Berkeley 2010 Forum
- Mr.Feeny

- Posts: 58
- Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:59 am
Re: Berkeley 2010
im just wondering how dean tom has not yet called me, as i have exhibited loyalty through my mentoring of cory, topanga, and shawn throughout their adolescent and adult lives, in addition to my thorough knowledge of gardening and making stern facial expressions
- hoopsguy6

- Posts: 212
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:46 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
aetennis17 wrote:Just had a really discouraging meeting with our pre-law advisor.
I have a 164 & 3.99 gpa from a top univ with strong LOR's, (& what I believe to be a) great & unique PS, and above-average softs....
is there really no chance in hell that dean tom will accept me? even if I beg?
I think "no chance in hell" is way too strong. You have a shot imo. Maybe not a great one, but a decent one nonetheless if your softs/ps are really great. Not much you can do at this point, but hope for the best. Good luck!
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
Basically, you have everything in line except the LSAT, and Berkeley is generally a GPA-happy school. So you should have a perfectly decent chance, although obviously not an overwhelming one. Berkeley admissions patterns are extremely difficult to predict, since their approach is truly holistic. Just don't worry about it and hope for the best!aetennis17 wrote:Just had a really discouraging meeting with our pre-law advisor.
I have a 164 & 3.99 gpa from a top univ with strong LOR's, (& what I believe to be a) great & unique PS, and above-average softs....
is there really no chance in hell that dean tom will accept me? even if I beg?
- tintin

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:26 am
Re: Berkeley 2010
they seem pretty lsat happy this cycle....theyve been accepting high lsat / low gpa folks pretty much exclusively thus far.managamy wrote:
Basically, you have everything in line except the LSAT, and Berkeley is generally a GPA-happy school. So you should have a perfectly decent chance, although obviously not an overwhelming one. Berkeley admissions patterns are extremely difficult to predict, since their approach is truly holistic. Just don't worry about it and hope for the best!
not that im bitter or anything...
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
As a clever poster on the NYU thread argued, they may be trying to get the high LSAT people early in order to address a relative weakness. Meanwhile, NYU is going after high GPAs early to address their relative weakness. I haven't yet gotten a call, though, so the high-LSAT trend isn't universal.tintin wrote:they seem pretty lsat happy this cycle....theyve been accepting high lsat / low gpa folks pretty much exclusively thus far.managamy wrote:
Basically, you have everything in line except the LSAT, and Berkeley is generally a GPA-happy school. So you should have a perfectly decent chance, although obviously not an overwhelming one. Berkeley admissions patterns are extremely difficult to predict, since their approach is truly holistic. Just don't worry about it and hope for the best!
not that im bitter or anything...
Not that I'm bitter or anything either.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Saya

- Posts: 194
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:33 am
Re: Berkeley 2010
Hard to be bitter when you've got Harvard in the bag, eh? Not that I'm bitter or anything.managamy wrote:As a clever poster on the NYU thread argued, they may be trying to get the high LSAT people early in order to address a relative weakness. Meanwhile, NYU is going after high GPAs early to address their relative weakness. I haven't yet gotten a call, though, so the high-LSAT trend isn't universal.![]()
Not that I'm bitter or anything either.
- hoopsguy6

- Posts: 212
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:46 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
I'll trade my Berkeley acceptance with your Harvard one...managamy wrote:As a clever poster on the NYU thread argued, they may be trying to get the high LSAT people early in order to address a relative weakness. Meanwhile, NYU is going after high GPAs early to address their relative weakness. I haven't yet gotten a call, though, so the high-LSAT trend isn't universal.tintin wrote:they seem pretty lsat happy this cycle....theyve been accepting high lsat / low gpa folks pretty much exclusively thus far.managamy wrote:
Basically, you have everything in line except the LSAT, and Berkeley is generally a GPA-happy school. So you should have a perfectly decent chance, although obviously not an overwhelming one. Berkeley admissions patterns are extremely difficult to predict, since their approach is truly holistic. Just don't worry about it and hope for the best!
not that im bitter or anything...![]()
Not that I'm bitter or anything either.
Bleh... looks like I'm not getting a JR1... not that I'm bitter or anything
edit: <-- high LSAT, slightly lower GPA here
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
Just curious, how do you make marginal higher-lower comparisons between the different scales of LSAT and GPA? I understand in the case of splitters and reverse-splitters, but slight differences seem harder to relate.hoopsguy6 wrote:
I'll trade my Berkeley acceptance with your Harvard one...
Bleh... looks like I'm not getting a JR1... not that I'm bitter or anything
edit: <-- high LSAT, slightly lower GPA here
- hoopsguy6

- Posts: 212
- Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:46 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
At 75% for HYS for LSAT, above 25% but below median for GPA. Not quite splitter territory, but GPA is definitely weaker.managamy wrote:Just curious, how do you make marginal higher-lower comparisons between the different scales of LSAT and GPA? I understand in the case of splitters and reverse-splitters, but slight differences seem harder to relate.hoopsguy6 wrote:
I'll trade my Berkeley acceptance with your Harvard one...
Bleh... looks like I'm not getting a JR1... not that I'm bitter or anything
edit: <-- high LSAT, slightly lower GPA here
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
A mere phone call probably wouldn't express Dean Tom's appreciation of everything that you've done. I'm sure that he's trying to rearrange his schedule so that he can travel to where you live and congratulate you in person.Mr.Feeny wrote:im just wondering how dean tom has not yet called me, as i have exhibited loyalty through my mentoring of cory, topanga, and shawn throughout their adolescent and adult lives, in addition to my thorough knowledge of gardening and making stern facial expressions
Good luck!
- calicocat

- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
This belongs in the USS Optimism threadmanagamy wrote:A mere phone call probably wouldn't express Dean Tom's appreciation of everything that you've done. I'm sure that he's trying to rearrange his schedule so that he can travel to where you live and congratulate you in person.Mr.Feeny wrote:im just wondering how dean tom has not yet called me, as i have exhibited loyalty through my mentoring of cory, topanga, and shawn throughout their adolescent and adult lives, in addition to my thorough knowledge of gardening and making stern facial expressions![]()
Good luck!![]()
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
I was actually trying to emulate the tone of those posts, so thank you!Oli wrote:This belongs in the USS Optimism threadmanagamy wrote:A mere phone call probably wouldn't express Dean Tom's appreciation of everything that you've done. I'm sure that he's trying to rearrange his schedule so that he can travel to where you live and congratulate you in person.Mr.Feeny wrote:im just wondering how dean tom has not yet called me, as i have exhibited loyalty through my mentoring of cory, topanga, and shawn throughout their adolescent and adult lives, in addition to my thorough knowledge of gardening and making stern facial expressions![]()
Good luck!![]()
-
lsnoob

- Posts: 69
- Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:58 am
Re: Berkeley 2010
anybody?polydolly wrote:lsnoob wrote:So, those admitted via phone already, which phone number from your status checker did Dean Tom call you on?
I have listed a daytime phone number and my cell phone number. Curious if I should be obsessing over one or the other. Thanks!
+1
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CardinalRules

- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
I imagine that the admits are still too intoxicated with the elixir of euphoria to answer this prosaic question. But it would be nice to know.lsnoob wrote:anybody?polydolly wrote:lsnoob wrote:So, those admitted via phone already, which phone number from your status checker did Dean Tom call you on?
I have listed a daytime phone number and my cell phone number. Curious if I should be obsessing over one or the other. Thanks!
+1
-
truevines

- Posts: 200
- Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:16 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
I think you have a shot but not now. You probably would be accepted after the committee review if any.aetennis17 wrote:Just had a really discouraging meeting with our pre-law advisor.
I have a 164 & 3.99 gpa from a top univ with strong LOR's, (& what I believe to be a) great & unique PS, and above-average softs....
is there really no chance in hell that dean tom will accept me? even if I beg?
So, don't worry now if you don't get a call from Dean Tom. No news is good news for you, at least until February.
- Laina

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:16 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
managamy wrote:I imagine that the admits are still too intoxicated with the elixir of euphoria to answer this prosaic question. But it would be nice to know.lsnoob wrote:anybody?polydolly wrote:lsnoob wrote:So, those admitted via phone already, which phone number from your status checker did Dean Tom call you on?
I have listed a daytime phone number and my cell phone number. Curious if I should be obsessing over one or the other. Thanks!
+1
Hah, sorry guys. I apparently either didn't put a daytime number on the application (or they didn't put it on my status checker), but he called me on my cell. And for the question upthread, I called back and he immediately knew who I was and remembered meeting me at an info session a couple of months ago.
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
I don't believe I qualify under that criterion.tintin wrote:they seem pretty lsat happy this cycle....theyve been accepting high lsat / low gpa folks pretty much exclusively thus far.managamy wrote:
Basically, you have everything in line except the LSAT, and Berkeley is generally a GPA-happy school. So you should have a perfectly decent chance, although obviously not an overwhelming one. Berkeley admissions patterns are extremely difficult to predict, since their approach is truly holistic. Just don't worry about it and hope for the best!
not that im bitter or anything...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Amelie

- Posts: 814
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:19 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
Neither do I...crackberry wrote:I don't believe I qualify under that criterion.tintin wrote:they seem pretty lsat happy this cycle....theyve been accepting high lsat / low gpa folks pretty much exclusively thus far.managamy wrote:
Basically, you have everything in line except the LSAT, and Berkeley is generally a GPA-happy school. So you should have a perfectly decent chance, although obviously not an overwhelming one. Berkeley admissions patterns are extremely difficult to predict, since their approach is truly holistic. Just don't worry about it and hope for the best!
not that im bitter or anything...
- tintin

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:26 am
Re: Berkeley 2010
sorry, i meant high lsat people AND people some people with low (for berkeley) gpas and high lsats. not exclusively one or the other....maggiebre wrote:Neither do I...crackberry wrote:I don't believe I qualify under that criterion.tintin wrote:they seem pretty lsat happy this cycle....theyve been accepting high lsat / low gpa folks pretty much exclusively thus far.managamy wrote:
Basically, you have everything in line except the LSAT, and Berkeley is generally a GPA-happy school. So you should have a perfectly decent chance, although obviously not an overwhelming one. Berkeley admissions patterns are extremely difficult to predict, since their approach is truly holistic. Just don't worry about it and hope for the best!
not that im bitter or anything...
- Legacy316

- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:57 am
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
protokurios

- Posts: 196
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 10:49 am
Re: Berkeley 2010
The lighting looks different as it switches from Yoo to the guy in black...not quite sure if it's real.Legacy316 wrote:I wonder if this stuff always happens at Berkeley....
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5v0d25QydCU
- Legacy316

- Posts: 250
- Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:57 am
Re: Berkeley 2010
I wonder if the professor they were making fun of actually did get fired.
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
Still on their faculty roster, so probably not. I would refuse to take his classes, though.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login