Post removed. Forum
- chneyo
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
...
Last edited by chneyo on Fri Feb 07, 2014 10:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
- yomisterd
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:52 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
What's the typical time between UCR and an update/decision? Asking for a friend.
- 05062014
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:05 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Up to 12 weeksyomisterd wrote:What's the typical time between UCR and an update/decision? Asking for a friend.
Last edited by 05062014 on Mon Jan 20, 2014 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Depends which UCR you're talking about. UCR1, UCR2, etc.?yomisterd wrote:What's the typical time between UCR and an update/decision? Asking for a friend.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Yep!chneyo wrote:We feeling better this morning?lawschool22 wrote:Sorry for objectively discussing something that lots of people ITT were already talking about. I forget, who is forcing you to read this thread? Reading facts and data should not "terrify" a future lawyer. I highly doubt a discussion about Penn YP in the Penn applicant's thread is "scaring the piss" out of anyone.kek5250 wrote:I'm wondering why we can't talk about YP on a different thread where it only terrifies those who want to read it. It's a relevant subject to many applicants outside this thread as well, so why bother scaring the piss out of people who just came to see some actual activity? a thread about YP all by itself isn't a bad idea.
anyone held for further review having any movement?
Feel free to start a YP thread if you don't think its a bad idea.

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- yomisterd
- Posts: 1571
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 12:52 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I believe it is UCR1lawschool22 wrote:Depends which UCR you're talking about. UCR1, UCR2, etc.?yomisterd wrote:What's the typical time between UCR and an update/decision? Asking for a friend.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I probably wouldn't expect anything for the next 4 weeks at least.yomisterd wrote:I believe it is UCR1lawschool22 wrote:Depends which UCR you're talking about. UCR1, UCR2, etc.?yomisterd wrote:What's the typical time between UCR and an update/decision? Asking for a friend.
- nothingtosee
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 12:08 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I'm trying to lay out a schedule for ASWs, and can't find the info on the site.
When is the Penn ASW? Do they offer two?
When is the Penn ASW? Do they offer two?
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I'm bored yo.
- demersal
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 11:21 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Try the admitted students' thread. We would be useful if we could, but most of us are too busy stressing about not being able to join you on that thread yet (or ever!nothingtosee wrote:I'm trying to lay out a schedule for ASWs, and can't find the info on the site.
When is the Penn ASW? Do they offer two?

- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Try SVP and Russillo out, they're killing it as always.ohpobrecito wrote:I'm bored yo.
-
- Posts: 164
- Joined: Tue Sep 10, 2013 12:44 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
chneyo wrote:We feeling better this morning?lawschool22 wrote:Sorry for objectively discussing something that lots of people ITT were already talking about. I forget, who is forcing you to read this thread? Reading facts and data should not "terrify" a future lawyer. I highly doubt a discussion about Penn YP in the Penn applicant's thread is "scaring the piss" out of anyone.kek5250 wrote:I'm wondering why we can't talk about YP on a different thread where it only terrifies those who want to read it. It's a relevant subject to many applicants outside this thread as well, so why bother scaring the piss out of people who just came to see some actual activity? a thread about YP all by itself isn't a bad idea.
anyone held for further review having any movement?
Feel free to start a YP thread if you don't think its a bad idea.
I was going to wait a full week to ask that question, you know, until the hormones settled. :p
For the record, I'm not terrified of YP, it doesn't apply to me in the least. But I read at least one post in response to the figures that mentioned being terrified (or some similar word) by them, and after they took up about 3 pages I got sick of reading them too. And for that matter I don't remember saying that facts and data were terrifying, that's a bit of a misinterpretation of what I wrote. The rampant speculation is what's terrifying. At some point, it becomes ridiculous to keep analyzing the numbers. You might as well look for your future in tea leaves. You're not going to determine your fate or anyone else's this way. I don't think that you ought to be so offended, as a future lawyer, by someone questioning the relevance of your "facts and data." Sheesh. People take their forum posts very seriously around here.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Finally UCR1 after applying early December.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
As of today?Dominican_Lawyer wrote:Finally UCR1 after applying early December.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 5:30 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
No sorry. As of 1/17.
-
- Posts: 1673
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:22 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
But then what else do we do while we pass the time waiting for movement?kek5250 wrote:chneyo wrote:We feeling better this morning?lawschool22 wrote:Sorry for objectively discussing something that lots of people ITT were already talking about. I forget, who is forcing you to read this thread? Reading facts and data should not "terrify" a future lawyer. I highly doubt a discussion about Penn YP in the Penn applicant's thread is "scaring the piss" out of anyone.kek5250 wrote:I'm wondering why we can't talk about YP on a different thread where it only terrifies those who want to read it. It's a relevant subject to many applicants outside this thread as well, so why bother scaring the piss out of people who just came to see some actual activity? a thread about YP all by itself isn't a bad idea.
anyone held for further review having any movement?
Feel free to start a YP thread if you don't think its a bad idea.
I was going to wait a full week to ask that question, you know, until the hormones settled. :p
For the record, I'm not terrified of YP, it doesn't apply to me in the least. But I read at least one post in response to the figures that mentioned being terrified (or some similar word) by them, and after they took up about 3 pages I got sick of reading them too. And for that matter I don't remember saying that facts and data were terrifying, that's a bit of a misinterpretation of what I wrote. The rampant speculation is what's terrifying. At some point, it becomes ridiculous to keep analyzing the numbers. You might as well look for your future in tea leaves. You're not going to determine your fate or anyone else's this way. I don't think that you ought to be so offended, as a future lawyer, by someone questioning the relevance of your "facts and data." Sheesh. People take their forum posts very seriously around here.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I wasn't offended by anything you said. I just didn't understand why you felt the need to be the arbiter of what we can and can't post in this thread. I'm sorry you got sick of reading our discussion, but again no one forced you to read it. You could have easily skimmed over it until something of interest to you was posted. Do you really expect everyone in this forum to be interested in every post?kek5250 wrote:chneyo wrote:We feeling better this morning?lawschool22 wrote:Sorry for objectively discussing something that lots of people ITT were already talking about. I forget, who is forcing you to read this thread? Reading facts and data should not "terrify" a future lawyer. I highly doubt a discussion about Penn YP in the Penn applicant's thread is "scaring the piss" out of anyone.kek5250 wrote:I'm wondering why we can't talk about YP on a different thread where it only terrifies those who want to read it. It's a relevant subject to many applicants outside this thread as well, so why bother scaring the piss out of people who just came to see some actual activity? a thread about YP all by itself isn't a bad idea.
anyone held for further review having any movement?
Feel free to start a YP thread if you don't think its a bad idea.
I was going to wait a full week to ask that question, you know, until the hormones settled. :p
For the record, I'm not terrified of YP, it doesn't apply to me in the least. But I read at least one post in response to the figures that mentioned being terrified (or some similar word) by them, and after they took up about 3 pages I got sick of reading them too. And for that matter I don't remember saying that facts and data were terrifying, that's a bit of a misinterpretation of what I wrote. The rampant speculation is what's terrifying. At some point, it becomes ridiculous to keep analyzing the numbers. You might as well look for your future in tea leaves. You're not going to determine your fate or anyone else's this way. I don't think that you ought to be so offended, as a future lawyer, by someone questioning the relevance of your "facts and data." Sheesh. People take their forum posts very seriously around here.
I'm sorry you feel it's ridiculous to keep analyzing the numbers. You're entitled to that opinion, but I think we were having a perfectly reasonable conversation.
We were not trying to "determine anyone's fate" through that analysis. We were actually talking about something relevant and useful to future applicants. That is, does Penn place a large emphasis on your commitment to attending if accepted? It is pertinent information because it may change the angle that an applicant takes during his or her application or waitlists strategy.
Finally, we weren't rampantly speculating. We were using the data we have and trying to come to reasonable conclusions from that.
I stand by what I said earlier. Our discussion was perfectly within the bounds of this thread, and if it wasn't a mod would have deleted it or chimed in. That's what they're here for. I'm not really "taking this seriously," I think those who are terrified by the discussion or "sick of reading" something are probably taking it a bit too seriously. Again, no one is forcing you to read anything in this thread.
I'm not sure what you mean by the hormones comment, so I'll just leave that one alone as I'm sure you probably didn't mean it in the way I think you did.
We can just agree to disagree on this. I would just recommend you don't go around to every thread you're tired of reading and tell reasonable posters talking about reasonable topics that you're sick of their posts.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
So uh, how's everyone doing today?
- Robbin Blue
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 12:13 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Looks like everyone's a tiny bit stressed.ohpobrecito wrote:So uh, how's everyone doing today?
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Who wants to predict this week's events?Robbin Blue wrote:Looks like everyone's a tiny bit stressed.ohpobrecito wrote:So uh, how's everyone doing today?
- Robbin Blue
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 12:13 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
ohpobrecito wrote:Who wants to predict this week's events?Robbin Blue wrote:Looks like everyone's a tiny bit stressed.ohpobrecito wrote:So uh, how's everyone doing today?

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Robbin Blue wrote:ohpobrecito wrote:Who wants to predict this week's events?Robbin Blue wrote:Looks like everyone's a tiny bit stressed.ohpobrecito wrote:So uh, how's everyone doing today?

-
- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I feel like there's decisions to be hashed out tomorrow and wednesday. I'd like to go UR1 by the end of the week though:ohpobrecito wrote:
Who wants to predict this week's events?

- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
They don't yield protect.
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Hi Clearly!!!Clearly wrote:They don't yield protect.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login