Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
twinkletoes16

Silver
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by twinkletoes16 » Sat Mar 02, 2013 2:09 am

MAHamlin wrote:Went UR1 this evening. Submitted 12/8 and went complete 12/20.

i'm still sitting at complete 12/13.

they may be in the running for "slower than stanford."

User avatar
pedestrian

Bronze
Posts: 461
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:38 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by pedestrian » Sat Mar 02, 2013 2:19 am

Complete 12/14
UR1 3/1

twinkletoes, I'm sure your time is coming soon.

User avatar
twinkletoes16

Silver
Posts: 1317
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by twinkletoes16 » Sat Mar 02, 2013 2:32 am

pedestrian wrote:Complete 12/14
UR1 3/1

twinkletoes, I'm sure your time is coming soon.

thanks dude. man, i feel bad for all the january submitters. they're not getting a decision until June it seems.

User avatar
JXander

Silver
Posts: 966
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by JXander » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:17 pm

twinkletoes16 wrote:
pedestrian wrote:Complete 12/14
UR1 3/1

twinkletoes, I'm sure your time is coming soon.

thanks dude. man, i feel bad for all the january submitters. they're not getting a decision until June it seems.
:cry:

Big Dog

Silver
Posts: 1205
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 9:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Big Dog » Sat Mar 02, 2013 12:20 pm

i feel bad for all the january submitters. they're not getting a decision until June it seems.
Maybe by then, Chicago shower them with money to close the deal quickly. (Jan applicants can dream, can't they???)

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


edamame

Bronze
Posts: 294
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by edamame » Sat Mar 02, 2013 3:59 pm

So glad to be UR.

manti5

New
Posts: 25
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 9:47 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by manti5 » Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:29 pm

Submitted early Jan, complete 1/17.

UR1 this morning.

nba101790

Bronze
Posts: 475
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:05 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by nba101790 » Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:30 pm

Still complete, but at least they're working on a Saturday!

User avatar
smdpnp

Bronze
Posts: 252
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:49 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by smdpnp » Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:32 pm

Nope.
Last edited by smdpnp on Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


04102014

Gold
Posts: 1695
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by 04102014 » Sat Mar 02, 2013 4:40 pm

It's sad how exhilarating I find this.

User avatar
pannekoeken

New
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 11:07 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by pannekoeken » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:00 pm

Just noticed that I went UR yesterday (3/1) but didn't even go complete until 2/1. Is this quick turnaround (relative to everyone else applying to Chicago at least, lol) a good or bad thing? Stats in profile...

User avatar
Lavitz

Gold
Posts: 3402
Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Lavitz » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:14 pm

pannekoeken wrote:Just noticed that I went UR yesterday (3/1) but didn't even go complete until 2/1. Is this quick turnaround (relative to everyone else applying to Chicago at least, lol) a good or bad thing? Stats in profile...
I think it's a good thing that you just jumped ahead in line.

They have to know they need to pick up the pace if they want to finish RD admits by mid-April. So maybe they've given up on reviewing everyone as they go complete and decided to start grabbing the best apps out of the pile and putting them on the fast track.

I think they'd be in more of a rush to accept people than to reject or WL people.

MAHamlin

Bronze
Posts: 222
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:58 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by MAHamlin » Sat Mar 02, 2013 7:39 pm

Lavitz wrote:
pannekoeken wrote:Just noticed that I went UR yesterday (3/1) but didn't even go complete until 2/1. Is this quick turnaround (relative to everyone else applying to Chicago at least, lol) a good or bad thing? Stats in profile...
I think it's a good thing that you just jumped ahead in line.

They have to know they need to pick up the pace if they want to finish RD admits by mid-April. So maybe they've given up on reviewing everyone as they go complete and decided to start grabbing the best apps out of the pile and putting them on the fast track.

I think they'd be in more of a rush to accept people than to reject or WL people.
+1 I think you're in good shape panne. :)

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


KingFish

Bronze
Posts: 334
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by KingFish » Sun Mar 03, 2013 1:16 am

UR 3/1

Complete 1/24

User avatar
jselson

Platinum
Posts: 6337
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by jselson » Sun Mar 03, 2013 1:32 am

KingFish wrote:UR 3/1

Complete 1/24
+1

User avatar
jselson

Platinum
Posts: 6337
Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by jselson » Sun Mar 03, 2013 1:37 am

Has anyone gotten in, or just an interview even (or a Ruby, maybe), without having written a Why Chicago or have anything school-specific in their app?

Edit: k, from lsn, it seems it's not out of the realm of possibility for any of those.
Last edited by jselson on Sun Mar 03, 2013 1:44 am, edited 1 time in total.

one_by_one

Bronze
Posts: 278
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by one_by_one » Sun Mar 03, 2013 1:43 am

.
Last edited by one_by_one on Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


MacB

Bronze
Posts: 341
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by MacB » Sun Mar 03, 2013 2:26 am

jselson wrote:Has anyone gotten in, or just an interview even (or a Ruby, maybe), without having written a Why Chicago or have anything school-specific in their app?

Edit: k, from lsn, it seems it's not out of the realm of possibility for any of those.
I didn't write a "Why Chi" and there was absolutely nothing Chicago-specific in my application. During my interview, I made it clear why I was interested in attending Chicago specifically when presented with the opportunity. Worked out for me.

User avatar
postard

Bronze
Posts: 154
Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:39 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by postard » Sun Mar 03, 2013 2:57 am

MacB wrote:
jselson wrote:Has anyone gotten in, or just an interview even (or a Ruby, maybe), without having written a Why Chicago or have anything school-specific in their app?

Edit: k, from lsn, it seems it's not out of the realm of possibility for any of those.
I didn't write a "Why Chi" and there was absolutely nothing Chicago-specific in my application. During my interview, I made it clear why I was interested in attending Chicago specifically when presented with the opportunity. Worked out for me.
+1

04102014

Gold
Posts: 1695
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by 04102014 » Sun Mar 03, 2013 2:25 pm

Can a bro just get an UR?

User avatar
risa

Bronze
Posts: 466
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by risa » Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:08 pm

postard wrote:
MacB wrote:
jselson wrote:Has anyone gotten in, or just an interview even (or a Ruby, maybe), without having written a Why Chicago or have anything school-specific in their app?

Edit: k, from lsn, it seems it's not out of the realm of possibility for any of those.
I didn't write a "Why Chi" and there was absolutely nothing Chicago-specific in my application. During my interview, I made it clear why I was interested in attending Chicago specifically when presented with the opportunity. Worked out for me.
+1
+2

I think the interview was essentially my "why chicago"

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
ManOfTheMinute

Gold
Posts: 1557
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by ManOfTheMinute » Sun Mar 03, 2013 3:16 pm

ohpobrecito wrote:Can a bro just get an UR?
You and everyone else... if they don't UR our apps before May, do we get our money back?

User avatar
Crowing

Gold
Posts: 2631
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by Crowing » Sun Mar 03, 2013 4:43 pm

IIRC Chicago didn't specifically provide the option for a why x so I didn't write one. I'm kinda surprised they don't though tbh since most people prefer CLS and NYU to Chicago; it seems like why x could be useful for them.

User avatar
you'rethemannowdawg

Bronze
Posts: 211
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 1:36 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by you'rethemannowdawg » Sun Mar 03, 2013 4:59 pm

UR1 3/1. Complete late January. Looking at the #s of you other fine folks who went UR1 the same day, I have to admit I'm more hopeful about UChi than I was last week...

User avatar
ManOfTheMinute

Gold
Posts: 1557
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Post by ManOfTheMinute » Sun Mar 03, 2013 5:25 pm

you'rethemannowdawg wrote:UR1 3/1. Complete late January. Looking at the #s of you other fine folks who went UR1 the same day, I have to admit I'm more hopeful about UChi than I was last week...
You know what would be helpful? You posting your numbers after you specifically mention looking at other peoples. Worm has a great rant about this, and this post swayed me to his opinion.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”