At least you have a solid backup plan. Congrats!Zelda wrote:Sorry! I had a Rubenstein deadline for today, so I contacted the office last week asking to get a decision by today if at all possible. Another accepted student at Chicago did the same thing and was waitlisted on Friday.
Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- Tom Joad

- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- yepyepyep

- Posts: 232
- Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 4:36 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, after I read Dean Asha's post, I regretted putting it in my LOCI...but so be it. Maybe it's tucked well enough in there that they haven't really noticed yet.sharktankdean wrote:Zelda wrote:Sorry! I had a Rubenstein deadline for today, so I contacted the office last week asking to get a decision by today if at all possible. Another accepted student at Chicago did the same thing and was waitlisted on Friday.
Thanks. I guessed that's why we heard an early wait list. I think Dean Asha was right. I'm not sure telling a school you have to meet a deadline is a good idea. But these schools put us in those positions.
- jetissent

- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 12:33 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Hmm I did the same thing and got DLS Friday. Maybe it's a waitlist and not the ding I anticipated.Zelda wrote:Sorry! I had a Rubenstein deadline for today, so I contacted the office last week asking to get a decision by today if at all possible. Another accepted student at Chicago did the same thing and was waitlisted on Friday.
- Kring345

- Posts: 286
- Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 9:30 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
How do you figure this? 52,000 tution - 17,500 GI bill - 10,000 Yellow Ribbon = 24,500 tuition, but 2,350/month for BAH with an average UAH rent of 1,000-1,300/month.EMZE wrote:CLS would be, based on the tuition/COLA estimtes, around 150k.
- LaCumparsita

- Posts: 319
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 11:54 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
So are those of us who haven't heard destined for the dreaded Waitlist?
- sharktankdean

- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
LaCumparsita wrote:So are those of us who haven't heard destined for the dreaded Waitlist?
not necessarily....i think anyone could be in any of the 3 piles (admit/waitlist/deny) at this point..i think they are still reviewing apps (dean deal is prob finishing up tho).
-
adam1

- Posts: 179
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:36 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I tend to agree.sharktankdean wrote:LaCumparsita wrote:So are those of us who haven't heard destined for the dreaded Waitlist?
not necessarily....i think anyone could be in any of the 3 piles (admit/waitlist/deny) at this point..i think they are still reviewing apps (dean deal is prob finishing up tho).
- jetissent

- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 12:33 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'd agree as well. I don't think Stanford would WL or ding people because they mentioned that they had deadlines. I think we are mostly already in our respective piles and they just hold the sing and WL pile to release in larger batches. People who asked for a quicker decision probably only got them because the decision had already been made.
- Doorkeeper

- Posts: 4869
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Come at me, Dean Deal!
My phone needs some activity!
My phone needs some activity!
-
EMZE

- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
PM'd w/ my workup on numbers.Kring345 wrote:How do you figure this? 52,000 tution - 17,500 GI bill - 10,000 Yellow Ribbon = 24,500 tuition, but 2,350/month for BAH with an average UAH rent of 1,000-1,300/month.EMZE wrote:CLS would be, based on the tuition/COLA estimtes, around 150k.
-
adam1

- Posts: 179
- Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2011 11:36 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Dean Deal, please do NOT call me. Not yet. I want to swoop in off the WL all dramatic. Whatever you do, do not call me. No.Doorkeeper wrote:Come at me, Dean Deal!
My phone needs some activity!
- LaCumparsita

- Posts: 319
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 11:54 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
But if we are already in the 'admit' pile, why haven't we gotten a call yet? This leads me to believe that the rest of us might be waitlisted or rejected... at least those of us with early submit dates...
- sharktankdean

- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
LaCumparsita wrote:But if we are already in the 'admit' pile, why haven't we gotten a call yet? This leads me to believe that the rest of us might be waitlisted or rejected... at least those of us with early submit dates...
last year some early submitters got admitted in April...i think that's just the way Stanford operates.
- jetissent

- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sat Oct 22, 2011 12:33 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm sorry I guess I wasn't terribly clear there. I'm sure there are some people she is still weighing between admit and WL. I just meant that I think the swift WL letters to people who mentioned that they had upcoming deadlines were merely expedited notifications of a decision that had previously been made--not rushed decisions because of the deadline notifications. I think that makes sense....LaCumparsita wrote:But if we are already in the 'admit' pile, why haven't we gotten a call yet? This leads me to believe that the rest of us might be waitlisted or rejected... at least those of us with early submit dates...
- Tom Joad

- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I think they might be waiting until deadlines at Chicago and NYU pass so that those people withdraw, therefore increasing their yield from the people they do admit. Maybe?LaCumparsita wrote:But if we are already in the 'admit' pile, why haven't we gotten a call yet? This leads me to believe that the rest of us might be waitlisted or rejected... at least those of us with early submit dates...
- Doorkeeper

- Posts: 4869
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I understand that rationale, but last year they admitted people consistently through 3/30 to 4/9. Perhaps Dean Deal just can't make the final decisions? Who knows at this point.Tom Joad wrote:I think they might be waiting until deadlines at Chicago and NYU pass so that those people withdraw, therefore increasing their yield from the people they do admit. Maybe?LaCumparsita wrote:But if we are already in the 'admit' pile, why haven't we gotten a call yet? This leads me to believe that the rest of us might be waitlisted or rejected... at least those of us with early submit dates...
- Chucky21

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 12:36 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I hope so. But also I don't know how many people actually withdraw. They may, and most likely will just let their offer expire naturally as the deposit deadline passes.Tom Joad wrote:I think they might be waiting until deadlines at Chicago and NYU pass so that those people withdraw, therefore increasing their yield from the people they do admit. Maybe?LaCumparsita wrote:But if we are already in the 'admit' pile, why haven't we gotten a call yet? This leads me to believe that the rest of us might be waitlisted or rejected... at least those of us with early submit dates...
- Tom Joad

- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
We could just all be super special snowflakes.Doorkeeper wrote:I understand that rationale, but last year they admitted people consistently through 3/30 to 4/9. Perhaps Dean Deal just can't make the final decisions? Who knows at this point.Tom Joad wrote:I think they might be waiting until deadlines at Chicago and NYU pass so that those people withdraw, therefore increasing their yield from the people they do admit. Maybe?LaCumparsita wrote:But if we are already in the 'admit' pile, why haven't we gotten a call yet? This leads me to believe that the rest of us might be waitlisted or rejected... at least those of us with early submit dates...
I think with some of those scholarships you are required to withdraw from all other schools. But I am not the expert because I am not a baller with a T6 scholarship offer.
-
EMZE

- Posts: 710
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:53 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
From what I understand, most of those schools only require withdrawal of applications with decisions. Pending applications are not required to be withdrawn.
- Doorkeeper

- Posts: 4869
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:25 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Considering that Stanford only accepts 380 people, I could totally see Dean Deal having a problem with picking between the various special snowflakes.Tom Joad wrote:We could just all be super special snowflakes.Doorkeeper wrote:I understand that rationale, but last year they admitted people consistently through 3/30 to 4/9. Perhaps Dean Deal just can't make the final decisions? Who knows at this point.Tom Joad wrote:I think they might be waiting until deadlines at Chicago and NYU pass so that those people withdraw, therefore increasing their yield from the people they do admit. Maybe?LaCumparsita wrote:But if we are already in the 'admit' pile, why haven't we gotten a call yet? This leads me to believe that the rest of us might be waitlisted or rejected... at least those of us with early submit dates...
I think with some of those scholarships you are required to withdraw from all other schools. But I am not the expert because I am not a baller with a T6 scholarship offer.
I see what you're saying, my point is that in the past acceptances have gone out before those deadlines...but who knows.
- sharktankdean

- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Its tough being a snowflake.lol
-
lefty20

- Posts: 29
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:44 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Anyone else reading into the fact that Dean Deal has hardly updated her blog this year, and that it must mean she's a little behind schedule, and therefore has TONS of admit calls still to make?
- Tom Joad

- Posts: 4526
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:56 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Nope.lefty20 wrote:Anyone else reading into the fact that Dean Deal has hardly updated her blog this year, and that it must mean she's a little behind schedule, and therefore has TONS of admit calls still to make?
I have tons of free time and no blog, so I don't think the two are related.
- hypothalamus

- Posts: 744
- Joined: Thu Sep 03, 2009 7:11 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Hahah I think a lot of the dean blogs have fallen into disrepair this year, but I think it's just because they kind of exhausted the novelty of them and don't have much new to say really..lefty20 wrote:Anyone else reading into the fact that Dean Deal has hardly updated her blog this year, and that it must mean she's a little behind schedule, and therefore has TONS of admit calls still to make?
-
Chiller303

- Posts: 24
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I think the fact that I diagrammed this statement in my mind to discern its truth value is a sign that I wasted far too much of my time studying for the LSAT. And that it has left scars.Tom Joad wrote:Nope.lefty20 wrote:Anyone else reading into the fact that Dean Deal has hardly updated her blog this year, and that it must mean she's a little behind schedule, and therefore has TONS of admit calls still to make?
I have tons of free time and no blog, so I don't think the two are related.