A void at 168 opened up when Vandy jumped to a 169 last year. If Vandy is now taking 169s who didn't get into the T14, who's left to take the 168s? Most were probably rejected by better schools and dispersed to pad the 75%s of T25s. Cornell's already at a 168, and 168 splitters aren't getting into Berkeley. Texas and UCLA hate splitters, and USC is only slightly more tolerant. At least 25% of WUSTL's class had a 168 last year - all they need is to substitute 25% (and likely less than that, probably closer to 15%) of the 167s with 168s and voila, 168 median. 168s with lower GPAs (3.5/3.6/3.7 and lower) have a ceiling, just like 167s with lower GPAs. WUSTL intends to vacuum them up with the allure of T18 PREFTIGE (maybe T17 next year, if the 168 median causes WUSTL to gain a point and break the tie with USC) and scholarships comparable to what they'd get at worse schools.Tim0thy222 wrote:I'm a 167 splitter and having the same thoughts as you, and I'm still fairly optimistic. My reason is that I can't imagine WUSTL would suddenly be able to be more selective than they were last year. Maybe someone else knows this - how competitive is law school admission in general compared to last year? I saw that the number of October LSAT takers went down from last year, so unless there is some influx of applicants from somewhere else (reapplying after last year or something), I would imagine WUSTL is going to eventually accept us 167 splitters, just like they did last year, the year before that, and the year before that.law4vus wrote:What are everyone's thoughts on whether it will be significantly harder for a 167 splitter to get in compared to last year when nearly everyone on LSN with a 167 was admitted?
It looks like they are really trying to push for that 168 median, but I also heard they did something very similar last year before admitting many of the 167 applicants.
WUSTL 2011 Cycle Forum
- stratocophic

- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
- ArthurDigbySellers

- Posts: 395
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:49 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Shit I just read this "If we receive the completed financial aid forms on or before March 1, we will make every effort to notify you of scholarship and loan awards before the April 1 deadline for first deposit." I can't believe I fucked myself in terms of possible merit aid. Is scholly still possible? Fuck me, I thought it was just for need-based aid and direct federal loans. Fuck fuckety fuck.
- FuManChusco

- Posts: 1217
- Joined: Tue Jan 26, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
while almost all of this makes sense, wouldn't USC just become 19 and WUSTL would be the stand alone 18?stratocophic wrote:A void at 168 opened up when Vandy jumped to a 169 last year. If Vandy is now taking 169s who didn't get into the T14, who's left to take the 168s? Most were probably rejected by better schools and dispersed to pad the 75%s of T25s. Cornell's already at a 168, and 168 splitters aren't getting into Berkeley. Texas and UCLA hate splitters, and USC is only slightly more tolerant. At least 25% of WUSTL's class had a 168 last year - all they need is to substitute 25% (and likely less than that, probably closer to 15%) of the 167s with 168s and voila, 168 median. 168s with lower GPAs (3.5/3.6/3.7 and lower) have a ceiling, just like 167s with lower GPAs. WUSTL intends to vacuum them up with the allure of T18 PREFTIGE (maybe T17 next year, if the 168 median causes WUSTL to gain a point and break the tie with USC) and scholarships comparable to what they'd get at worse schools.Tim0thy222 wrote:I'm a 167 splitter and having the same thoughts as you, and I'm still fairly optimistic. My reason is that I can't imagine WUSTL would suddenly be able to be more selective than they were last year. Maybe someone else knows this - how competitive is law school admission in general compared to last year? I saw that the number of October LSAT takers went down from last year, so unless there is some influx of applicants from somewhere else (reapplying after last year or something), I would imagine WUSTL is going to eventually accept us 167 splitters, just like they did last year, the year before that, and the year before that.law4vus wrote:What are everyone's thoughts on whether it will be significantly harder for a 167 splitter to get in compared to last year when nearly everyone on LSN with a 167 was admitted?
It looks like they are really trying to push for that 168 median, but I also heard they did something very similar last year before admitting many of the 167 applicants.
-
snichols16

- Posts: 295
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:33 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Cool out. I hope that your reading of that statement isn't indicative of your reading comp skills in general... because then how did you get into Wash U?ArthurDigbySellers wrote:Shit I just read this "If we receive the completed financial aid forms on or before March 1, we will make every effort to notify you of scholarship and loan awards before the April 1 deadline for first deposit." I can't believe I fucked myself in terms of possible merit aid. Is scholly still possible? Fuck me, I thought it was just for need-based aid and direct federal loans. Fuck fuckety fuck.
NOTIFY is the operative word there. They don't say anything about eligibility or availability or "you're fucked" -- just that they'll try and get back to you before you have to put down a deposit WHICH IS REFUNDABLE FOR A MONTH AFTER YOU PAY IT ANYWAY.
I swear to God TLS needs to take a collective dose of Xanax.
- ArthurDigbySellers

- Posts: 395
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:49 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
I NEED TO LATCH ONTO THINGS TO OBSESS/WORRY ABOUTsnichols16 wrote:Cool out. I hope that your reading of that statement isn't indicative of your reading comp skills in general... because then how did you get into Wash U?ArthurDigbySellers wrote:Shit I just read this "If we receive the completed financial aid forms on or before March 1, we will make every effort to notify you of scholarship and loan awards before the April 1 deadline for first deposit." I can't believe I fucked myself in terms of possible merit aid. Is scholly still possible? Fuck me, I thought it was just for need-based aid and direct federal loans. Fuck fuckety fuck.
NOTIFY is the operative word there. They don't say anything about eligibility or availability or "you're fucked" -- just that they'll try and get back to you before you have to put down a deposit WHICH IS REFUNDABLE FOR A MONTH AFTER YOU PAY IT ANYWAY.
I swear to God TLS needs to take a collective dose of Xanax.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
bbermud

- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 7:35 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
ArthurDigbySellers wrote:I NEED TO LATCH ONTO THINGS TO OBSESS/WORRY ABOUTsnichols16 wrote:Cool out. I hope that your reading of that statement isn't indicative of your reading comp skills in general... because then how did you get into Wash U?ArthurDigbySellers wrote:Shit I just read this "If we receive the completed financial aid forms on or before March 1, we will make every effort to notify you of scholarship and loan awards before the April 1 deadline for first deposit." I can't believe I fucked myself in terms of possible merit aid. Is scholly still possible? Fuck me, I thought it was just for need-based aid and direct federal loans. Fuck fuckety fuck.
NOTIFY is the operative word there. They don't say anything about eligibility or availability or "you're fucked" -- just that they'll try and get back to you before you have to put down a deposit WHICH IS REFUNDABLE FOR A MONTH AFTER YOU PAY IT ANYWAY.
I swear to God TLS needs to take a collective dose of Xanax.
I thought the same thing. Btw, these past four post made me smile. So thank you.
-
snichols16

- Posts: 295
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:33 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
You're killing your father, Larry.ArthurDigbySellers wrote:I NEED TO LATCH ONTO THINGS TO OBSESS/WORRY ABOUTsnichols16 wrote:Cool out. I hope that your reading of that statement isn't indicative of your reading comp skills in general... because then how did you get into Wash U?ArthurDigbySellers wrote:Shit I just read this "If we receive the completed financial aid forms on or before March 1, we will make every effort to notify you of scholarship and loan awards before the April 1 deadline for first deposit." I can't believe I fucked myself in terms of possible merit aid. Is scholly still possible? Fuck me, I thought it was just for need-based aid and direct federal loans. Fuck fuckety fuck.
NOTIFY is the operative word there. They don't say anything about eligibility or availability or "you're fucked" -- just that they'll try and get back to you before you have to put down a deposit WHICH IS REFUNDABLE FOR A MONTH AFTER YOU PAY IT ANYWAY.
I swear to God TLS needs to take a collective dose of Xanax.
- stratocophic

- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
...FuManChusco wrote:while almost all of this makes sense, wouldn't USC just become 19 and WUSTL would be the stand alone 18?stratocophic wrote:A void at 168 opened up when Vandy jumped to a 169 last year. If Vandy is now taking 169s who didn't get into the T14, who's left to take the 168s? Most were probably rejected by better schools and dispersed to pad the 75%s of T25s. Cornell's already at a 168, and 168 splitters aren't getting into Berkeley. Texas and UCLA hate splitters, and USC is only slightly more tolerant. At least 25% of WUSTL's class had a 168 last year - all they need is to substitute 25% (and likely less than that, probably closer to 15%) of the 167s with 168s and voila, 168 median. 168s with lower GPAs (3.5/3.6/3.7 and lower) have a ceiling, just like 167s with lower GPAs. WUSTL intends to vacuum them up with the allure of T18 PREFTIGE (maybe T17 next year, if the 168 median causes WUSTL to gain a point and break the tie with USC) and scholarships comparable to what they'd get at worse schools.Tim0thy222 wrote:I'm a 167 splitter and having the same thoughts as you, and I'm still fairly optimistic. My reason is that I can't imagine WUSTL would suddenly be able to be more selective than they were last year. Maybe someone else knows this - how competitive is law school admission in general compared to last year? I saw that the number of October LSAT takers went down from last year, so unless there is some influx of applicants from somewhere else (reapplying after last year or something), I would imagine WUSTL is going to eventually accept us 167 splitters, just like they did last year, the year before that, and the year before that.law4vus wrote:What are everyone's thoughts on whether it will be significantly harder for a 167 splitter to get in compared to last year when nearly everyone on LSN with a 167 was admitted?
It looks like they are really trying to push for that 168 median, but I also heard they did something very similar last year before admitting many of the 167 applicants.
...
...
Yes. If I could do math, I wouldn't be in law school.
- stratocophic

- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Yeah, don't sweat it. People got scholarships despite getting admitted in like April last year. People withdraw, funds open up. NBDArthurDigbySellers wrote:Shit I just read this "If we receive the completed financial aid forms on or before March 1, we will make every effort to notify you of scholarship and loan awards before the April 1 deadline for first deposit." I can't believe I fucked myself in terms of possible merit aid. Is scholly still possible? Fuck me, I thought it was just for need-based aid and direct federal loans. Fuck fuckety fuck.
- ArthurDigbySellers

- Posts: 395
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:49 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Have you ever heard of Vietnam?snichols16 wrote:You're killing your father, Larry.ArthurDigbySellers wrote:I NEED TO LATCH ONTO THINGS TO OBSESS/WORRY ABOUTsnichols16 wrote:Cool out. I hope that your reading of that statement isn't indicative of your reading comp skills in general... because then how did you get into Wash U?ArthurDigbySellers wrote:Shit I just read this "If we receive the completed financial aid forms on or before March 1, we will make every effort to notify you of scholarship and loan awards before the April 1 deadline for first deposit." I can't believe I fucked myself in terms of possible merit aid. Is scholly still possible? Fuck me, I thought it was just for need-based aid and direct federal loans. Fuck fuckety fuck.
NOTIFY is the operative word there. They don't say anything about eligibility or availability or "you're fucked" -- just that they'll try and get back to you before you have to put down a deposit WHICH IS REFUNDABLE FOR A MONTH AFTER YOU PAY IT ANYWAY.
I swear to God TLS needs to take a collective dose of Xanax.
-
snichols16

- Posts: 295
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:33 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Just me and Charlie, man. Eyeball to eyeball. That's fuckin' combat.
- ArthurDigbySellers

- Posts: 395
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:49 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
A bunch of fig-eaters wearing towels on their heads, trying to find reverse in a Soviet tank. This is not a worthy adversary.snichols16 wrote:Just me and Charlie, man. Eyeball to eyeball. That's fuckin' combat.
-
columbia86

- Posts: 181
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:59 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
I updated to In Review 3/15; anyone else update today?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ArthurDigbySellers

- Posts: 395
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:49 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
IR 3/14--->3/15columbia86 wrote:I updated to In Review 3/15; anyone else update today?
- labballin24

- Posts: 43
- Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2011 3:18 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
In Review 2/17- In Review 3/15columbia86 wrote:I updated to In Review 3/15; anyone else update today?
-
columbia86

- Posts: 181
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:59 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Sorry, I just caught up on the thread; I should have read before I posted.ArthurDigbySellers wrote:IR 3/14--->3/15columbia86 wrote:I updated to In Review 3/15; anyone else update today?
Hopefully we will hear back soon.
- JCougar

- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
I got admitted in early June and I still got a scholarship. Of course, I was hold-listed for a while because I applied with a February LSAT the day before the deadline.stratocophic wrote:Yeah, don't sweat it. People got scholarships despite getting admitted in like April last year. People withdraw, funds open up. NBDArthurDigbySellers wrote:Shit I just read this "If we receive the completed financial aid forms on or before March 1, we will make every effort to notify you of scholarship and loan awards before the April 1 deadline for first deposit." I can't believe I fucked myself in terms of possible merit aid. Is scholly still possible? Fuck me, I thought it was just for need-based aid and direct federal loans. Fuck fuckety fuck.
Moral of the story --> get a good LSAT BEFORE February to save you from an extra 4 months of panic and worry.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
SrLaw

- Posts: 588
- Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2010 8:10 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Ir 3/14 ---- IR 3/15. 167/3.44. I want an acceptance + 25K and I will be there!!!
- ArthurDigbySellers

- Posts: 395
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:49 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
We're not so different, you and I...very similar numbers and same exact review dates...I'll be watching you...SrLaw wrote:Ir 3/14 ---- IR 3/15. 167/3.44. I want an acceptance + 25K and I will be there!!!
- law4vus

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
I didn't get updated from 3/14 to 3/15. Does that mean they just took one look at my app and tossed it? 
- ArthurDigbySellers

- Posts: 395
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 4:49 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
I've given up trying to parse the meaning of review date changes. I might as well go read tea leaves.law4vus wrote:I didn't get updated from 3/14 to 3/15. Does that mean they just took one look at my app and tossed it?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
tinlawman

- Posts: 59
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 5:52 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Anybody here in review before they started going to the lower LSATs? Am I the only one above 168 that's going to get rejected
?
-
bbermud

- Posts: 139
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 7:35 am
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
im auto-reject. blast you WUSTL for toying with me and making me get me hopes up.
- jacketman03

- Posts: 763
- Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2010 3:44 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
I went IR 2/7 the first time, but I'm a URM, so take that as you will.tinlawman wrote:Anybody here in review before they started going to the lower LSATs? Am I the only one above 168 that's going to get rejected?
Also, I was pretty sure I was an auto-ding, but they changed my IR date to 3/3 and I'm still waiting, so I guess I'm not as auto-dingy as I thought I was.
- kjadkins

- Posts: 648
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 6:49 pm
Re: WUSTL 2011 Cycle
Numbers almost-twinsssssss (triplets?)! Too bad we're not IR date triplets, still at my second IR (3/10)ArthurDigbySellers wrote:We're not so different, you and I...very similar numbers and same exact review dates...I'll be watching you...SrLaw wrote:Ir 3/14 ---- IR 3/15. 167/3.44. I want an acceptance + 25K and I will be there!!!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login