Don't confuse a sense of decorum with being a douche.Capitol A wrote:Is a sense of decorum considered a douchie trait?
Good luck wherever you end up.
Don't confuse a sense of decorum with being a douche.Capitol A wrote:Is a sense of decorum considered a douchie trait?
That's fine, but i'm having trouble seeing how respecting the current students and professor of your potential school is douchie.fathergoose wrote:Thisalphasteve wrote:We try to have a douche-free school. To the best we can, the community policies it. You, sir, are being a douche. And I am glad to hear you've withdrawn.
Being on time. Paying attention, especially when one is a guest, are both matters of decorum, not douchieness.fathergoose wrote:Don't confuse a sense of decorum with being a douche.Capitol A wrote:Is a sense of decorum considered a douchie trait?
Good luck wherever you end up.
Thank makes me feel a lot better about the situation. Back to opening day celebrations.Longhorn88 wrote:I withdrew from SMU weeks ago.
Making harsh comments on a situational circumstance which you were not present is a matter of douchieness and not decorumCapitol A wrote:Being on time. Paying attention, especially when one is a guest, are both matters of decorum, not douchieness.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Nice.Longhorn88 wrote:Hope Crespi wasn't offended, it's habitual:fathergoose wrote: And that sucks for nodding off guy, Crespi does not go down well hungover. Nobody wants to hear about the finer points of anticipatory repudiation while they are focusing really hard on not yakking.
Yep.wellington wrote:So you "withdrew" from SMU recently, which makes you a 0L. Try going to law school before lecturing us on "decorum."
It's the rare proxy-gunner. The proxy-gunner kisses a law professor's ass who teaches at a school he will never go to.ebo wrote:Why is some dude who withdrew weeks ago still posting in the SMU 2011 thread?
boredom.ebo wrote:Why is some dude who withdrew weeks ago still posting in the SMU 2011 thread?
Do you need to be in law school to have a sense of decorum?Thirteen wrote:Yep.wellington wrote:So you "withdrew" from SMU recently, which makes you a 0L. Try going to law school before lecturing us on "decorum."
I like the Umbrella. It lets the casual observer know that while you are here to party, you are also prepared for the worst. Well played sir.Thirteen wrote:Nice.Longhorn88 wrote:Hope Crespi wasn't offended, it's habitual:fathergoose wrote: And that sucks for nodding off guy, Crespi does not go down well hungover. Nobody wants to hear about the finer points of anticipatory repudiation while they are focusing really hard on not yakking.
End of the semester party:
--ImageRemoved--
West Campus last summer:
--ImageRemoved--
Even if her actions were not respectable, calling someone out online for something they didn't even witness in person is what makes you a fucking douche, dude. I am a 2L.. I have no idea who this poster was. I wasn't in that class, so I can't judge those actions.. but I easily can judge yours.Capitol A wrote:That's fine, but i'm having trouble seeing how respecting the current students and professor of your potential school is douchie.fathergoose wrote:Thisalphasteve wrote:We try to have a douche-free school. To the best we can, the community policies it. You, sir, are being a douche. And I am glad to hear you've withdrawn.
This chick must be super hot.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Hey, I don't particularly care. I found it hard to pay attention, and I know what he was talking about. I didn't mean it in a bad way, I just enjoyed the fact that you were right next to him (if it was you...jeans, brown cowboy boots?) and obviously disinterested. I feel like more professors need to be informed when they aren't being particularly interesting.labeauche wrote:I think you are talking about me. Sorry, I do not see the point of sitting in on a class that half of the language can be classified as legalese. Isn't it akin to trying to read a casebook the summer before you begin law school? Lots of energy expended with very little to show for it. I am sure he is an excellent prof, but it may have been easier to sit in on a class utilizing even a hint of the socratic method. For a bystander at least, it makes for a more dynamic experience. After sitting through several such lectures I probably should have learned my lesson and just skipped ahead to the tour. My bad.fathergoose wrote:She will have a much easier time finding 1L summer employment than I did.kalvano wrote:Props to the cute blonde who walked in late then played with her hair all throughout class.
All of this is credited, especially the part about Property sucking.kalvano wrote:Hey, I don't particularly care. I found it hard to pay attention, and I know what he was talking about. I didn't mean it in a bad way, I just enjoyed the fact that you were right next to him (if it was you...jeans, brown cowboy boots?) and obviously disinterested. I feel like more professors need to be informed when they aren't being particularly interesting.labeauche wrote:I think you are talking about me. Sorry, I do not see the point of sitting in on a class that half of the language can be classified as legalese. Isn't it akin to trying to read a casebook the summer before you begin law school? Lots of energy expended with very little to show for it. I am sure he is an excellent prof, but it may have been easier to sit in on a class utilizing even a hint of the socratic method. For a bystander at least, it makes for a more dynamic experience. After sitting through several such lectures I probably should have learned my lesson and just skipped ahead to the tour. My bad.fathergoose wrote:She will have a much easier time finding 1L summer employment than I did.kalvano wrote:Props to the cute blonde who walked in late then played with her hair all throughout class.
Anyway, I would venture that most of the 1L's were paying less attention than you. Today's was a very uninteresting class, and having him do a review session right before the class always overloads me on Contracts.
Also, no one really uses the Socratic to any great extent, except Forrester, but Property sucks.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
I don't mind it. I liked last semester a lot more than this semester though.wellington wrote:Does it make me crazy for liking property?
EDIT: Thirteen I know you love Civ Pro--your opinion is tainted
labeauche wrote:Yeah Kalvano, that was me. Part of the joy of having phone with internet is that my boss can always reach me, even on my day off. If it redeems me at all, I really liked SMU and everyone I met today.
Oh and Thirteen, the jorts were a classy touch.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
I'm the total opposite. I love this semester (relatively speaking, haha).fathergoose wrote:I don't mind it. I liked last semester a lot more than this semester though.wellington wrote:Does it make me crazy for liking property?
EDIT: Thirteen I know you love Civ Pro--your opinion is tainted
No clue. I'm surprised, because I fucking hated it last semester.kalvano wrote:How can you like Civ Pro? I almost never go. It's like being hit with a hammer repeatedly.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login