JamesDean1955 wrote:They were probably about to release decisions, then checked up on this thread and saw that half of us were making comments about the hotness of one of their interviewers, found out who we are, then had to make a bunch of decision reversals that set everything back.
Oops.
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- robot_socrates

- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- Crowing

- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
BETTER NOT it's pretty easy to out me from my TLS body of work. Gonna be awkward on campus..........JamesDean1955 wrote:They were probably about to release decisions, then checked up on this thread and saw that half of us were making comments about the hotness of one of their interviewers, found out who we are, then had to make a bunch of decision reversals that set everything back.
Oops.
- robot_socrates

- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My primary email is uppercase for Chicago, and given that I'm at UR4, I'm sure they have a decision rendered on me. Maybe your undercase could mean something about the nature of the decision, but who knows.Teflon_Don wrote:Alright so I just realized my emails are in lowercase.. All my other apps are uppercase. Anyone else's like this or could it mean possible decision rendered like stanford?
- callmemaybe84

- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm uppercase--just to give another data point for the decisions about to come.robot_socrates wrote:My primary email is uppercase for Chicago, and given that I'm at UR4, I'm sure they have a decision rendered on me. Maybe your undercase could mean something about the nature of the decision, but who knows.Teflon_Don wrote:Alright so I just realized my emails are in lowercase.. All my other apps are uppercase. Anyone else's like this or could it mean possible decision rendered like stanford?
-
MacB

- Posts: 341
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
How many of you are refreshing Chicago's twitter feed every two to three minutes... be honest.
...sheepishly raises his hand...
...sheepishly raises his hand...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- robot_socrates

- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm surprised you can make it 2-3 minutes.MacB wrote:How many of you are refreshing Chicago's twitter feed every two to three minutes... be honest.
...sheepishly raises his hand...
- NoodleyOne

- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 7:32 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I got no shame. Hell, maybe it'll give me an edge.Crowing wrote:BETTER NOT it's pretty easy to out me from my TLS body of work. Gonna be awkward on campus..........JamesDean1955 wrote:They were probably about to release decisions, then checked up on this thread and saw that half of us were making comments about the hotness of one of their interviewers, found out who we are, then had to make a bunch of decision reversals that set everything back.
Oops.
- venus

- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I feel like I just wasted a whole day refreshing pages for nothing
Was really hoping today would be the day.
- robot_socrates

- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same. They did promise a twitter update no matter what, so I haven't quite given up hope yet. But it looks bad.venus wrote:I feel like I just wasted a whole day refreshing pages for nothingWas really hoping today would be the day.
-
iteachtenthgrade

- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
a) This is torture
b) Could the WUSTL thread be more incessant?
c) I must be on edge
b) Could the WUSTL thread be more incessant?
c) I must be on edge
-
grapefruits

- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
At the very least, we can be sure they are still in the office. While they didn't promise decisions, they (kind of) promised an update, which they are yet to deliver on. I'm optimistic about decisions still.
-
Volforlife

- Posts: 140
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:22 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1iteachtenthgrade wrote: b) Could the WUSTL thread be more incessant?
-
MacB

- Posts: 341
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
If they don't follow through on this twitter update, I'm withdrawing. THAT'S IT.

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- callmemaybe84

- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Agree. Longer we go without twitter update, the more i'm certain decisions are coming in the next hour. But after that, we can move on with our lives for a few daysgrapefruits wrote:At the very least, we can be sure they are still in the office. While they didn't promise decisions, they (kind of) promised an update, which they are yet to deliver on. I'm optimistic about decisions still.
- Crowing

- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
The ratio of views/replies in that thread is cray compared to the other schools.Volforlife wrote:+1iteachtenthgrade wrote: b) Could the WUSTL thread be more incessant?
-
grapefruits

- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
~6%, when most other threads look to be around 2%.Crowing wrote:The ratio of views/replies in that thread is cray compared to the other schools.Volforlife wrote:+1iteachtenthgrade wrote: b) Could the WUSTL thread be more incessant?
- venus

- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Haha I had never been on that thread but just realized what you guys were talking about.grapefruits wrote:~6%, when most other threads look to be around 2%.Crowing wrote:The ratio of views/replies in that thread is cray compared to the other schools.Volforlife wrote:+1iteachtenthgrade wrote: b) Could the WUSTL thread be more incessant?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- reallysearch

- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:57 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Don't give up hope just yet.. I got my acceptance on Jan 1 at almost 5pm...
and good luck everyone!
and good luck everyone!
-
wisteria

- Posts: 285
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
For those who went UR on 2/11 or later, anyone received interview invites yet? It seems that many who went UR 2/4 got interview invites on 2/8.
-
iteachtenthgrade

- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
5pm where?reallysearch wrote:Don't give up hope just yet.. I got my acceptance on Jan 1 at almost 5pm...
and good luck everyone!
- Teflon_Don

- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Really surprised at the lack of a Twitter update..
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JamesDean1955

- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hopefully PST, then that would actually give me some hope lol.iteachtenthgrade wrote:5pm where?reallysearch wrote:Don't give up hope just yet.. I got my acceptance on Jan 1 at almost 5pm...
and good luck everyone!
- venus

- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Please, say west coast!iteachtenthgrade wrote:5pm where?reallysearch wrote:Don't give up hope just yet.. I got my acceptance on Jan 1 at almost 5pm...
and good luck everyone!
- LSATSCORES2012

- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
IN!!!!!
Edited to add:
170/3.86, submitted 9/15, complete 11/2 (held for Oct. LSAT)
had two major typos on my resume
I thought the interview went poorly because my interviewer didn't seem to like me, but had I not been able to see them then I would have thought it went pretty well.
Super excited - right now, I think Chicago is my top choice!
Edited to add:
170/3.86, submitted 9/15, complete 11/2 (held for Oct. LSAT)
had two major typos on my resume
I thought the interview went poorly because my interviewer didn't seem to like me, but had I not been able to see them then I would have thought it went pretty well.
Super excited - right now, I think Chicago is my top choice!
Last edited by LSATSCORES2012 on Fri Feb 15, 2013 7:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Teflon_Don

- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login