Sorry, this might be silly, but what does "YP'ed" mean?Thelaw23 wrote:I know the information sessions are a good way of decreasing the chances of being YP'ed by a school.
Unfortunately, I don't have that problem with Harvard.
Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum
- cherrygalore

- Posts: 474
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:13 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
- Thelaw23

- Posts: 794
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Yield Protection - if your stats are too 'high' for a school they might reject you because they know that if they do admit you, another higher school will admit you as well and you will probably go to the higher ranked school.cherrygalore wrote:Sorry, this might be silly, but what does "YP'ed" mean?Thelaw23 wrote:I know the information sessions are a good way of decreasing the chances of being YP'ed by a school.
Unfortunately, I don't have that problem with Harvard.
I'm not even sure if Harvard has that problem? Probably not. It can only lose substantial amount of people to Y, and there's not that many spots at Yale.
- cherrygalore

- Posts: 474
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2016 11:13 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Oh, I see! Thanks!Thelaw23 wrote:Yield Protection - if your stats are too 'high' for a school they might reject you because they know that if they do admit you, another higher school will admit you as well and you will probably go to the higher ranked school.cherrygalore wrote:Sorry, this might be silly, but what does "YP'ed" mean?Thelaw23 wrote:I know the information sessions are a good way of decreasing the chances of being YP'ed by a school.
Unfortunately, I don't have that problem with Harvard.
I'm not even sure if Harvard has that problem? Probably not. It can only lose substantial amount of people to Y, and there's not that many spots at Yale.
-
Kaziende

- Posts: 206
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:10 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Yeah HLS definitely does not YP, so wipe your brows, all you 4.0/180s out there. All will be well.
- ArtistOfManliness

- Posts: 590
- Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 10:56 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Wait. Have people in this thread been talking about HLS YP-ing? Good news, it doesn't and HLS will (apparently) we welcoming a whole new breed of douchebags this year.Kaziende wrote:Yeah HLS definitely does not YP, so wipe your brows, all you 4.0/180s out there. All will be well.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
cantyoloforever

- Posts: 169
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 7:02 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I'd be willing to name my first born after him if that ends up being the case lmaopotterotter wrote:If you get in, you owe him dinner!cantyoloforever wrote:All it took was one comment to make me pull the trigger haha.call-me-bubbles wrote:Absolutely go for it. Your numbers aren't so wildly out of range that it's impossible, even though it may be unlikely according to myLSN and the folks on TLS, but I'm a big believer in at least throwing one's hat in the ring. For me, that $115 was probably a waste, and it may ultimately be for you, too, but I think it's always worth a try; you never know.cantyoloforever wrote:I am a non-URM with a GPA in the 3.6-3.7 range and an LSAT score in the 168-170 range with unexceptional softs. I'm talking myself into throwing away $115 to apply to Harvard just to see what happens. Stupid, or go for it?
- pretzeltime

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
cool it bruv. no one was talking about harvard YP in earnestArtistOfManliness wrote:Wait. Have people in this thread been talking about HLS YP-ing? Good news, it doesn't and HLS will (apparently) we welcoming a whole new breed of douchebags this year.Kaziende wrote:Yeah HLS definitely does not YP, so wipe your brows, all you 4.0/180s out there. All will be well.
-
TAD

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun May 15, 2016 11:40 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
names his first born bubblescantyoloforever wrote:I'd be willing to name my first born after him if that ends up being the case lmaopotterotter wrote:If you get in, you owe him dinner!cantyoloforever wrote:All it took was one comment to make me pull the trigger haha.call-me-bubbles wrote:Absolutely go for it. Your numbers aren't so wildly out of range that it's impossible, even though it may be unlikely according to myLSN and the folks on TLS, but I'm a big believer in at least throwing one's hat in the ring. For me, that $115 was probably a waste, and it may ultimately be for you, too, but I think it's always worth a try; you never know.cantyoloforever wrote:I am a non-URM with a GPA in the 3.6-3.7 range and an LSAT score in the 168-170 range with unexceptional softs. I'm talking myself into throwing away $115 to apply to Harvard just to see what happens. Stupid, or go for it?
-
Kaziende

- Posts: 206
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:10 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
No, he was kidding. But if I get a WL/rejection, I'll be sure to tell grandma about the YP factor. She's fragile these days.ArtistOfManliness wrote:Wait. Have people in this thread been talking about HLS YP-ing? Good news, it doesn't and HLS will (apparently) we welcoming a whole new breed of douchebags this year.Kaziende wrote:Yeah HLS definitely does not YP, so wipe your brows, all you 4.0/180s out there. All will be well.
- Thelaw23

- Posts: 794
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I"ll tell my grandchildren that I didn't get into H because of YP. And maybe because of an arrow to the knee.
- ayylmao

- Posts: 543
- Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2016 10:38 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Earnestly discussing whether HLS YPs? Man, I think we've reached peak TLS.
-
cantyoloforever

- Posts: 169
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2016 7:02 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Your avatar goes perfectly with that postayylmao wrote:Earnestly discussing whether HLS YPs? Man, I think we've reached peak TLS.
- R. Jeeves

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by R. Jeeves on Wed Oct 26, 2016 1:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- pretzeltime

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
but why do ALL of that reading when you could just skip straight to the snark jeevesyR. Jeeves wrote:if you go back just one page, youll find that no such earnest discussion took place. if you go up just 6 posts, you'll see that someone already explicitly pointed this out.
- R. Jeeves

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by R. Jeeves on Wed Oct 26, 2016 1:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- call-me-bubbles

- Posts: 320
- Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2016 11:46 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by call-me-bubbles on Wed Jan 11, 2017 1:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Thelaw23

- Posts: 794
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:23 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Do you guys think that, if given the chance to interview, doing so with a Yankees cap might increase my chances of being YP'ed?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- ashrice13

- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Depends how long the interviewer has lived in Boston.Thelaw23 wrote:Do you guys think that, if given the chance to interview, doing so with a Yankees cap might increase my chances of being YP'ed?
Even then, they wouldn't give you the satisfaction of thinking you were YP'd. They'd send a rejection letter with a personalized note that said
"Yankees suck. Go Sox.
Love never,
Harvard
P.S. Papi for life"
-
smartmoon

- Posts: 33
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2015 1:39 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
-
Last edited by smartmoon on Thu Mar 16, 2017 9:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
Kaziende

- Posts: 206
- Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2016 8:10 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Nothing but crickets in Cambridge.smartmoon wrote:Any updates on JS1?
- pretzeltime

- Posts: 1993
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Maybe admissions is just really hangry because of the strike
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
rico32

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:40 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Hype is not nearly high enough on this board. I wonder if next week is more likely at this point--seems that admissions prefers to let people know earlier in the week (historically).
- R. Jeeves

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
my bets on monday
-
aaron1621

- Posts: 83
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2016 4:30 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Any chance JS1s sent out today or tomorrow?
-
AriGold33

- Posts: 59
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2016 12:51 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
No interview spots open yet, but hopefully soon!aaron1621 wrote:Any chance JS1s sent out today or tomorrow?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login