Thanks. I figure I'll send my letter tomorrow. Fingers crossed. I really, really love Stanford.BioEBear2010 wrote:Yeah, the general admissions e-mail (I think it's admissions@law.stanford.edu).BenJ wrote:BioEBear, you said you e-mailed your LOCI, right? To which email address did you send it? The general admissions email?
Also, should I PDF the LOCI and attached it, or just send it in the body of the email?
You can do either, but I just put it in the body.
Stanford 2010!!! Forum
-
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
- WhiskeyGuy
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:34 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I think it would unwise to send a LOCI directly to Faye or another admissions staffer. SLS receives many updates such as LOCIs at the general admissions e-mail address, and likely has protocols to ensure that updates sent there a) do not become lost or forgotten and b) are quickly added to students' files. While sending a LOCI directly to Faye may get her initial attention, it may also run a higher risk of the LOCI not getting added to your file when you need it to. This is total speculation, but it doesn't seem unlikely; I'd play it safe.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Wow, BenJ, are you hand writing your LOCI? Now that is dedication.BenJ wrote:Also, should I PDF the LOCI and attach it, or just send it in the body of the email?
-
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Dean Deal and Members of the Admission Committee;crackberry wrote:Wow, BenJ, are you hand writing your LOCI? Now that is dedication.BenJ wrote:Also, should I PDF the LOCI and attach it, or just send it in the body of the email?
I am writing to express my continued interest in Stanford Law School. Since my last update, as you can probably see, I have learned several forms of beautiful Chinese calligraphy. It's quite stunning, huh? I thought you might like it. It was all for you.
Smooches,
BenJ
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
The debate wasn't over where he should physically send the letter but to whom he should address it (like in the body of the letter). I still feel it should read something along the lines of "Dear Dean Deal and Members of the Admissions Committee," rather than "Dear Members of the Admissions Committee" or "To Whom It May Concern" or some other alternative.WhiskeyGuy wrote:I think it would unwise to send a LOCI directly to Faye or another admissions staffer. SLS receives many updates such as LOCIs at the general admissions e-mail address, and likely has protocols to ensure that updates sent there a) do not become lost or forgotten and b) are quickly added to students' files. While sending a LOCI directly to Faye may get her initial attention, it may also run a higher risk of the LOCI not getting added to your file when you need it to. This is total speculation, but it doesn't seem unlikely; I'd play it safe.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- WhiskeyGuy
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:34 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I was belatedly joining the conversation about which e-mail address they should use (one page back). I agree with you, though, that the letter should be addressed to Dean Deal and the Committee--don't let the other folks feel left out!crackberry wrote:The debate wasn't over where he should physically send the letter but to whom he should address it (like in the body of the letter). I still feel it should read something along the lines of "Dear Dean Deal and Members of the Admissions Committee," rather than "Dear Members of the Admissions Committee" or "To Whom It May Concern" or some other alternative.WhiskeyGuy wrote:I think it would unwise to send a LOCI directly to Faye or another admissions staffer. SLS receives many updates such as LOCIs at the general admissions e-mail address, and likely has protocols to ensure that updates sent there a) do not become lost or forgotten and b) are quickly added to students' files. While sending a LOCI directly to Faye may get her initial attention, it may also run a higher risk of the LOCI not getting added to your file when you need it to. This is total speculation, but it doesn't seem unlikely; I'd play it safe.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
BenJ - alternatively, I (or any admit) can give you Dean Deal's digits and you can call her directly. She probably won't think it's at all creepy or inappropriate.
-
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I could actually do that with Egyptian hieroglyphs. I'm taking a class this semester. LOL.Kretzy wrote:Dean Deal and Members of the Admission Committee;crackberry wrote:Wow, BenJ, are you hand writing your LOCI? Now that is dedication.BenJ wrote:Also, should I PDF the LOCI and attach it, or just send it in the body of the email?
I am writing to express my continued interest in Stanford Law School. Since my last update, as you can probably see, I have learned several forms of beautiful Chinese calligraphy. It's quite stunning, huh? I thought you might like it. It was all for you.
Smooches,
BenJ
bnr-wy ntk n ib-i, Stanford.
(How sweet you are in my heart, Stanford.)
-
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Wow. That's pretty amazing, actually. Just make Dean Deal know it's actual hieroglyphs, and not just you translating your Word document into Wingdings.BenJ wrote:I could actually do that with Egyptian hieroglyphs. I'm taking a class this semester. LOL.Kretzy wrote:Dean Deal and Members of the Admission Committee;crackberry wrote:Wow, BenJ, are you hand writing your LOCI? Now that is dedication.BenJ wrote:Also, should I PDF the LOCI and attach it, or just send it in the body of the email?
I am writing to express my continued interest in Stanford Law School. Since my last update, as you can probably see, I have learned several forms of beautiful Chinese calligraphy. It's quite stunning, huh? I thought you might like it. It was all for you.
Smooches,
BenJ
bnr-wy ntk n ib-i, Stanford.
(How sweet you are in my heart, Stanford.)

- clyde_barrow
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:33 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
or she'll return a ding, also written in wingdings.Kretzy wrote: Just make Dean Deal know it's actual hieroglyphs, and not just you translating your Word document into Wingdings.

-
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I had a dream last night that, after sending in my LOCI, Stanford turned my app to ED and then dinged me a few hours later via status checker. Which makes no sense on multiple levels. I think I'm going crazy.
Anyway, not including any hieroglyphs but will actually be sending the LOCI after reading it over a few times.
Anyway, not including any hieroglyphs but will actually be sending the LOCI after reading it over a few times.
- clyde_barrow
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:33 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
i've had more than one admissions-related dream this cycle. none quite as funny/nonsensical as yours, though, but i still felt like i was going nuts.BenJ wrote:I had a dream last night that, after sending in my LOCI, Stanford turned my app to ED and then dinged me a few hours later via status checker. Which makes no sense on multiple levels. I think I'm going crazy.
Anyway, not including any hieroglyphs but will actually be sending the LOCI after reading it over a few times.
best of luck w/ the LOCI. hope you get it!!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- tintin
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:26 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
well mine is sent fwiw. now...more waiting! 

- Tangerine Gleam
- Posts: 1280
- Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 4:50 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
When will the dinghammer smash me? Submitted in late October.
- Core
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
+1Tangerine Gleam wrote:When will the dinghammer smash me? Submitted in [strike]late[/strike]mid October.
-
- Posts: 814
- Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 12:19 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I really just want an answer so I can make a final decision... I know it's probably a rejection, so I just hope it comes sooner than laterCore wrote:+1Tangerine Gleam wrote:When will the dinghammer smash me? Submitted in [strike]late[/strike]mid October.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
+1. This is the last school left that can pull me away so I want an answer so I can know for sure!Amelie wrote:I really just want an answer so I can make a final decision... I know it's probably a rejection, so I just hope it comes sooner than laterCore wrote:+1Tangerine Gleam wrote:When will the dinghammer smash me? Submitted in [strike]late[/strike]mid October.
- tintin
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:26 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
+10000000000000L Hoping for 1 wrote:+1. This is the last school left that can pull me away so I want an answer so I can know for sure!Amelie wrote:I really just want an answer so I can make a final decision... I know it's probably a rejection, so I just hope it comes sooner than laterCore wrote:+1Tangerine Gleam wrote:When will the dinghammer smash me? Submitted in [strike]late[/strike]mid October.
- WhiskeyGuy
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:34 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
FYI folks: friend just got the call. Faye is back on the horn today!
- tintin
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:26 am
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
but since she only seems to do 1 call per day, the rest of us are probably out of luckWhiskeyGuy wrote:FYI folks: friend just got the call. Faye is back on the horn today!
also, damn, she must wake up early.

edited: whiskey, do you know when your friend went complete?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- theadw
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 1:05 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
I just got in. Yikes!
Numbers on LSN (I just got a 175 on the February test as well); I also have a unique commitment to SLS. PM for details.
Numbers on LSN (I just got a 175 on the February test as well); I also have a unique commitment to SLS. PM for details.
- WhiskeyGuy
- Posts: 361
- Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 4:34 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Haha, yes. He got called around 7:30 PST. I think Faye called me even earlier.tintin wrote:but since she only seems to do 1 call per day, the rest of us are probably out of luckWhiskeyGuy wrote:FYI folks: friend just got the call. Faye is back on the horn today!
also, damn, she must wake up early.
-
- Posts: 1437
- Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:11 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Congrats!theadw wrote:I just got in. Yikes!
Numbers on LSN (I just got a 175 on the February test as well); I also have a unique commitment to SLS. PM for details.
-
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Stanford 2010!!!
Awesome, congratulationstheadw wrote:I just got in. Yikes!
Numbers on LSN (I just got a 175 on the February test as well); I also have a unique commitment to SLS. PM for details.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login