Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 481
- Joined: Sat Jul 17, 2010 4:34 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
UChicagoLawAdmission @UChicagoLawApps
We're finalizing a group of decisions. Hoping to get them out tomorrow, but no promises. We will update Twitter tomorrow either way.
We're finalizing a group of decisions. Hoping to get them out tomorrow, but no promises. We will update Twitter tomorrow either way.
- clouded.memory
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 7:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
And it officially begins...fallingup wrote:UChicagoLawAdmission @UChicagoLawApps
We're finalizing a group of decisions. Hoping to get them out tomorrow, but no promises. We will update Twitter tomorrow either way.
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:11 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Haha, ohhhhhh no.
Last edited by mcb0902 on Thu Feb 14, 2013 2:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- callmemaybe84
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Be positive. We don't have to worry about an email coming today! At least we can relax now and wait for tomorrow.mcb0902 wrote:Haha, ohhhhhh no.
- LSATSCORES2012
- Posts: 770
- Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Ohh boooy.
I'm thinking those of us who updated today might be in for WL's/dings...
We all seem to be either under both medians or under the LSAT median...
Then again, earlier in the thread, people with the same UR date have received different decisions.
I'm thinking those of us who updated today might be in for WL's/dings...
We all seem to be either under both medians or under the LSAT median...
Then again, earlier in the thread, people with the same UR date have received different decisions.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- learntolift
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:31 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
well i went UR yesterday but that's because my interview was also yesterday i believe?
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:11 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
callmemaybe84 wrote:Be positive. We don't have to worry about an email coming today! At least we can relax now and wait for tomorrow.mcb0902 wrote:Haha, ohhhhhh no.
In an ideal world, I could follow your lead and relax for the day. Sadly in my world, I have just shed the relatively minor stress of wondering if an email might come today and replaced it with the MUCH larger stress of knowing that an email is coming tomorrow with an unknown decision.

I need to chill, I know, haha.
- callmemaybe84
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm above both, and was updated today. My guess is that updated today = decision tomorrow. No more significance than that. Y'all are over-thinking this.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Ohh boooy.
I'm thinking those of us who updated today might be in for WL's/dings...
We all seem to be either under both medians or under the LSAT median...
Then again, earlier in the thread, people with the same UR date have received different decisions.
- risa
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Would be crazy if I actually saw a decision tomorrow, but I won't hold my breath. My interview was only yesterday. (I updated yesterday after my interview and again today)
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1callmemaybe84 wrote:I'm above both, and was updated today. My guess is that updated today = decision tomorrow. No more significance than that. Y'all are over-thinking this.LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Ohh boooy.
I'm thinking those of us who updated today might be in for WL's/dings...
We all seem to be either under both medians or under the LSAT median...
Then again, earlier in the thread, people with the same UR date have received different decisions.
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm not even UR yet and this is all so exciting.
- cwid1391
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 10:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
UR 1/31, but no word since. Gimme dat ding, UC.
- trojandave
- Posts: 389
- Joined: Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
After my interview I had 2 updates also then nothing till decision time. You could be in the mix!risa wrote:Would be crazy if I actually saw a decision tomorrow, but I won't hold my breath. My interview was only yesterday. (I updated yesterday after my interview and again today)
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by Lurkington on Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
callmemaybe84 wrote:Y'all are over-thinking this.
- risa
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Snickerdoodle?Lurkington wrote:risa wrote:Would be crazy if I actually saw a decision tomorrow, but I won't hold my breath. My interview was only yesterday. (I updated yesterday after my interview and again today)
Bet you a cookie you get a decision tomorrow
- Spritzpiggy
- Posts: 229
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 9:57 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Had my interview today so I think its safe to assume I won't be in the next batch...
BUT I did learn something interesting during the interview. Apparently the interviewer ONLY sees your resume before the interview and doesn't know the other aspects of your application. So if you're discussing something that relates to your PS make sure to give them a little background.
BUT I did learn something interesting during the interview. Apparently the interviewer ONLY sees your resume before the interview and doesn't know the other aspects of your application. So if you're discussing something that relates to your PS make sure to give them a little background.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- risa
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
That definitely isn't true all the time. Dean Perry made a very direct reference to my diversity statement during my interview. She also told me my resume "screams law" so obviously she saw that too.Spritzpiggy wrote:Had my interview today so I think its safe to assume I won't be in the next batch...
BUT I did learn something interesting during the interview. Apparently the interviewer ONLY sees your resume before the interview and doesn't know the other aspects of your application. So if you're discussing something that relates to your PS make sure to give them a little background.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by Lurkington on Fri Jun 10, 2016 9:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
- DaRascal
- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Another update today. I think that's the 3rd one. Maybe Chicago wants to show me some love on V-Day... probably not though... definitely not lol... 

- venus
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Date change. Interviewed at the end of January. Tomorrow is going to be a very unproductive day for me. Planning on refreshing TLS, the status checker, my inbox and Twitter all day.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- SteelPenguin
- Posts: 1089
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2012 12:37 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sorry you're probably right. I haven't been paying much attention to this thread because I'm such a long shot. I just hadn't seen 4 URs at other schools I've been looking at.clouded.memory wrote:I have also had 4 URs, but I wasn't under the impression that it was unusual.SteelPenguin wrote:That's crazy. I've never heard of 4 URs before. At least you'll probably get an answer soon, right?robot_socrates wrote:Status change for me too. This is UR 4 for me (1/9, interview 1/29, UR 1/29, 1/30, now today). I'm freaking out.
-
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:37 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
We're all getting in!
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
This is exciting. Pulling for y'all!
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You mean the Rise Against logo? Apparently some megaposter around here used that for his tar for a while so it was getting people confused.JamesDean1955 wrote:Crowing what happened to the bad-ass tar. Drastic tar change you pulled there.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login