I don't think anyone has been invited for multiple interviews.whereskyle wrote:Two questions.
Firstly, are certain applicants interviewed more than once?
Secondly, has anyone here, who thought his or her interview went pretty well, been disappointed by subsequent results?
Thanks, all.
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- WhiteyCakes
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- RSterling
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
For first-wave admits: what are your thoughts on when scholarship info (beyond the Ruby) will come out?
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 278
- Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2012 2:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by one_by_one on Fri Jul 17, 2015 1:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 716
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 5:37 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
May the silence on question two be golden!whereskyle wrote:Two questions.
Firstly, are certain applicants interviewed more than once?
Secondly, has anyone here, who thought his or her interview went pretty well, been disappointed by subsequent results?
Thanks, all.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- risa
- Posts: 466
- Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 4:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Re: #2, check out the spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/lv? ... ldWc#gid=0whereskyle wrote:Two questions.
Firstly, are certain applicants interviewed more than once?
Secondly, has anyone here, who thought his or her interview went pretty well, been disappointed by subsequent results?
Thanks, all.
I think my interview this morning went well! Thanks so much to those who posted about their experiences, so I felt prepared for every question I got. I was not pleased with my cat (the real Risa) who was pawing at my bedroom door and wailing to get let in the whole time but luckily I'm used to her antics and wasn't too distracted! I will post more in Regulus' how-to-prep-for-an-interview thread re: specifics.
ETA: Posted re: specific questions here: http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 0#p6423453
Last edited by risa on Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 11:07 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
How long after going UR does it generally take to receive an invitation to interview? I went UR on 2/11.
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Mon Feb 16, 2015 2:07 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I believe Lavitz thought his interview went well but was WLed.whereskyle wrote:May the silence on question two be golden!whereskyle wrote:Two questions.
Firstly, are certain applicants interviewed more than once?
Secondly, has anyone here, who thought his or her interview went pretty well, been disappointed by subsequent results?
Thanks, all.
- Teflon_Don
- Posts: 474
- Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2012 7:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
What day did the first wave of RDs get in?
- WhiteyCakes
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thursday?Teflon_Don wrote:What day did the first wave of RDs get in?
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It was a Wednesday. 1/23.WhiteyCakes wrote:Thursday?Teflon_Don wrote:What day did the first wave of RDs get in?
- venus
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
And I've been unproductive all day today waiting for a Twitter post or decisions... There is still hope but I think it's going to be next week.Crowing wrote:It was a Wednesday. 1/23.WhiteyCakes wrote:Thursday?Teflon_Don wrote:What day did the first wave of RDs get in?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Nala7892
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 12:33 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
just had my interview with Ann Perry. she didn't really look at me which threw me off but i kind of think i'm off my interview game anyway. hopefully it went well, despite my perceptions, though because i would love to stay in illinois and go to uchicago!
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
UR 1/31. still nothing.ht2988 wrote:How long after going UR does it generally take to receive an invitation to interview? I went UR on 2/11.
- learntolift
- Posts: 198
- Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 8:31 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
just had mine as well probably right after youNala7892 wrote:just had my interview with Ann Perry. she didn't really look at me which threw me off but i kind of think i'm off my interview game anyway. hopefully it went well, despite my perceptions, though because i would love to stay in illinois and go to uchicago!
edit: back to UR already o.o
- robot_socrates
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Officially losing hope that today is a decision day 

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Crowing
- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I expect a twitter update from admissions before they're issued like last time.robot_socrates wrote:Officially losing hope that today is a decision day
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Correct.Crowing wrote:I believe Lavitz thought his interview went well but was WLed.whereskyle wrote:May the silence on question two be golden!whereskyle wrote:Two questions.
Firstly, are certain applicants interviewed more than once?
Secondly, has anyone here, who thought his or her interview went pretty well, been disappointed by subsequent results?
Thanks, all.
- callmemaybe84
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:04 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I want to just give you a hug, Lavitz. Some really good news has to come your way soon enough.Lavitz wrote: Correct.
- Lavitz
- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks. I already got some really good news today in the form of $$$ at Cornell but I guess it doesn't hurt to hope for more good news.callmemaybe84 wrote:I want to just give you a hug, Lavitz. Some really good news has to come your way soon enough.Lavitz wrote: Correct.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- banjo
- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
NICE. CONGRATS! It's going to take a lot to top that.Lavitz wrote:Thanks. I already got some really good news today in the form of $$$ at Cornell but I guess it doesn't hurt to hope for more good news.callmemaybe84 wrote:I want to just give you a hug, Lavitz. Some really good news has to come your way soon enough.Lavitz wrote: Correct.
- reallysearch
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Jun 23, 2012 1:57 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sir, your numbers are for HYSLavitz wrote:Thanks. I already got some really good news today in the form of $$$ at Cornell but I guess it doesn't hurt to hope for more good news.callmemaybe84 wrote:I want to just give you a hug, Lavitz. Some really good news has to come your way soon enough.Lavitz wrote: Correct.

-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I know this is a noob question, but how long after going complete can I expect to go under review?
-
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2012 4:43 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
complete 12/5, UR 2/11. It was torture.ohpobrecito wrote:I know this is a noob question, but how long after going complete can I expect to go under review?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login