Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

jbagelboy · Post by **jbagelboy** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:02 pm

vzapana wrote:HOLY SHIT I GOT A RUBY kdkwlzhbixks

holy shit. ruby vs stanford hmmmmmmmmmmmm good luck with that decision

Spritzpiggy · Post by **Spritzpiggy** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:54 pm

RUBY!!!!! Oh my goodness I'm freaking out!!

broadstreet11 · Post by **broadstreet11** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:55 pm

jbagelboy wrote:
vzapana wrote:HOLY SHIT I GOT A RUBY kdkwlzhbixks
holy shit. ruby vs stanford hmmmmmmmmmmmm good luck with that decision

Congrats!! Are Ruby's in waves? Or are we SOL the without an email today?

spicyyoda17 · Post by **spicyyoda17** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 7:34 pm

broadstreet11 wrote:
jbagelboy wrote:
vzapana wrote:HOLY SHIT I GOT A RUBY kdkwlzhbixks
holy shit. ruby vs stanford hmmmmmmmmmmmm good luck with that decision
Congrats!! Are Ruby's in waves? Or are we SOL the without an email today?

Waves

jbagelboy · Post by **jbagelboy** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:26 pm

interview invite received just now, early november complete and 1/31 UR. Thought it would never come!

jbagelboy · Post by **jbagelboy** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:32 pm

jbagelboy wrote:interview invite received just now, early november complete and 1/31 UR. Thought it would never come!

lol, just realized my skype name is identical to my TLS screen name. so much for anonymity.

MacB · Post by **MacB** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:35 pm

spicyyoda17 wrote:
broadstreet11 wrote:
jbagelboy wrote:
vzapana wrote:HOLY SHIT I GOT A RUBY kdkwlzhbixks
holy shit. ruby vs stanford hmmmmmmmmmmmm good luck with that decision
Congrats!! Are Ruby's in waves? Or are we SOL the without an email today?
Waves

Congrats!

I would like waves of Rubies.

wisteria · Post by **wisteria** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:38 pm

Invitation to interview received. Complete 12/5, UR 2/11.

I tried to schedule the first time slot I could see which was on 2/25. In a blink of eye all slots on 2/25 and 2/26 were gone.

Managed to schedule one 2/27. Thank god the invite came in time, because I'm traveling abroad on 2/28!

Crowing · Post by **Crowing** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:44 pm

jbagelboy wrote:
jbagelboy wrote:interview invite received just now, early november complete and 1/31 UR. Thought it would never come!
lol, just realized my skype name is identical to my TLS screen name. so much for anonymity.

I actually made a new Skype account specifically for the purposes of this interview.

sinfiery · Post by **sinfiery** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 9:14 pm

wisteria wrote:Invitation to interview received. Complete 12/5, UR 2/11.

+1

spyder11 · Post by **spyder11** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:35 pm

Just got invited to interview

I didn't know UChicago interviewed but I'm glad I got my Harvard interview over with. Should be better prepared for this one...

shntn · Post by **shntn** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:40 pm

Oh they're Rubying people now? I should pay more attention to these threads.

On second thought, no, I shouldn't. Ignorance is bliss.

WalkingPlato · Post by **WalkingPlato** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:41 pm

Does an interview invite suggest a higher chance of admission? I've heard that at some other schools, those who are interviewed have more than 50% of getting in. But, at those other schools, interviews were mandatory.

mambar · Post by **mambar** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:44 pm

WalkingPlato · Post by **WalkingPlato** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:46 pm

mambar wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:Does an interview invite suggest a higher chance of admission? I've heard that at some other schools, those who are interviewed have more than 50% of getting in. But, at those other schools, interviews were mandatory.
The spreadsheet makes it look very promising, but that could be deceptive. I think it's likely a very good sign.

Which spreadsheet? I'm sorry if it was talked about before.

Crowing · Post by **Crowing** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:48 pm

WalkingPlato wrote:
mambar wrote:
WalkingPlato wrote:Does an interview invite suggest a higher chance of admission? I've heard that at some other schools, those who are interviewed have more than 50% of getting in. But, at those other schools, interviews were mandatory.
The spreadsheet makes it look very promising, but that could be deceptive. I think it's likely a very good sign.
Which spreadsheet? I'm sorry if it was talked about before.

It's in the OP. We're suffering from some underreporting of post-interview WLs but it sill looks like a good sign overall to get an invite, even though Chicago tries to claim it doesn't imply anything.

mambar · Post by **mambar** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:50 pm

Crowing · Post by **Crowing** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:52 pm

mambar wrote: Yep. But no denials!

Yeah so much for "any outcome being possible." GG Chicago.

Though I guess that could still be true. Maybe nobody stood up and took their pants off in the middle of their interview yet.

mambar · Post by **mambar** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:54 pm

postard · Post by **postard** » Fri Feb 22, 2013 11:30 pm

Invited/Set up my interview today. Stoked!

Jaqen · Post by **Jaqen** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 10:08 am

postard wrote:Invited/Set up my interview today. Stoked!

If you haven't seen this thread, check it out: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=200887

It was a big help for my interview. <3 Regulus for making it, and everyone who contributed.

vzapana · Post by **vzapana** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 12:40 pm

Jaqen wrote: If you haven't seen this thread, check it out: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 2&t=200887

It was a big help for my interview. <3 Regulus for making it, and everyone who contributed.

+1

ssanonymous · Post by **ssanonymous** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:20 pm

Invites out? Congrats guys! Guess this means I got rejected. No surprises there. Make it quick, Chicago!

reallysearch · Post by **reallysearch** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:32 pm

Crowing wrote:
mambar wrote: Yep. But no denials!
Yeah so much for "any outcome being possible." GG Chicago.

Though I guess that could still be true. Maybe nobody stood up and took their pants off in the middle of their interview yet.

I know someone who was interviewed and rejected.... I guess it's just the self-reporting nature of the spreadsheet has made the result quite biased. But overall it's quite a positive sign to be invited.

ht2988 · Post by **ht2988** » Sat Feb 23, 2013 5:28 pm

ssanonymous wrote:Invites out? Congrats guys! Guess this means I got rejected. No surprises there. Make it quick, Chicago!

+1. complete 12/5, UR 1/31 and 2/11 and no interview invite for me. wasn't expecting to get in here, but...

Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register for access!

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register now!

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?