I sent the negotiating email 10 days ago, but there's no response.pcjudge wrote:Has anyone had luck negotiating scholarships?

I sent the negotiating email 10 days ago, but there's no response.pcjudge wrote:Has anyone had luck negotiating scholarships?
I sent an email 13 days ago. I got a response that they will take the information into consideration and "hope to follow up with a response in the near future", which doesn't give me a lot of hope for hearing back soon. However, my numbers suck and they already offered me as much as I was hoping they would so I'm not expecting much.nkime wrote:I sent the negotiating email 10 days ago, but there's no response.pcjudge wrote:Has anyone had luck negotiating scholarships?
I got a similar "we will send this along to financial aid for consideration" response to mine after 2 days. If you've heard nothing, you might call for a follow up.rufus&miles wrote:I sent an email 13 days ago. I got a response that they will take the information into consideration and "hope to follow up with a response in the near future", which doesn't give me a lot of hope for hearing back soon. However, my numbers suck and they already offered me as much as I was hoping they would so I'm not expecting much.nkime wrote:I sent the negotiating email 10 days ago, but there's no response.pcjudge wrote:Has anyone had luck negotiating scholarships?
Agreed. Was accepted by e-mail this morning (not snail mail), but will be withdrawing shortly. (Not even gonna wait for financial aid offer, since I've become attached to other schools by this time.)BC was in my top 2 when I applied back in early January. I am extremely turned off by how long it is taking for me to receive a decision.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Not insofar as it reflects on the level and quality of interaction between Administration and students; if an Admissions office is in a mild state of disarray (not necessarily saying BC's is) and cannot respond to emails and phone requests promptly and professionally, it makes me question what the Career Services office's outlook is like. I think that's a somewhat fair line to draw, though obviously it shouldn't be a deciding factor.skri65 wrote:The fact that some of you are making turnaround time a significant factor in your law school decision baffles me. Either you like the employment prospects, location, reputation, and maybe the campus, or you don't. Seems like regarding turnaround time as a serious factor in deciding which school to go is a little shortsighted in the grand scheme of things.
nba101790 wrote:Not insofar as it reflects on the level and quality of interaction between Administration and students; if an Admissions office is in a mild state of disarray (not necessarily saying BC's is) and cannot respond to emails and phone requests promptly and professionally, it makes me question what the Career Services office's outlook is like. I think that's a somewhat fair line to draw, though obviously it shouldn't be a deciding factor.skri65 wrote:The fact that some of you are making turnaround time a significant factor in your law school decision baffles me. Either you like the employment prospects, location, reputation, and maybe the campus, or you don't. Seems like regarding turnaround time as a serious factor in deciding which school to go is a little shortsighted in the grand scheme of things.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
skri65 wrote:The fact that some of you are making turnaround time a significant factor in your law school decision baffles me. Either you like the employment prospects, location, reputation, and maybe the campus, or you don't. Seems like regarding turnaround time as a serious factor in deciding which school to go is a little shortsighted in the grand scheme of things.
The career service office and the admissions office are relatively independent. Either way, from what I've read, a schools reputation in the location you want to work and your ability to hustle and network on your own are levels of magnitude more important than the speed in which the career services office responds to emails.nba101790 wrote:Not insofar as it reflects on the level and quality of interaction between Administration and students; if an Admissions office is in a mild state of disarray (not necessarily saying BC's is) and cannot respond to emails and phone requests promptly and professionally, it makes me question what the Career Services office's outlook is like. I think that's a somewhat fair line to draw, though obviously it shouldn't be a deciding factor.skri65 wrote:The fact that some of you are making turnaround time a significant factor in your law school decision baffles me. Either you like the employment prospects, location, reputation, and maybe the campus, or you don't. Seems like regarding turnaround time as a serious factor in deciding which school to go is a little shortsighted in the grand scheme of things.
That's a strawman argument. It is not either/or.Either you like the employment prospects, location, reputation, and maybe the campus, or you don't.
The above definitely rings true when speaking of peer schools. While employment prospects and cost of attendance are always at the top of the list - if the previous are equal, a personal/friendly welcoming can easily sway an applicant.Big Dog wrote:That's a strawman argument. It is not either/or.Either you like the employment prospects, location, reputation, and maybe the campus, or you don't.
One can easily like the "employment prospects, location, reputation and...campus" of more than one LS; they all have good and not-so-good aspects. More importantly, BC can easily lose out to a school with greater prospects and greater reputation that has already shown a lotta love to its acceptees, which includes showering an applicant with money. Once accepted, it becomes a buyer's market. IFF BC wants to play the game -- and they probably don't care -- they need to be competitive across the board, and that means in their admissions process as well. Otherwise, the other Catholic and Jesuit schools -- think DC! -- will snatch the applicant first.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
that's one risky bet you're taking buddy but if you're willing to do take the risk by all means I respect your steel ballsDaRascal wrote:After much thought I think BC warrants sticker. ESPECIALLY if you're like me and you can live frugally and plan to work over the summers to cut into that law school debt. If I attend I plan to take out $150k and that's it. Hopefully with the right kind of summer job that can be sub $100k by graduation.
lhanvt13 wrote:that's one risky bet you're taking buddy but if you're willing to do take the risk by all means I respect your steel ballsDaRascal wrote:After much thought I think BC warrants sticker. ESPECIALLY if you're like me and you can live frugally and plan to work over the summers to cut into that law school debt. If I attend I plan to take out $150k and that's it. Hopefully with the right kind of summer job that can be sub $100k by graduation.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Georgetown and BC are only competitive for people who don't know where they want to work. My assumption is that you know where you want to work. If you want to work in Boston, then go to BC or BU (or an eastcoast T6 if you are able to). Turnaround time should have no affect on this. Turnaround time may have an affect if you're choosing between BC and BU, but again I imagine individuals programs and campus style should be more important here anyway. If you don't care about either of those, then yes, I imagine turnaround time could sway you one way or another (still stupid, in my mind).Big Dog wrote:That's a strawman argument. It is not either/or.Either you like the employment prospects, location, reputation, and maybe the campus, or you don't.
One can easily like the "employment prospects, location, reputation and...campus" of more than one LS; they all have good and not-so-good aspects. More importantly, BC can easily lose out to a school with greater prospects and greater reputation that has already shown a lotta love to its acceptees, which includes showering an applicant with money. Once accepted, it becomes a buyer's market. IFF BC wants to play the game -- and they probably don't care -- they need to be competitive across the board, and that means in their admissions process as well. Otherwise, the other Catholic and Jesuit schools -- think DC! -- will snatch the applicant first.
Of course. Boston is a wonderful place to live, but so are several others. Some/many will focus solely on one city, which by definition narrows their choices. Me, I'm open to several locales, including Boston. And due to BC's relatively poor performance, that locale has dropped much lower on the choice scale.Chances are you don't like all locations equally.
Perhaps it is to you. (And nothing wrong with that.) But why are you arguing with folks for whom location is not paramount?I just think that location is so much more paramount a consideration.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login