My pre-law advisor didn't have the time to help me, and I still did fine, so I don't think that they're necessarily essential.BioEBear2010 wrote:I wouldn't worry too much. I sent my PS off to a pre-law advisor, and she thought it was terrible. I thought it was alright, so I sent it off anyway, with pretty positive results.Sakura3210 wrote: Pre-law advisor at my undergrad uni.
Stanford 2010!!! Forum
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
- ConMan345

- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
FWIW, our pre-law advisor is pretty terrible.CardinalRules wrote:My pre-law advisor didn't have the time to help me, and I still did fine, so I don't think that they're necessarily essential.BioEBear2010 wrote:I wouldn't worry too much. I sent my PS off to a pre-law advisor, and she thought it was terrible. I thought it was alright, so I sent it off anyway, with pretty positive results.Sakura3210 wrote: Pre-law advisor at my undergrad uni.
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Battle of understatements?CardinalRules wrote:My pre-law advisor didn't have the time to help me, and I still did fine, so I don't think that they're necessarily essential.BioEBear2010 wrote:I wouldn't worry too much. I sent my PS off to a pre-law advisor, and she thought it was terrible. I thought it was alright, so I sent it off anyway, with pretty positive results.Sakura3210 wrote: Pre-law advisor at my undergrad uni.
- adameus

- Posts: 719
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
we didn't even have a pre-law advisor...
- ConMan345

- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
you're only encouraging themKronk wrote:Battle of understatements?CardinalRules wrote:My pre-law advisor didn't have the time to help me, and I still did fine, so I don't think that they're necessarily essential.BioEBear2010 wrote:I wouldn't worry too much. I sent my PS off to a pre-law advisor, and she thought it was terrible. I thought it was alright, so I sent it off anyway, with pretty positive results.Sakura3210 wrote: Pre-law advisor at my undergrad uni.
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
No doubt.ConMan345 wrote:FWIW, our pre-law advisor is pretty terrible.CardinalRules wrote:My pre-law advisor didn't have the time to help me, and I still did fine, so I don't think that they're necessarily essential.BioEBear2010 wrote:I wouldn't worry too much. I sent my PS off to a pre-law advisor, and she thought it was terrible. I thought it was alright, so I sent it off anyway, with pretty positive results.Sakura3210 wrote: Pre-law advisor at my undergrad uni.
- ConMan345

- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
In fact, she told me I should aim for American but had a decent shot at Yale in the same sentence.crackberry wrote:No doubt.ConMan345 wrote:FWIW, our pre-law advisor is pretty terrible.CardinalRules wrote:My pre-law advisor didn't have the time to help me, and I still did fine, so I don't think that they're necessarily essential.BioEBear2010 wrote: I wouldn't worry too much. I sent my PS off to a pre-law advisor, and she thought it was terrible. I thought it was alright, so I sent it off anyway, with pretty positive results.
- adameus

- Posts: 719
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
ConMan345 wrote:
In fact, she told me I should aim for American but had a decent shot at Yale in the same sentence.
sounds like sound advice to me.
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I can actually understand how someone could get Yale but nothing else in the top 10. Obviously, the odds arer minuscule, but it could happen.adameus wrote:ConMan345 wrote:
In fact, she told me I should aim for American but had a decent shot at Yale in the same sentence.
sounds like sound advice to me.
- ConMan345

- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Sure, but as far as giving a student who knows nothing of law school admissions an idea of where to apply--it's more than a little misleading. I would hazard a guess that <1% of Yale admits get nothing else in the t10.CardinalRules wrote:I can actually understand how someone could get Yale but nothing else in the top 10. Obviously, the odds arer minuscule, but it could happen.adameus wrote:ConMan345 wrote:
In fact, she told me I should aim for American but had a decent shot at Yale in the same sentence.
sounds like sound advice to me.
- bloodonthetracks

- Posts: 421
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:28 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
i guess anything is possible, but i can't see this happening.CardinalRules wrote:I can actually understand how someone could get Yale but nothing else in the top 10. Obviously, the odds arer minuscule, but it could happen.adameus wrote:ConMan345 wrote:
In fact, she told me I should aim for American but had a decent shot at Yale in the same sentence.
sounds like sound advice to me.
-
liljerry

- Posts: 22
- Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:18 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I've been checking in on this thread occasionally and it seems like S hasn't accepted anyone in the past week and a half (at least on TLS). Anyone want to guess when/if the next wave will happen?
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I thought that three people got in last Thursday?liljerry wrote:I've been checking in on this thread occasionally and it seems like S hasn't accepted anyone in the past week and a half (at least on TLS). Anyone want to guess when/if the next wave will happen?
- tomhobbes

- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Wait didn't you use a private admissions consultant or something?CardinalRules wrote:My pre-law advisor didn't have the time to help me, and I still did fine, so I don't think that they're necessarily essential.BioEBear2010 wrote:I wouldn't worry too much. I sent my PS off to a pre-law advisor, and she thought it was terrible. I thought it was alright, so I sent it off anyway, with pretty positive results.Sakura3210 wrote: Pre-law advisor at my undergrad uni.
- adameus

- Posts: 719
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
yeah 3 got in last week, 2 URMs and I'm not sure about the other one.Kronk wrote:I thought that three people got in last Thursday?liljerry wrote:I've been checking in on this thread occasionally and it seems like S hasn't accepted anyone in the past week and a half (at least on TLS). Anyone want to guess when/if the next wave will happen?
Does anyone know if this is Stanford's spring break?
- BioEBear2010

- Posts: 745
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:05 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
It is.adameus wrote:yeah 3 got in last week, 2 URMs and I'm not sure about the other one.Kronk wrote:I thought that three people got in last Thursday?liljerry wrote:I've been checking in on this thread occasionally and it seems like S hasn't accepted anyone in the past week and a half (at least on TLS). Anyone want to guess when/if the next wave will happen?
Does anyone know if this is Stanford's spring break?
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
No?tomhobbes wrote:Wait didn't you use a private admissions consultant or something?CardinalRules wrote:My pre-law advisor didn't have the time to help me, and I still did fine, so I don't think that they're necessarily essential.BioEBear2010 wrote:I wouldn't worry too much. I sent my PS off to a pre-law advisor, and she thought it was terrible. I thought it was alright, so I sent it off anyway, with pretty positive results.Sakura3210 wrote: Pre-law advisor at my undergrad uni.
- tomhobbes

- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
My bad. But you have to admit, that does qualify as "or something."
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Haha, true. Nice catch!tomhobbes wrote:My bad. But you have to admit, that does qualify as "or something."
-
Amelie

- Posts: 814
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:19 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I'm spending 5 days in SF around Berkeley's ASW, and I was thinking of making a visit to Stanford. It's probably too late at that point, but any chance it could give me a small boost since I'd be showing more interest?
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
There's nothing to see at Palo Alto Technical Institute.Amelie wrote:I'm spending 5 days in SF around Berkeley's ASW, and I was thinking of making a visit to Stanford. It's probably too late at that point, but any chance it could give me a small boost since I'd be showing more interest?
- ConMan345

- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
At least it's not Palo Alto Technical State University.Kronk wrote:There's nothing to see at Palo Alto Technical Institute.Amelie wrote:I'm spending 5 days in SF around Berkeley's ASW, and I was thinking of making a visit to Stanford. It's probably too late at that point, but any chance it could give me a small boost since I'd be showing more interest?
- CoaltoNewCastle

- Posts: 316
- Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 5:40 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
The Harvard thread made me feel bad about my 750 word LOCI to Stanford.
But I really think everything in the LOCI was worth saying. Some of it was about what I've been doing, and some of it was some pretty Stanford-specific, and what I think is compelling, stuff. Hard to explain why here though. Oh well. There was just nothing in my regular application that showed Stanford that I was applying to them not just because they're a top school, but because I love Stanford.
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I assume you are going to the Cal State Oakland ASW, yes?Kronk wrote:There's nothing to see at Palo Alto Technical Institute.Amelie wrote:I'm spending 5 days in SF around Berkeley's ASW, and I was thinking of making a visit to Stanford. It's probably too late at that point, but any chance it could give me a small boost since I'd be showing more interest?
- Herb Watchfell

- Posts: 228
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:48 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
ftfycrackberry wrote:I assume you are going to the [strike]Cal State Oakland[/strike] Golden Gate University School of Law-East Campus ASW, yes?Kronk wrote:There's nothing to see at Palo Alto Technical Institute.Amelie wrote:I'm spending 5 days in SF around Berkeley's ASW, and I was thinking of making a visit to Stanford. It's probably too late at that point, but any chance it could give me a small boost since I'd be showing more interest?