Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply

Next JS2 wave(s) will be...

Monday 3/27
2
2%
Tuesday 3/28
18
17%
Wednesday 3/29
35
32%
Thursday 3/30
13
12%
Friday 3/31
30
28%
Saturday 4/1
10
9%
 
Total votes: 108

admin24

New
Posts: 10
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 3:31 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by admin24 » Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:25 pm

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:
admin24 wrote:
Pozzo wrote:
admin24 wrote:This question is regarding all Law Schools not just H. Isn't the whole URM has an advantage thing pure racism. I don't mean to spark a fight/debate but this hypocrisy has always bothered me. Can someone please help me understand why it isn't racism? Thanks.
Really? Not the place to discuss this.
Actually I couldn't think of a better place to discuss this.
Do you want our general opinions on the matter? Well a bunch of prospective law students are not going to want to get into a heated discussion(IE not a good place to discuss). Do you want a 0L take on why affirmative action repeatedly passed scotus muster? Well none of us are anywhere near qualified to speak on it yet (IE not the place to discuss).

Why do you think this is the best place to discuss?
Well being that I just apologized for bringing the subject up I am not going to discuss why I think its a good place to discuss. Because that would be discussing it. :D

Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

Silver
Posts: 1296
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash » Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:28 pm

admin24 wrote:
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:
admin24 wrote:
Pozzo wrote:
admin24 wrote:This question is regarding all Law Schools not just H. Isn't the whole URM has an advantage thing pure racism. I don't mean to spark a fight/debate but this hypocrisy has always bothered me. Can someone please help me understand why it isn't racism? Thanks.
Really? Not the place to discuss this.
Actually I couldn't think of a better place to discuss this.
Do you want our general opinions on the matter? Well a bunch of prospective law students are not going to want to get into a heated discussion(IE not a good place to discuss). Do you want a 0L take on why affirmative action repeatedly passed scotus muster? Well none of us are anywhere near qualified to speak on it yet (IE not the place to discuss).

Why do you think this is the best place to discuss?
Well being that I just apologized for bringing the subject up I am not going to discuss why I think its a good place to discuss. Because that would be discussing it. :D
Yeah I was going through my notifications and caught the first comment and didn't see the rest of the Convo until after I posted. I edited my post to remove all of it

ParisHilton

New
Posts: 25
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:34 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by ParisHilton » Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:38 pm

Sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread, but does anyone have any idea if they are giving out more interviews this year than normal? It seems like more people than normal with low GPAs and/or LSATs are getting interviews--even people below both medians.

VapidP

Bronze
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:11 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by VapidP » Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:39 pm

ParisHilton wrote:Sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread, but does anyone have any idea if they are giving out more interviews this year than normal? It seems like more people than normal with low GPAs and/or LSATs are getting interviews--even people below both medians.
So Harvard tries to interview 1200 people every year, but from a friend who goes to HLS, he says that they don't always hit that target.

User avatar
CHyde

Bronze
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by CHyde » Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:40 pm

.
Last edited by CHyde on Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
CHyde

Bronze
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by CHyde » Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:43 pm

.
Last edited by CHyde on Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Pozzo

Gold
Posts: 1918
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Pozzo » Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:44 pm

CHyde wrote:Average amount of time between going complete to a JS1? If this already exists somewhere, kindly point me to it plz. I'm just here biting my fingernails while doing zip at work and anxiously checking email.
According to this year's spreadsheet, it's 41 days (meanmedian: 37.5). Hard to know if that's a representative sample.

e: my basic stats terminology sucks, i guess.
Last edited by Pozzo on Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
CHyde

Bronze
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by CHyde » Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:45 pm

.
Last edited by CHyde on Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

VapidP

Bronze
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:11 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by VapidP » Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:49 pm

CHyde wrote:
VapidP wrote:
ParisHilton wrote:Sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread, but does anyone have any idea if they are giving out more interviews this year than normal? It seems like more people than normal with low GPAs and/or LSATs are getting interviews--even people below both medians.
So Harvard tries to interview 1200 people every year, but from a friend who goes to HLS, he says that they don't always hit that target.
I hope that they're giving out more interviews to lower numbers because we've had a lower scoring year. My worst nightmare would be if they shrunk the number of admits to like 700 to either maintain or bump median LSAT to 173.
I don't think they will do that because they risk just getting a tiny class, which I don't think they particularly want. Plus, with lower admit numbers, there is more variance in median scores. If you lose your high scorers to Y/S/Full Rides, you'll much more easily lower your median LSAT.

I think they'll probably just admit more splitters? I'm a splitter though so maybe that's just wishful thinking
Last edited by VapidP on Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


pkalltheway

New
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 5:04 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by pkalltheway » Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:49 pm

CHyde wrote:
Pozzo wrote:
CHyde wrote:Average amount of time between going complete to a JS1? If this already exists somewhere, kindly point me to it plz. I'm just here biting my fingernails while doing zip at work and anxiously checking email.
According to this year's spreadsheet, it's 41 days (mean: 37.5). Hard to know if that's a representative sample.
You da real MVP, Pozzo.
Lol @ me still waiting since October.

Why, Harvard, why?

Pozzo

Gold
Posts: 1918
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Pozzo » Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:53 pm

pkalltheway wrote:
CHyde wrote:
Pozzo wrote:
CHyde wrote:Average amount of time between going complete to a JS1? If this already exists somewhere, kindly point me to it plz. I'm just here biting my fingernails while doing zip at work and anxiously checking email.
According to this year's spreadsheet, it's 41 days (mean: 37.5). Hard to know if that's a representative sample.
You da real MVP, Pozzo.
Lol @ me still waiting since October.

Why, Harvard, why?
From last year, avg was 33, median was 26. Timelines shorten up later in the cycle. Fret not, some people waited 100+ days last year

User avatar
CHyde

Bronze
Posts: 207
Joined: Sun Jul 17, 2016 10:17 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by CHyde » Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:53 pm

.
Last edited by CHyde on Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
jjcorvino

Silver
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by jjcorvino » Wed Feb 08, 2017 4:57 pm

CHyde wrote:
VapidP wrote:
CHyde wrote:
VapidP wrote:
ParisHilton wrote:Sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread, but does anyone have any idea if they are giving out more interviews this year than normal? It seems like more people than normal with low GPAs and/or LSATs are getting interviews--even people below both medians.
So Harvard tries to interview 1200 people every year, but from a friend who goes to HLS, he says that they don't always hit that target.
I hope that they're giving out more interviews to lower numbers because we've had a lower scoring year. My worst nightmare would be if they shrunk the number of admits to like 700 to either maintain or bump median LSAT to 173.
I don't think they will do that because they risk just getting a tiny class, which I don't think they particularly want. Plus, with lower admit numbers, there is more variance in median scores. If you lose your high scorers to Y/S/Full Rides, you'll much more easily have your median LSAT.

I think they'll probably just admit more splitters? I'm a splitter though so maybe that's just wishful thinking
It'd be great if someone could explain to me how this splitters thing works. Like, Harvard sees 177/3.3 and a 3.97/165 and they're like...well let's accept them both. They basically equal a 177/3.97? I started the law game journey in large part because I dunno how to math.
You are sort of on the right track. Basically, if they accept both of those applicants then their medians would not be affected. They have added above and below their LSAT and GPA 25/75ths. It is a bit different from averages. On averages, 177 and 180 would be different. For medians, they are exactly the same.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


sittykitty

Bronze
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:32 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by sittykitty » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:25 pm

jjcorvino wrote:
CHyde wrote:
VapidP wrote:
CHyde wrote:
VapidP wrote:
ParisHilton wrote:Sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread, but does anyone have any idea if they are giving out more interviews this year than normal? It seems like more people than normal with low GPAs and/or LSATs are getting interviews--even people below both medians.
So Harvard tries to interview 1200 people every year, but from a friend who goes to HLS, he says that they don't always hit that target.
I hope that they're giving out more interviews to lower numbers because we've had a lower scoring year. My worst nightmare would be if they shrunk the number of admits to like 700 to either maintain or bump median LSAT to 173.
I don't think they will do that because they risk just getting a tiny class, which I don't think they particularly want. Plus, with lower admit numbers, there is more variance in median scores. If you lose your high scorers to Y/S/Full Rides, you'll much more easily have your median LSAT.

I think they'll probably just admit more splitters? I'm a splitter though so maybe that's just wishful thinking
It'd be great if someone could explain to me how this splitters thing works. Like, Harvard sees 177/3.3 and a 3.97/165 and they're like...well let's accept them both. They basically equal a 177/3.97? I started the law game journey in large part because I dunno how to math.
You are sort of on the right track. Basically, if they accept both of those applicants then their medians would not be affected. They have added above and below their LSAT and GPA 25/75ths. It is a bit different from averages. On averages, 177 and 180 would be different. For medians, they are exactly the same.
I'm keeping my fingers crossed that they're reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally looking to maintain their 173 median.

Monday

Silver
Posts: 784
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Monday » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:46 pm

.
Last edited by Monday on Wed May 10, 2017 11:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.

sittykitty

Bronze
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:32 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by sittykitty » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:47 pm

Monday wrote:
sittykitty wrote:I'm keeping my fingers crossed that they're reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally looking to maintain their 173 172 median.
EVEN BETTER

addie1412

Silver
Posts: 588
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2016 7:43 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by addie1412 » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:49 pm

sittykitty wrote:
jjcorvino wrote:
CHyde wrote:
VapidP wrote:
CHyde wrote:
VapidP wrote:
ParisHilton wrote:Sorry if I missed this earlier in the thread, but does anyone have any idea if they are giving out more interviews this year than normal? It seems like more people than normal with low GPAs and/or LSATs are getting interviews--even people below both medians.
So Harvard tries to interview 1200 people every year, but from a friend who goes to HLS, he says that they don't always hit that target.
I hope that they're giving out more interviews to lower numbers because we've had a lower scoring year. My worst nightmare would be if they shrunk the number of admits to like 700 to either maintain or bump median LSAT to 173.
I don't think they will do that because they risk just getting a tiny class, which I don't think they particularly want. Plus, with lower admit numbers, there is more variance in median scores. If you lose your high scorers to Y/S/Full Rides, you'll much more easily have your median LSAT.

I think they'll probably just admit more splitters? I'm a splitter though so maybe that's just wishful thinking
It'd be great if someone could explain to me how this splitters thing works. Like, Harvard sees 177/3.3 and a 3.97/165 and they're like...well let's accept them both. They basically equal a 177/3.97? I started the law game journey in large part because I dunno how to math.
You are sort of on the right track. Basically, if they accept both of those applicants then their medians would not be affected. They have added above and below their LSAT and GPA 25/75ths. It is a bit different from averages. On averages, 177 and 180 would be different. For medians, they are exactly the same.
I'm keeping my fingers crossed that they're reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally looking to maintain their 173 median.
+1 but in regards to their 75th ;)

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


sonyco

New
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:15 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by sonyco » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:50 pm

sittykitty wrote:
Monday wrote:
sittykitty wrote:I'm keeping my fingers crossed that they're reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally looking to maintain their 173 172 median.
EVEN BETTER
Lol not for splitters.

dyebri

Bronze
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:42 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by dyebri » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:51 pm

How decisive are the JS1 interviews to getting accepted. I had mine yesterday and Im sure my interviwer could tell I was nervous so i dont know how great I did

VapidP

Bronze
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:11 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by VapidP » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:52 pm

dyebri wrote:How decisive are the JS1 interviews to getting accepted. I had mine yesterday and Im sure my interviwer could tell I was nervous so i dont know how great I did
A friend at HLS told me the JS1 is basically to screen if you're crazy/weird or not. Otherwise, they don't help that much, but it's also hard to truly screw it up.

sittykitty

Bronze
Posts: 324
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2017 1:32 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by sittykitty » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:52 pm

sonyco wrote:
sittykitty wrote:
Monday wrote:
sittykitty wrote:I'm keeping my fingers crossed that they're reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally looking to maintain their 173 172 median.
EVEN BETTER
Lol not for splitters.
I'm a splitter -- I feel like my chances are better if they prioritize their LSAT median over their GPA median, since there are fewer >172s than >3.86s.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Pozzo

Gold
Posts: 1918
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Pozzo » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:52 pm

dyebri wrote:How decisive are the JS1 interviews to getting accepted. I had mine yesterday and Im sure my interviwer could tell I was nervous so i dont know how great I did
folk wisdom is ~75% of JS1s get an offer

sonyco

New
Posts: 80
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2016 2:15 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by sonyco » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:54 pm

sittykitty wrote:
sonyco wrote:
sittykitty wrote:
Monday wrote:
sittykitty wrote:I'm keeping my fingers crossed that they're reaaaaaaaaaaaaaally looking to maintain their 173 172 median.
EVEN BETTER
Lol not for splitters.
I'm a splitter -- I feel like my chances are better if they prioritize their LSAT median over their GPA median, since there are fewer >172s than >3.86s.
So it would be better for them to maintain their 173 rather than 172.

dyebri

Bronze
Posts: 267
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 1:42 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by dyebri » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:57 pm

Pozzo wrote:
dyebri wrote:How decisive are the JS1 interviews to getting accepted. I had mine yesterday and Im sure my interviwer could tell I was nervous so i dont know how great I did
folk wisdom is ~75% of JS1s get an offer

do you have any insight what would make the 25 % not get the offer?

i dont feel too hot after my interview

Monday

Silver
Posts: 784
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Monday » Wed Feb 08, 2017 6:03 pm

.
Last edited by Monday on Wed May 10, 2017 11:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”