http://uva.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0910/DeeCee wrote:I figured as much. I'm really sad about this, because I now know it means I have zero chance of getting in with my LSAT (157).paulinaporizkova wrote:pretty sure they waitlist twice as many people as they reject. it really makes absolutely no sense. UVA does weird things.DeeCee wrote: does anyone know how many people they keep on the waitlist? Is this some crazy list that I'll never get off of?
UVa. Regular Decision Forum
-
- Posts: 2489
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:25 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
- DeeCee
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:09 am
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
That's a lot of waitlisting!! Does the graph so WL'ers that got in?paulinaporizkova wrote:http://uva.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0910/DeeCee wrote:I figured as much. I'm really sad about this, because I now know it means I have zero chance of getting in with my LSAT (157).paulinaporizkova wrote:pretty sure they waitlist twice as many people as they reject. it really makes absolutely no sense. UVA does weird things.DeeCee wrote: does anyone know how many people they keep on the waitlist? Is this some crazy list that I'll never get off of?
-
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:43 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
WL'er don't generally get in. Un/fortunately for UVA, it's about as good as a rejection
- Burgstaller04
- Posts: 628
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:45 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
WL via email. Numbers and dates in profile.
- akili
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:21 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
I think I'm waitlist bound too then. Sorry burg..Burgstaller04 wrote:WL via email. Numbers and dates in profile.

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- DeeCee
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:09 am
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
They probably just felt bad for me then because I had so much correspondence (face-to-face and email) with them, and I wrote a UVa specific essay.pimpsdontcry wrote:WL'er don't generally get in. Un/fortunately for UVA, it's about as good as a rejection
-
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:43 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
trust me. any news is good news. now you can move on with your life and make your choices accordingly. ur probably too good, they just can't handle itDeeCee wrote:They probably just felt bad for me then because I had so much correspondence (face-to-face and email) with them, and I wrote a UVa specific essay.pimpsdontcry wrote:WL'er don't generally get in. Un/fortunately for UVA, it's about as good as a rejection

- Burgstaller04
- Posts: 628
- Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:45 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
I was screwed from the beginning. oos and didn't write a why uva. not too broken up about this.akili wrote:I think I'm waitlist bound too then. Sorry burg..Burgstaller04 wrote:WL via email. Numbers and dates in profile.
- DeeCee
- Posts: 1352
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:09 am
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
I probably won't move on unless I get in at UNC (I'm in-state). Then, even though UNC is not my top choice like UVa and GW, at least I won't be in major debt for the rest of my life, since I want to do PI.pimpsdontcry wrote:trust me. any news is good news. now you can move on with your life and make your choices accordingly. ur probably too good, they just can't handle itDeeCee wrote:They probably just felt bad for me then because I had so much correspondence (face-to-face and email) with them, and I wrote a UVa specific essay.pimpsdontcry wrote:WL'er don't generally get in. Un/fortunately for UVA, it's about as good as a rejection
- Dany
- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
No email.
*crickets*
*crickets*
- absolutazn87
- Posts: 715
- Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 2:16 am
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
eskimo wrote:No email.
*crickets*
- law_monkey
- Posts: 1709
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:25 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
I withdrew, so that's one less person on the list. I only applied to see what would happen, and I'm happy with my other options so I would rather not waste anyone's times. Good luck to the rest of you!DeeCee wrote:That's a lot of waitlisting!! Does the graph so WL'ers that got in?paulinaporizkova wrote:http://uva.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0910/DeeCee wrote:I figured as much. I'm really sad about this, because I now know it means I have zero chance of getting in with my LSAT (157).paulinaporizkova wrote:
pretty sure they waitlist twice as many people as they reject. it really makes absolutely no sense. UVA does weird things.
-
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 12:16 am
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
eskimo wrote:No email.
*crickets*
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Redsgomarchingon
- Posts: 457
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:42 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
same. UR 12/10...eskimo wrote:No email.
*crickets*
- daisyduke
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 10:22 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
+1 but UR 10/4Redsgomarchingon wrote:same. UR 12/10...eskimo wrote:No email.
*crickets*
-
- Posts: 557
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:58 am
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
Yep. UR 12/6 (originally 11/15).Redsgomarchingon wrote:same. UR 12/10...eskimo wrote:No email.
*crickets*
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 3:07 am
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
UR in September, OOS, crickets
I'm getting to the point where I want to just tell them that, yes, I need the amount of money that my numbers get on LSN to consider your school, but if you do give it, you'll be my (current) top choice. And if you're not going to, just reject me, keep your yield up, and that's fine too.
Obviously, I'd phrase it more politely. Does anyone know of directness ever working?
I'm getting to the point where I want to just tell them that, yes, I need the amount of money that my numbers get on LSN to consider your school, but if you do give it, you'll be my (current) top choice. And if you're not going to, just reject me, keep your yield up, and that's fine too.
Obviously, I'd phrase it more politely. Does anyone know of directness ever working?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 11:03 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
+1. UR 11/10.c_dubya_s wrote:Yep. UR 12/6 (originally 11/15).Redsgomarchingon wrote:same. UR 12/10...eskimo wrote:No email.
*crickets*
- suspicious android
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
Obviously it's frustrating (I'm waiting on Duke and Berkeley for almost as long as you), but I'm pretty sure that's not a good idea. The problem is, while we all really want to know right now, there's unlikely to be a reason any particular person needs to know right now. If UVA with $$ would be your top choice today, it should be your top choice in a month, too. Forcing the issue would come off poorly, in my opinion.thsmthcrmnl wrote:Obviously, I'd phrase it more politely. Does anyone know of directness ever working?
-
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Fri Dec 25, 2009 3:07 am
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
Yeah, thanks for talking me down.
-
- Posts: 2489
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:25 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
do you mind sharing your numbers? UVA is tough because they seem to admit people with good "lower" numbers with money (for instance, a 170, 4.0 will get in with $$, a 172, 4.0 will get waitlisted due to YP, even if they really wanted to go with a scholarship) - just go back and review this thread and you'll see a handful of people with numbers like this in with $$ and a handful waitlisted.thsmthcrmnl wrote:UR in September, OOS, crickets
I'm getting to the point where I want to just tell them that, yes, I need the amount of money that my numbers get on LSN to consider your school, but if you do give it, you'll be my (current) top choice. And if you're not going to, just reject me, keep your yield up, and that's fine too.
Obviously, I'd phrase it more politely. Does anyone know of directness ever working?
though i'd advise against it, i've read LSN profiles where a person (usually a VA resident) ED's to UVA (with super high #s) and then gets huge $ after the ED. but what i'm not clear on is whether they get $$ because they ED with good numbers, thus showing this really is their top choice and they'd love to go with $$, or because they are VA residents. conventional wisdom tells me it's the latter.
what you said was that if UVA wanted to reject you to keep their yield up, that would be fine with you. so i guess you shouldn't do anything right now since it sounds like you wouldn't just die if you didn't get in.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- soullesswonder
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:36 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
I've heard both Trujillo and Faulk affirm UVA's philosophy that they don't shirk applicants who apply ED...if the numbers and softs are there, they'll still get their scholarship money.paulinaporizkova wrote:do you mind sharing your numbers? UVA is tough because they seem to admit people with good "lower" numbers with money (for instance, a 170, 4.0 will get in with $$, a 172, 4.0 will get waitlisted due to YP, even if they really wanted to go with a scholarship) - just go back and review this thread and you'll see a handful of people with numbers like this in with $$ and a handful waitlisted.thsmthcrmnl wrote:UR in September, OOS, crickets
I'm getting to the point where I want to just tell them that, yes, I need the amount of money that my numbers get on LSN to consider your school, but if you do give it, you'll be my (current) top choice. And if you're not going to, just reject me, keep your yield up, and that's fine too.
Obviously, I'd phrase it more politely. Does anyone know of directness ever working?
though i'd advise against it, i've read LSN profiles where a person (usually a VA resident) ED's to UVA (with super high #s) and then gets huge $ after the ED. but what i'm not clear on is whether they get $$ because they ED with good numbers, thus showing this really is their top choice and they'd love to go with $$, or because they are VA residents. conventional wisdom tells me it's the latter.
what you said was that if UVA wanted to reject you to keep their yield up, that would be fine with you. so i guess you shouldn't do anything right now since it sounds like you wouldn't just die if you didn't get in.
There's an art to avoiding YP while still leveraging scholarship money. My approach was to send a LOCI that had an innocuous line about UVA being my first choice "financial circumstances permitting" (I'm paraphrasing). I shortly thereafter followed it up with a visit to the school and a face-to-face chat with admissions. I firmly believe that it's easier to pull this off when the person on the other side can hear the tone of your voice and read your body language...it makes the whole thing seem less like a stick-up note and more like a frank and forthcoming discussion of needs and preferences.
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:52 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
Random question: Does anyone know how many full tuition scholarships UVA gives out each year. I am very curious.
- soullesswonder
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:36 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
I believe the answer is 2-4 Dillards plus an unknown number of quasi-full tuition scholarships at 45k/year.nothereok wrote:Random question: Does anyone know how many full tuition scholarships UVA gives out each year. I am very curious.
- askyemcdonald
- Posts: 531
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2010 12:53 pm
Re: UVa. Regular Decision
Sooo I have been updated 3 times...1/10, 1/17 and now 1/30. Is that a good or bad thing? How many updates before a decision?? 

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login