Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
-
missvik218

- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:45 am
Post
by missvik218 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:20 pm
D. H2Oman wrote:missvik218 wrote:D. H2Oman wrote:
I think I count
I think you do too!
Thanks MissV, any chance you can pull some strings for me?
Idk how I got in so quickly ...!? I will do what I can, but let me get my scholly offer (fingers crossed) first, then I'll get pushy!
P.S. How did everyone change their names?!
-
stratocophic

- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Post
by stratocophic » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:24 pm
missvik218 wrote:D. H2Oman wrote:missvik218 wrote:D. H2Oman wrote:
I think I count
I think you do too!
Thanks MissV, any chance you can pull some strings for me?
Idk how I got in so quickly ...!? I will do what I can, but let me get my scholly offer (fingers crossed) first, then I'll get pushy!
P.S. How did everyone change their names?!
PM a mod and tell 'em you're concerned with security after the outing fiasco of the other night
-
D. H2Oman

- Posts: 7445
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:47 am
Post
by D. H2Oman » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:24 pm
missvik218 wrote:
Idk how I got in so quickly ...!? I will do what I can, but let me get my scholly offer (fingers crossed) first, then I'll get pushy!
P.S. How did everyone change their names?!

, I'm blaming you when I get waitlisted. You PM hawkeye if you want change. Don't change it though!
-
rapstar

- Posts: 161
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Post
by rapstar » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:25 pm
171; 3.9
applied in early november and updated to 2/3. nothing since.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
missvik218

- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:45 am
Post
by missvik218 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:25 pm
stratocophic wrote:
PM a mod and tell 'em you're concerned with security after the outing fiasco of the other night
Oh

Naw, I'm good .. just curious!
-
finalaspects

- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Post
by finalaspects » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:27 pm
rapstar wrote:171; 3.9
applied in early november and updated to 2/3. nothing since.
betting they assume you're a YP candidate.
-
stratocophic

- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Post
by stratocophic » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:28 pm
missvik218 wrote:stratocophic wrote:
PM a mod and tell 'em you're concerned with security after the outing fiasco of the other night
Oh

Naw, I'm good .. just curious!
Yeah I feel half of it was the lurkers and denizens of Bitter Pessimism changing identities for the fun of it... it may or may not have played a small part in my decision

-
missvik218

- Posts: 1103
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:45 am
Post
by missvik218 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:29 pm
stratocophic wrote:missvik218 wrote:stratocophic wrote:
PM a mod and tell 'em you're concerned with security after the outing fiasco of the other night
Oh

Naw, I'm good .. just curious!
Yeah I feel half of
it was the lurkers and denizens of Bitter Pessimism changing identities for the fun of it... it may or may not have played a small part in my decision

TITCR I'm sure.
Want to continue reading?
Register for access!
Did I mention it was FREE ?
Already a member? Login
-
utcris410

- Posts: 465
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:37 pm
Post
by utcris410 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:36 pm
mrm2083 wrote:lol the same thing just happened to me... Can we compile a list of people with numbers that should get in to WUSTL and are still in limbo so we all feel better. I'll start:
171/3.43
2/4 and still nothing
163/3.29 updated complete 2/4
-
Zapatero

- Posts: 517
- Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2008 7:14 pm
Post
by Zapatero » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:37 pm
utcris410 wrote:mrm2083 wrote:lol the same thing just happened to me... Can we compile a list of people with numbers that should get in to WUSTL and are still in limbo so we all feel better. I'll start:
171/3.43
2/4 and still nothing
163/3.29 updated complete 2/4
164/3.5, 2/4 update. Not exactly auto-admit numbers, but I thought I'd throw it out there.
-
finalaspects

- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Post
by finalaspects » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:43 pm
mrm2083 wrote:lol the same thing just happened to me... Can we compile a list of people with numbers that should get in to WUSTL and are still in limbo so we all feel better. I'll start:
171/3.43
2/4 and still nothing
what's the definition of "should get in"?
anyone with a high lsat (167?), and gpa doesn't matter?
-
stratocophic

- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Post
by stratocophic » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:45 pm
finalaspects wrote:mrm2083 wrote:lol the same thing just happened to me... Can we compile a list of people with numbers that should get in to WUSTL and are still in limbo so we all feel better. I'll start:
171/3.43
2/4 and still nothing
what's the definition of "should get in"?
anyone with a high lsat (167?), and gpa doesn't matter?
Within reason, yes. There'll be a couple of people dinged for YP or the council not liking their application (also a possibility if it's turned in at the very end of the cycle), but 167+ is generally considered safe ground as long as your GPA isn't unbelievably bad.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
finalaspects

- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Post
by finalaspects » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:46 pm
stratocophic wrote:finalaspects wrote:mrm2083 wrote:lol the same thing just happened to me... Can we compile a list of people with numbers that should get in to WUSTL and are still in limbo so we all feel better. I'll start:
171/3.43
2/4 and still nothing
what's the definition of "should get in"?
anyone with a high lsat (167?), and gpa doesn't matter?
Within reason, yes. There'll be a couple of people dinged for YP or the council not liking their application (also a possibility if it's turned in at the very end of the cycle), but 167+ is generally considered safe ground as long as your GPA isn't unbelievably bad.
whats an unbelievably bad gpa? 2.8?
-
84Sunbird2000

- Posts: 756
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:39 pm
Post
by 84Sunbird2000 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:47 pm
Well, I think I'm still pretty good - 166/3.75, only because my GPA is over 75th, which seems to be the magic criteria for 166ers on LSN.
-
D. H2Oman

- Posts: 7445
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:47 am
Post
by D. H2Oman » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:47 pm
finalaspects wrote:
whats an unbelievably bad gpa? 2.8?

-
finalaspects

- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Post
by finalaspects » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:48 pm
kwhitegocubs wrote:Well, I think I'm still pretty good - 166/3.75, only because my GPA is over 75th, which seems to be the magic criteria for 166ers on LSN.
according to WUSTL's site directly for 2012 class profile their 75% gpa = 3.8 their median = 3.7
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
finalaspects

- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Post
by finalaspects » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:49 pm
D. H2Oman wrote:finalaspects wrote:
whats an unbelievably bad gpa? 2.8?

don't worry i asked because my gpa is that bad too. but your 172 is incredible.
-
stratocophic

- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Post
by stratocophic » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:50 pm
kwhitegocubs wrote:Well, I think I'm still pretty good - 166/3.75, only because my GPA is over 75th, which seems to be the magic criteria for 166ers on LSN.
You're also above median for LSAT. I'd say you're autoadmit because you solidify both medians, but what do I know...
D. H2Oman wrote:finalaspects wrote:
whats an unbelievably bad gpa? 2.8?

Blatant anti-H20 trolling. We're talking people with 2.3-2.5 GPAs getting in, according to LSN. Not even URMs, in some cases.
Last edited by
stratocophic on Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
84Sunbird2000

- Posts: 756
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 5:39 pm
Post
by 84Sunbird2000 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:51 pm
So, is everyone on here anxious about the 4:30 time period? Is the Tuesday Smorgasboard about to continue?
-
stratocophic

- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Post
by stratocophic » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:52 pm
kwhitegocubs wrote:So, is everyone on here anxious about the 4:30 time period? Is the Tuesday Smorgasboard about to continue?
That's what I'm thinking. I'm wigging out waiting for 4:30-4:50, and have been since yesterday.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
-
finalaspects

- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Post
by finalaspects » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:53 pm
stratocophic wrote:kwhitegocubs wrote:Well, I think I'm still pretty good - 166/3.75, only because my GPA is over 75th, which seems to be the magic criteria for 166ers on LSN.
You're also above median for LSAT. I'd say you're autoadmit because you solidify both medians, but what do I know...
Blatant anti-H20 trolling. We're talking people with 2.3-2.5 GPAs getting in, according to LSN. Not even URMs, in some cases.
umm where are you guys getting these medians from. LSN has outdated information and their numbers are from over 3 years ago.
From WUSTL's site directly the class of 2012 (last years class) had these #'s
GPA = 3.3/3.7/3.8
LSAT = 161/167/168
%%% = 25/50/75 respectively
http://law.wustl.edu/admissions/documen ... rofile.pdf
Last edited by
finalaspects on Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
finalaspects

- Posts: 1866
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:21 am
Post
by finalaspects » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:55 pm
stratocophic wrote:
Blatant anti-H20 trolling. We're talking people with 2.3-2.5 GPAs getting in, according to LSN. Not even URMs, in some cases.
i didn't know what his gpa was nor who he was before i asked. i was asking for my own sake... i just signed up for WUSTL yesterday.
-
brose002

- Posts: 283
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 4:34 pm
Post
by brose002 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:56 pm
168/3.00 Stuck since 2/3
-
hiromoto45

- Posts: 690
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:05 pm
Post
by hiromoto45 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:56 pm
They sent acceptances yesterday morning...that's a change from their pattern. Unless someone knows more abbot their process?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login