+10000jk148706 wrote:I'm so scared. My body is not ready.ohpobrecito wrote:It appears so. If last cycle is any indication, however, there will be many more tomorrow.jk148706 wrote:Are the emails over!?
Post removed. Forum
- Ambi-Turner

- Posts: 166
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:12 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
- scoobysnax

- Posts: 208
- Joined: Fri Nov 15, 2013 3:51 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Ambi-Turner wrote:+10000jk148706 wrote:I'm so scared. My body is not ready.ohpobrecito wrote:It appears so. If last cycle is any indication, however, there will be many more tomorrow.jk148706 wrote:Are the emails over!?
-
jk148706

- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
For those denied or WL'd : did your status checker update as well?
-
flat-fifth

- Posts: 76
- Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:30 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
DING! 'Twas a reach, but I still need a hug... 
- gobears!!

- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:04 am
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by gobears!! on Tue Nov 10, 2015 12:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
hausmaus

- Posts: 20
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 8:36 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
the status checker now recognizes my wait listedness.jk148706 wrote:For those denied or WL'd : did your status checker update as well?
-
jk148706

- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
12/3 can't be auto rejects.. Got some good applicants still with that dategobears!! wrote:I was at work all day and just now saw how brutal...I thought quakers are supposed to be friendly folk!?! I am sorry for everyone and wish you the best of luck.
Hopefully us 12/3 folks were not auto-rejects going to hear back tomorrow
May the odds be ever in your favor. Let us drink in solidarity
-
SplitMyPants

- Posts: 1673
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:22 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Yeah, this is frighteningjk148706 wrote:I'm so scared. My body is not ready.ohpobrecito wrote:It appears so. If last cycle is any indication, however, there will be many more tomorrow.jk148706 wrote:Are the emails over!?
ETA: in reality, based on what we've seen today, I have little to no shot.
- gobears!!

- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:04 am
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by gobears!! on Tue Nov 10, 2015 12:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
JustHawkin

- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I just want to go complete...
- EzraFitz

- Posts: 764
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 10:42 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
My complete 12 weekiversary is tomorrow...gobears!! wrote:I have no clue but I am wondering why we are stagnant. I do know that my 12 week anniversary of submitting to Penn is very very near...probably tomorrow....jk148706 wrote:12/3 can't be auto rejects.. Got some good applicants still with that dategobears!! wrote:I was at work all day and just now saw how brutal...I thought quakers are supposed to be friendly folk!?! I am sorry for everyone and wish you the best of luck.
Hopefully us 12/3 folks were not auto-rejects going to hear back tomorrow
May the odds be ever in your favor. Let us drink in solidarity
eta: saving post 200 for news from a school.
- gobears!!

- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:04 am
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by gobears!! on Tue Nov 10, 2015 12:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
ConLawNerd91

- Posts: 88
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 2:42 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Waitlisted, no Why Penn (starting to regret that), UCR2 12/10. Does anyone know what their waitlist is like? Is there any chance of getting in, or is it basically a rejection?
- scorneli

- Posts: 70
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 8:16 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
WL tonight about 30 mins ago. Strange it was so late.
171/3.5, no why penn
171/3.5, no why penn
-
jk148706

- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
gobears!! wrote:I have no clue but I am wondering why we are stagnant. I do know that my 12 week anniversary of submitting to Penn is very very near...probably tomorrow....jk148706 wrote:12/3 can't be auto rejects.. Got some good applicants still with that dategobears!! wrote:I was at work all day and just now saw how brutal...I thought quakers are supposed to be friendly folk!?! I am sorry for everyone and wish you the best of luck.
Hopefully us 12/3 folks were not auto-rejects going to hear back tomorrow
May the odds be ever in your favor. Let us drink in solidarity
There is also this for us 12/3ers:
alex.cm wrote:In at Penn as of about 20 mins ago! I missed the call so it was via voicemail. I'm a little surprised because I only had 1 UR (12/3).
Submitted 10/21, complete 10/23, under review 12/3, which is what my status checker still said at 9 this am when I checked. 171/3.6 RD
Last edited by jk148706 on Thu Jan 16, 2014 10:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
04102014

- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
This makes me want to die.scorneli wrote:WL tonight about 30 mins ago. Strange it was so late.
171/3.5, no why penn
-
jk148706

- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
+1 omgohpobrecito wrote:This makes me want to die.scorneli wrote:WL tonight about 30 mins ago. Strange it was so late.
171/3.5, no why penn
- Ambi-Turner

- Posts: 166
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 11:12 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
+2jk148706 wrote:+1 omgohpobrecito wrote:This makes me want to die.scorneli wrote:WL tonight about 30 mins ago. Strange it was so late.
171/3.5, no why penn
-
Humbert Humbert

- Posts: 407
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 3:46 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
...
Last edited by Humbert Humbert on Thu Feb 06, 2014 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Humbert Humbert wrote:172, 3.85
WL
![]()
Ok penn
well, there goes any semblance of calm towards all this
- gobears!!

- Posts: 2080
- Joined: Mon Nov 11, 2013 12:04 am
Post removed.
Post removed.
Last edited by gobears!! on Tue Nov 10, 2015 12:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
jk148706

- Posts: 2502
- Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
HolyHumbert Humbert wrote:172, 3.85
WL
![]()
Ok penn
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
did you submit a why penn/have you killed someone/did you tell them your name was "Humbert Humbert" on TOP DASH LAW DASH SCHOOLS DOT COM in your essay???Humbert Humbert wrote:172, 3.85
WL
![]()
Ok penn
-
04102014

- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
iluscoobers wrote:did you submit a why penn/have you killed someone/did you tell them your name was "Humbert Humbert" on TOP DASH LAW DASH SCHOOLS DOT COM in your essay???Humbert Humbert wrote:172, 3.85
WL
![]()
Ok penn
- t14splitter

- Posts: 163
- Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 5:07 pm
Re: Penn c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Humbert Humbert wrote:172, 3.85
WL
![]()
Ok penn
When did you find out? In other words, are these emails still happening?