Admissions is so weird.. I'm not hearing back from places I thought I might, and then not getting rejected quickly from Harvard, which I expected

They could just straight ding/WL us now... They dinged enough people in the last week.ilovemulch wrote:HOLY MOLY, held as well! I am in complete shock - I'm definitely an auto-ding with my #s alone (~ @ both 25ths and non-URM). Think it could possibly be legacy status? I'd be interested in knowing stats on likelihood of getting in afte rbeing held - is this basically a straight path to the WL/Ding?
r6_philly wrote:They could just straight ding/WL us now... They dinged enough people in the last week.ilovemulch wrote:HOLY MOLY, held as well! I am in complete shock - I'm definitely an auto-ding with my #s alone (~ @ both 25ths and non-URM). Think it could possibly be legacy status? I'd be interested in knowing stats on likelihood of getting in afte rbeing held - is this basically a straight path to the WL/Ding?
This is pure speculations: if you had JR1, then you must have the numerical qualities they are looking for. For whatever reason if you are held after JR1 there must be some reservations/weaknesses about your file that you must address before getting in. On the other hand, if you are complete in Oct but now held without a JR1, the opposite may be true: you may have the necessary qualities but lack numerical quality (I'd like to think that's my case). So I don't really know if one have advantage over the other other than we are not strong enough to be admitted at this time. We all have a gap that we need to bridge. We are really all non-autoadmit -> reconsideration, they may be a bit more holistic which may benefit us with no JR1's.ilovemulch wrote: True, although they haven't begun WL yet, have they? I've only seen Dings...so that's why I thought maybe this means a likely WL? I'm sure some will get in from being held but probably more likely the ones who already had JR1s. I already sent in 2 academic LORs and 1 professional so I don't think I'll send another LOR. Really wish I could win a nobel peace prize in the next couple of months!
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
R6, you're awesome haha. I never thought my softs were that great, but maybe they're not so bad after allr6_philly wrote:This is pure speculations: if you had JR1, then you must have the numerical qualities they are looking for. For whatever reason if you are held after JR1 there must be some reservations/weaknesses about your file that you must address before getting in. On the other hand, if you are complete in Oct but now held without a JR1, the opposite may be true: you may have the necessary qualities but lack numerical quality (I'd like to think that's my case). So I don't really know if one have advantage over the other other than we are not strong enough to be admitted at this time. We all have a gap that we need to bridge. We are really all non-autoadmit -> reconsideration, they may be a bit more holistic which may benefit us with no JR1's.ilovemulch wrote: True, although they haven't begun WL yet, have they? I've only seen Dings...so that's why I thought maybe this means a likely WL? I'm sure some will get in from being held but probably more likely the ones who already had JR1s. I already sent in 2 academic LORs and 1 professional so I don't think I'll send another LOR. Really wish I could win a nobel peace prize in the next couple of months!
Just random guessing and self-assurance, don't take it even for resemblance of truth.
Tough to do with the Nobel Prize schedule...ilovemulch wrote:Really wish I could win a nobel peace prize in the next couple of months!
This is pure speculations: if you had JR1, then you must have the numerical qualities they are looking for. For whatever reason if you are held after JR1 there must be some reservations/weaknesses about your file that you must address before getting in. On the other hand, if you are complete in Oct but now held without a JR1, the opposite may be true: you may have the necessary qualities but lack numerical quality (I'd like to think that's my case). So I don't really know if one have advantage over the other other than we are not strong enough to be admitted at this time. We all have a gap that we need to bridge. We are really all non-autoadmit -> reconsideration, they may be a bit more holistic which may benefit us with no JR1's.r6_philly wrote:ilovemulch wrote: True, although they haven't begun WL yet, have they? I've only seen Dings...so that's why I thought maybe this means a likely WL? I'm sure some will get in from being held but probably more likely the ones who already had JR1s. I already sent in 2 academic LORs and 1 professional so I don't think I'll send another LOR. Really wish I could win a nobel peace prize in the next couple of months!
r6_philly wrote:This is pure speculations: if you had JR1, then you must have the numerical qualities they are looking for. For whatever reason if you are held after JR1 there must be some reservations/weaknesses about your file that you must address before getting in. On the other hand, if you are complete in Oct but now held without a JR1, the opposite may be true: you may have the necessary qualities but lack numerical quality (I'd like to think that's my case). So I don't really know if one have advantage over the other other than we are not strong enough to be admitted at this time. We all have a gap that we need to bridge. We are really all non-autoadmit -> reconsideration, they may be a bit more holistic which may benefit us with no JR1's.ilovemulch wrote: True, although they haven't begun WL yet, have they? I've only seen Dings...so that's why I thought maybe this means a likely WL? I'm sure some will get in from being held but probably more likely the ones who already had JR1s. I already sent in 2 academic LORs and 1 professional so I don't think I'll send another LOR. Really wish I could win a nobel peace prize in the next couple of months!
Just random guessing and self-assurance, don't take it even for resemblance of truth.
Yeah, I had a JR1 and was held today. I was expected as the interview was...interesting.lawpuppy wrote:A great deal of holds in the last few days. Has anyone received a JR2 in this period? And has anyone who received a JR1 been held in the newest batch?
This is specially true since I was straight rejected last cycle. If they didn't like my new application a little bit more they'd just reject me again since I didn't retake.jd2014! wrote: Truth. Additionally, if there were no chance of admittance (or at least a WL/WL --> admit) at this point, they would have rejected our asses already. Otherwise, why keep all of those files around to clutter up your office?
True..I guess in my case I was thinking they might be trying to be nice given my legacy status even though they have no intention to ever let me in. (although parent DEFINITELY does not have his name on a bldg AT ALL!)jd2014! wrote:r6_philly wrote:This is pure speculations: if you had JR1, then you must have the numerical qualities they are looking for. For whatever reason if you are held after JR1 there must be some reservations/weaknesses about your file that you must address before getting in. On the other hand, if you are complete in Oct but now held without a JR1, the opposite may be true: you may have the necessary qualities but lack numerical quality (I'd like to think that's my case). So I don't really know if one have advantage over the other other than we are not strong enough to be admitted at this time. We all have a gap that we need to bridge. We are really all non-autoadmit -> reconsideration, they may be a bit more holistic which may benefit us with no JR1's.ilovemulch wrote: True, although they haven't begun WL yet, have they? I've only seen Dings...so that's why I thought maybe this means a likely WL? I'm sure some will get in from being held but probably more likely the ones who already had JR1s. I already sent in 2 academic LORs and 1 professional so I don't think I'll send another LOR. Really wish I could win a nobel peace prize in the next couple of months!
Just random guessing and self-assurance, don't take it even for resemblance of truth.
Truth. Additionally, if there were no chance of admittance (or at least a WL/WL --> admit) at this point, they would have rejected our asses already. Otherwise, why keep all of those files around to clutter up your office?
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
There is still time! Donate a bench or something...ilovemulch wrote: True..I guess in my case I was thinking they might be trying to be nice given my legacy status even though they have no intention to ever let me in. (although parent DEFINITELY does not have his name on a bldg AT ALL!)
If you could, I can't do it until after work.kazu wrote:Has anyone stalked the past HLS thread yet and figured out if a hold means a good or bad thing?? Like, have people gotten accepted after getting held?
Maybe I should go do that.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
I don't think I'll be able to do it until tonight either....r6_philly wrote:If you could, I can't do it until after work.kazu wrote:Has anyone stalked the past HLS thread yet and figured out if a hold means a good or bad thing?? Like, have people gotten accepted after getting held?
Maybe I should go do that.
Kind of? UR 1/10 now instead of 10/something.r6_philly wrote:All who have been held: did everyone's status checker update?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
cardinals1989 wrote:I guess at this point Harvard doesn't even know what the hell to do with me. Maybe they just tossed my file to the side of the room and hoped I would forget about it.
They haven't gotten to you yet? I think the holds/dings will continue for a while. I guess since Dec. score is out, they are holding all the leftovers from earlier to compare to the new apps soon to come in.funkytown wrote:What's the difference between getting held and just not getting a response?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login