Of course!Otunga wrote:
But the logical reason is THE reason (not the only one, but the most motivating one) why I have that desire to attend. I think that's true for most of us.

Of course!Otunga wrote:
But the logical reason is THE reason (not the only one, but the most motivating one) why I have that desire to attend. I think that's true for most of us.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
I didn't write a Why X. But I should've. Is it unconventional send in a Why X (what I thought might be construed as a LOCI too) after app submission? (I submitted in mid-December.)cron1834 wrote:Wait, are people writing LOCIs without being waitlisted? Isn't that overkill? Spivey seems to hate on that strategy based on his latest blog post. I was under the impression that if you already did Why X? and haven't been waitlisted, then a LOCI is not useful.
This just sounds like impatience to me.
Ahhh, I misread, then. That doesn't seem nearly so bad!Otunga wrote:I didn't write a Why X. But I should've. Is it unconventional send in a Why X (what I thought might be construed as a LOCI too) after app submission? (I submitted in mid-December.)cron1834 wrote:Wait, are people writing LOCIs without being waitlisted? Isn't that overkill? Spivey seems to hate on that strategy based on his latest blog post. I was under the impression that if you already did Why X? and haven't been waitlisted, then a LOCI is not useful.
This just sounds like impatience to me.
I hate you all for getting this email.kobe1020 wrote:finally joining the "complete" team as i just got the email
I'm considering this as well, because I really want to get in here. But, and it's kind of been discussed before, Cornell had that three sentence why-Cornell in the app.Otunga wrote:I didn't write a Why X. But I should've. Is it unconventional send in a Why X (what I thought might be construed as a LOCI too) after app submission? (I submitted in mid-December.)cron1834 wrote:Wait, are people writing LOCIs without being waitlisted? Isn't that overkill? Spivey seems to hate on that strategy based on his latest blog post. I was under the impression that if you already did Why X? and haven't been waitlisted, then a LOCI is not useful.
This just sounds like impatience to me.
yours is on its wayJustHawkin wrote:I hate you all for getting this email.kobe1020 wrote:finally joining the "complete" team as i just got the email
JK![]()
One day...
I didn't even write the three sentences, but either way, perhaps they might get annoyed if they're in the process of reviewing our files and then a Why X turns up. But it should also make them more eager to admit us.yossarian71 wrote:I'm considering this as well, because I really want to get in here. But, and it's kind of been discussed before, Cornell had that three sentence why-Cornell in the app.Otunga wrote:I didn't write a Why X. But I should've. Is it unconventional send in a Why X (what I thought might be construed as a LOCI too) after app submission? (I submitted in mid-December.)cron1834 wrote:Wait, are people writing LOCIs without being waitlisted? Isn't that overkill? Spivey seems to hate on that strategy based on his latest blog post. I was under the impression that if you already did Why X? and haven't been waitlisted, then a LOCI is not useful.
This just sounds like impatience to me.
We had a few of us, myself included indicate that a Why X wouldn't really do anything but go a bit more in depth to what you should be able to cover in three sentences. Efficiency is everything, right?
But, then someone else reported that a Cornell adcomm encouraged Why X essays?
That said, I really want to get in. What is the risk of writing a Why X v. the reward.
FWIW: I feel like my three sentences were great and covered what I would cover in a Why X
Copped that Complete just now. Thanks for the good vibeskobe1020 wrote: yours is on its way
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Must be BS. So I would have a 99% chance of being admitted?thewrman wrote:Has anyone ever seen this old website article before? This seems very incorrect... Look at the chart this person uses halfway down the page.
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx
Stopped reading at "entering class of about 500 law students."Lebrarian_Booker wrote:Must be BS. So I would have a 99% chance of being admitted?thewrman wrote:Has anyone ever seen this old website article before? This seems very incorrect... Look at the chart this person uses halfway down the page.
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Thanks for the laughsthewrman wrote:Has anyone ever seen this old website article before? This seems very incorrect... Look at the chart this person uses halfway down the page.
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx
Same as bolded lol.Lavitz wrote:Stopped reading at "entering class of about 500 law students."Lebrarian_Booker wrote:Must be BS. So I would have a 99% chance of being admitted?thewrman wrote:Has anyone ever seen this old website article before? This seems very incorrect... Look at the chart this person uses halfway down the page.
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx
Nope.
Lol at this but seriously hoping it is true LOLthewrman wrote:Has anyone ever seen this old website article before? This seems very incorrect... Look at the chart this person uses halfway down the page.
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx
Stopped reading at "ranked fifteenth in New York City"Lavitz wrote:Stopped reading at "entering class of about 500 law students."Lebrarian_Booker wrote:Must be BS. So I would have a 99% chance of being admitted?thewrman wrote:Has anyone ever seen this old website article before? This seems very incorrect... Look at the chart this person uses halfway down the page.
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx
Nope.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Anybody with a GPA at least 3.5 and a score of 168-180 should've gotten an acceptance immediately after submitting the app.kobe1020 wrote:Lol at this but seriously hoping it is true LOLthewrman wrote:Has anyone ever seen this old website article before? This seems very incorrect... Look at the chart this person uses halfway down the page.
http://www.applyingtoschool.com/forms/l ... rnell.aspx
Apparently I skimmed right past that.kobe1020 wrote:Stopped reading at "ranked fifteenth in New York City"
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login