SMU 2010! Forum
-
jgrin

- Posts: 295
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:07 am
Re: SMU 2010!
Thirteen, What happened to the Garrett Gilbert pic?
-
da87

- Posts: 241
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 12:50 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
So no status changes for anyone today?
- Thirteen

- Posts: 25405
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:53 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
I changed it because I was excited about House being back on, haha. I'll change it to something else to represent for the burnt orange and white.jgrin wrote:Thirteen, What happened to the Garrett Gilbert pic?
- kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: SMU 2010!
No, leave it at Thirteen. Please.
- Thirteen

- Posts: 25405
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:53 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
Too late.kalvano wrote:No, leave it at Thirteen. Please.
I just RSVP'd for the admitted students day on April 23. See y'all there.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Thirteen

- Posts: 25405
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 4:53 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
Blasphemy. Durant is the man. Olivia Wilde is pretty hot, but she isn't a Texas Ex.
- kalvano

- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: SMU 2010!
I don't even know who that is. All I know is that it isn't Olivia Wilde and therefore doesn't matter.
-
tinyone

- Posts: 116
- Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:22 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
jgrin wrote:Agreed. How could you argue to the contrary. I haven't done much research into the subject, but I would be willing to bet that SMU's LSAT range has a top 10 rank for largest LSAT broadness between 25 - 75. That means that 155ers have to offer something equally as attractive as the 165ers to be admitted. I honestly doubt that GPA is the only other ingredient, so it must be something else, non-numbers related.Sangiovese wrote:Feel free to offer your own alternative explanation. The range between the 25% and 75% LSAT scores for SMU is about twice the size of other schools. We've offered one possible explanation.Bustang wrote:I find it curious that many of you claim "SMU looks beyond numbers" yet they admitted 99% of the applicants who had 163s and above. Actually, per this thread, the ONLY people they've accepted into the FT program(thus far) are those with 163+.
"This thread" is a pretty small sample size to form the basis of any generalizations regarding their acceptance criteria. It may be true that they haven't accepted anyone in this thread into the FT program with anything under a 163... but the fact that the 25% LSAT score is a 155 means that they do admit a lot of folks with scores of 155 and below. Just because they aren't posting in this thread doesn't mean they don't exist. Also, if you check LSN, there are several sub-160s who have been admitted... and a good portion of them are for full time.
Well that seems to be one way SMU could climb the rankings more than a point next year, close the gap.
-
jgrin

- Posts: 295
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:07 am
Re: SMU 2010!
+ infinityThirteen wrote:Blasphemy. Durant is the man. Olivia Wilde is pretty hot, but she isn't a Texas Ex.
-
jgrin

- Posts: 295
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 4:07 am
Re: SMU 2010!
Me too. Only a little more than 1/2 a month until we know though. So be grateful that we haven't been rejected yet, as this means (I am assuming) they have seen something in our application that deems us worthy of further consideration. The wait will be over soon.da87 wrote:the wait is killing me
-
da87

- Posts: 241
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 12:50 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
Yes, very true.jgrin wrote:Me too. Only a little more than 1/2 a month until we know though. So be grateful that we haven't been rejected yet, as this means (I am assuming) they have seen something in our application that deems us worthy of further consideration. The wait will be over soon.da87 wrote:the wait is killing me
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
texag08

- Posts: 66
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:03 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
So what do you think the odds are for those of us who are still waiting?
- fathergoose

- Posts: 852
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:36 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
Unless they have a 100% yield, they still need to accept a second batch slightly bigger than the first batch. Just take a deep breath and hope that you are in it.texag08 wrote:So what do you think the odds are for those of us who are still waiting?
- fathergoose

- Posts: 852
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:36 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
Also texag08 its nice to see another Aggie on here. Best of luck to you.
-
texag08

- Posts: 66
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:03 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
Sweet goose. What year and major? Were you in the Corps?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
DavidB

- Posts: 126
- Joined: Fri Jul 03, 2009 3:28 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
I'm still waiting. LSN shows others with similar numbers to me that have been accepted and even some who have been offered $$, so I'm still hopeful.fathergoose wrote:Unless they have a 100% yield, they still need to accept a second batch slightly bigger than the first batch. Just take a deep breath and hope that you are in it.
- fathergoose

- Posts: 852
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:36 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
09/BBA. Not in the corp, they got up a little early in the morning for my tastes. You?
-
texag08

- Posts: 66
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:03 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
What are your numbers and are you FT or PT??
-
texag08

- Posts: 66
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:03 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
08, was in Corps, Poli Sci. I was beginning to think that only horns were applying to SMU (nothing wrong with my burnt orange brothers and sisters).
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
da87

- Posts: 241
- Joined: Fri Jan 29, 2010 12:50 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
How did you come up with this? If it's true, it definitely makes me feel better.fathergoose wrote:Unless they have a 100% yield, they still need to accept a second batch slightly bigger than the first batch. Just take a deep breath and hope that you are in it.texag08 wrote:So what do you think the odds are for those of us who are still waiting?
- Not-A-Teabagger

- Posts: 73
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 7:01 am
Re: SMU 2010!
didn't somebody a while back say that at ASD they were told that SMU had already handed out approximately 10% of the number of acceptances they were going to give out, and that they were going to give out another 10%-15% beginning at the end of April? If you look back through this forum I think you will find this.da87 wrote:How did you come up with this? If it's true, it definitely makes me feel better.fathergoose wrote:Unless they have a 100% yield, they still need to accept a second batch slightly bigger than the first batch. Just take a deep breath and hope that you are in it.texag08 wrote:So what do you think the odds are for those of us who are still waiting?
- fathergoose

- Posts: 852
- Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:36 pm
Re: SMU 2010!
Yup I was the one who said that. They mentioned it at the first ASD.
Just hang tight and you'll find out soon enough.
Just hang tight and you'll find out soon enough.
- UTL_plz

- Posts: 156
- Joined: Tue Apr 07, 2009 11:48 am
Re: SMU 2010!
I think they said they have handed acceptances to 10% of all applications received thus far.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login