
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just had the real shitty realization that some of us are about to get denied 

- Rahviveh
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
grapefruits wrote:Just had the real shitty realization that some of us are about to get denied
I'd be surprised if you were one of them.
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checked my e-mail and got the 1/23 decision at 4:25 CST or about 40 minutes from now.
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My status JUST updated a few minutes ago...
GAH OMG OMG OMG IT IS HAPPENING GUYS.
This is my fourth update, I think.
GAH OMG OMG OMG IT IS HAPPENING GUYS.
This is my fourth update, I think.
- learntolift
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:31 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Me too :Oiteachtenthgrade wrote:My status JUST updated a few minutes ago...
GAH OMG OMG OMG IT IS HAPPENING GUYS.
This is my fourth update, I think.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:37 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
iteachtenthgrade wrote:My status JUST updated a few minutes ago...
GAH OMG OMG OMG IT IS HAPPENING GUYS.
This is my fourth update, I think.
hmmm, i must be in the next batch.
- JamesDean1955
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Ugh, this is looking more and more likely (I would have expected a twitter update to precede decisions by at least an hour to give people heads up, no update means they frantically tried and failed), although not Monday because of the holiday, they'll probably say next week.Teflon_Don wrote:A "sorry we couldn't finish today but decisions Monday" tweet is going to blow
- Rahviveh
- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
that likely means no decisions todaywhereskyle wrote:iteachtenthgrade wrote:My status JUST updated a few minutes ago...
GAH OMG OMG OMG IT IS HAPPENING GUYS.
This is my fourth update, I think.
hmmm, i must be in the next batch.
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
How d'ya figure?ChampagnePapi wrote:that likely means no decisions todaywhereskyle wrote:iteachtenthgrade wrote:My status JUST updated a few minutes ago...
GAH OMG OMG OMG IT IS HAPPENING GUYS.
This is my fourth update, I think.
hmmm, i must be in the next batch.
- JamesDean1955
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Lol. The economics of courtship.Crowing wrote:Oh come on, we're all UChicago prospies, so we all know that the situation would really unfold like this.JamesDean1955 wrote:Assuming we're all in, I call dibbs on the hottie interviewer.
Also, gee they're really making us wait right up until the wire here...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tTN-CVQuBR8
- venus
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No date change here 

- Teflon_Don
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No update here.. Still sitting at 2/14 with that being my third or fourth update, not sure
- clouded.memory
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I wonder if today's date changes are just the adcomms finalizing their list of admits/denies/WLs...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Teflon_Don
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
This will probably seem dumb, but I'm finding too different pieces of info regarding their LSAT median last year, was it 170 or 171? Thanks
- venus
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
According to what I could fine on their official website, 171.Teflon_Don wrote:This will probably seem dumb, but I'm finding too different pieces of info regarding their LSAT median last year, was it 170 or 171? Thanks
- Teflon_Don
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks!venus wrote:According to what I could fine on their official website, 171.Teflon_Don wrote:This will probably seem dumb, but I'm finding too different pieces of info regarding their LSAT median last year, was it 170 or 171? Thanks
- robot_socrates
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
30 minutes to go...c'mon Chicago!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
any other jan submitters come to this thread and have to remind themselves they actually applied to uchi at some point? talk about dead silence
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It's completely chronological so it's not that surprising - I think all of us who interviewed were mid-November submitters.az21833 wrote:any other jan submitters come to this thread and have to remind themselves they actually applied to uchi at some point? talk about dead silence
- learntolift
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:31 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
yupiteachtenthgrade wrote:It's completely chronological so it's not that surprising - I think all of us who interviewed were mid-November submitters.az21833 wrote:any other jan submitters come to this thread and have to remind themselves they actually applied to uchi at some point? talk about dead silence
- Teflon_Don
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Definitely losing hope for today, they're off work in 20 probably and there's not even a tweet. Sucks they got our hopes up
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
you could be right, but a lot of admissions people work way later than 5PM during the heat of the seasonTeflon_Don wrote:Definitely losing hope for today, they're off work in 20 probably and there's not even a tweet. Sucks they got our hopes up
- callmemaybe84
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm predicting, 5:05 CT tweet, decisions around 5:30
- JamesDean1955
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
They were probably about to release decisions, then checked up on this thread and saw that half of us were making comments about the hotness of one of their interviewers, found out who we are, then had to make a bunch of decision reversals that set everything back.
Oops.
Oops.
- Teflon_Don
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Alright so I just realized my emails are in lowercase.. All my other apps are uppercase. Anyone else's like this or could it mean possible decision rendered like stanford?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login