Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- barrelofmonkeys
- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
guys stop feeding trolls c'mon now
eta: was able to get on to status checker, still UR
eta: was able to get on to status checker, still UR
Last edited by barrelofmonkeys on Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- chneyo
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
...
Last edited by chneyo on Tue Feb 18, 2014 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
- vuthy
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 8:55 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Still just UR, but I'm an early January submit.
- Slytherpuff
- Posts: 5401
- Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2013 12:50 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
+1vuthy wrote:Still just UR, but I'm an early January submit.
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Ummm, OK. The gist of the letter was that I should stop logging into the status checker 2,000 times a second on four different computers. While it is true the Harvard website has a glitch whereby anyone who checks their status 1,000,009 times will be automatically admitted, they can come after me for damages and are legally entitled to deny my a meal plan should I matriculate.cesium wrote:Wow. What did the letter say? You don't have to divulge it completely, but what was the gist of the letter?IrishJew wrote: +1 I hope so! That would be nicer than the nasty letter I got from Harvard's IT department! (Who knew Harvard IT had so many lawyers?!)
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Oh. While I was examining the letter from Harvard IT's legal team it fell into the fireplace and when I fished it out some glowing words appeared at the bottom! They read:cesium wrote:Wow. What did the letter say? You don't have to divulge it completely, but what was the gist of the letter?IrishJew wrote: +1 I hope so! That would be nicer than the nasty letter I got from Harvard's IT department! (Who knew Harvard IT had so many lawyers?!)
"PS Be careful when posting jokes on TLS because even though you may think it's obvious that absurd statements are not true it's very hard to convey tone on the internet and some people might take you seriously. One time this guy we knew had a friend or cousin who made jokes on TLS and his gerbil died the same day. If you have posted jokes on TLS, make sure to forward this letter to 5 friends within 24 hours or your gerbil might die too!"
Last edited by IrishJew on Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- JD1776
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 3:08 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Still UR as well. But with a mid-November complete date, the hammer might be falling soon on my sweet little head.
- PotenC
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2012 11:13 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Hey guys just in case anyone was interested my friend got that call from Dean Deal this morning. Shout out to him.
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I am also still UR with early November submit. In the same boat as you, dude.JD1776 wrote:Still UR as well. But with a mid-November complete date, the hammer might be falling soon on my sweet little head.
- barrelofmonkeys
- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
i will shout him out WHEN YOU PROVIDE HIS STATS/DATES.PotenC wrote:Hey guys just in case anyone was interested my friend got that call from Dean Deal this morning. Shout out to him.
congrats potenc's friend

-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Man, dings and admits on the same day. SMH. Vicarious congrats.PotenC wrote:Hey guys just in case anyone was interested my friend got that call from Dean Deal this morning. Shout out to him.
- chicky
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:14 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Immaculate trolling. +180. Would read again.IrishJew wrote:Oh. While I was examining the letter from Harvard IT's legal team it fell into the fireplace and when I fished it out some glowing words appeared at the bottom! They read:cesium wrote:Wow. What did the letter say? You don't have to divulge it completely, but what was the gist of the letter?IrishJew wrote: +1 I hope so! That would be nicer than the nasty letter I got from Harvard's IT department! (Who knew Harvard IT had so many lawyers?!)
"PS Be careful when posting jokes on TLS because even though you may think it's obvious that absurd statements are not true it's very hard to convey tone on the internet and some people might take you seriously. One time this guy we knew had a friend or cousin who made jokes on TLS and his gerbil died the same day. If you have posted jokes on TLS, make sure to forward this letter to 5 friends within 24 hours or your gerbil might die too!"
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Honestly, do my posts count as trolling? I thought from the beginning they were patently ridiculous. Sorry for the folks I confused.



Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- chicky
- Posts: 62
- Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2013 2:14 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
"Trolling" was the wrong word - my comment was one of purest appreciation. Dry humor is the best humor.
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Oh, no worries. When I saw that BOM posted "stop feeding the trolls" I got worried.chicky wrote:"Trolling" was the wrong word - my comment was one of purest appreciation. Dry humor is the best humor.
- barrelofmonkeys
- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Only because it was getting out of hand. I honestly was more disappointed in people's too-serious reactions to your dumb jokes than I was in your dumb jokes = )IrishJew wrote:Oh, no worries. When I saw that BOM posted "stop feeding the trolls" I got worried.chicky wrote:"Trolling" was the wrong word - my comment was one of purest appreciation. Dry humor is the best humor.
- JD1776
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 3:08 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
This is what rejections on Valentine's Day do to people haha.barrelofmonkeys wrote:Only because it was getting out of hand. I honestly was more disappointed in people's too-serious reactions to your dumb jokes than I was in your dumb jokes = )IrishJew wrote:Oh, no worries. When I saw that BOM posted "stop feeding the trolls" I got worried.chicky wrote:"Trolling" was the wrong word - my comment was one of purest appreciation. Dry humor is the best humor.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Yeah, when I saw people asking me what the letter said I thought it was time to close it out. This is how balloon boys get started.barrelofmonkeys wrote:Only because it was getting out of hand. I honestly was more disappointed in people's too-serious reactions to your dumb jokes than I was in your dumb jokes = )IrishJew wrote:Oh, no worries. When I saw that BOM posted "stop feeding the trolls" I got worried.chicky wrote:"Trolling" was the wrong word - my comment was one of purest appreciation. Dry humor is the best humor.
PS The Harvard login hack is real though.
PPS No. No it's not.
- chneyo
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 7:46 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
...
Last edited by chneyo on Tue Feb 18, 2014 10:01 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
It said:chneyo wrote:
So what DID the letter say?
"Dear Mr. Wycliff T. Sturgeon:
Chneyo = +1"
Very short and cryptic. What do you think it means?
Last edited by IrishJew on Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Leo
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:58 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Using post 180 to say DLS, no call. Oh well, SLS was a long shot.
Submitted early November
3.7x / 171 / strong softs
Submitted early November
3.7x / 171 / strong softs
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- phillywc
- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
BOM gets a little ornery on Valentine's Day....barrelofmonkeys wrote:Only because it was getting out of hand. I honestly was more disappointed in people's too-serious reactions to your dumb jokes than I was in your dumb jokes = )IrishJew wrote:Oh, no worries. When I saw that BOM posted "stop feeding the trolls" I got worried.chicky wrote:"Trolling" was the wrong word - my comment was one of purest appreciation. Dry humor is the best humor.
Why? Because she's at work and hasn't been able to watch house of cards yet, of course!
eta: trolling bom is always worth a post milestone
Last edited by phillywc on Fri Feb 14, 2014 2:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 12:39 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Sorry, Doc Brown. That sucks.Leo wrote:Using post 180 to say DLS, no call. Oh well, SLS was a long shot.
Submitted early November
3.7x / 171 / strong softs
- barrelofmonkeys
- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
...fuck.Leo wrote:Using post 180 to say DLS, no call. Oh well, SLS was a long shot.
Submitted early November
3.7x / 171 / strong softs
- barrelofmonkeys
- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
love you toophillywc wrote:BOM gets a little ornery on Valentine's Day....barrelofmonkeys wrote:Only because it was getting out of hand. I honestly was more disappointed in people's too-serious reactions to your dumb jokes than I was in your dumb jokes = )IrishJew wrote:
Oh, no worries. When I saw that BOM posted "stop feeding the trolls" I got worried.
Why? Because she's at work and hasn't been able to watch house of cards yet, of course!
eta: trolling bom is always worth a post milestone
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login