Alumni base and location in NYC.JayJones78 wrote:So what is your view that Cardozo places so high (relatevily), when looking at it together with WashUcusenation wrote:A thousand times yes. The US News are a measure of the incoming credentials of students and of peer-based prestige. The NLJ250 is actual student outcomes for BigLaw.JayJones78 wrote: Would you say this list for those who want/need biglaw is more important the USnews rankings?
But remember it doesn't account for grads who go to BigLaw after clerkships
WUSTL c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
When I first saw it I was struck by their placement in relation to the hate they get on TLS, only preceded by the hate towards Ameican.shntn wrote:Alumni base and location in NYC.JayJones78 wrote:So what is your view that Cardozo places so high (relatevily), when looking at it together with WashUcusenation wrote:A thousand times yes. The US News are a measure of the incoming credentials of students and of peer-based prestige. The NLJ250 is actual student outcomes for BigLaw.JayJones78 wrote: Would you say this list for those who want/need biglaw is more important the USnews rankings?
But remember it doesn't account for grads who go to BigLaw after clerkships
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
Can someone explain the American hate?
- goldeneye
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 12:25 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
http://insidethelawschoolscam.blogspot. ... ategy.htmlwannabelawstudent wrote:Can someone explain the American hate?
they game the system more than most schools. competitive market, huge class, expensive.
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
It pains me to think how seriously I was considering attending back in the day.goldeneye wrote:http://insidethelawschoolscam.blogspot. ... ategy.htmlwannabelawstudent wrote:Can someone explain the American hate?
they game the system more than most schools. competitive market, huge class, expensive.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dproduct
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
shntn wrote:It pains me to think how seriously I was considering attending back in the day.goldeneye wrote:http://insidethelawschoolscam.blogspot. ... ategy.htmlwannabelawstudent wrote:Can someone explain the American hate?
they game the system more than most schools. competitive market, huge class, expensive.
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
I can understand some of the words thrown towards AU but I don't really get why the hate towards Cardozo when (at least it looks as) their grads who do well (and that's similar to almost any non t14 grads) do just fine. I think the fact that they rank there almost 20 some spots higher than their usnews ranking speaks volumes. I don't think one should choose cardozo over WashU if they are not 100 percent sure they want NYCshntn wrote:It pains me to think how seriously I was considering attending back in the day.goldeneye wrote:http://insidethelawschoolscam.blogspot. ... ategy.htmlwannabelawstudent wrote:Can someone explain the American hate?
they game the system more than most schools. competitive market, huge class, expensive.
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2013 6:08 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
Thank you guys for the advice. I think I definitely need to look at WUSTL seriously. Definitely at the top of my list now.
- Xs20
- Posts: 815
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:03 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
Come on, Krystal, hit us with DAT $$$ this week


- dproduct
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
I hope WUSTL pulls a UVA this cycle.
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
Except for the part where they change tacks midcycle and start acting all crazy.dproduct wrote:I hope WUSTL pulls a UVA this cycle.
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
But American is #11 in Cooley's law school rankings?
- dproduct
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
Here's hoping.shntn wrote:Except for the part where they change tacks midcycle and start acting all crazy.dproduct wrote:I hope WUSTL pulls a UVA this cycle.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- somewhatwayward
- Posts: 1442
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 5:10 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
I am actually surprised how close Cardozo and WUSTL are on that list....completely negligible difference (of course, you have to include their federal clerkship placement, but it doesn't change much because WUSTL is 3.8% while Cardozo is 2.9%). I would've expected WUSTL at 20% and Cardozo at 10%. I would guess, though, that another 5-10% of WUSTL's class is placed into decent midwestern firms that don't make the NLJ 250. Overall WUSTL places 60% into legal jobs while Cardozo places 50%, so not a huge difference there either although that doesn't tell us anything about the quality of the jobs obtained. WUSTL may have an edge there.JayJones78 wrote:So what is your view that Cardozo places so high (relatevily), when looking at it together with WashUcusenation wrote:A thousand times yes. The US News are a measure of the incoming credentials of students and of peer-based prestige. The NLJ250 is actual student outcomes for BigLaw.JayJones78 wrote: Would you say this list for those who want/need biglaw is more important the USnews rankings?
But remember it doesn't account for grads who go to BigLaw after clerkships
... I don't really get why the hate towards Cardozo when (at least it looks as) their grads who do well (and that's similar to almost any non t14 grads) do just fine. I think the fact that they rank there almost 20 some spots higher than their usnews ranking speaks volumes. I don't think one should choose cardozo over WashU if they are not 100 percent sure they want NYC
Given these numbers, and without information about quality of jobs obtained, I think Cardozo makes more sense (although it does not make sense in an absolute sense) because you are getting basically the same placement while competing against a less qualified student body and probably getting more scholarship money since Cardozo will pay for a 165 while WUSTL will probably reject that person, forget a scholarship. The caveat is, as you point out, that if you don't want NYC, Cardozo will definitely be a bad choice. In that case, though, I might look to lower T1 schools with scholarships over WUSTL if the employment figures are similar. It sucks to be trying to best 80-90% of your class when your class is as smart as the classes WUSTL is taking.
The reason Cardozo gets shit, though, is because even though it places 15% into big law + clerkships, besting many higher-ranked schools, it doesn't produce good outcomes for the vast majority of the other students, and it is really, really expensive, partially because of COL in NYC but also because it charges way more tuition than it has business charging. Cardozo may be beating other schools but those other schools are doing so poorly that beating them doesn't mean much. Also, as with WUSTL, other schools that aren't in major metropolitan areas may place some of their class into decent firms that aren't NLJ 250, so their numbers are somewhat deflated.
-
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 1:26 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
You can't count on doing better because of the 'quality of the student body'. The difference between a 166 and a 165 on the LSAT when it comes to taking law school exams is meaningless. At both places you'll be competing against very intelligent and motivated people - and you have no way of knowing how you will be at law school exams until you start taking them. Your logic here is very flawed.somewhatwayward wrote: Given these numbers, and without information about quality of jobs obtained, I think Cardozo makes more sense (although it does not make sense in an absolute sense) because you are getting basically the same placement while competing against a less qualified student body and probably getting more scholarship money since Cardozo will pay for a 165 while WUSTL will probably reject that person, forget a scholarship. The caveat is, as you point out, that if you don't want NYC, Cardozo will definitely be a bad choice. In that case, though, I might look to lower T1 schools with scholarships over WUSTL if the employment figures are similar. It sucks to be trying to best 80-90% of your class when your class is as smart as the classes WUSTL is taking.
The reason Cardozo gets shit, though, is because even though it places 15% into big law + clerkships, besting many higher-ranked schools, it doesn't produce good outcomes for the vast majority of the other students, and it is really, really expensive, partially because of COL in NYC but also because it charges way more tuition than it has business charging. Cardozo may be beating other schools but those other schools are doing so poorly that beating them doesn't mean much. Also, as with WUSTL, other schools that aren't in major metropolitan areas may place some of their class into decent firms that aren't NLJ 250, so their numbers are somewhat deflated.
- DoveBodyWash
- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
Cardozos placement is inflated by IP. They draw a lot of older students with previous STEM WE. Also almost any likely increase in scholly from Dozo would be offset by the ridiculously high living cost in NYC.
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
I agree with you.Randomnumbers wrote:You can't count on doing better because of the 'quality of the student body'. The difference between a 166 and a 165 on the LSAT when it comes to taking law school exams is meaningless. At both places you'll be competing against very intelligent and motivated people - and you have no way of knowing how you will be at law school exams until you start taking them. Your logic here is very flawed.somewhatwayward wrote: Given these numbers, and without information about quality of jobs obtained, I think Cardozo makes more sense (although it does not make sense in an absolute sense) because you are getting basically the same placement while competing against a less qualified student body and probably getting more scholarship money since Cardozo will pay for a 165 while WUSTL will probably reject that person, forget a scholarship. The caveat is, as you point out, that if you don't want NYC, Cardozo will definitely be a bad choice. In that case, though, I might look to lower T1 schools with scholarships over WUSTL if the employment figures are similar. It sucks to be trying to best 80-90% of your class when your class is as smart as the classes WUSTL is taking.
The reason Cardozo gets shit, though, is because even though it places 15% into big law + clerkships, besting many higher-ranked schools, it doesn't produce good outcomes for the vast majority of the other students, and it is really, really expensive, partially because of COL in NYC but also because it charges way more tuition than it has business charging. Cardozo may be beating other schools but those other schools are doing so poorly that beating them doesn't mean much. Also, as with WUSTL, other schools that aren't in major metropolitan areas may place some of their class into decent firms that aren't NLJ 250, so their numbers are somewhat deflated.
For me the biggest thing is COL is NYC, which is why I am fearing even getting off the WL at Fordham. 3 years with no money coming in while paying ridiculous rent in NYC is very very scary to me
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- goldeneye
- Posts: 790
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 12:25 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
I got off the WL at Fordham last year. No scholly money that late. No thank you. COA was near 70k at that rate. I'll take STL cost of living and scholly at WUSTL.
the less you spend in law school, in theory, the more flexible you can be in looking for legal jobs.
the less you spend in law school, in theory, the more flexible you can be in looking for legal jobs.
Last edited by goldeneye on Sun Feb 10, 2013 5:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
Yeah Dozo (and other NYC schools below Fordham) get shit on constantly mainly due to cost. On top of NYC CoL Dozo's tuition is like 50k/year.
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
Yah. I think (but who knows) ill get into Cardozo but I really don't know if I should attend if they give me little to no money. That said, I would be very much okay with NYC big lawCrowing wrote:Yeah Dozo (and other NYC schools below Fordham) get shit on constantly mainly due to cost. On top of NYC CoL Dozo's tuition is like 50k/year.
- dproduct
- Posts: 4078
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
Something that is not stated quite enough on this website.goldeneye wrote:I got off the WL at Fordham last year. No scholly money that late. No thank you. COA was near 70k at that rate. I'll take STL cost of living and scholly at WUSTL.
the less you spend in law school, in theory, the more flexible you can be in looking for legal jobs.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
Agreed. But for me, with my numbers Im looking at sticker/close to sticker at 90% of the schools I applied to. So for me COL is key and it maybe the only think I can really control as tuition is not whats going to impact the decision (I may get surprised , but it's unlikely)dproduct wrote:Something that is not stated quite enough on this website.goldeneye wrote:I got off the WL at Fordham last year. No scholly money that late. No thank you. COA was near 70k at that rate. I'll take STL cost of living and scholly at WUSTL.
the less you spend in law school, in theory, the more flexible you can be in looking for legal jobs.
- timeandspace11
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:16 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
New York is definitely rough with rent, but isnt it possible to find something "relatively" affordable in Brooklyn if you have roommates? I understand a studio apartment or a 1 bedroom is out of the question, but roommates may drive the cost down
- shifty_eyed
- Posts: 1925
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 8:09 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
I think you also have to consider quality of life. If you are paying the same to live with 3 roommates in Brooklyn as you would be to live alone within walking distance to school, some might choose the lower COL school. Of course, there are those who LOVE the NYC experience and may find it worth it.timeandspace11 wrote:New York is definitely rough with rent, but isnt it possible to find something "relatively" affordable in Brooklyn if you have roommates? I understand a studio apartment or a 1 bedroom is out of the question, but roommates may drive the cost down
- timeandspace11
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:16 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2016
shifty_eyed wrote:I think you also have to consider quality of life. If you are paying the same to live with 3 roommates in Brooklyn as you would be to live alone within walking distance to school, some might choose the lower COL school. Of course, there are those who LOVE the NYC experience and may find it worth it.timeandspace11 wrote:New York is definitely rough with rent, but isnt it possible to find something "relatively" affordable in Brooklyn if you have roommates? I understand a studio apartment or a 1 bedroom is out of the question, but roommates may drive the cost down
Thats true. I think that is why NYC is so expensive. Even middle class people are willing to spend a lot to enjoy all the city has to offer. Nothing wrong with that.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login