feelings of exasperation, or something...Elendil wrote:Just as a disclaimer, I do not in any way ACTUALLY endorse this hypothetical but terrible idea!
- Doorkeeper
- Posts: 4869
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Sounds like a great plan!Elendil wrote:Just as a disclaimer, I donot in any wayACTUALLY endorse this hypothetical butterribleawesome idea!
-
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:32 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
i like u. u r in. by in i mean accepted to whatever school u want to go to. for free. that is allDoorkeeper wrote:Sounds like a great plan!Elendil wrote:Just as a disclaimer, I donot in any wayACTUALLY endorse this hypothetical butterribleawesome idea!
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
How do you know SLS has not admitted 380 students already?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- sn20
- Posts: 157
- Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2010 1:36 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
GTFO. Jk, in past years they've at least admitted a few in late March/early April.jim-green wrote:How do you know SLS has not admitted 380 students already?
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:53 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Because they would have had the decency to reject or wait list the rest of us?jim-green wrote:How do you know SLS has not admitted 380 students already?
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I heard Dean Deal gave up accepting people for lent. Since it is Good Friday, feel free to jump back on the train at any point Dean 

- Doorkeeper
- Posts: 4869
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just called the Admissions Office just to see if they were open...
They are open...
and I think I'm starting to lose it.
They are open...
and I think I'm starting to lose it.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Ah ok, good point. Yep, if 380 are already admitted, they would probably have told the rest of us by now.splbagel wrote:Because they would have had the decency to reject or wait list the rest of us?jim-green wrote:How do you know SLS has not admitted 380 students already?
It could be they have admitted a few in March/April not from TLS.
Last edited by jim-green on Fri Apr 06, 2012 12:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I have no knowledge to base this on, but I think we may be nearing the end of the road.jim-green wrote:How do you know SLS has not admitted 380 students already?
Looking through last years and prior years threads, I think that while it is foolish to hope to discern a pattern for dates, there was one constant: that at the tail end of the notification deadline, all of the applicants retained a great deal of hope. That hope was met with a waitlist/ rejection bloodbath at the end of April.
-
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:32 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
aw, that is sad, but probs important for people to know. any idea if this was also the case for harvard/yale?EMZE wrote:I have no knowledge to base this on, but I think we may be nearing the end of the road.jim-green wrote:How do you know SLS has not admitted 380 students already?
Looking through last years and prior years threads, I think that while it is foolish to hope to discern a pattern for dates, there was one constant: that at the tail end of the notification deadline, all of the applicants retained a great deal of hope. That hope was met with a waitlist/ rejection bloodbath at the end of April.
-
- Posts: 804
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 7:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Would a targetted LoR this late in the game be considered OK by SLS? Don't want to annoy them.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 1:54 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm reapplying from last cycle. Applied near deadline to SLS, got rejected shortly after 4/20.
As for Harvard, I was WLed in a wave in late April, then in the first week of May, around 20 people were accepted off the WL, and it was trickle for the rest of the summer.
As for Harvard, I was WLed in a wave in late April, then in the first week of May, around 20 people were accepted off the WL, and it was trickle for the rest of the summer.
-
- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Look through last years threads for any school you are wonderng about. There were no rounds of final mass acceptances.Geneva wrote:aw, that is sad, but probs important for people to know. any idea if this was also the case for harvard/yale?EMZE wrote:I have no knowledge to base this on, but I think we may be nearing the end of the road.jim-green wrote:How do you know SLS has not admitted 380 students already?
Looking through last years and prior years threads, I think that while it is foolish to hope to discern a pattern for dates, there was one constant: that at the tail end of the notification deadline, all of the applicants retained a great deal of hope. That hope was met with a waitlist/ rejection bloodbath at the end of April.
- Doorkeeper
- Posts: 4869
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I would advise against it, but it's your call.jim-green wrote:Would a targetted LoR this late in the game be considered OK by SLS? Don't want to annoy them.
-
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2011 1:32 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
or not on lsn. i was admitted last week but i dont have a profile there and a few other people on tls were accepted that don't appear to have profiles. "fortuitous" got accepted at about the same time i did and s/he didn't have a filled in lsn profile; i think there was at least one other...jim-green wrote:Ah ok, good point. Yep, if 380 are already admitted, they would probably have told the rest of us by now.splbagel wrote:Because they would have had the decency to reject or wait list the rest of us?jim-green wrote:How do you know SLS has not admitted 380 students already?
It could be they have admitted a few in March/April not from TLS.
again, this isn't to predict the future but to say that there seems to have been a steady enough stream of acceptances over the past couple weeks
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login