there are quite a few of us. i think we're just borderline/hold-worthy candidates, because we span a pretty wide school and number spectrum. that info might not be helpful at all. oh well, good luck!gossipgirl wrote:"We have now released most decisions on files completed in Sept. and Oct. However, Ad. Comm. is still carefully considering some early files"
Who else is in this batch? I wonder why we've gotten additional review?
U Chicago 2010 Forum
-
georgina

- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:49 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
- grrrstick

- Posts: 137
- Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2009 2:58 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Another UR 12/31 to UR 1/25. Good luck this week!
- GobiasIndustries

- Posts: 358
- Joined: Tue Nov 24, 2009 7:56 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Still 12/29'ing it here. Who knows?
- Lermontov

- Posts: 220
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Still 11/25. Hoping for my sake that that crew is still hanging strong.
-
owhlcn

- Posts: 276
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 12:06 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
+1.GobiasIndustries wrote:Still 12/29'ing it here. Who knows?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
pissantvache

- Posts: 115
- Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2009 2:37 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Finally UR 1/25. Only 2 months after my completion date. Do decisions typically get made pretty quickly at UofC?
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
All of us are still here, and a few others have come out of the woodwork the past few days.Lermontov wrote:Still 11/25. Hoping for my sake that that crew is still hanging strong.
-
georgina

- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:49 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
i feel they'll definitely get back to us this week. next week is february, and it would just be poor form for them to get back to us so late.crackberry wrote:All of us are still here, and a few others have come out of the woodwork the past few days.Lermontov wrote:Still 11/25. Hoping for my sake that that crew is still hanging strong.
- keiko

- Posts: 88
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 12:37 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
what's your best guess georgina? WL, acceptance, rejections, or all three?georgina wrote:i feel they'll definitely get back to us this week. next week is february, and it would just be poor form for them to get back to us so late.crackberry wrote:All of us are still here, and a few others have come out of the woodwork the past few days.Lermontov wrote:Still 11/25. Hoping for my sake that that crew is still hanging strong.
-
insidethetwenty

- Posts: 221
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 8:00 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
UR 1/13 here, checking in. I've only changed to UR once and was complete in early November.
Should I hold my breath this week?
Should I hold my breath this week?
-
georgina

- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:49 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
my guess is WL's (or holds) and A's. no WL's have been given out RD so far, and since nobody debates that long between a WL and R, they must be deciding between WL's and A's.keiko wrote:what's your best guess georgina? WL, acceptance, rejections, or all three?georgina wrote:i feel they'll definitely get back to us this week. next week is february, and it would just be poor form for them to get back to us so late.crackberry wrote:All of us are still here, and a few others have come out of the woodwork the past few days.Lermontov wrote:Still 11/25. Hoping for my sake that that crew is still hanging strong.
but on the other hand, there are so many more A's than R's on LSN right now, and i can't imagine the bias to not report is that severe. ok, i confess, i have no idea.
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Yeah I can't imagine they would take 2+ months (today marks 2 months since we first went UR) to reject all of us. I'm with georgina that we're a mixture of WL/holds and acceptances.georgina wrote:my guess is WL's (or holds) and A's. no WL's have been given out RD so far, and since nobody debates that long between a WL and R, they must be deciding between WL's and A's.
but on the other hand, there are so many more A's than R's on LSN right now, and i can't imagine the bias to not report is that severe. ok, i confess, i have no idea.
- gossipgirl

- Posts: 261
- Joined: Sat Jan 10, 2009 1:25 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
Assuming this, good time to send in fall grades?crackberry wrote:Yeah I can't imagine they would take 2+ months (today marks 2 months since we first went UR) to reject all of us. I'm with georgina that we're a mixture of WL/holds and acceptances.georgina wrote:my guess is WL's (or holds) and A's. no WL's have been given out RD so far, and since nobody debates that long between a WL and R, they must be deciding between WL's and A's.
but on the other hand, there are so many more A's than R's on LSN right now, and i can't imagine the bias to not report is that severe. ok, i confess, i have no idea.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Lermontov

- Posts: 220
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
+1crackberry wrote:Yeah I can't imagine they would take 2+ months (today marks 2 months since we first went UR) to reject all of us. I'm with georgina that we're a mixture of WL/holds and acceptances.georgina wrote:my guess is WL's (or holds) and A's. no WL's have been given out RD so far, and since nobody debates that long between a WL and R, they must be deciding between WL's and A's.
but on the other hand, there are so many more A's than R's on LSN right now, and i can't imagine the bias to not report is that severe. ok, i confess, i have no idea.
I generally doubt that we're all going to be the same, because that would have meant planning our review process in great detail several months ago. And at least most of us seem like there's a not unreasonable shot at getting in. WL/Admit it will be.
But, (mind you, I do stand by what I just said) the lack of Rejects on LSN makes me nervous.
- TheWire

- Posts: 479
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:24 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I usually hate when people post these sort of questions on threads BUT, I think I'm at the point where I am actually concerned. I have been complete since 11/17 without going under review. Is anyone else in this position? I mean, it's over 9 wks now. Should I call or just be patient? I was skeptical about UofC because of the weather, little did I know that they usually give you the cold shoulder too...
- Lermontov

- Posts: 220
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
My gut instinct was to say 'Call, who knows what happened to your file.' Then I realized that you are complete, which means there's nothing wrong with your file, so really nothing for you to do or worry about at this point. It's odd and frustrating, but I don't think it's something to worry about. My status hasn't changed in 8 odd weeks, so I do sortof know how that feels, even if I've made it to UR.TheWire wrote:I usually hate when people post these sort of questions on threads BUT, I think I'm at the point where I am actually concerned. I have been complete since 11/17 without going under review. Is anyone else in this position? I mean, it's over 9 wks now. Should I call or just be patient? I was skeptical about UofC because of the weather, little did I know that they usually give you the cold shoulder too...
At the same time, it's completely legit to call. People make a bigger deal out of calling than need be. Your question isn't frivolous and will take about 30 seconds of someone's time and they're not going to red-flag you for calling with a serious question (as long as you don't get all smart and try to figure out if they'll accept you), so if you're really worried then go ahead and put your mind at ease.
- TheWire

- Posts: 479
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:24 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Most considerate TLS advice I've received in awhile, I appreciate it. I think I'll call tomorrow...Lermontov wrote:My gut instinct was to say 'Call, who knows what happened to your file.' Then I realized that you are complete, which means there's nothing wrong with your file, so really nothing for you to do or worry about at this point. It's odd and frustrating, but I don't think it's something to worry about. My status hasn't changed in 8 odd weeks, so I do sortof know how that feels, even if I've made it to UR.TheWire wrote:I usually hate when people post these sort of questions on threads BUT, I think I'm at the point where I am actually concerned. I have been complete since 11/17 without going under review. Is anyone else in this position? I mean, it's over 9 wks now. Should I call or just be patient? I was skeptical about UofC because of the weather, little did I know that they usually give you the cold shoulder too...
At the same time, it's completely legit to call. People make a bigger deal out of calling than need be. Your question isn't frivolous and will take about 30 seconds of someone's time and they're not going to red-flag you for calling with a serious question (as long as you don't get all smart and try to figure out if they'll accept you), so if you're really worried then go ahead and put your mind at ease.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Jericwithers

- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I'm interested in their response. I've been complete since 11/24.TheWire wrote:Most considerate TLS advice I've received in awhile, I appreciate it. I think I'll call tomorrow...
- TheWire

- Posts: 479
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:24 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I'll be sure to update the thread then...Jericwithers wrote:I'm interested in their response. I've been complete since 11/24.TheWire wrote:Most considerate TLS advice I've received in awhile, I appreciate it. I think I'll call tomorrow...
- Lermontov

- Posts: 220
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I would say, just make sure you leave it at "I've been held at complete since 11/17, so I'm just calling to make sure there are no problems with my file," along with some vague pleasantry. They don't really want to talk with you, so the briefer you keep it the betterTheWire wrote:Most considerate TLS advice I've received in awhile, I appreciate it. I think I'll call tomorrow...Lermontov wrote:My gut instinct was to say 'Call, who knows what happened to your file.' Then I realized that you are complete, which means there's nothing wrong with your file, so really nothing for you to do or worry about at this point. It's odd and frustrating, but I don't think it's something to worry about. My status hasn't changed in 8 odd weeks, so I do sortof know how that feels, even if I've made it to UR.TheWire wrote:I usually hate when people post these sort of questions on threads BUT, I think I'm at the point where I am actually concerned. I have been complete since 11/17 without going under review. Is anyone else in this position? I mean, it's over 9 wks now. Should I call or just be patient? I was skeptical about UofC because of the weather, little did I know that they usually give you the cold shoulder too...
At the same time, it's completely legit to call. People make a bigger deal out of calling than need be. Your question isn't frivolous and will take about 30 seconds of someone's time and they're not going to red-flag you for calling with a serious question (as long as you don't get all smart and try to figure out if they'll accept you), so if you're really worried then go ahead and put your mind at ease.
-
AppsAbound

- Posts: 85
- Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2009 12:04 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
I wouldn't worry actually. They seem to actually be going in order. I was complete 11/16 and just went UR for the first time last week, 1/19.
But if it makes you feel better, call.
But if it makes you feel better, call.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
alabamabound

- Posts: 140
- Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 11:31 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
ditto.pissantvache wrote:Finally UR 1/25. Only 2 months after my completion date. Do decisions typically get made pretty quickly at UofC?
- TheWire

- Posts: 479
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 9:24 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Sooo I checked the status checker earlier in the day before my post. Ironically, I am now under review.
11/17 completion --> 1/25 UR
So, I guess the moral of the story is don't trip, UofC just does things the way they do it...
11/17 completion --> 1/25 UR
So, I guess the moral of the story is don't trip, UofC just does things the way they do it...
- Jericwithers

- Posts: 2194
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 9:34 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
(If that way is very slowly, then yes)TheWire wrote:Sooo I checked the status checker earlier in the day before my post. Ironically, I am now under review.
11/17 completion --> 1/25 UR
So, I guess the moral of the story is don't trip, UofC just does things the way they do it...
I am under review now too. 11/24.
- Richie Tenenbaum

- Posts: 2118
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 2008 6:17 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
Still waiting.
Last edited by Richie Tenenbaum on Wed Nov 21, 2012 2:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login