Same. I imagine there will be a wave of new URs on Monday or Tuesday now that this batch is out.GoldenGriffin wrote:Submitted back in November, still haven't gone under review yet.
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
WaitingandHopeful

- Posts: 129
- Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- Rahviveh

- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congrats everyone! Feel free to join us in the c/o 2016 thread
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=200475
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 3&t=200475
- Nala7892

- Posts: 54
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:33 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm in too! Applied 11/2, interview 2/13! 170/3.76. I'm so excited right now
-
sokomofo

- Posts: 163
- Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2011 7:49 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by sokomofo on Tue Jun 24, 2014 10:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
Dr. Gaius Baltar

- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No decision. Not that I'm sour-grapesing or anything, it's just that I've never been to Chicago and only have what I hear on NPR to go off. Are people liable to get shot in Hyde Park?
-
grapefruits

- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Ironically they gave un-promised decisions, but not the pseudo-promised twitter update. Anyhow, I have nothing to complain about, but think about all the poor, isolated, TLSless masses!
- amsong

- Posts: 425
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Waitlisted, no interview. I'm not all that surprised. If anything, I'm happy I wasn't dinged.
-
shakespeare

- Posts: 174
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
In via email.
Interview invitation late Jan.
Interview mid-Feb.
Contrary to what some people have been saying, I actually loved my interview. I thought my interviewer was personable and engaging. Overall, I thought it was a great conversation, and it felt like both didn't want it to end.
PM for details.
Interview invitation late Jan.
Interview mid-Feb.
Contrary to what some people have been saying, I actually loved my interview. I thought my interviewer was personable and engaging. Overall, I thought it was a great conversation, and it felt like both didn't want it to end.
PM for details.
-
Dr. Gaius Baltar

- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Several people on here confessed to loving their interview(er) as well earlier today.shakespeare wrote:In via email.
Interview invitation late Jan.
Interview mid-Feb.
Contrary to what some people have been saying, I actually loved my interview. I thought my interviewer was personable and engaging. Overall, I thought it was a great conversation, and it felt like both didn't want it to end.
PM for details.
I thought mine was great too.
- Crowing

- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Well some people who had Dean Perry didn't seem to enjoy the experience too much.Dr. Gaius Baltar wrote:Several people on here confessed to loving their interview(er) as well earlier today.shakespeare wrote:In via email.
Interview invitation late Jan.
Interview mid-Feb.
Contrary to what some people have been saying, I actually loved my interview. I thought my interviewer was personable and engaging. Overall, I thought it was a great conversation, and it felt like both didn't want it to end.
PM for details.
I thought mine was great too.
As for people who had... the other person... well...
-
MacB

- Posts: 341
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I had Dean Perry and loved the interview.
...wait, not LOVED loved. Don't judge me.
...wait, not LOVED loved. Don't judge me.
- Jaqen

- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I was expecting ice cold death stares, but nah. It was pleasant.MacB wrote:I had Dean Perry and loved the interview.
- risa

- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
ditto.Jaqen wrote:I was expecting ice cold death stares, but nah. It was pleasant.MacB wrote:I had Dean Perry and loved the interview.
also, I owe someone a snickerdoodle.
- robot_socrates

- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I mean, if you act stupidly enough, you're liable to get shot anywhere in Chicago. But generally Hyde Park is fine. Source: I'm from Chicago.Dr. Gaius Baltar wrote:No decision. Not that I'm sour-grapesing or anything, it's just that I've never been to Chicago and only have what I hear on NPR to go off. Are people liable to get shot in Hyde Park?
- honeybadger12

- Posts: 273
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:40 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Waitlisted yesterday. Weird thing is I withdrew my app three weeks ago and their office confirmed. Is this common? It feels like they're trying to manipulate their acceptance rate...
-
Gisney

- Posts: 403
- Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2011 1:32 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Waitlisted yesterday. Surprised because I expected a ding. Under 25% GPA and at median LSAT.
-
vzapana

- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
you might want to re-confirm your withdrawal - you don't run into any problems in the springhoneybadger12 wrote:Waitlisted yesterday. Weird thing is I withdrew my app three weeks ago and their office confirmed. Is this common? It feels like they're trying to manipulate their acceptance rate...
-
vzapana

- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also thisChampagnePapi wrote:Please fill out
Acceptance/Interview Google Doc:
Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... dWc6MQ&ifq
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... ldWc#gid=0
- reallysearch

- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:57 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I think the self reporting nature has made the spreadsheet a rather biased sample, we only see acceptances and few WL there. (probably people who were dinged just stopped checking the thread)vzapana wrote:Also thisChampagnePapi wrote:Please fill out
Acceptance/Interview Google Doc:
Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... dWc6MQ&ifq
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... ldWc#gid=0
But it would be useful to find out % who interviewed was rejected...
- hhockberger

- Posts: 174
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:28 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Dinged yesterday, as expected. Congrats admits!!
- Crowing

- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah I'm sure even WLs are underreported because there were people ITT who reported WL after interview yesterday but there are none on the spreadsheet.reallysearch wrote:I think the self reporting nature has made the spreadsheet a rather biased sample, we only see acceptances and few WL there. (probably people who were dinged just stopped checking the thread)vzapana wrote:Also thisChampagnePapi wrote:Please fill out
Acceptance/Interview Google Doc:
Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... dWc6MQ&ifq
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... ldWc#gid=0
But it would be useful to find out % who interviewed was rejected...
-
talesofyore

- Posts: 293
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 10:21 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It's still kind of useful if you judge the amount of people who answered 'accepted' vs. the original 'invited to interview' spreadsheet.reallysearch wrote:I think the self reporting nature has made the spreadsheet a rather biased sample, we only see acceptances and few WL there. (probably people who were dinged just stopped checking the thread)vzapana wrote:Also thisChampagnePapi wrote:Please fill out
Acceptance/Interview Google Doc:
Form: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/vie ... dWc6MQ&ifq
Spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... ldWc#gid=0
But it would be useful to find out % who interviewed was rejected...
-
04102014

- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I want my UR
-
shakespeare

- Posts: 174
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Dr. Gaius Baltar wrote:Several people on here confessed to loving their interview(er) as well earlier today.shakespeare wrote:In via email.
Interview invitation late Jan.
Interview mid-Feb.
Contrary to what some people have been saying, I actually loved my interview. I thought my interviewer was personable and engaging. Overall, I thought it was a great conversation, and it felt like both didn't want it to end.
PM for details.
I thought mine was great too.
Sry I was refering to much earlier comments. Ppl had said they felt the interviewer was bored and gave one word answers to their questions.
-
Ruthie

- Posts: 24
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I applied late(1/15) and haven't heard anything, though my application is complete. Did those who were rejected get an email? Or just see it on status checker? Mine in probably coming today:(