Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 271
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:07 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
*finally* went complete this evening. 1/7 to 1/29 was quite a jump and I'm afraid probably puts me out of contention for $$$ given the super-late complete date. Sigh.
-
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Tue May 19, 2009 2:41 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I hope you are right but don't you feel like this years first batch is a lot bigger than last years?Lavitz wrote:At the risk of getting my own hopes up again, it looks like there were quite a few letters mailed on 1/25 last year--which was the same day the first VCEs started arriving--and arrived on 1/27.
Since the first NCEs arrived on a Saturday this year, I think this supports my earlier theory that they mailed another batch on Monday because they (probably) didn't come into work on Saturday. And a few of the 1/27 people received Hamiltons, to boot.
Then one person had a letter postmarked 1/26, and the next batch had letters postdated 1/31 or 2/1. So all hope is not lost.
- banjo
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Stopped at the post office. Nothing today either, tristate area. If I can't even get CLS in a down cycle with a 176/3.76, I should probably sit out and reapply.
- rehsalt
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:32 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hey, man, I know the feeling. You're not the only one having a crummy cycle. We just need to keep focused on the goal, which is presumably to have a successful career coming out of law school. And that's what you'll do with Chicago or NYU.banjo wrote:Stopped at the post office. Nothing today either, tristate area. If I can't even get CLS in a down cycle with a 176/3.76, I should probably sit out and reapply.
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My fear exactly...banjo wrote:Stopped at the post office. Nothing today either, tristate area. If I can't even get CLS in a down cycle with a 176/3.76, I should probably sit out and reapply.

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- djwjddl
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 1:50 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
you applied in january. chillcarboncopyx wrote:My fear exactly...banjo wrote:Stopped at the post office. Nothing today either, tristate area. If I can't even get CLS in a down cycle with a 176/3.76, I should probably sit out and reapply.
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
lol @ carbon worrying.
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Shh. I have nightmares about my LORs saying, "Well, Carbon was present in class every time--in body at least, if not in mind..."
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hasn't that been his/her schtick in every thread?TripTrip wrote:lol @ carbon worrying.
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Riiiight, and it just so happens that no one at Duke, NU, or NYU looked at anything in your app before admitting you. (Although I would believe that last one.)carboncopyx wrote:Shh. I have nightmares about my LORs saying, "Well, Carbon was present in class every time--in body at least, if not in mind..."
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
TripTrip wrote:Riiiight, and it just so happens that no one at Duke, NU, or NYU looked at anything in your app before admitting you. (Although I would believe that last one.)carboncopyx wrote:Shh. I have nightmares about my LORs saying, "Well, Carbon was present in class every time--in body at least, if not in mind..."
i am almost certain nyu looks at the two numbers and goes BOOM YOU'RE IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! because i feel like they move at too fast a pace to do anything else.
although to be fair, the email a student sent me was targeted to me- cali, my type of law, blah blah
- TripTrip
- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Traditionally I agree. However, there's a counterexample: me.twinkletoes16 wrote:i am almost certain nyu looks at the two numbers and goes BOOM YOU'RE IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! because i feel like they move at too fast a pace to do anything else.

- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
TripTrip wrote:Traditionally I agree. However, there's a counterexample: me.twinkletoes16 wrote:i am almost certain nyu looks at the two numbers and goes BOOM YOU'RE IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! because i feel like they move at too fast a pace to do anything else.
didn't you apply on the late end though?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Her. If you knew me in real life, you would realize that I am a naturally very paranoid/anxious/OCD person. My apologies.BigZuck wrote:Hasn't that been his/her schtick in every thread?TripTrip wrote:lol @ carbon worrying.
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
carboncopyx wrote:Her. If you knew me in real life, you would realize that I am a naturally very paranoid/anxious/OCD person. My apologies.BigZuck wrote:Hasn't that been his/her schtick in every thread?TripTrip wrote:lol @ carbon worrying.
me too. i think we would be frandz.
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
twinkletoes16 wrote:me too. i think we would be frandz.

-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No need to apologize, you're certainly not alone at this site!carboncopyx wrote:Her. If you knew me in real life, you would realize that I am a naturally very paranoid/anxious/OCD person. My apologies.BigZuck wrote:Hasn't that been his/her schtick in every thread?TripTrip wrote:lol @ carbon worrying.
Little perspective is always good too though.
#firstworldproblems
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- twinkletoes16
- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
carboncopyx wrote:twinkletoes16 wrote:me too. i think we would be frandz.
For reals though, I feel like I should maybe get anxiety meds or something. Or learn to practice yoga.
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
DRUGS ARE NOT THE ANSWER.twinkletoes16 wrote:For reals though, I feel like I should maybe get anxiety meds or something. Or learn to practice yoga.
Namaste.
- amsong
- Posts: 425
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:42 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Is it sad that I can tell you exactly what episode that's from?carboncopyx wrote:twinkletoes16 wrote:me too. i think we would be frandz.
- ph5354a
- Posts: 1600
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No, that makes you awesome.amsong wrote:Is it sad that I can tell you exactly what episode that's from?carboncopyx wrote:twinkletoes16 wrote:me too. i think we would be frandz.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
ph5354a wrote:No, that makes you awesome.amsong wrote:Is it sad that I can tell you exactly what episode that's from?carboncopyx wrote:twinkletoes16 wrote:me too. i think we would be frandz.
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 2:19 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My mailman officially thinks I'm crazy.
- Audeamus
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I am also a counterexample. I am non-urm, below both medians and was admitted after UR1.TripTrip wrote:Traditionally I agree. However, there's a counterexample: me.twinkletoes16 wrote:i am almost certain nyu looks at the two numbers and goes BOOM YOU'RE IN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! because i feel like they move at too fast a pace to do anything else.
-
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 12:19 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
To be fair, people suspect 171 was last year's median and the last released median GPA was 3.71Audeamus wrote: I am also a counterexample. I am non-urm, below both medians and was admitted after UR1.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login