I'm on both the waitlists and thinking of dropping to just one. I'm leaning W&L and I might have a better chance with my strong GPA/weak LSAT there...freeman09 wrote:akili wrote:What do you think about W&M vs. W&L? Are they comparable?
WM GPA 3.35-3.79/ LSAT 160-166
W&L GPA 3.27-3.70/ LSAT 160-166
Lots more to compare but nothing too far apart.
I'd be interested to hear what others think who are looking at the two schools.
William & Mary Forum
- akili
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm
Re: William & Mary
- Onion
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 2:45 pm
Re: William & Mary
Waitlisted: How is this even possible with my abysmal 3.3x/160? Maybe I will still get lucky and get in!
- SamSeaborn2016
- Posts: 412
- Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2009 3:07 pm
Re: William & Mary
Got my official W&M rejection today. After being strung along for such a long time, I'm not really upset. Very "meh."
- Bustang
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 4:26 pm
Re: William & Mary
Waitlisted. Sending a loci probably next week. Does W&M put people on a waitlist that have 0 chance or do they actually admit some WL'ers?
- eandy
- Posts: 2724
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 7:07 pm
Re: William & Mary
W&M is notorious for WL being a soft reject.Bustang wrote:Waitlisted. Sending a loci probably next week. Does W&M put people on a waitlist that have 0 chance or do they actually admit some WL'ers?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 3:29 pm
Re: William & Mary
W&L manages those numbers without a low in state tuition rate. I'm on the W&M hateraide train, don't get in my wayfreeman09 wrote:akili wrote:What do you think about W&M vs. W&L? Are they comparable?
WM GPA 3.35-3.79/ LSAT 160-166
W&L GPA 3.27-3.70/ LSAT 160-166
Lots more to compare but nothing too far apart.
I'd be interested to hear what others think who are looking at the two schools.

-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 11:50 am
Re: William & Mary
What's the point of a soft reject? Why would a law school be bashful about rejecting applicants? I can see soft rejections being useful if they're trying to boost their acceptance rate but why would any school want to look less selective than they actually are?eandy wrote:W&M is notorious for WL being a soft reject.Bustang wrote:Waitlisted. Sending a loci probably next week. Does W&M put people on a waitlist that have 0 chance or do they actually admit some WL'ers?
Are you sure W&M's WL isn't notorious simply because its hard to get off of it?
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:06 pm
Re: William & Mary
Any idea how many are on the wait list?
- tommytahoe
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:46 pm
Re: William & Mary
Newbie waitlister here: 163/3.81. I dunno... I'm collecting waitlists now, officially.
They're a top-3 choice, so def. sending an LOCI next week.
They're a top-3 choice, so def. sending an LOCI next week.
-
- Posts: 732
- Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 3:29 pm
Re: William & Mary
Thus the wait list is way to large and they over use it. I honestly believe W&M wait list more people than they outright reject. There is no need to have 1,000 people on a wait list unless you are overly paranoid.lunu wrote:What's the point of a soft reject? Why would a law school be bashful about rejecting applicants? I can see soft rejections being useful if they're trying to boost their acceptance rate but why would any school want to look less selective than they actually are?eandy wrote:W&M is notorious for WL being a soft reject.Bustang wrote:Waitlisted. Sending a loci probably next week. Does W&M put people on a waitlist that have 0 chance or do they actually admit some WL'ers?
Are you sure W&M's WL isn't notorious simply because its hard to get off of it?
- tommytahoe
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:46 pm
Re: William & Mary
So, since I'm new here, I thought I'd gather some info: starting with, how many folks does W&M waitlist per year? I think 1,000 sounds a bit much, but hey, I'm the one seeking answers.LSATfromNC wrote:Thus the wait list is way to large and they over use it. I honestly believe W&M wait list more people than they outright reject. There is no need to have 1,000 people on a wait list unless you are overly paranoid.lunu wrote:What's the point of a soft reject? Why would a law school be bashful about rejecting applicants? I can see soft rejections being useful if they're trying to boost their acceptance rate but why would any school want to look less selective than they actually are?eandy wrote:W&M is notorious for WL being a soft reject.Bustang wrote:Waitlisted. Sending a loci probably next week. Does W&M put people on a waitlist that have 0 chance or do they actually admit some WL'ers?
Are you sure W&M's WL isn't notorious simply because its hard to get off of it?
When do they usually start making offers off of the waitlist? Does anyone know any historical facts on that one?
Thanks
- bonnieblue
- Posts: 201
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 11:56 pm
Re: William & Mary
waitlisted 166 and 3.5
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:02 pm
Re: William & Mary
Waitlisted today...166/3.55
Oh well, I guess I'll take my substantial scholarship at either Emory or W&L?!?! Wtf W&M?
Sorry...just a little confused.
Oh well, I guess I'll take my substantial scholarship at either Emory or W&L?!?! Wtf W&M?
Sorry...just a little confused.

- 84Sunbird2000
- Posts: 756
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:39 pm
Re: William & Mary
Ran out of spots for everyone I guess. That's pretty surprising given the LSN graph, but it was all waitlists yesterday (apparently).outlaw08 wrote:Waitlisted today...166/3.55
Oh well, I guess I'll take my substantial scholarship at either Emory or W&L?!?! Wtf W&M?
Sorry...just a little confused.
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 11:50 am
Re: William & Mary
I didn't think about that. soft-reject because dean wixson wakes up in a cold sweat imaging that all his admits go to harvard.LSATfromNC wrote:Thus the wait list is way to large and they over use it. I honestly believe W&M wait list more people than they outright reject. There is no need to have 1,000 people on a wait list unless you are overly paranoid.lunu wrote:What's the point of a soft reject? Why would a law school be bashful about rejecting applicants? I can see soft rejections being useful if they're trying to boost their acceptance rate but why would any school want to look less selective than they actually are?eandy wrote:W&M is notorious for WL being a soft reject.Bustang wrote:Waitlisted. Sending a loci probably next week. Does W&M put people on a waitlist that have 0 chance or do they actually admit some WL'ers?
Are you sure W&M's WL isn't notorious simply because its hard to get off of it?
that said, really? 1000 wait listers?
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:06 pm
Re: William & Mary
It'd be nice to have some info into the numbers and what the office is up to. If they create a huge waitlist, it strikes against being upfront and honest.
They know how many people get off and should tell people honestly.
Their WL web section leaves little doubt into actual chances. Oddly enough I feel better about my WL chances at UVA.
But still, gotta have some hope for WM. If we are the WL crowd, then some of us have a fighting chance.
Is this the first major WL group? hopefully the last...
They know how many people get off and should tell people honestly.
Their WL web section leaves little doubt into actual chances. Oddly enough I feel better about my WL chances at UVA.
But still, gotta have some hope for WM. If we are the WL crowd, then some of us have a fighting chance.
Is this the first major WL group? hopefully the last...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Dec 04, 2009 4:36 pm
Re: William & Mary
Wl'd as well - planning to withdraw but not sure how, what's the easiest way?
- whatchootalkinbout
- Posts: 113
- Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:13 am
Re: William & Mary
Add me to the WL train.
Really, W&M? It took you three months to decide that?
Really, W&M? It took you three months to decide that?
- tommytahoe
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:46 pm
Re: William & Mary
What do you mean by this first statement, specifically?freeman09 wrote:Their WL web section leaves little doubt into actual chances.
Is this the first major WL group? hopefully the last...
And, I think there's def. been some WL's handed out. LSN shows some WLs that I recognize seeing as early as December/Jan...
- lifeaway1985
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:25 am
Re: William & Mary
Dinged today via email.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 4:46 pm
Re: William & Mary
http://law.wm.edu/admissions/waitlist/waitlistform.phpanonis wrote:Wl'd as well - planning to withdraw but not sure how, what's the easiest way?
Enough people complete this remove from waitlist form maybe I'll have a shot at getting in.
-
- Posts: 218
- Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:31 am
Re: William & Mary
I think they're referring Dean Shealy's interview on TLS or the updated W&M school profile both of which have been condensed into a single document.tommytahoe wrote:What do you mean by this first statement, specifically?freeman09 wrote:Their WL web section leaves little doubt into actual chances.
Is this the first major WL group? hopefully the last...
And, I think there's def. been some WL's handed out. LSN shows some WLs that I recognize seeing as early as December/Jan...
As to the waitlist, I cannot see why they would waitlist so many people if they felt that they weren't qualified in some way to attend. They have clearly rejected some applicants and can't see why they wouldn't go down that route for many others if they felt they were unqualified. The idea of a soft rejection seems too considerate and, quite honestly, too much work on their part for an admissions office.
- akili
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm
Re: William & Mary
I debated, but then withdrew from the waitlist. Good luck all!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login