I just went complete on 2/12. Fuck.wisteria wrote:complete 12/5, UR 2/11. It was torture.ohpobrecito wrote:I know this is a noob question, but how long after going complete can I expect to go under review?
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I doubt you'll have to wait that long like we did. With the ED applications out of the way, I'm sure the RD process is speeding up. Plus, they just have to catch up with the other schools at some point.ohpobrecito wrote:I just went complete on 2/12. Fuck.wisteria wrote:complete 12/5, UR 2/11. It was torture.ohpobrecito wrote:I know this is a noob question, but how long after going complete can I expect to go under review?
-
- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 8:58 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Your complete and UR dates give me hope. I've been complete since 12/19 and was beginning to feel forgotten.wisteria wrote:complete 12/5, UR 2/11. It was torture.ohpobrecito wrote:I know this is a noob question, but how long after going complete can I expect to go under review?
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I think I was complete 9/26 and UR1 12/4. But the process should be a lot faster now than it was back then.
- learntolift
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:31 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
have you received your decision yet? sorry i havent read all the pages if you already posted thatCrowing wrote:I think I was complete 9/26 and UR1 12/4. But the process should be a lot faster now than it was back then.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yeah. I had a 2nd UR minutes after my interview and a 3rd about a week later then got my decision as part of the 1/23 batch. Unlike some places, Chicago really does seem to be working chronologically.learntolift wrote:have you received your decision yet? sorry i havent read all the pages if you already posted thatCrowing wrote:I think I was complete 9/26 and UR1 12/4. But the process should be a lot faster now than it was back then.
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by bernaldiaz on Wed Feb 13, 2013 10:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Is it advisable to write a thank you note?
- learntolift
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:31 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
say whatbernaldiaz wrote:Does anyone know how much time there typically is between waives of Rubies? and do you think a HYS acceptance would be more valuable in negotiating for a Ruby or, say, the Levy?
- bernaldiaz
- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sorry posted in the wrong place.learntolift wrote:say whatbernaldiaz wrote:Does anyone know how much time there typically is between waives of Rubies? and do you think a HYS acceptance would be more valuable in negotiating for a Ruby or, say, the Levy?
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
If you're talking about for the interview I didn't because it wasn't in-person.Dr. Gaius Baltar wrote:Is it advisable to write a thank you note?
Plus U of C seems to hate additional correspondence lol.
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Crowing wrote:If you're talking about for the interview I didn't because it wasn't in-person.Dr. Gaius Baltar wrote:Is it advisable to write a thank you note?
Plus U of C seems to hate additional correspondence lol.
This is the part that scares me.
- WhiteyCakes
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I did and it was well-receivedDr. Gaius Baltar wrote:Is it advisable to write a thank you note?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- robot_socrates
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Shoot, now I'm stressed out about not sending one myself. Can one of the Jan-Admits make me feel better and confirm they got accepted without sending a thank you note?WhiteyCakes wrote:I did and it was well-receivedDr. Gaius Baltar wrote:Is it advisable to write a thank you note?
- tsr92
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Sun Sep 02, 2012 3:52 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Didn't send one and got in. I don't think all that many sent thank you notes.robot_socrates wrote:Shoot, now I'm stressed out about not sending one myself. Can one of the Jan-Admits make me feel better and confirm they got accepted without sending a thank you note?WhiteyCakes wrote:I did and it was well-receivedDr. Gaius Baltar wrote:Is it advisable to write a thank you note?
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Accepted without a thank you. Don't worry about it bro.robot_socrates wrote:Shoot, now I'm stressed out about not sending one myself. Can one of the Jan-Admits make me feel better and confirm they got accepted without sending a thank you note?WhiteyCakes wrote:I did and it was well-receivedDr. Gaius Baltar wrote:Is it advisable to write a thank you note?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 3:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I ended up writing it because I felt weird and itchy from doing an interview and not sending a thank you note.
I really did enjoy my interview. The interviewer was pretty friendly.
I really did enjoy my interview. The interviewer was pretty friendly.
- WhiteyCakes
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Believe it or not, I got a thank-you note for my thank-you note.applemaroon wrote:How do you know it was well-received?WhiteyCakes wrote:I did and it was well-receivedDr. Gaius Baltar wrote:Is it advisable to write a thank you note?
- JamesDean1955
- Posts: 744
- Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 4:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Crowing what happened to the bad-ass tar. Drastic tar change you pulled there.
-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 10:42 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So thank you note is the verdict?
I think that was the most fun, relaxed interview I have EVER had. What a wonderful experience.
I think that was the most fun, relaxed interview I have EVER had. What a wonderful experience.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- WhiteyCakes
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You probably can't go wrong either way, but I always prefer to write one rather than not write one.iteachtenthgrade wrote:So thank you note is the verdict?
I think that was the most fun, relaxed interview I have EVER had. What a wonderful experience.
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Haven't interviewed with Chicago, but in general life this is credited.WhiteyCakes wrote:You probably can't go wrong either way, but I always prefer to write one rather than not write one.iteachtenthgrade wrote:So thank you note is the verdict?
I think that was the most fun, relaxed interview I have EVER had. What a wonderful experience.
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1ohpobrecito wrote:Haven't interviewed with Chicago, but in general life this is credited.WhiteyCakes wrote:You probably can't go wrong either way, but I always prefer to write one rather than not write one.iteachtenthgrade wrote:So thank you note is the verdict?
I think that was the most fun, relaxed interview I have EVER had. What a wonderful experience.
Edit: Not sure about law schools, but I've interviewed with some firms/companies who said (after they hired me) that they won't hire anyone who "does not have the courtesy to send a note of gratitude." I would think this is especially applicable to Admissions Offices at T14 schools that have to do a lot of tedious work.
- applemaroon
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by applemaroon on Wed Sep 04, 2013 10:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login