Duke NOT Priority Track Forum

[Hannibal]

Menage a quad? It's getting a little crowded.

[mst]

No, we're keeping it at 3 BFF's. Because.....we're the three best friends that anybody could have, we're the three best friends that anybody could have, we're the three best friends that anybody could have, and we'll never ever ever ever ever leave eachotherrrr cuz we're the three....

[Hannibal]

I just realized what your tar is and I can't tell if I hate it or love it.

[kazu]

Hanni, don't worry about Duke because you're going to be at NYU with me.

Awwwwwwwwww.

Do I spot potential BFFs?

We already are. Step up your creeping game, kazu.

Sorry Hanni I've been slacking

[mst]

I just realized what your tar is and I can't tell if I hate it or love it.

I like it. Although it did take a while to discover what color mauve was.

[Fresh]

Applied 10/29
Complete 11/1
Under Review 11/8

how long have folks been waiting to hear back after "Under Review"??

[cigrainger]

Applied 10/29
Complete 11/1
Under Review 11/8

how long have folks been waiting to hear back after "Under Review"??

I've been under review since 10/25. Submitted 10/12.

[crossingforHYS]

I have been under review since 10/12

[r6_philly]

I have been under review since 10/12

10/11. Hopefully, soon...

[kk19131]

It annoys me that this school is keeping tons of people under review... yet still finds the room to add even MORE people to the "under review" group.

[ajcollege]

It annoys me that this school is keeping tons of people under review... yet still finds the room to add even MORE people to the "under review" group.

Well, you could always withdraw. That'd show 'em!

[kk19131]

It annoys me that this school is keeping tons of people under review... yet still finds the room to add even MORE people to the "under review" group.

Well, you could always withdraw. That'd show 'em!

After I've paid 12 bucks?

Fat chance.

[abarrios]

Under review on 11/8 also.

[jeremychristiansen]

Under review since 10/12

[DorianGray89]

Under review on 11/8 also.

when did you submit?

[abarrios]

Under review on 11/8 also.

when did you submit?

10/25

[DreamShake]

I have been under review since 10/12

10/11. Hopefully, soon...

I have been under review since 10/12

Well, that's dispiriting. Went UR on 11/8, had gotten excited thinking it'd be only a couple more days.

I'm a little confused by PT--when I submitted on LSAC, I found out Duke had waived my app fee. Never got an email from them to that effect or anything. Anybody have an idea of whether I preempted a PT e-mail by applying (applied 3-4 days after I got my new LSAT score), or was it just a normal merit-based waiver?

[daisyduke]

I have been UR since 10/11... Come on RD decisions!

[Deuce]

Riding the UR 10/12 train.

[r6_philly]

Riding the UR 10/12 train.

Slacker

[crossingforHYS]

Riding the UR 10/12 train.

Slacker

its been an official month for us....

[DorianGray89]

Just went under review... Duke is my first choice, hopefully I won't have to wait long (although I think I will)

[kk19131]

... yet again...

It annoys me that this school is keeping tons of people under review... yet still finds the room to add even MORE people to the "under review" group.

[ajcollege]

... yet again...

It annoys me that this school is keeping tons of people under review... yet still finds the room to add even MORE people to the "under review" group.

Why does that annoy you? It's possible, and likely, that there's a multi-step review process.In the admission process at my UG, we had one reviewer read your app, hand it to another reviewer for their thoughts, then hand the app up to the board for final vote-up or down. Step two or three could be bottlenecked and reviewer 1 could still be reviewing a different file (and hence, the new file would legitimately be "under review"). They haven't made any promise to you as an RD, and even ED's won't hear back until "no later than 12/31".

Granted, I'm projecting my UG onto law school adcomms, so if you've read or heard something to the contrary, I'd love to become more informed.

[r6_philly]

If they can reach decisions on PT apps in 10 days or less, there is no reason to keep non-PT applications of the same caliber under review for 6 weeks or more - especially when PT process is primarily if not entirely numbers driven.