Of course!Otunga wrote:
But the logical reason is THE reason (not the only one, but the most motivating one) why I have that desire to attend. I think that's true for most of us.
Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014) Forum
- Yea All Right

- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:27 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
- Lavitz

- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Logic is good.
- cron1834

- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Wait, are people writing LOCIs without being waitlisted? Isn't that overkill? Spivey seems to hate on that strategy based on his latest blog post. I was under the impression that if you already did Why X? and haven't been waitlisted, then a LOCI is not useful.
This just sounds like impatience to me.
This just sounds like impatience to me.
- Yea All Right

- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:27 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Before I received a decision (but two months after I submitted my application), I submitted a Why X essay by attachment via email, and the text of the email itself had the tone of a LOCI.
- bombaysippin

- Posts: 1977
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:11 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I think you all need to slow ya roll. The wait is agonizing, but it's been long for about everyone. Just relax lol.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Otunga

- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I didn't write a Why X. But I should've. Is it unconventional send in a Why X (what I thought might be construed as a LOCI too) after app submission? (I submitted in mid-December.)cron1834 wrote:Wait, are people writing LOCIs without being waitlisted? Isn't that overkill? Spivey seems to hate on that strategy based on his latest blog post. I was under the impression that if you already did Why X? and haven't been waitlisted, then a LOCI is not useful.
This just sounds like impatience to me.
- cron1834

- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Ahhh, I misread, then. That doesn't seem nearly so bad!Otunga wrote:I didn't write a Why X. But I should've. Is it unconventional send in a Why X (what I thought might be construed as a LOCI too) after app submission? (I submitted in mid-December.)cron1834 wrote:Wait, are people writing LOCIs without being waitlisted? Isn't that overkill? Spivey seems to hate on that strategy based on his latest blog post. I was under the impression that if you already did Why X? and haven't been waitlisted, then a LOCI is not useful.
This just sounds like impatience to me.
Some folks definitely do what I described, though - it strikes me as douchey
-
kobe1020

- Posts: 425
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:43 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
finally joining the "complete" team as i just got the email
here it comes
here it comes
-
JustHawkin

- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I hate you all for getting this email.kobe1020 wrote:finally joining the "complete" team as i just got the email
JK
One day...
- yossarian

- Posts: 1303
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I'm considering this as well, because I really want to get in here. But, and it's kind of been discussed before, Cornell had that three sentence why-Cornell in the app.Otunga wrote:I didn't write a Why X. But I should've. Is it unconventional send in a Why X (what I thought might be construed as a LOCI too) after app submission? (I submitted in mid-December.)cron1834 wrote:Wait, are people writing LOCIs without being waitlisted? Isn't that overkill? Spivey seems to hate on that strategy based on his latest blog post. I was under the impression that if you already did Why X? and haven't been waitlisted, then a LOCI is not useful.
This just sounds like impatience to me.
We had a few of us, myself included indicate that a Why X wouldn't really do anything but go a bit more in depth to what you should be able to cover in three sentences. Efficiency is everything, right?
But, then someone else reported that a Cornell adcomm encouraged Why X essays?
That said, I really want to get in. What is the risk of writing a Why X v. the reward.
FWIW: I feel like my three sentences were great and covered what I would cover in a Why X
-
kobe1020

- Posts: 425
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:43 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
yours is on its wayJustHawkin wrote:I hate you all for getting this email.kobe1020 wrote:finally joining the "complete" team as i just got the email
JK![]()
One day...
- Otunga

- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I didn't even write the three sentences, but either way, perhaps they might get annoyed if they're in the process of reviewing our files and then a Why X turns up. But it should also make them more eager to admit us.yossarian71 wrote:I'm considering this as well, because I really want to get in here. But, and it's kind of been discussed before, Cornell had that three sentence why-Cornell in the app.Otunga wrote:I didn't write a Why X. But I should've. Is it unconventional send in a Why X (what I thought might be construed as a LOCI too) after app submission? (I submitted in mid-December.)cron1834 wrote:Wait, are people writing LOCIs without being waitlisted? Isn't that overkill? Spivey seems to hate on that strategy based on his latest blog post. I was under the impression that if you already did Why X? and haven't been waitlisted, then a LOCI is not useful.
This just sounds like impatience to me.
We had a few of us, myself included indicate that a Why X wouldn't really do anything but go a bit more in depth to what you should be able to cover in three sentences. Efficiency is everything, right?
But, then someone else reported that a Cornell adcomm encouraged Why X essays?
That said, I really want to get in. What is the risk of writing a Why X v. the reward.
FWIW: I feel like my three sentences were great and covered what I would cover in a Why X
To anybody who knows: do we send the Why X straight to the admissions email?
-
JustHawkin

- Posts: 1798
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 10:54 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Copped that Complete just now. Thanks for the good vibeskobe1020 wrote: yours is on its way
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
thewrman

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 2:05 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Has anyone ever seen this old website article before? This seems very incorrect... Look at the chart this person uses halfway down the page.
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx
- Lebrarian_Booker

- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:05 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Must be BS. So I would have a 99% chance of being admitted?thewrman wrote:Has anyone ever seen this old website article before? This seems very incorrect... Look at the chart this person uses halfway down the page.
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx

- Lavitz

- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Stopped reading at "entering class of about 500 law students."Lebrarian_Booker wrote:Must be BS. So I would have a 99% chance of being admitted?thewrman wrote:Has anyone ever seen this old website article before? This seems very incorrect... Look at the chart this person uses halfway down the page.
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx
Nope.
- Yea All Right

- Posts: 579
- Joined: Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:27 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
A supplemental essay shows that you're willing to expend time and effort to express your interest in the law school, which is positive in the eyes of the admissions committee. At least that's how I would interpret it.
You can submit the essay directly to the Admissions Office email as an attachment, they will then place it in your application file.
You can submit the essay directly to the Admissions Office email as an attachment, they will then place it in your application file.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Nonconsecutive

- Posts: 2398
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Thanks for the laughsthewrman wrote:Has anyone ever seen this old website article before? This seems very incorrect... Look at the chart this person uses halfway down the page.
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx
- bombaysippin

- Posts: 1977
- Joined: Fri Mar 22, 2013 3:11 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Same as bolded lol.Lavitz wrote:Stopped reading at "entering class of about 500 law students."Lebrarian_Booker wrote:Must be BS. So I would have a 99% chance of being admitted?thewrman wrote:Has anyone ever seen this old website article before? This seems very incorrect... Look at the chart this person uses halfway down the page.
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx
Nope.
-
kobe1020

- Posts: 425
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:43 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Lol at this but seriously hoping it is true LOLthewrman wrote:Has anyone ever seen this old website article before? This seems very incorrect... Look at the chart this person uses halfway down the page.
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx
-
kobe1020

- Posts: 425
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 1:43 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Stopped reading at "ranked fifteenth in New York City"Lavitz wrote:Stopped reading at "entering class of about 500 law students."Lebrarian_Booker wrote:Must be BS. So I would have a 99% chance of being admitted?thewrman wrote:Has anyone ever seen this old website article before? This seems very incorrect... Look at the chart this person uses halfway down the page.
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx
Nope.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Otunga

- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 7:56 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Anybody with a GPA at least 3.5 and a score of 168-180 should've gotten an acceptance immediately after submitting the app.kobe1020 wrote:Lol at this but seriously hoping it is true LOLthewrman wrote:Has anyone ever seen this old website article before? This seems very incorrect... Look at the chart this person uses halfway down the page.
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx
- Lavitz

- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Apparently I skimmed right past that.kobe1020 wrote:Stopped reading at "ranked fifteenth in New York City"
13th in the nation. 15th in NYC. Sounds legit.
-
mandyjay11

- Posts: 1171
- Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 10:36 am
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Another date change... Complete 1/21, 2/4, 2/11
- Leo

- Posts: 366
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:58 pm
Re: Cornell c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Date change here, too. Interview last week.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login