Berkeley 2010 Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
Mr.Feeny

New
Posts: 58
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:59 am

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by Mr.Feeny » Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:20 pm

im just wondering how dean tom has not yet called me, as i have exhibited loyalty through my mentoring of cory, topanga, and shawn throughout their adolescent and adult lives, in addition to my thorough knowledge of gardening and making stern facial expressions

User avatar
hoopsguy6

Bronze
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:46 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by hoopsguy6 » Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:30 pm

aetennis17 wrote:Just had a really discouraging meeting with our pre-law advisor.

I have a 164 & 3.99 gpa from a top univ with strong LOR's, (& what I believe to be a) great & unique PS, and above-average softs....

is there really no chance in hell that dean tom will accept me? even if I beg?

I think "no chance in hell" is way too strong. You have a shot imo. Maybe not a great one, but a decent one nonetheless if your softs/ps are really great. Not much you can do at this point, but hope for the best. Good luck!

User avatar
CardinalRules

Gold
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by CardinalRules » Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:43 pm

aetennis17 wrote:Just had a really discouraging meeting with our pre-law advisor.

I have a 164 & 3.99 gpa from a top univ with strong LOR's, (& what I believe to be a) great & unique PS, and above-average softs....

is there really no chance in hell that dean tom will accept me? even if I beg?
Basically, you have everything in line except the LSAT, and Berkeley is generally a GPA-happy school. So you should have a perfectly decent chance, although obviously not an overwhelming one. Berkeley admissions patterns are extremely difficult to predict, since their approach is truly holistic. Just don't worry about it and hope for the best!

User avatar
tintin

Silver
Posts: 952
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:26 am

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by tintin » Sun Dec 06, 2009 8:13 pm

managamy wrote:
Basically, you have everything in line except the LSAT, and Berkeley is generally a GPA-happy school. So you should have a perfectly decent chance, although obviously not an overwhelming one. Berkeley admissions patterns are extremely difficult to predict, since their approach is truly holistic. Just don't worry about it and hope for the best!
they seem pretty lsat happy this cycle....theyve been accepting high lsat / low gpa folks pretty much exclusively thus far.

not that im bitter or anything... :roll:

User avatar
CardinalRules

Gold
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by CardinalRules » Sun Dec 06, 2009 8:18 pm

tintin wrote:
managamy wrote:
Basically, you have everything in line except the LSAT, and Berkeley is generally a GPA-happy school. So you should have a perfectly decent chance, although obviously not an overwhelming one. Berkeley admissions patterns are extremely difficult to predict, since their approach is truly holistic. Just don't worry about it and hope for the best!
they seem pretty lsat happy this cycle....theyve been accepting high lsat / low gpa folks pretty much exclusively thus far.

not that im bitter or anything... :roll:
As a clever poster on the NYU thread argued, they may be trying to get the high LSAT people early in order to address a relative weakness. Meanwhile, NYU is going after high GPAs early to address their relative weakness. I haven't yet gotten a call, though, so the high-LSAT trend isn't universal. :lol:

Not that I'm bitter or anything either. :wink:

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
Saya

Bronze
Posts: 194
Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:33 am

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by Saya » Sun Dec 06, 2009 8:21 pm

managamy wrote:As a clever poster on the NYU thread argued, they may be trying to get the high LSAT people early in order to address a relative weakness. Meanwhile, NYU is going after high GPAs early to address their relative weakness. I haven't yet gotten a call, though, so the high-LSAT trend isn't universal. :lol:

Not that I'm bitter or anything either. :wink:
Hard to be bitter when you've got Harvard in the bag, eh? Not that I'm bitter or anything. 8)

User avatar
hoopsguy6

Bronze
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:46 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by hoopsguy6 » Sun Dec 06, 2009 8:43 pm

managamy wrote:
tintin wrote:
managamy wrote:
Basically, you have everything in line except the LSAT, and Berkeley is generally a GPA-happy school. So you should have a perfectly decent chance, although obviously not an overwhelming one. Berkeley admissions patterns are extremely difficult to predict, since their approach is truly holistic. Just don't worry about it and hope for the best!
they seem pretty lsat happy this cycle....theyve been accepting high lsat / low gpa folks pretty much exclusively thus far.

not that im bitter or anything... :roll:
As a clever poster on the NYU thread argued, they may be trying to get the high LSAT people early in order to address a relative weakness. Meanwhile, NYU is going after high GPAs early to address their relative weakness. I haven't yet gotten a call, though, so the high-LSAT trend isn't universal. :lol:

Not that I'm bitter or anything either. :wink:
I'll trade my Berkeley acceptance with your Harvard one...

Bleh... looks like I'm not getting a JR1... not that I'm bitter or anything :cry:

edit: <-- high LSAT, slightly lower GPA here

User avatar
CardinalRules

Gold
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by CardinalRules » Sun Dec 06, 2009 8:48 pm

hoopsguy6 wrote:

I'll trade my Berkeley acceptance with your Harvard one...

Bleh... looks like I'm not getting a JR1... not that I'm bitter or anything :cry:

edit: <-- high LSAT, slightly lower GPA here
Just curious, how do you make marginal higher-lower comparisons between the different scales of LSAT and GPA? I understand in the case of splitters and reverse-splitters, but slight differences seem harder to relate.

User avatar
hoopsguy6

Bronze
Posts: 212
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2009 7:46 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by hoopsguy6 » Sun Dec 06, 2009 8:53 pm

managamy wrote:
hoopsguy6 wrote:

I'll trade my Berkeley acceptance with your Harvard one...

Bleh... looks like I'm not getting a JR1... not that I'm bitter or anything :cry:

edit: <-- high LSAT, slightly lower GPA here
Just curious, how do you make marginal higher-lower comparisons between the different scales of LSAT and GPA? I understand in the case of splitters and reverse-splitters, but slight differences seem harder to relate.
At 75% for HYS for LSAT, above 25% but below median for GPA. Not quite splitter territory, but GPA is definitely weaker.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
CardinalRules

Gold
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by CardinalRules » Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:00 pm

Mr.Feeny wrote:im just wondering how dean tom has not yet called me, as i have exhibited loyalty through my mentoring of cory, topanga, and shawn throughout their adolescent and adult lives, in addition to my thorough knowledge of gardening and making stern facial expressions
A mere phone call probably wouldn't express Dean Tom's appreciation of everything that you've done. I'm sure that he's trying to rearrange his schedule so that he can travel to where you live and congratulate you in person. :wink:

Good luck! :D :D

User avatar
calicocat

Silver
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by calicocat » Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:25 pm

managamy wrote:
Mr.Feeny wrote:im just wondering how dean tom has not yet called me, as i have exhibited loyalty through my mentoring of cory, topanga, and shawn throughout their adolescent and adult lives, in addition to my thorough knowledge of gardening and making stern facial expressions
A mere phone call probably wouldn't express Dean Tom's appreciation of everything that you've done. I'm sure that he's trying to rearrange his schedule so that he can travel to where you live and congratulate you in person. :wink:

Good luck! :D :D
This belongs in the USS Optimism thread :D

User avatar
CardinalRules

Gold
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by CardinalRules » Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:27 pm

Oli wrote:
managamy wrote:
Mr.Feeny wrote:im just wondering how dean tom has not yet called me, as i have exhibited loyalty through my mentoring of cory, topanga, and shawn throughout their adolescent and adult lives, in addition to my thorough knowledge of gardening and making stern facial expressions
A mere phone call probably wouldn't express Dean Tom's appreciation of everything that you've done. I'm sure that he's trying to rearrange his schedule so that he can travel to where you live and congratulate you in person. :wink:

Good luck! :D :D
This belongs in the USS Optimism thread :D
I was actually trying to emulate the tone of those posts, so thank you! :)

lsnoob

New
Posts: 69
Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 10:58 am

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by lsnoob » Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:48 pm

polydolly wrote:
lsnoob wrote:So, those admitted via phone already, which phone number from your status checker did Dean Tom call you on?

I have listed a daytime phone number and my cell phone number. Curious if I should be obsessing over one or the other. Thanks!


+1
anybody?

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
CardinalRules

Gold
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by CardinalRules » Sun Dec 06, 2009 10:03 pm

lsnoob wrote:
polydolly wrote:
lsnoob wrote:So, those admitted via phone already, which phone number from your status checker did Dean Tom call you on?

I have listed a daytime phone number and my cell phone number. Curious if I should be obsessing over one or the other. Thanks!


+1
anybody?
I imagine that the admits are still too intoxicated with the elixir of euphoria to answer this prosaic question. But it would be nice to know.

truevines

Bronze
Posts: 200
Joined: Fri Jun 20, 2008 6:16 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by truevines » Sun Dec 06, 2009 10:23 pm

aetennis17 wrote:Just had a really discouraging meeting with our pre-law advisor.

I have a 164 & 3.99 gpa from a top univ with strong LOR's, (& what I believe to be a) great & unique PS, and above-average softs....

is there really no chance in hell that dean tom will accept me? even if I beg?
I think you have a shot but not now. You probably would be accepted after the committee review if any.
So, don't worry now if you don't get a call from Dean Tom. No news is good news for you, at least until February.

User avatar
Laina

Bronze
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 5:16 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by Laina » Sun Dec 06, 2009 11:06 pm

managamy wrote:
lsnoob wrote:
polydolly wrote:
lsnoob wrote:So, those admitted via phone already, which phone number from your status checker did Dean Tom call you on?

I have listed a daytime phone number and my cell phone number. Curious if I should be obsessing over one or the other. Thanks!


+1
anybody?
I imagine that the admits are still too intoxicated with the elixir of euphoria to answer this prosaic question. But it would be nice to know.

Hah, sorry guys. I apparently either didn't put a daytime number on the application (or they didn't put it on my status checker), but he called me on my cell. And for the question upthread, I called back and he immediately knew who I was and remembered meeting me at an info session a couple of months ago.

User avatar
crackberry

Gold
Posts: 3252
Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by crackberry » Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:04 am

tintin wrote:
managamy wrote:
Basically, you have everything in line except the LSAT, and Berkeley is generally a GPA-happy school. So you should have a perfectly decent chance, although obviously not an overwhelming one. Berkeley admissions patterns are extremely difficult to predict, since their approach is truly holistic. Just don't worry about it and hope for the best!
they seem pretty lsat happy this cycle....theyve been accepting high lsat / low gpa folks pretty much exclusively thus far.

not that im bitter or anything... :roll:
I don't believe I qualify under that criterion.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Eigenvalue A

New
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:35 am

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by Eigenvalue A » Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:06 am

^ditto

Amelie

Silver
Posts: 814
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:19 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by Amelie » Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:10 am

crackberry wrote:
tintin wrote:
managamy wrote:
Basically, you have everything in line except the LSAT, and Berkeley is generally a GPA-happy school. So you should have a perfectly decent chance, although obviously not an overwhelming one. Berkeley admissions patterns are extremely difficult to predict, since their approach is truly holistic. Just don't worry about it and hope for the best!
they seem pretty lsat happy this cycle....theyve been accepting high lsat / low gpa folks pretty much exclusively thus far.

not that im bitter or anything... :roll:
I don't believe I qualify under that criterion.
Neither do I...

User avatar
tintin

Silver
Posts: 952
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:26 am

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by tintin » Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:16 am

maggiebre wrote:
crackberry wrote:
tintin wrote:
managamy wrote:
Basically, you have everything in line except the LSAT, and Berkeley is generally a GPA-happy school. So you should have a perfectly decent chance, although obviously not an overwhelming one. Berkeley admissions patterns are extremely difficult to predict, since their approach is truly holistic. Just don't worry about it and hope for the best!
they seem pretty lsat happy this cycle....theyve been accepting high lsat / low gpa folks pretty much exclusively thus far.

not that im bitter or anything... :roll:
I don't believe I qualify under that criterion.
Neither do I...
sorry, i meant high lsat people AND people some people with low (for berkeley) gpas and high lsats. not exclusively one or the other....

User avatar
Legacy316

Bronze
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:57 am

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by Legacy316 » Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:17 am

I wonder if this stuff always happens at Berkeley....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5v0d25QydCU

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


protokurios

Bronze
Posts: 196
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 10:49 am

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by protokurios » Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:31 am

Legacy316 wrote:I wonder if this stuff always happens at Berkeley....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5v0d25QydCU
The lighting looks different as it switches from Yoo to the guy in black...not quite sure if it's real.

Kronk

Diamond
Posts: 32987
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by Kronk » Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:34 am

Yeah it's a spoof.

User avatar
Legacy316

Bronze
Posts: 250
Joined: Sun May 25, 2008 5:57 am

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by Legacy316 » Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:38 am

I wonder if the professor they were making fun of actually did get fired.

Kronk

Diamond
Posts: 32987
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm

Re: Berkeley 2010

Post by Kronk » Mon Dec 07, 2009 12:42 am

Still on their faculty roster, so probably not. I would refuse to take his classes, though.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”