SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
Stevoman

Bronze
Posts: 186
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 10:28 am

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by Stevoman » Thu Jan 15, 2015 12:16 pm

Rent is really getting ridiculous in Dallas. Not going to pretend it isn't an issue if you choose SMU. North Texas rent prices are rising at an absurd rate and there are no signs of slowing down construction of new luxury high-rises everywhere.

The Village still has some cheap places, and you certainly can find some cheap places if you look hard around Lower Greenville or far East Dallas. But you aren't going to find a decent 1BR for $500. A decent apartment near SMU will probably cost you at least $800 and probably closer to $1000 for a nice one. Forget about Uptown for anything less than $1200-1400.

User avatar
TX_UH

Bronze
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 9:52 pm

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by TX_UH » Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:36 pm

Anybody had any luck leveraging Baylor scholarship offers to raise an SMU offer?

Stevoman

Bronze
Posts: 186
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 10:28 am

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by Stevoman » Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:53 pm

SMU will not budge on scholarships. They just won't.

User avatar
bound

Silver
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:49 pm

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by bound » Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:57 pm

TX_UH wrote:Anybody had any luck leveraging Baylor scholarship offers to raise an SMU offer?

SMU doesn't negotiate.

User avatar
TX_UH

Bronze
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 9:52 pm

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by TX_UH » Thu Jan 15, 2015 1:59 pm

For a pricey private school, they sure are stingy. I still have to try. With a full-tuition scholarship to Baylor and about a half-scholly to SMU, I would think they would consider moving a little. I'll report back if I have any luck.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
bound

Silver
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:49 pm

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by bound » Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:01 pm

As far as housing goes, you really just have to do your research. I currently live in uptown in one of the many Gables communities for very very reasonable relative to other places in uptown. Just check every day once you get to about 2-3months out.

User avatar
bound

Silver
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:49 pm

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by bound » Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:01 pm

TX_UH wrote:For a pricey private school, they sure are stingy. I still have to try. With a full-tuition scholarship to Baylor and about a half-scholly to SMU, I would think they would consider moving a little. I'll report back if I have any luck.
You can try but they won't consider. At least not in the last two cycles. It's not their policy. Maybe something will change this time around.

User avatar
indypup

New
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:40 pm

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by indypup » Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:08 pm

I didn't feel that they were stingy at all. 24k for being <25% GPA and slightly below median LSAT seemed pretty generous. I was still planning on a negotiating because it doesn't hurt, but I was pleasantly surprised with the offer they gave me. They gave me more than Baylor did, and Baylor is more expensive.

ilikebaseball

Gold
Posts: 4102
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by ilikebaseball » Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:24 pm

bound wrote:
TX_UH wrote:For a pricey private school, they sure are stingy. I still have to try. With a full-tuition scholarship to Baylor and about a half-scholly to SMU, I would think they would consider moving a little. I'll report back if I have any luck.
You can try but they won't consider. At least not in the last two cycles. It's not their policy. Maybe something will change this time around.
I'm hoping that a retake and a slightly higher LSAT MIGHT make them reconsider, but I've only heard what you say, bound.

BTW, I've never found a single bd in uptown for less than 950. You probs got a better deal tho

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


ilikebaseball

Gold
Posts: 4102
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by ilikebaseball » Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:26 pm

indypup wrote:I didn't feel that they were stingy at all. 24k for being <25% GPA and slightly below median LSAT seemed pretty generous. I was still planning on a negotiating because it doesn't hurt, but I was pleasantly surprised with the offer they gave me. They gave me more than Baylor did, and Baylor is more expensive.
Did you have good softs? That's really generous lol I'd have difficulty turning that down

User avatar
indypup

New
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:40 pm

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by indypup » Thu Jan 15, 2015 2:38 pm

Strong leadership in a unique student organization (took them from broke and about to get shut down to loaded), but it's not like I cured cancer or was a nuclear physicist or anything :lol: SMU is definitely in my top 2, and I suspect it's where I'll ultimately end up.

User avatar
TX_UH

Bronze
Posts: 171
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 9:52 pm

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by TX_UH » Thu Jan 15, 2015 3:42 pm

indypup wrote:I didn't feel that they were stingy at all. 24k for being <25% GPA and slightly below median LSAT seemed pretty generous. I was still planning on a negotiating because it doesn't hurt, but I was pleasantly surprised with the offer they gave me. They gave me more than Baylor did, and Baylor is more expensive.
Stingy was probably a bit harsh. I mean they are offering less than others that are similar in the rankings/region. Here's to luck!

User avatar
indypup

New
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2014 10:40 pm

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by indypup » Thu Jan 15, 2015 3:48 pm

TX_UH wrote:
indypup wrote:I didn't feel that they were stingy at all. 24k for being <25% GPA and slightly below median LSAT seemed pretty generous. I was still planning on a negotiating because it doesn't hurt, but I was pleasantly surprised with the offer they gave me. They gave me more than Baylor did, and Baylor is more expensive.
Stingy was probably a bit harsh. I mean they are offering less than others that are similar in the rankings/region. Here's to luck!
Good luck! Have you visited both schools? I loved my visit at Baylor, but the lower offer and anti-Baylor sentiment on here has sort of scared me off. I imagine it's incredibly hard though to justify turning down a full ride.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
kalvano

Diamond
Posts: 11951
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by kalvano » Fri Jan 16, 2015 9:46 am

TX_UH wrote:For a pricey private school, they sure are stingy. I still have to try. With a full-tuition scholarship to Baylor and about a half-scholly to SMU, I would think they would consider moving a little. I'll report back if I have any luck.
Because they know that SMU is an objectively better choice than Baylor.

User avatar
c28

New
Posts: 64
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2014 1:17 pm

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by c28 » Fri Jan 16, 2015 12:54 pm

kalvano wrote:
TX_UH wrote:For a pricey private school, they sure are stingy. I still have to try. With a full-tuition scholarship to Baylor and about a half-scholly to SMU, I would think they would consider moving a little. I'll report back if I have any luck.
Because they know that SMU is an objectively better choice than Baylor.

This

ilikebaseball

Gold
Posts: 4102
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by ilikebaseball » Tue Jan 20, 2015 9:32 pm

Status is still the same, but it updated the date today

zavi1022

New
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2014 7:15 pm

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by zavi1022 » Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:17 pm

I submitted on 12/10 and was complete a week later. Is it too early to be hearing back? 4.0 with an almost complete (will graduate in May) M.S. in bioethics- also a 4.0. 150 on LSAT without studying at all, which I know isn't great. I was pre-med, started the M.S., got hooked on health law. Lots of leadership experience, alumni at SMU, and work at a law firm in downtown Dallas as a legal assistant right now.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Iwanttolawschool

Bronze
Posts: 351
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by Iwanttolawschool » Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:20 pm

Im not admissions officer, but I'd say you're not gonna get in with that LSAT. Retake that.. don't waste a 4.0

ilikebaseball

Gold
Posts: 4102
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by ilikebaseball » Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:36 pm

zavi1022 wrote:I submitted on 12/10 and was complete a week later. Is it too early to be hearing back? 4.0 with an almost complete (will graduate in May) M.S. in bioethics- also a 4.0. 150 on LSAT without studying at all, which I know isn't great. I was pre-med, started the M.S., got hooked on health law. Lots of leadership experience, alumni at SMU, and work at a law firm in downtown Dallas as a legal assistant right now.
dude please retake. SMU will give you a lot of money if you increase that even to just above their 25th.

User avatar
BVest

Platinum
Posts: 7887
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by BVest » Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:48 pm

Iwanttolawschool wrote:Im not admissions officer, but I'd say you're not gonna get in with that LSAT. Retake that.. don't waste a 4.0
I actually think he will get in with that LSAT... which is even worse because a 4.0 screams out for a retake with an LSAT that low.
Last edited by BVest on Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:31 am, edited 1 time in total.

ilikebaseball

Gold
Posts: 4102
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by ilikebaseball » Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:50 pm

BVest wrote:
Iwanttolawschool wrote:Im not admissions officer, but I'd say you're not gonna get in with that LSAT. Retake that.. don't waste a 4.0
I actually think he will get in with that LSAT... which is even worse because a 4.0 screams out for a retake with an LSAT that low.
ehhhhh idk. I highly doubt it

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Accountanon

New
Posts: 20
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 3:38 pm

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by Accountanon » Tue Jan 20, 2015 11:58 pm

ilikebaseball wrote:
BVest wrote:
Iwanttolawschool wrote:Im not admissions officer, but I'd say you're not gonna get in with that LSAT. Retake that.. don't waste a 4.0
I actually think he will get in with that LSAT... which is even worse because a 4.0 screams out for a retake with an LSAT that low.
ehhhhh idk. I highly doubt it

The problem with that score with your other credentials is that they will probably know you didn't study for it. They may think you just like to wing it and not take things seriously. Retake, stat. Or write a really impressive addendum explaining yourself. But don't write one without a convincing reason.

I got accepted with $30k/year with a 161. I did an addendum. Albeit for a different reason, but an addendum may set you apart.

ilikebaseball

Gold
Posts: 4102
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by ilikebaseball » Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:20 am

even though SMU doesn't negotiate, do you guys think that if they offered me a certain amount, then I retook the LSAT in February, they'd up my scholarship offer up one package (if I don't get 30, obviously)? They don't negotiate with other schools as leverage, but would they use increased stats?

Big Red

Gold
Posts: 3294
Joined: Thu Nov 13, 2014 1:29 pm

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by Big Red » Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:33 am

zavi1022 wrote:LSAT without studying at all
This really shouldn't/can't happen if you're serious about this... A 4.0 going through that course-load at SMU is a big deal - but you're kind of throwing that away applying with an LSAT that's essentially a cold diagnostic.

Anyway, checking in. Does the SMU status checker change at all?

ilikebaseball

Gold
Posts: 4102
Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am

Re: SMU Dedman Law c/o 18 Applicants

Post by ilikebaseball » Wed Jan 21, 2015 12:35 am

Big Red wrote:
zavi1022 wrote:LSAT without studying at all
This really shouldn't/can't happen if you're serious about this... A 4.0 going through that course-load at SMU is a big deal - but you're kind of throwing that away applying with an LSAT that's essentially a cold diagnostic.

Anyway, checking in. Does the SMU status checker change at all?
heyyyyy

and I've been complete since 1/2. Based on previous years, there's more than likely gonna be a February wave. If I get the 30k package I'll most likely go here cuz I can live at home and I LOVE smu, as well as Dallas.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”