Same deal: UR1 on 2/18, UR2 today. Hoping for a quick decision!Merylian wrote:UR2 today!
UR1 was 2/18. Does this mean a decision isn't far off? I saw that most people who got their decisions yesterday were UR2 on 2/26...is that kind of turnaround typical?
Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2013 11:36 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
- megagnarley
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Has anyone tried their hand at negotiating yet?
- Rory19
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:14 am
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
It was sunny today in my hometown and we have not seen the sun in quite a while and I must admit that it made me rethink withdrawing from Duke's waitlist. The pamphlets they sent me over a year ago about how it is 65 degrees there right now certainly are making me wish Duke was a sold option...
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:38 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
UR1 3/1, UR2 3/7.
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:31 am
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Wonder what that means...framboozer wrote:UR1 3/1, UR2 3/7.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Poo-T
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:32 am
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
UR2, my body is NOT ready!!
--ImageRemoved--
--ImageRemoved--
- Poo-T
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:32 am
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Has anyone in the past week been accepted?
-
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:34 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
I am still on UR1 3/1. Not liking my chances.
-
- Posts: 213
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2010 12:38 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Any guesses?racrfish wrote:Wonder what that means...framboozer wrote:UR1 3/1, UR2 3/7.
-
- Posts: 208
- Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:31 am
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
I don't know, man. Could go either way. I'm guessing it's good because of your numbers.framboozer wrote:Any guesses?racrfish wrote:Wonder what that means...framboozer wrote:UR1 3/1, UR2 3/7.
- RG3ismyhomeboy
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:40 am
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Scholarship decision mailed 3/8
Info was complete 2/1
Not expecting a dime, was just happy with the acceptance.
Info was complete 2/1
Not expecting a dime, was just happy with the acceptance.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 10:39 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
In (by email) FINALLY. last status date 2/26.
- jcan91
- Posts: 224
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:24 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Congrats!nonymouse wrote:In (by email) FINALLY. last status date 2/26.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- VeeD101
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:49 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Priority reserve. UR1 2/15, UR2 3/7
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:19 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Admitted, UR 1 2/14/13, UR2 3/7.
-
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:34 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Welp...there go my chances...VeeD101 wrote:Priority reserve. UR1 2/15, UR2 3/7
- Rory19
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:14 am
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
As a waitlist applicant, would someone mind copying and pasting the wording from the priority reserve e-mails? I would just like to understand the distinction.VeeD101 wrote:Priority reserve. UR1 2/15, UR2 3/7
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- VeeD101
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:49 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Rory19 wrote:As a waitlist applicant, would someone mind copying and pasting the wording from the priority reserve e-mails? I would just like to understand the distinction.VeeD101 wrote:Priority reserve. UR1 2/15, UR2 3/7
Thank you for applying to Duke Law School. I am writing to inform you of the status of your application for admission. We have completed a thorough review of your application, and would like to offer you a space on our Priority Reserve list for the 2013 entering class.
As you are likely aware, Duke is among the smallest of the national law schools. This year's applicant pool has already proven exceptionally strong, and competition is particularly fierce for a seat in the Class of 2016. Although we are unable to offer you admission at this time, the Committee was impressed with your application and you will remain under consideration as the review process continues over the next several months.
Please keep our office informed of any changes to your contact information. You will be contacted initially by email or telephone if you are selected for admission.
We appreciate your patience during this lengthy admission process, and we will do our best to reach a final decision on your candidacy as soon as possible. In the meantime, please feel free to submit updated or additional information, such as letters of recommendation, transcripts for work completed since your application was submitted, a statement of continued interest, or any new honors or awards received.
- VeeD101
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:49 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Maybe not! I didn't write a why duke nor do I have any ties in the area. Also I don't get the difference between a priority reserve and a waitlist!?!? I thought people said Priority Reserve was for the Priority Track people?fallingup wrote:Welp...there go my chances...VeeD101 wrote:Priority reserve. UR1 2/15, UR2 3/7

-
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:34 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Yeah I find it very confusing too. I'm surprised there's nothing on their website about it at all. It seems like some PR people do get in though.
I can't imagine ties really matter all that much. Looking at the LSN graph, it seems that 170 is a big hump - lots of 169/3.5+s waitlisted.
I can't imagine ties really matter all that much. Looking at the LSN graph, it seems that 170 is a big hump - lots of 169/3.5+s waitlisted.
- VeeD101
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:49 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Yeah, that 170 is the magic number. Never has the difference of 1 number mattered so much in my life. Its crazy what the difference between a 170/3.7 and 169/3.7 can be in terms of acceptances and more significantly scholarships. Good Luck!fallingup wrote:Yeah I find it very confusing too. I'm surprised there's nothing on their website about it at all. It seems like some PR people do get in though.
I can't imagine ties really matter all that much. Looking at the LSN graph, it seems that 170 is a big hump - lots of 169/3.5+s waitlisted.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:56 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
anyone else out there UR1 2/15...is there another blood bath coming soon?
- megagnarley
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:58 am
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Credited. I Had a 169. Was Priority Reserve. Retook. Scored 170. Was admitted a week later with 67k scholly.VeeD101 wrote:Yeah, that 170 is the magic number. Never has the difference of 1 number mattered so much in my life. Its crazy what the difference between a 170/3.7 and 169/3.7 can be in terms of acceptances and more significantly scholarships. Good Luck!fallingup wrote:Yeah I find it very confusing too. I'm surprised there's nothing on their website about it at all. It seems like some PR people do get in though.
I can't imagine ties really matter all that much. Looking at the LSN graph, it seems that 170 is a big hump - lots of 169/3.5+s waitlisted.
- Jaqen
- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Nah, PT is completely separate from PR. PR is basically the preferred waitlist, from my understanding.VeeD101 wrote:Maybe not! I didn't write a why duke nor do I have any ties in the area. Also I don't get the difference between a priority reserve and a waitlist!?!? I thought people said Priority Reserve was for the Priority Track people?
- Rory19
- Posts: 299
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2013 3:14 am
Re: Duke c/o 2016 Applicants Thread (2012-2013 Cycle)
Thanks VeeD101.
My interpretation is that Priority Reserve is more like a "Held" designation. Anyone else have any guesses?
My interpretation is that Priority Reserve is more like a "Held" designation. Anyone else have any guesses?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login