I'm not worried about employment after graduation and I certainly don't care if my school is "invisible". I want to go to a school that I LIKE and that I feel will support my legal education. I'm not going to get into Stanford and I went to Berkeley for undergrad (don't care to spend three more years there). I really don't feel that you, Anonymous Poster, has enough information about me or anyone else on this forum to make major decisions like where we should spend the next three years of our lives.Anon234 wrote:Do not go there unless they give you a scholarship you can't turn down. They cannot compete with Stanford and Berkeley. They aren't even third tier in the area....they are invisible
Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014) Forum
- qapla
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 2:14 pm
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
But I would at least consider the implications. That poster was a little direct. but I think it is fair to say that SCU has lower employment stats than some of its fellow schools in the area so the debt is a concern.qapla wrote:I'm not worried about employment after graduation and I certainly don't care if my school is "invisible". I want to go to a school that I LIKE and that I feel will support my legal education. I'm not going to get into Stanford and I went to Berkeley for undergrad (don't care to spend three more years there). I really don't feel that you, Anonymous Poster, has enough information about me or anyone else on this forum to make major decisions like where we should spend the next three years of our lives.Anon234 wrote:Do not go there unless they give you a scholarship you can't turn down. They cannot compete with Stanford and Berkeley. They aren't even third tier in the area....they are invisible
What kind of law are you thinking about by the way? Are you considering Hastings? I'm out at Berkeley and Stanford as well but I'm not sure I want to commit to SCU given the scholarship offer and stip and its retention rate.
- qapla
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 2:14 pm
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I'm not really considering Hastings. Everyone I know who went there has terrible things to say and it's in the Tenderloin.Moonlight wrote:But I would at least consider the implications. That poster was a little direct. but I think it is fair to say that SCU has lower employment stats than some of its fellow schools in the area so the debt is a concern.qapla wrote:I'm not worried about employment after graduation and I certainly don't care if my school is "invisible". I want to go to a school that I LIKE and that I feel will support my legal education. I'm not going to get into Stanford and I went to Berkeley for undergrad (don't care to spend three more years there). I really don't feel that you, Anonymous Poster, has enough information about me or anyone else on this forum to make major decisions like where we should spend the next three years of our lives.Anon234 wrote:Do not go there unless they give you a scholarship you can't turn down. They cannot compete with Stanford and Berkeley. They aren't even third tier in the area....they are invisible
What kind of law are you thinking about by the way? Are you considering Hastings? I'm out at Berkeley and Stanford as well but I'm not sure I want to commit to SCU given the scholarship offer and stip and its retention rate.
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Terrible things to say? Like what? Would you mind sharing? You can PM me if that's better for you.
- Dingo Starr
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:50 am
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Also curious about this, if you don't mind. Hastings is still near the top of the heap for me.Moonlight wrote:Terrible things to say? Like what? Would you mind sharing? You can PM me if that's better for you.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Rankings killed us this year. Hastings 54 and SCU 107 and USF off ranks. McGeorge off ranks as well.Dingo Starr wrote:Also curious about this, if you don't mind. Hastings is still near the top of the heap for me.Moonlight wrote:Terrible things to say? Like what? Would you mind sharing? You can PM me if that's better for you.
Do you think the employment stats on USN are correct? 30% for Hastings and 17% for SCU?
- Dingo Starr
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:50 am
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Call me crazy, but I think the numbers at LST are more valid than USNWR.Moonlight wrote: Do you think the employment stats on USN are correct? 30% for Hastings and 17% for SCU?
Either way, though, they do not paint a pretty picture.
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
That's for sure...Dingo Starr wrote:Call me crazy, but I think the numbers at LST are more valid than USNWR.Moonlight wrote: Do you think the employment stats on USN are correct? 30% for Hastings and 17% for SCU?
Either way, though, they do not paint a pretty picture.
We were all a few years late to the party. Should have gotten on board when the market was hot.
- Dingo Starr
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:50 am
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Also this.jenesaislaw wrote:The data U.S. News uses are the data that have been used on the LST CA report for almost a year. It's all 2012 graduation class data.
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
So are you taking it as a + or a -?Dingo Starr wrote:Also this.jenesaislaw wrote:The data U.S. News uses are the data that have been used on the LST CA report for almost a year. It's all 2012 graduation class data.
- Dingo Starr
- Posts: 228
- Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2013 4:50 am
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Really, they are different metrics using the same data base.Moonlight wrote: So are you taking it as a + or a -?
I was just pointing out that it is not new data that USNWR is taking in, just new data they are spewing out.
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
True that. Is last year's USNWR based on 2011 data then?Dingo Starr wrote:Really, they are different metrics using the same data base.Moonlight wrote: So are you taking it as a + or a -?
I was just pointing out that it is not new data that USNWR is taking in, just new data they are spewing out.
I was wondering if this means we can be hopeful of a potential turn around given that this past year's employment stats aren't in the pipeline yet.
- starchild
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 9:29 pm
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Sounds terrible.. have you heard anything? I applied 1/17 and am still waiting. Stupid diversity day.missjables16 wrote:+1astrodoggy wrote:In Committee since 12/20... wtf!
I applied 11/12 and went complete the next day. WTF is right!!
Those of you still waiting on a decision - did you receive an email invitation to "Law Diversity Day" today? These promo emails get me everytime!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- qapla
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 2:14 pm
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
What I have been told:Moonlight wrote:Terrible things to say? Like what? Would you mind sharing? You can PM me if that's better for you.
Colleague #1: "Eh...don't go there. It's....not a great place."
Colleague #2: "Strongly consider going to another school. Hastings is depressing."
Colleague #3: "Hastings is okay, if you can get into any of the classes you want, which you probably can't."
All three seem to hold the mentality that Hastings is a well-enough ranked place to go, if you must. Not one of these people has ever laughed or glowed about their Hastings experiences.
I personally cannot imagine taking BART into the Tenderloin every day. If you're someone who is *totally energized* by San Francisco, then I can imagine you might feel differently. I care, first and foremost, about being safe and not having weird men follow me around after class. As a tall redhead, I cannot justify the enormous amount of personal risk that going to school in such a sketchy area is bundled with.
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
qapla wrote:What I have been told:Moonlight wrote:Terrible things to say? Like what? Would you mind sharing? You can PM me if that's better for you.
Colleague #1: "Eh...don't go there. It's....not a great place."
Colleague #2: "Strongly consider going to another school. Hastings is depressing."
Colleague #3: "Hastings is okay, if you can get into any of the classes you want, which you probably can't."
All three seem to hold the mentality that Hastings is a well-enough ranked place to go, if you must. Not one of these people has ever laughed or glowed about their Hastings experiences.
I personally cannot imagine taking BART into the Tenderloin every day. If you're someone who is *totally energized* by San Francisco, then I can imagine you might feel differently. I care, first and foremost, about being safe and not having weird men follow me around after class. As a tall redhead, I cannot justify the enormous amount of personal risk that going to school in such a sketchy area is bundled with.
Hmm interesting. Would you take Santa Clara over Hastings for those reasons though? Even with the ran drop from 96 to 107 and the employment stats?
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 1:06 pm
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
For those that were accepted, how long did it take to get your admission packet? Also was scholarship information included in packet or email?
Went under review 3/7, got decision on 3/9. No packet yet and I live pretty close.
.
Went under review 3/7, got decision on 3/9. No packet yet and I live pretty close.
.
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I was Early App. Took maybe 2 weeks and the scholarship was included at a later date smaller envelope.Shirosham wrote:For those that were accepted, how long did it take to get your admission packet? Also was scholarship information included in packet or email?
Went under review 3/7, got decision on 3/9. No packet yet and I live pretty close.
.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- qapla
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Oct 30, 2013 2:14 pm
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Likely. I have a standing job offer at the firm I currently work for. Would I take Santa Clara over Boalt? Hell no. But I don't think the difference between Hastings and Santa Clara is that significant to potential employers. Would I rather be top 10% at Santa Clara or top 50% at Hastings? SCU all the way. I could be totally wrong but that's my gut feeling. I *really* care more about being a happy person than anything else. I don't intend to scramble to pay off hefty loans from Hastings, spending my time in the armpit of San Francisco, just to get a more competitive job offer from a firm that wants me to work 70 hours per week so I can make $50k per year more. I think my goals may differ from many other TLS posters and I think what makes each of us happy should impact our school choice more than rank.Moonlight wrote:qapla wrote:What I have been told:Moonlight wrote:Terrible things to say? Like what? Would you mind sharing? You can PM me if that's better for you.
Colleague #1: "Eh...don't go there. It's....not a great place."
Colleague #2: "Strongly consider going to another school. Hastings is depressing."
Colleague #3: "Hastings is okay, if you can get into any of the classes you want, which you probably can't."
All three seem to hold the mentality that Hastings is a well-enough ranked place to go, if you must. Not one of these people has ever laughed or glowed about their Hastings experiences.
I personally cannot imagine taking BART into the Tenderloin every day. If you're someone who is *totally energized* by San Francisco, then I can imagine you might feel differently. I care, first and foremost, about being safe and not having weird men follow me around after class. As a tall redhead, I cannot justify the enormous amount of personal risk that going to school in such a sketchy area is bundled with.
Hmm interesting. Would you take Santa Clara over Hastings for those reasons though? Even with the ran drop from 96 to 107 and the employment stats?
What are your long-term career goals?
I think it's also worth mentioning that this year's (2015) employment rankings were based on data collected from students who graduated in 2012. It's not irrelevant but it also doesn't seem too predictive for students who are graduating in 2017 or 2018.
-
- Posts: 753
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 2:19 am
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Oh yea that's true. I totally understand your concerns and I actually support the happy person thought. But given me being a K-JD, I'm looking for a career focused approach for the moment. My long term career goals are floating. I'm open to a lot of different paths. But for time being, I'd like big law bur would be just as happy with mid to large firms or in-house.qapla wrote:
Likely. I have a standing job offer at the firm I currently work for. Would I take Santa Clara over Boalt? Hell no. But I don't think the difference between Hastings and Santa Clara is that significant to potential employers. Would I rather be top 10% at Santa Clara or top 50% at Hastings? SCU all the way. I could be totally wrong but that's my gut feeling. I *really* care more about being a happy person than anything else. I don't intend to scramble to pay off hefty loans from Hastings, spending my time in the armpit of San Francisco, just to get a more competitive job offer from a firm that wants me to work 70 hours per week so I can make $50k per year more. I think my goals may differ from many other TLS posters and I think what makes each of us happy should impact our school choice more than rank.
What are your long-term career goals?
I think it's also worth mentioning that this year's (2015) employment rankings were based on data collected from students who graduated in 2012. It's not irrelevant but it also doesn't seem too predictive for students who are graduating in 2017 or 2018.
I like the point about employment stats.
You have a 30k with scu right? Does it have stips? Are you worried about that?
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 1:06 pm
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Anyone successful with negotiating? Got the 30k with SCU but I'm probably going to be looking for a bit more before I make serious plans.
Only other place I've heard back is Pepperdine w/ 15k.
Only other place I've heard back is Pepperdine w/ 15k.
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 7:27 pm
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
anyone know if it is good or bad i haven't heard from santa clara yet. Went complete in early november with 158/3.2
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Thu Feb 20, 2014 8:42 pm
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
qapla wrote:What I have been told:Moonlight wrote:Terrible things to say? Like what? Would you mind sharing? You can PM me if that's better for you.
Colleague #1: "Eh...don't go there. It's....not a great place."
Colleague #2: "Strongly consider going to another school. Hastings is depressing."
Colleague #3: "Hastings is okay, if you can get into any of the classes you want, which you probably can't."
All three seem to hold the mentality that Hastings is a well-enough ranked place to go, if you must. Not one of these people has ever laughed or glowed about their Hastings experiences.
I personally cannot imagine taking BART into the Tenderloin every day. If you're someone who is *totally energized* by San Francisco, then I can imagine you might feel differently. I care, first and foremost, about being safe and not having weird men follow me around after class. As a tall redhead, I cannot justify the enormous amount of personal risk that going to school in such a sketchy area is bundled with.
San Francisco native here and I completely agree with you! I didn't even apply to Hastings because of all the horrible things I've heard from students that went there. Yes, it's close to all the major courthouses in SF and its decently ranked, but most people I've talked to say the best part of Hastings is graduating.
- Cal Trask
- Posts: 4720
- Joined: Tue Nov 19, 2013 7:40 pm
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
better to not have heard than be rejected, no?jstellini wrote:anyone know if it is good or bad i haven't heard from santa clara yet. Went complete in early november with 158/3.2
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:06 pm
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
That's what I keep telling myself!Cal Trask wrote:better to not have heard than be rejected, no?jstellini wrote:anyone know if it is good or bad i haven't heard from santa clara yet. Went complete in early november with 158/3.2
I went complete in early Nov as well, so I feel your pain!
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 1:06 pm
Re: Santa Clara c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Have you called and asked about your app yet? I submitted on deadline 2/15, went under review a few weeks later and got a decision two days after review.complete es16 wrote:That's what I keep telling myself!Cal Trask wrote:better to not have heard than be rejected, no?jstellini wrote:anyone know if it is good or bad i haven't heard from santa clara yet. Went complete in early november with 158/3.2
I went complete in early Nov as well, so I feel your pain!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login