Same here only I'm not ED. Has anyone been able to contact the admissions office? I'm a bit worried now but I'm positive that I sent everything...vicuna wrote:I have "Application being processed" since 9/25. Does anyone else have this? Perhaps because I'm ED?
174/3.99ilovemulch wrote:would people who are UR already mind posting stats? Have a theory they are mostly reviewing auto-admits/likely candidates first and "processing" more marginal people like me, lol :/
I called them and they confirmed that they had all my materials, including my ED contract. So I don't know what the deal is.kazu wrote:Same here only I'm not ED. Has anyone been able to contact the admissions office? I'm a bit worried now but I'm positive that I sent everything...vicuna wrote:I have "Application being processed" since 9/25. Does anyone else have this? Perhaps because I'm ED?
Thanks for calling & sharing the info.....a bunch of people apparently got admitted to NYU last year w/o even receiving a "complete" email (and last year I don't think NYU had status checkers) so I'm just going to hope that they're not really diligent about updating these things.vicuna wrote:I called them and they confirmed that they had all my materials, including my ED contract. So I don't know what the deal is.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
why?s0ph1e2007 wrote:submitted 10/28 UR 11/08
173/3.4 URM
edit: I do want to mention though how unlikely I think it is that they separated ALL the thousands of applications into auto-admit, deny, and non auto-admit piles
just FYI
This def happens at some schools. I've had an admissions officer tell me that.s0ph1e2007 wrote:submitted 10/28 UR 11/08
173/3.4 URM
edit: I do want to mention though how unlikely I think it is that they separated ALL the thousands of applications into auto-admit, deny, and non auto-admit piles
just FYI
Why not? They can electronically sort them and print them out into piles.s0ph1e2007 wrote:submitted 10/28 UR 11/08
173/3.4 URM
edit: I do want to mention though how unlikely I think it is that they separated ALL the thousands of applications into auto-admit, deny, and non auto-admit piles
just FYI
+1im_blue wrote:Why not? They can electronically sort them and print them out into piles.s0ph1e2007 wrote:submitted 10/28 UR 11/08
173/3.4 URM
edit: I do want to mention though how unlikely I think it is that they separated ALL the thousands of applications into auto-admit, deny, and non auto-admit piles
just FYI
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
PM me for statsilovemulch wrote:would people who are UR already mind posting stats? Have a theory they are mostly reviewing auto-admits/likely candidates first and "processing" more marginal people like me, lol :/
shanemahsa wrote:PM me for statsilovemulch wrote:would people who are UR already mind posting stats? Have a theory they are mostly reviewing auto-admits/likely candidates first and "processing" more marginal people like me, lol :/
idkim_blue wrote:Why not? They can electronically sort them and print them out into piles.s0ph1e2007 wrote:submitted 10/28 UR 11/08
173/3.4 URM
edit: I do want to mention though how unlikely I think it is that they separated ALL the thousands of applications into auto-admit, deny, and non auto-admit piles
just FYI
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
lol, I don't know how much reasoning was necessary. It would just take a simple query of the database to do what you suggest.s0ph1e2007 wrote:idkim_blue wrote:Why not? They can electronically sort them and print them out into piles.s0ph1e2007 wrote:submitted 10/28 UR 11/08
173/3.4 URM
edit: I do want to mention though how unlikely I think it is that they separated ALL the thousands of applications into auto-admit, deny, and non auto-admit piles
just FYI
i think ive been out-reasoned, but I guess initially I thought this just because it's NYU... I don't think I qualify as an auto-admit
How would we know. No one has been accepted yet.chaosnoodlesoup wrote:Sent: 11/02
Under Review: 11/09
Good sign, bad sign or no correlation between speedy processing/review and acceptance?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Sure, but we collectively draw arbitrary lines through everything else. One more subject shouldn't be excluded from our wisdom simply because we have no readily available anecdotes.CastleRock wrote:How would we know. No one has been accepted yet.chaosnoodlesoup wrote:Sent: 11/02
Under Review: 11/09
Good sign, bad sign or no correlation between speedy processing/review and acceptance?
Ok, no correlation.chaosnoodlesoup wrote:Sure, but we collectively draw arbitrary lines through everything else. One more subject shouldn't be excluded from our wisdom simply because we have no readily available anecdotes.CastleRock wrote:How would we know. No one has been accepted yet.chaosnoodlesoup wrote:Sent: 11/02
Under Review: 11/09
Good sign, bad sign or no correlation between speedy processing/review and acceptance?
Come now, pick one.
Good, now we're getting somewhere.CastleRock wrote:Ok, no correlation.chaosnoodlesoup wrote:Sure, but we collectively draw arbitrary lines through everything else. One more subject shouldn't be excluded from our wisdom simply because we have no readily available anecdotes.CastleRock wrote:How would we know. No one has been accepted yet.chaosnoodlesoup wrote:Sent: 11/02
Under Review: 11/09
Good sign, bad sign or no correlation between speedy processing/review and acceptance?
Come now, pick one.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
