U Chicago 2010 Forum
- rockchalk86

- Posts: 528
- Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 10:16 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
Finally UR as of 1/15. Complete 11/13... Now the real wait begins
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
My hunch is the UPDATED UR 1/15 folks (that is, the people who were UR XX/XX and then updated to UR 1/15 [not those who are UR for the first time on 1/15]) comprise a batch of rejections. This from looking at LSN history and knowing the stats of some of these folks.
On another note, still UR 11/25 georgiana? I am!
On another note, still UR 11/25 georgiana? I am!
- SanBun

- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:19 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
well thank you crackberry, that makes us feel so goodcrackberry wrote:My hunch is the UPDATED UR 1/15 folks (that is, the people who were UR XX/XX and then updated to UR 1/15 [not those who are UR for the first time on 1/15]) comprise a batch of rejections. This from looking at LSN history and knowing the stats of some of these folks.
On another note, still UR 11/25 georgiana? I am!
-
ankit

- Posts: 226
- Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:48 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
Yeah and I'm pretty certain that those of us who went UR before December and havent heard anything as yet will see a WL e-mail very soon. Still stuck at 12/14 btw.crackberry wrote:My hunch is the UPDATED UR 1/15 folks (that is, the people who were UR XX/XX and then updated to UR 1/15 [not those who are UR for the first time on 1/15]) comprise a batch of rejections. This from looking at LSN history and knowing the stats of some of these folks.
On another note, still UR 11/25 georgiana? I am!
-
02082010

- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Why don't you just withdraw already?crackberry wrote:My hunch is the UPDATED UR 1/15 folks (that is, the people who were UR XX/XX and then updated to UR 1/15 [not those who are UR for the first time on 1/15]) comprise a batch of rejections. This from looking at LSN history and knowing the stats of some of these folks.
On another note, still UR 11/25 georgiana? I am!
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Well I obviously hope I'm wrong.SanBun wrote:well thank you crackberry, that makes us feel so goodcrackberry wrote:My hunch is the UPDATED UR 1/15 folks (that is, the people who were UR XX/XX and then updated to UR 1/15 [not those who are UR for the first time on 1/15]) comprise a batch of rejections. This from looking at LSN history and knowing the stats of some of these folks.
On another note, still UR 11/25 georgiana? I am!
- mayosmith

- Posts: 256
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 3:05 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Obviously.crackberry wrote:Well I obviously hope I'm wrong.SanBun wrote:well thank you crackberry, that makes us feel so goodcrackberry wrote:My hunch is the UPDATED UR 1/15 folks (that is, the people who were UR XX/XX and then updated to UR 1/15 [not those who are UR for the first time on 1/15]) comprise a batch of rejections. This from looking at LSN history and knowing the stats of some of these folks.
On another note, still UR 11/25 georgiana? I am!
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I agree.ankit wrote:Yeah and I'm pretty certain that those of us who went UR before December and havent heard anything as yet will see a WL e-mail very soon. Still stuck at 12/14 btw.crackberry wrote:My hunch is the UPDATED UR 1/15 folks (that is, the people who were UR XX/XX and then updated to UR 1/15 [not those who are UR for the first time on 1/15]) comprise a batch of rejections. This from looking at LSN history and knowing the stats of some of these folks.
On another note, still UR 11/25 georgiana? I am!
Well, Chicago is one of the few schools I told myself I'd still consider. I'm really attracted to Chicago's learning environment, as well as its clerkship & academia placement. My sister went there for UG and I like the city a lot. You can rest assured, however, that I will withdraw upon receipt of the WL email I am sure to get in the near future.hopefulundergrad wrote:Why don't you just withdraw already?
-
02082010

- Posts: 1645
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I think you'll get in.crackberry wrote:I agree.ankit wrote:Yeah and I'm pretty certain that those of us who went UR before December and havent heard anything as yet will see a WL e-mail very soon. Still stuck at 12/14 btw.crackberry wrote:My hunch is the UPDATED UR 1/15 folks (that is, the people who were UR XX/XX and then updated to UR 1/15 [not those who are UR for the first time on 1/15]) comprise a batch of rejections. This from looking at LSN history and knowing the stats of some of these folks.
On another note, still UR 11/25 georgiana? I am!Well, Chicago is one of the few schools I told myself I'd still consider. I'm really attracted to Chicago's learning environment, as well as its clerkship & academia placement. My sister went there for UG and I like the city a lot. You can rest assured, however, that I will withdraw upon receipt of the WL email I am sure to get in the near future.hopefulundergrad wrote:Why don't you just withdraw already?
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Well if I do then I will visit and make a decision at a later date. The truth is, I have to do my due diligence with a few non-HYS schools (namely NYU, Chicago and Berkeley), which I thought might be my targets/minor reaches entering the cycle.hopefulundergrad wrote:I think you'll get in.
- JollyGreenGiant

- Posts: 995
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Still UR (once) 12/31.
Hoping that changes soon.
Hoping that changes soon.
- los blancos

- Posts: 8397
- Joined: Mon Apr 21, 2008 4:18 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
crackberry wrote:Well if I do then I will visit and make a decision at a later date. The truth is, I have to do my due diligence with a few non-HYS schools (namely NYU, Chicago and Berkeley), which I thought might be my targets/minor reaches entering the cycle.hopefulundergrad wrote:I think you'll get in.
Haha I am so jealous; if I was you my cycle would be over.
-
georgina

- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:49 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
still UR 11/25!crackberry wrote:My hunch is the UPDATED UR 1/15 folks (that is, the people who were UR XX/XX and then updated to UR 1/15 [not those who are UR for the first time on 1/15]) comprise a batch of rejections. This from looking at LSN history and knowing the stats of some of these folks.
On another note, still UR 11/25 georgiana? I am!
looking at LSN, last year holds were given out alongside rejections in january, and everyone who submitted in sept/oct heard something by the end of january. (sound like a familiar system?) last year R/H were by mail, but this year it seems everything is email. maybe the holds have been delayed this year, but i surely won't be looking forward to an email from chi this week.
edit: to say, holds don't correspond with dates on LSN because they're not real decisions. people describe them in their profiles.
-
jumpinjackflash

- Posts: 42
- Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:27 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Anyone know if admissions offices are open today?
-
amidea

- Posts: 197
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 8:58 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
I was updated to 1/15 from 1/11. I hope you're wrong.. 177/3.63 here.crackberry wrote:My hunch is the UPDATED UR 1/15 folks (that is, the people who were UR XX/XX and then updated to UR 1/15 [not those who are UR for the first time on 1/15]) comprise a batch of rejections. This from looking at LSN history and knowing the stats of some of these folks.
On another note, still UR 11/25 georgiana? I am!
- SanBun

- Posts: 560
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:19 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Wow amidea, I am 1/15 UR second update, I'd be surprised if you were a straight reject- in fact just based on numbers, I'd say you're in. You make me feel better about the 1/15 batchamidea wrote:I was updated to 1/15 from 1/11. I hope you're wrong.. 177/3.63 here.crackberry wrote:My hunch is the UPDATED UR 1/15 folks (that is, the people who were UR XX/XX and then updated to UR 1/15 [not those who are UR for the first time on 1/15]) comprise a batch of rejections. This from looking at LSN history and knowing the stats of some of these folks.
On another note, still UR 11/25 georgiana? I am!
and also +1 on the question before: are admissions offices open today??
- of Benito Cereno

- Posts: 748
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:40 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
its a federal holiday so I really doubt it.SanBun wrote:Wow amidea, I am 1/15 UR second update, I'd be surprised if you were a straight reject- in fact just based on numbers, I'd say you're in. You make me feel better about the 1/15 batchamidea wrote:I was updated to 1/15 from 1/11. I hope you're wrong.. 177/3.63 here.crackberry wrote:My hunch is the UPDATED UR 1/15 folks (that is, the people who were UR XX/XX and then updated to UR 1/15 [not those who are UR for the first time on 1/15]) comprise a batch of rejections. This from looking at LSN history and knowing the stats of some of these folks.
On another note, still UR 11/25 georgiana? I am!
and also +1 on the question before: are admissions offices open today??
- summerschooled

- Posts: 267
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 5:41 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Same here.Tangerine Gleam wrote:Still UR 12/31.
- of Benito Cereno

- Posts: 748
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 6:40 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
same here. no worries.
-
hesitantstyle

- Posts: 62
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 1:32 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Sweet avatar, Mayosmith.mayosmith wrote:Obviously.crackberry wrote:Well I obviously hope I'm wrong.SanBun wrote:well thank you crackberry, that makes us feel so goodcrackberry wrote:My hunch is the UPDATED UR 1/15 folks (that is, the people who were UR XX/XX and then updated to UR 1/15 [not those who are UR for the first time on 1/15]) comprise a batch of rejections. This from looking at LSN history and knowing the stats of some of these folks.
On another note, still UR 11/25 georgiana? I am!
- mayosmith

- Posts: 256
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 3:05 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Thanks, Hes. Congrats on getting in.hesitantstyle wrote:Sweet avatar, Mayosmith.
-
Aias

- Posts: 65
- Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 6:17 am
Re: U Chicago 2010
Updated to UR 1/15 from 1/7. 169/3.75
-
oneforship

- Posts: 1004
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:17 pm
Re: U Chicago 2010
Something tells me probably not until tomorrow or Thursday.sotomayor wrote:any calls today?