Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Actually, I just read last year's thread more closely, and it looks like Dean Perry called some admitted students in January and February to interview them for the Rubenstein, and then notified them the result later by email. I have no idea what percentage of people who were interviewed actually received Rubensteins. Find out for yourselves (I searched Rubenstein and Ruby): http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 7&t=129424
- smokeylarue
- Posts: 611
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 3:55 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Also updated today, I think its my 4th update. I THINK it's rejection considering my GPA is below the 25th percentile
- Zelda
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 10:06 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Can someone post Chicago's twitter? Is it just the general Chicago law one?
- WhiteGuy5
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
http://twitter.com/#!/UChicagoLawApps here you go loveZelda wrote:Can someone post Chicago's twitter? Is it just the general Chicago law one?
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Ruby >>>>> Harvard unless you get a need based full rideCurious1 wrote:Hence: small chance.WhiteGuy5 wrote:
No you wouldn't. You're too in love with the idea of getting to say "I went to Harvard." I can tell from how excited you were when you got in.
Hard to say no to $200,000 though.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
No.JamMasterJ wrote:Ruby >>>>> Harvard unless you get a need based full rideCurious1 wrote:Hence: small chance.WhiteGuy5 wrote:
No you wouldn't. You're too in love with the idea of getting to say "I went to Harvard." I can tell from how excited you were when you got in.
Hard to say no to $200,000 though.
- sharktankdean
- Posts: 663
- Joined: Sat Jan 07, 2012 2:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
The fact that they tweeted this better be an indication that tomorrow is the day...i mean aren't they closed on Monday...and Tuesday seems like torture to me.Wrapped up final comm. meeting on this group of files. Thanks for your patience. Big group of apps and had to make tough decisions.
- WhiteGuy5
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
This is factually inaccurate.JamMasterJ wrote:Ruby >>>>> Harvard unless you get a need based full rideCurious1 wrote:Hence: small chance.WhiteGuy5 wrote:
No you wouldn't. You're too in love with the idea of getting to say "I went to Harvard." I can tell from how excited you were when you got in.
Hard to say no to $200,000 though.
- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Ok, fine. H with over half could be better depending on your post-grad goals.WhiteGuy5 wrote:This is factually inaccurate.JamMasterJ wrote:Ruby >>>>> Harvard unless you get a need based full rideCurious1 wrote:Hence: small chance.WhiteGuy5 wrote:
No you wouldn't. You're too in love with the idea of getting to say "I went to Harvard." I can tell from how excited you were when you got in.
Hard to say no to $200,000 though.
- Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
H is TCR If you want anything other than biglaw and I would still take H regardless.JamMasterJ wrote: Ok, fine. H with over half could be better depending on your post-grad goals.
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
You're cute.Nelson wrote:H is TCR If you want anything other than biglaw and I would still take H regardless.JamMasterJ wrote: Ok, fine. H with over half could be better depending on your post-grad goals.
- Zelda
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 10:06 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
<3 Thank youuuuu.WhiteGuy5 wrote:http://twitter.com/#!/UChicagoLawApps here you go loveZelda wrote:Can someone post Chicago's twitter? Is it just the general Chicago law one?
- Xifeng
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
He should definitely mention this if interviewed for the ruby.Bildungsroman wrote:You're cute.Nelson wrote:H is TCR If you want anything other than biglaw and I would still take H regardless.JamMasterJ wrote: Ok, fine. H with over half could be better depending on your post-grad goals.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Thanks.Bildungsroman wrote:You're cute.Nelson wrote:H is TCR If you want anything other than biglaw and I would still take H regardless.JamMasterJ wrote: Ok, fine. H with over half could be better depending on your post-grad goals.
- Zelda
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 10:06 am
- WhiteGuy5
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Are you saying this because of a cost/benefit analysis taking into account only the rising pay scale of a big law firm + paying off loans? (I.e. Both Harvard and Chicago get you to 160k/year 1st year salary, except Chicago w/ Ruby gets you there with no loans and interest, whereas Harvard does)?JamMasterJ wrote: Ok, fine. H with over half could be better depending on your post-grad goals.
-
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Uggghhh too much prestige discussion.
Hope you all hear good news tomorrow
Hope you all hear good news tomorrow

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- WhiteGuy5
- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I know, but what else are we gonna do, ya know?snehpets wrote:Uggghhh too much prestige discussion.
Hope you all hear good news tomorrow

- JamMasterJ
- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
no, I hate mathWhiteGuy5 wrote:Are you saying this because of a cost/benefit analysis taking into account only the rising pay scale of a big law firm + paying off loans? (I.e. Both Harvard and Chicago get you to 160k/year 1st year salary, except Chicago w/ Ruby gets you there with no loans and interest, whereas Harvard does)?JamMasterJ wrote: Ok, fine. H with over half could be better depending on your post-grad goals.
- dakure
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 1:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Lol. The difference between H and Chicago is actually a lot smaller in placement than most people think. Go look at the aliarrow thread from a couple years ago, the nlj 250 data, as well as clerkship and academia data. Chicago placed more graduates in biglaw than wanted it (leaked data) and also is astronomically good at getting clerkships and is great for getting people into academia. This notion that Harvard is worth considerably more than Chicago with a scholarship, in most cases, is ridiculous. If you ask people who have graduated and are in the field, most would say that they'd take a Butler at Columbia or the equivalent at Chicago over Harvard at sticker ten times out of ten.
-
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Thank you.dakure wrote:Lol. The difference between H and Chicago is actually a lot smaller in placement than most people think. Go look at the aliarrow thread from a couple years ago, the nlj 250 data, as well as clerkship and academia data. Chicago placed more graduates in biglaw than wanted it (leaked data) and also is astronomically good at getting clerkships and is great for getting people into academia. This notion that Harvard is worth considerably more than Chicago with a scholarship, in most cases, is ridiculous. If you ask people who have graduated and are in the field, most would say that they'd take a Butler at Columbia or the equivalent at Chicago over Harvard at sticker ten times out of ten.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Did I mention that UChicago has a zero-depth reflecting pool?
- Nelson
- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
What if you have extreme East coast bias?dakure wrote:Lol. The difference between H and Chicago is actually a lot smaller in placement than most people think. Go look at the aliarrow thread from a couple years ago, the nlj 250 data, as well as clerkship and academia data. Chicago placed more graduates in biglaw than wanted it (leaked data) and also is astronomically good at getting clerkships and is great for getting people into academia. This notion that Harvard is worth considerably more than Chicago with a scholarship, in most cases, is ridiculous. If you ask people who have graduated and are in the field, most would say that they'd take a Butler at Columbia or the equivalent at Chicago over Harvard at sticker ten times out of ten.

-
- Posts: 1164
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 1:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Sold.Bildungsroman wrote:Did I mention that UChicago has a zero-depth reflecting pool?
- catholicgirl
- Posts: 320
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I cannot deal with this anymore. Updated for the fourth time today.
Chicago is a very bad boyfriend right now, leading all of us on like this.
Chicago is a very bad boyfriend right now, leading all of us on like this.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login