I think that's a pretty strong sign they accepted uJewel628 wrote:Gave me a little heart attack today when I got an email that they followed me on twitter!Just me being silly!
Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
-
jpal13

- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 6:53 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- Mr. Somebody

- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Did you guys both just get followed? Maybe they just logged in and are about to make an announcement....
- JustE

- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Mr. Somebody wrote:Did you guys both just get followed? Maybe they just logged in and are about to make an announcement....
-
gatorlaw

- Posts: 224
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 2:16 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
So is it safe to assume today is not the day? 
-
46nyc

- Posts: 198
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It was this morning, and it was @UChicagoLaw, not the @UChicagoLawAppsMr. Somebody wrote:Did you guys both just get followed? Maybe they just logged in and are about to make an announcement....
I'm thinking they went to the "Who to Follow" page and clicked "Follow all"
- Nelson

- Posts: 2058
- Joined: Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Since it's after 1 PM CST with no tweets and no call reports, seems unlikely today is the day. There were some status updates this morning too so maybe they're still working on apps. Maybe tomorrow?gatorlaw wrote:So is it safe to assume today is not the day?
-
Revolver066

- Posts: 260
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 7:54 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Same here. Chicago is a pretty extreme reach for me, updated to 1/11 todaySmumps wrote:I'm a huuuuuge longshot to get into Chicago (171, 3.5x), and I had the following UR status updates:
12/22 --> 1/11
Not to scare anyone, or anything
- catholicgirl

- Posts: 320
- Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
This has to qualify as some form of torture.
-
crosby813

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2011 5:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Chicago is a pretty big reach for me as well (reverse splitter) maybe that has something to do with today's updates?
-
AS33

- Posts: 173
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 3:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Maybe. I went 12/14, 1/9, 1/11 and it's a huuuge reach for me too as well. Even as a URM, my numbers are low.crosby813 wrote:Chicago is a pretty big reach for me as well (reverse splitter) maybe that has something to do with today's updates?
- JustE

- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Not really. I think you have a good shot at it. Good luck.AS33 wrote:Maybe. I went 12/14, 1/9, 1/11 and it's a huuuge reach for me too as well. Even as a URM, my numbers are low.crosby813 wrote:Chicago is a pretty big reach for me as well (reverse splitter) maybe that has something to do with today's updates?
-
addy11

- Posts: 479
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
In what is perhaps the worst example of trying to predict something from something completely irrelevant, I would like to know whether you two are "protected" twitter-ers46nyc wrote:Me too!!! I flipped outJewel628 wrote:Gave me a little heart attack today when I got an email that they followed me on twitter!Just me being silly!
-
46nyc

- Posts: 198
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 10:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm not protected, no. Lol. Good question thoughaddy11 wrote:In what is perhaps the worst example of trying to predict something from something completely irrelevant, I would like to know whether you two are "protected" twitter-ers46nyc wrote:Me too!!! I flipped outJewel628 wrote:Gave me a little heart attack today when I got an email that they followed me on twitter!Just me being silly!
I am and have not been followed.
- JustE

- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Damn... they're twitter stalking applicants?!?!?... Yep... Guess they actually do a holistic review... Leaves to go delete drunk tweets...46nyc wrote:I'm not protected, no. Lol. Good question thoughaddy11 wrote:In what is perhaps the worst example of trying to predict something from something completely irrelevant, I would like to know whether you two are "protected" twitter-ers46nyc wrote:Me too!!! I flipped outJewel628 wrote:Gave me a little heart attack today when I got an email that they followed me on twitter!Just me being silly!
I am and have not been followed.
Last edited by JustE on Wed Jan 11, 2012 3:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- WhiteGuy5

- Posts: 918
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 3:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
They started following me when my app went complete. I felt so special 
-
lameslice57

- Posts: 73
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 11:22 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
UR 12/21, 1/10/ and 1/11. Feel like decisions should be coming out tomorrow?
- Smumps

- Posts: 332
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
My guess is the double updates (1/10, 1/11) means in, single update means out. We shall see.lameslice57 wrote:UR 12/21, 1/10/ and 1/11. Feel like decisions should be coming out tomorrow?
- amc987

- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:58 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Maybe they're just trying to give everyone who is going to receive a decision soon 3 updates, regardless of what that decision will be. If you go back a few pages and look, almost everyone who submitted before a certain date (sometime in November) has been updated 3 times. I bet it just means that they're going to be included in the first decision batch.Smumps wrote:My guess is the double updates (1/10, 1/11) means in, single update means out. We shall see.
- Boston_NYG2245

- Posts: 238
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 11:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
That's what I was about to post. More and more I'm thinking that there's a big batch of decisions coming on Friday for everyone who has 3 UR datesamc987 wrote:Maybe they're just trying to give everyone who is going to receive a decision soon 3 updates, regardless of what that decision will be. If you go back a few pages and look, almost everyone who submitted before a certain date (sometime in November) has been updated 3 times. I bet it just means that they're going to be included in the first decision batch.Smumps wrote:My guess is the double updates (1/10, 1/11) means in, single update means out. We shall see.
- kulshan

- Posts: 413
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 1:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I got a double update as well (1/8 and 1/9). No idea what all this means, but I hope they tell us soon!
- Champion

- Posts: 286
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 9:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
What a weak day in law school admissions 
- JustE

- Posts: 1330
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 8:49 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
This.Champion wrote:What a weak day in law school admissions
-
anewaphorist

- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:13 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Good luck to those waiting! ED calls were made this year a day later than in previous years, so don't freak out too much if today's not the day or if you're numbers aren't auto-admit. All the indicators point to this cycle being different from recent ones...
-
jpal13

- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 6:53 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I am going to say boldly it will be tomorrow and Friday. There will be tears of both joy and sorrow.Boston_NYG2245 wrote:That's what I was about to post. More and more I'm thinking that there's a big batch of decisions coming on Friday for everyone who has 3 UR datesamc987 wrote:Maybe they're just trying to give everyone who is going to receive a decision soon 3 updates, regardless of what that decision will be. If you go back a few pages and look, almost everyone who submitted before a certain date (sometime in November) has been updated 3 times. I bet it just means that they're going to be included in the first decision batch.Smumps wrote:My guess is the double updates (1/10, 1/11) means in, single update means out. We shall see.
- Mr. Somebody

- Posts: 865
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 11:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah, today was totally dead if you were a T14 early-ish applicant. Let's pray for fireworks over the next couple days.JustE wrote:This.Champion wrote:What a weak day in law school admissions