Yup. Well for you it's down to how much $$$ USC/UCLA can toss at you to sway you away from Berkeleytwinkletoes16 wrote:there's a few of us on here- goden and myself included- who are cali or bust. Ideally we're cali biglaw->cali midlaw->other biglaw->other midlaw. I think goden said that somewhere, can't find it now.
Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
- goden

- Posts: 2756
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 12:52 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
- TripTrip

- Posts: 2767
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 9:52 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
goden doesn't have money at USC. Cornell sticker vs USC sticker = eh. But you're right about USC for socal... that's why I said, "You must really want California," because then it makes sense.BigZuck wrote:If you want Southern CA why would anyone take Cornell over USC with money? That doesn't make much sense to me. If someone wanted Northern CA or COA was closer then that's a different story.TripTrip wrote:You must really want California. I'd take Cornell over USC in a heartbeat.goden wrote:Oh no, I'm still on Committee First Read. I just meant that I could say that in my LOCI if I get WL'd or something.TripTrip wrote: Did you get cash from USC?
Eta: also, Ithaca.
Also, Ithaca is awesome.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I'm confident Goden will snag USC at a price lower than Cornell.
Anyway, back to the topic at hand: GIVE ME MY DING!!!
Anyway, back to the topic at hand: GIVE ME MY DING!!!
- twinkletoes16

- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
BigZuck wrote:
If you want Southern CA why would anyone take Cornell over USC with money? That doesn't make much sense to me. If someone wanted Northern CA or COA was closer then that's a different story.
Eta: also, Ithaca.
i could be totally wrong, but isn't it realllly hard to get back to SF/SV with cornell unless you are top 10%ish? I feel like NorCal is even more insular than LA.
-
BigZuck

- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Top 25% plus ties is what I have seen for Northern CA from the lower t14 (minus Berkeley of course), somewhat easier to get LA. But I am a no nothing 0L so take with the appropriate amount of salt.twinkletoes16 wrote:BigZuck wrote:
If you want Southern CA why would anyone take Cornell over USC with money? That doesn't make much sense to me. If someone wanted Northern CA or COA was closer then that's a different story.
Eta: also, Ithaca.
i could be totally wrong, but isn't it realllly hard to get back to SF/SV with cornell unless you are top 10%ish? I feel like NorCal is even more insular than LA.
GIVE US OUR DINGS!!!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I would definitely send it. My only source of info would be that I know a bunch of kids on FR and most of the professors and I can't imagine any of them would be turned off by a LOCI.mtmc wrote:Hi all,
Berkeley is my top choice for law school since I want to stay in California. Currently in Faculty Review. Any thoughts about sending a letter of continued intent to further express interest or should I just let it sit?
Any advice appreciated,
ETA: Also, it's sooooo hard to get NorCal BigLaw even from here. I'd say Top 25% and/or luck is what it takes from Berkeley. It probably takes even better grades and ties from somewhere like Cornell. Although (most) law firms in general care less about grades as a strict IN/OUT than I thought they would, tbh.
-
apinarba

- Posts: 83
- Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 8:16 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
lolzBigZuck wrote:Top 25% plus ties is what I have seen for Northern CA from the lower t14 (minus Berkeley of course), somewhat easier to get LA. But I am a no nothing 0L so take with the appropriate amount of salt.twinkletoes16 wrote:BigZuck wrote:
If you want Southern CA why would anyone take Cornell over USC with money? That doesn't make much sense to me. If someone wanted Northern CA or COA was closer then that's a different story.
Eta: also, Ithaca.
i could be totally wrong, but isn't it realllly hard to get back to SF/SV with cornell unless you are top 10%ish? I feel like NorCal is even more insular than LA.
GIVE US OUR DINGS!!!
- goden

- Posts: 2756
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 12:52 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
What about if you've been under regular review since early November? Still recommend sending one?Kronk wrote:I would definitely send it. My only source of info would be that I know a bunch of kids on FR and most of the professors and I can't imagine any of them would be turned off by a LOCI.mtmc wrote:Hi all,
Berkeley is my top choice for law school since I want to stay in California. Currently in Faculty Review. Any thoughts about sending a letter of continued intent to further express interest or should I just let it sit?
Any advice appreciated,
-
Kronk

- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I don't know. I don't want to be negative and say that it seems like a ding, but I don't really know of people who got in without FR after the first couple waves of people admitted prior to FR. If those exist on LSN and stuff--like, if anyone has ever been admitted without FR at this point in the cycle--I say definitely do it.goden wrote:What about if you've been under regular review since early November? Still recommend sending one?Kronk wrote:I would definitely send it. My only source of info would be that I know a bunch of kids on FR and most of the professors and I can't imagine any of them would be turned off by a LOCI.mtmc wrote:Hi all,
Berkeley is my top choice for law school since I want to stay in California. Currently in Faculty Review. Any thoughts about sending a letter of continued intent to further express interest or should I just let it sit?
Any advice appreciated,
Berkeley is one of those schools that I think considers your "fit" at the school a bit more than others. That's why it seems black boxy. I actually don't think it's that much of a black box at all. i think it's pretty obvious to see what Berkeley really likes in its student body once you get here--tons of diversity, perhaps a public interest and social justice slant, etc. I would think that a LOCI talking about how Berkeley is your #1 can only help you with a school like that, as opposed to a school like NYU that is going to admit who they admit purely based on numbers.
- digifly

- Posts: 652
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:28 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Just curious, I'm heavily leaning UVA at the moment but I'd ideally like CA Biglaw when I'm done. Would you guys take UVA with 135k over USC/UCLA with 120k?
I guess I'm going more for ranking than locale, but I'm a CA resident and native Californian so I feel like I have enough ties here to come back.
Also, since this IS the Berk thread, I will give an update: no movement since 11/21
I guess I'm going more for ranking than locale, but I'm a CA resident and native Californian so I feel like I have enough ties here to come back.
Also, since this IS the Berk thread, I will give an update: no movement since 11/21
- teiswei

- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
120 at UCLA for is full ride for a resident, no?digifly wrote:Just curious, I'm heavily leaning UVA at the moment but I'd ideally like CA Biglaw when I'm done. Would you guys take UVA with 135k over USC/UCLA with 120k?
I guess I'm going more for ranking than locale, but I'm a CA resident and native Californian so I feel like I have enough ties here to come back.
Also, since this IS the Berk thread, I will give an update: no movement since 11/21
Edit: Never mind, just looked it up. Personally if stay in California I would that's where you want to practice. The alumni network will be stronger and you can network with potential employers a lot easier. Going for ranking is bad practice.
Last edited by teiswei on Wed Jan 30, 2013 1:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
comeonletsgo

- Posts: 296
- Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2011 11:20 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
UCLA in-state is like 47.5kteiswei wrote:120 at UCLA for is full ride for a resident, no?digifly wrote:Just curious, I'm heavily leaning UVA at the moment but I'd ideally like CA Biglaw when I'm done. Would you guys take UVA with 135k over USC/UCLA with 120k?
I guess I'm going more for ranking than locale, but I'm a CA resident and native Californian so I feel like I have enough ties here to come back.
Also, since this IS the Berk thread, I will give an update: no movement since 11/21
- Rahviveh

- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
BTW I was walking through the law school last week and they got some damn good looking girls there
I could not tell if maybe they were undergrads or not. Hope its not exclusive to Boalt. 
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- danitt

- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
DINGED! Por fin!
- digifly

- Posts: 652
- Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 3:28 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I guess I should rephrase: I'd also like to get out of CA for a bit if I can and am not opposed to working anywhere else, any idea how difficult it'd be to do UVA back to San Diego or LA?teiswei wrote:120 at UCLA for is full ride for a resident, no?digifly wrote:Just curious, I'm heavily leaning UVA at the moment but I'd ideally like CA Biglaw when I'm done. Would you guys take UVA with 135k over USC/UCLA with 120k?
I guess I'm going more for ranking than locale, but I'm a CA resident and native Californian so I feel like I have enough ties here to come back.
Also, since this IS the Berk thread, I will give an update: no movement since 11/21
Edit: Never mind, just looked it up. Personally if stay in California I would that's where you want to practice. The alumni network will be stronger and you can network with potential employers a lot easier. Going for ranking is bad practice.
- Rahviveh

- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I would take UVA in this case, unless for some reason you HAVE to be in California. That's a fucking great deal for a T14 and gives you an extra safety net in case you miss out on CA biglaw.digifly wrote:Just curious, I'm heavily leaning UVA at the moment but I'd ideally like CA Biglaw when I'm done. Would you guys take UVA with 135k over USC/UCLA with 120k?
I guess I'm going more for ranking than locale, but I'm a CA resident and native Californian so I feel like I have enough ties here to come back.
Also, since this IS the Berk thread, I will give an update: no movement since 11/21
- letitloose

- Posts: 139
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:13 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I'm out as well.danitt wrote:DINGED! Por fin!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- WisemanAEKDB

- Posts: 329
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:01 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
let the bloodbath commence!After reviewing thoroughly your application for admission to UC Berkeley School of Law, the Admissions Committee has decided, with regret, not to offer you a place in the Class of 2016.
- westphiladelphia

- Posts: 123
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 1:52 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-d-ing, ding ding.
- twenty

- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Dropped at Berkeley. Extremely disappointed.
166/No GPA, URM.
166/No GPA, URM.
- hhockberger

- Posts: 174
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:28 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
That was seriously the sweetest rejection letter 
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kuttlefish

- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:29 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
And so it begins...letitloose wrote:I'm out as well.danitt wrote:DINGED! Por fin!
Ding
- Ned Racine

- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2012 3:54 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Condolences to those getting dinged. I'm definitely about to join.
Are they coming via email or status checker?
Are they coming via email or status checker?
-
calicali

- Posts: 41
- Joined: Sat Nov 17, 2012 1:41 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
hhockberger wrote:That was seriously the sweetest rejection letter
It was!! You win some, you lose some. Good luck to everyone else
- twenty

- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Email.Ned Racine wrote:Condolences to those getting dinged. I'm definitely about to join.
Are they coming via email or status checker?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login