Well being that I just apologized for bringing the subject up I am not going to discuss why I think its a good place to discuss. Because that would be discussing it.Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Do you want our general opinions on the matter? Well a bunch of prospective law students are not going to want to get into a heated discussion(IE not a good place to discuss). Do you want a 0L take on why affirmative action repeatedly passed scotus muster? Well none of us are anywhere near qualified to speak on it yet (IE not the place to discuss).admin24 wrote:Actually I couldn't think of a better place to discuss this.Pozzo wrote:Really? Not the place to discuss this.admin24 wrote:This question is regarding all Law Schools not just H. Isn't the whole URM has an advantage thing pure racism. I don't mean to spark a fight/debate but this hypocrisy has always bothered me. Can someone please help me understand why it isn't racism? Thanks.
Why do you think this is the best place to discuss?
Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum
-
admin24

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 3:31 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
-
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Yeah I was going through my notifications and caught the first comment and didn't see the rest of the Convo until after I posted. I edited my post to remove all of itadmin24 wrote:Well being that I just apologized for bringing the subject up I am not going to discuss why I think its a good place to discuss. Because that would be discussing it.Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:Do you want our general opinions on the matter? Well a bunch of prospective law students are not going to want to get into a heated discussion(IE not a good place to discuss). Do you want a 0L take on why affirmative action repeatedly passed scotus muster? Well none of us are anywhere near qualified to speak on it yet (IE not the place to discuss).admin24 wrote:Actually I couldn't think of a better place to discuss this.Pozzo wrote:Really? Not the place to discuss this.admin24 wrote:This question is regarding all Law Schools not just H. Isn't the whole URM has an advantage thing pure racism. I don't mean to spark a fight/debate but this hypocrisy has always bothered me. Can someone please help me understand why it isn't racism? Thanks.
Why do you think this is the best place to discuss?
-
ParisHilton

- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:34 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread, but does anyone have any idea if they are giving out more interviews this year than normal? It seems like more people than normal with low GPAs and/or LSATs are getting interviews--even people below both medians.
-
VapidP

- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:11 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
So Harvard tries to interview 1200 people every year, but from a friend who goes to HLS, he says that they don't always hit that target.ParisHilton wrote:Sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread, but does anyone have any idea if they are giving out more interviews this year than normal? It seems like more people than normal with low GPAs and/or LSATs are getting interviews--even people below both medians.
- CHyde

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by CHyde on Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CHyde

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by CHyde on Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Pozzo

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
According to this year's spreadsheet, it's 41 days (CHyde wrote:Average amount of time between going complete to a JS1? If this already exists somewhere, kindly point me to it plz. I'm just here biting my fingernails while doing zip at work and anxiously checking email.
e: my basic stats terminology sucks, i guess.
Last edited by Pozzo on Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- CHyde

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by CHyde on Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
VapidP

- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:11 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I don't think they will do that because they risk just getting a tiny class, which I don't think they particularly want. Plus, with lower admit numbers, there is more variance in median scores. If you lose your high scorers to Y/S/Full Rides, you'll much more easily lower your median LSAT.CHyde wrote:I hope that they're giving out more interviews to lower numbers because we've had a lower scoring year. My worst nightmare would be if they shrunk the number of admits to like 700 to either maintain or bump median LSAT to 173.VapidP wrote:So Harvard tries to interview 1200 people every year, but from a friend who goes to HLS, he says that they don't always hit that target.ParisHilton wrote:Sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread, but does anyone have any idea if they are giving out more interviews this year than normal? It seems like more people than normal with low GPAs and/or LSATs are getting interviews--even people below both medians.
I think they'll probably just admit more splitters? I'm a splitter though so maybe that's just wishful thinking
Last edited by VapidP on Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
pkalltheway

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 5:04 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Lol @ me still waiting since October.CHyde wrote:You da real MVP, Pozzo.Pozzo wrote:According to this year's spreadsheet, it's 41 days (mean: 37.5). Hard to know if that's a representative sample.CHyde wrote:Average amount of time between going complete to a JS1? If this already exists somewhere, kindly point me to it plz. I'm just here biting my fingernails while doing zip at work and anxiously checking email.
Why, Harvard, why?
-
Pozzo

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
From last year, avg was 33, median was 26. Timelines shorten up later in the cycle. Fret not, some people waited 100+ days last yearpkalltheway wrote:Lol @ me still waiting since October.CHyde wrote:You da real MVP, Pozzo.Pozzo wrote:According to this year's spreadsheet, it's 41 days (mean: 37.5). Hard to know if that's a representative sample.CHyde wrote:Average amount of time between going complete to a JS1? If this already exists somewhere, kindly point me to it plz. I'm just here biting my fingernails while doing zip at work and anxiously checking email.
Why, Harvard, why?
- CHyde

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by CHyde on Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- jjcorvino

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
You are sort of on the right track. Basically, if they accept both of those applicants then their medians would not be affected. They have added above and below their LSAT and GPA 25/75ths. It is a bit different from averages. On averages, 177 and 180 would be different. For medians, they are exactly the same.CHyde wrote:It'd be great if someone could explain to me how this splitters thing works. Like, Harvard sees 177/3.3 and a 3.97/165 and they're like...well let's accept them both. They basically equal a 177/3.97? I started the law game journey in large part because I dunno how to math.VapidP wrote:I don't think they will do that because they risk just getting a tiny class, which I don't think they particularly want. Plus, with lower admit numbers, there is more variance in median scores. If you lose your high scorers to Y/S/Full Rides, you'll much more easily have your median LSAT.CHyde wrote:I hope that they're giving out more interviews to lower numbers because we've had a lower scoring year. My worst nightmare would be if they shrunk the number of admits to like 700 to either maintain or bump median LSAT to 173.VapidP wrote:So Harvard tries to interview 1200 people every year, but from a friend who goes to HLS, he says that they don't always hit that target.ParisHilton wrote:Sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread, but does anyone have any idea if they are giving out more interviews this year than normal? It seems like more people than normal with low GPAs and/or LSATs are getting interviews--even people below both medians.
I think they'll probably just admit more splitters? I'm a splitter though so maybe that's just wishful thinking
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
sittykitty

- Posts: 324
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:32 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I'm keeping my fingers crossed that they're reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally looking to maintain their 173 median.jjcorvino wrote:You are sort of on the right track. Basically, if they accept both of those applicants then their medians would not be affected. They have added above and below their LSAT and GPA 25/75ths. It is a bit different from averages. On averages, 177 and 180 would be different. For medians, they are exactly the same.CHyde wrote:It'd be great if someone could explain to me how this splitters thing works. Like, Harvard sees 177/3.3 and a 3.97/165 and they're like...well let's accept them both. They basically equal a 177/3.97? I started the law game journey in large part because I dunno how to math.VapidP wrote:I don't think they will do that because they risk just getting a tiny class, which I don't think they particularly want. Plus, with lower admit numbers, there is more variance in median scores. If you lose your high scorers to Y/S/Full Rides, you'll much more easily have your median LSAT.CHyde wrote:I hope that they're giving out more interviews to lower numbers because we've had a lower scoring year. My worst nightmare would be if they shrunk the number of admits to like 700 to either maintain or bump median LSAT to 173.VapidP wrote:So Harvard tries to interview 1200 people every year, but from a friend who goes to HLS, he says that they don't always hit that target.ParisHilton wrote:Sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread, but does anyone have any idea if they are giving out more interviews this year than normal? It seems like more people than normal with low GPAs and/or LSATs are getting interviews--even people below both medians.
I think they'll probably just admit more splitters? I'm a splitter though so maybe that's just wishful thinking
-
Monday

- Posts: 784
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by Monday on Wed May 10, 2017 11:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
sittykitty

- Posts: 324
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:32 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
EVEN BETTERMonday wrote:sittykitty wrote:I'm keeping my fingers crossed that they're reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally looking to maintain their173172 median.
-
addie1412

- Posts: 588
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:43 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
+1 but in regards to their 75thsittykitty wrote:I'm keeping my fingers crossed that they're reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally looking to maintain their 173 median.jjcorvino wrote:You are sort of on the right track. Basically, if they accept both of those applicants then their medians would not be affected. They have added above and below their LSAT and GPA 25/75ths. It is a bit different from averages. On averages, 177 and 180 would be different. For medians, they are exactly the same.CHyde wrote:It'd be great if someone could explain to me how this splitters thing works. Like, Harvard sees 177/3.3 and a 3.97/165 and they're like...well let's accept them both. They basically equal a 177/3.97? I started the law game journey in large part because I dunno how to math.VapidP wrote:I don't think they will do that because they risk just getting a tiny class, which I don't think they particularly want. Plus, with lower admit numbers, there is more variance in median scores. If you lose your high scorers to Y/S/Full Rides, you'll much more easily have your median LSAT.CHyde wrote:I hope that they're giving out more interviews to lower numbers because we've had a lower scoring year. My worst nightmare would be if they shrunk the number of admits to like 700 to either maintain or bump median LSAT to 173.VapidP wrote:So Harvard tries to interview 1200 people every year, but from a friend who goes to HLS, he says that they don't always hit that target.ParisHilton wrote:Sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread, but does anyone have any idea if they are giving out more interviews this year than normal? It seems like more people than normal with low GPAs and/or LSATs are getting interviews--even people below both medians.
I think they'll probably just admit more splitters? I'm a splitter though so maybe that's just wishful thinking
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
sonyco

- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:15 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Lol not for splitters.sittykitty wrote:EVEN BETTERMonday wrote:sittykitty wrote:I'm keeping my fingers crossed that they're reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally looking to maintain their173172 median.
-
dyebri

- Posts: 267
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:42 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
How decisive are the JS1 interviews to getting accepted. I had mine yesterday and Im sure my interviwer could tell I was nervous so i dont know how great I did
-
VapidP

- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:11 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
A friend at HLS told me the JS1 is basically to screen if you're crazy/weird or not. Otherwise, they don't help that much, but it's also hard to truly screw it up.dyebri wrote:How decisive are the JS1 interviews to getting accepted. I had mine yesterday and Im sure my interviwer could tell I was nervous so i dont know how great I did
-
sittykitty

- Posts: 324
- Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:32 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I'm a splitter -- I feel like my chances are better if they prioritize their LSAT median over their GPA median, since there are fewer >172s than >3.86s.sonyco wrote:Lol not for splitters.sittykitty wrote:EVEN BETTERMonday wrote:sittykitty wrote:I'm keeping my fingers crossed that they're reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally looking to maintain their173172 median.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Pozzo

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
folk wisdom is ~75% of JS1s get an offerdyebri wrote:How decisive are the JS1 interviews to getting accepted. I had mine yesterday and Im sure my interviwer could tell I was nervous so i dont know how great I did
-
sonyco

- Posts: 80
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:15 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
So it would be better for them to maintain their 173 rather than 172.sittykitty wrote:I'm a splitter -- I feel like my chances are better if they prioritize their LSAT median over their GPA median, since there are fewer >172s than >3.86s.sonyco wrote:Lol not for splitters.sittykitty wrote:EVEN BETTERMonday wrote:sittykitty wrote:I'm keeping my fingers crossed that they're reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally looking to maintain their173172 median.
-
dyebri

- Posts: 267
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:42 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Pozzo wrote:folk wisdom is ~75% of JS1s get an offerdyebri wrote:How decisive are the JS1 interviews to getting accepted. I had mine yesterday and Im sure my interviwer could tell I was nervous so i dont know how great I did
do you have any insight what would make the 25 % not get the offer?
i dont feel too hot after my interview
-
Monday

- Posts: 784
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by Monday on Wed May 10, 2017 11:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login