nah, probs today or tomorrow.Helmholtz wrote:Did you get your letter yet?Veritas wrote:totesgahthelaw wrote:this thread is getting so morose...
this week sucks
nah, probs today or tomorrow.Helmholtz wrote:Did you get your letter yet?Veritas wrote:totesgahthelaw wrote:this thread is getting so morose...
Sorry to hear Veritas, i thought you'd be inVeritas wrote:nah, probs today or tomorrow.Helmholtz wrote:Did you get your letter yet?Veritas wrote:totesgahthelaw wrote:this thread is getting so morose...
this week sucks
So then why are people who went complete earlier than those who've received deferrals still at EA Complete? I have a hard time believing NO ONE will get in EA this year. A very hard time, in fact.Oban wrote:So one has gotten in yet? Honestly i think this years cycle will be nothing like last years. I don't think defferals mean anything, i mean autoadmits have been deffered along side with autorejects.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
agreed!crackberry wrote:So then why are people who went complete earlier than those who've received deferrals still at EA Complete? I have a hard time believing NO ONE will get in EA this year. A very hard time, in fact.Oban wrote:So one has gotten in yet? Honestly i think this years cycle will be nothing like last years. I don't think defferals mean anything, i mean autoadmits have been deffered along side with autorejects.
How did you get that he thinks no one will be accepted EA from his post?crackberry wrote:So then why are people who went complete earlier than those who've received deferrals still at EA Complete? I have a hard time believing NO ONE will get in EA this year. A very hard time, in fact.Oban wrote:So one has gotten in yet? Honestly i think this years cycle will be nothing like last years. I don't think defferals mean anything, i mean autoadmits have been deffered along side with autorejects.
+100! The key question though, I think, is whether there will be EA rejections. So far it's all deferrals, correct? Do we think they're just deferring/accepting everyone, or deferring/accepting/rejecting?finalaspects wrote:agreed!crackberry wrote:So then why are people who went complete earlier than those who've received deferrals still at EA Complete? I have a hard time believing NO ONE will get in EA this year. A very hard time, in fact.Oban wrote:So one has gotten in yet? Honestly i think this years cycle will be nothing like last years. I don't think defferals mean anything, i mean autoadmits have been deffered along side with autorejects.
Neg them imo.Helmholtz wrote:Just got off the phone with Cornell. They will be accepting nobody this year in an attempt to make them appear "hard to get." hth
That's weird. They told me last week when I called that these deferrals were for all the "assholes" who referenced Andy Bernard in the "Why Cornell" section.Helmholtz wrote:Just got off the phone with Cornell. They will be accepting nobody this year in an attempt to make them appear "hard to get." hth
I call BS, I wasnt deferredAngryAvocado wrote:That's weird. They told me last week when I called that these deferrals were for all the "assholes" who referenced Andy Bernard in the "Why Cornell" section.Helmholtz wrote:Just got off the phone with Cornell. They will be accepting nobody this year in an attempt to make them appear "hard to get." hth
That's what you get, assholes.
...yet.0L Hoping for 1 wrote:I call BS, I wasnt deferredAngryAvocado wrote:That's weird. They told me last week when I called that these deferrals were for all the "assholes" who referenced Andy Bernard in the "Why Cornell" section.Helmholtz wrote:Just got off the phone with Cornell. They will be accepting nobody this year in an attempt to make them appear "hard to get." hth
That's what you get, assholes.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
goodolgil wrote: -Fugazi lyrics-
ClemCarter wrote:goodolgil wrote: -Fugazi lyrics-
So glad I'm not the only one who gets this stuck in my head regularly now.
alexyoshi wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMOAXm94VWo
"i am a patient applicant... i wait i wait i wait i wait"
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
goodolgil wrote:haha, guess I got beaten to the punch on that one.
We're all conformists to Ian Mackaye I'm sure
Sounds like they still intend to accept people during EA then. Just too many people applied, making them defer a lot while reviewing the rest of EA. That's good news!swc65 wrote:So i had my interview with Cornell today and it went well.
I also spoke the dean of admissions about all this deferral business. He explained that there has been a significant uptick in applications (16%). he also said that they were not sure if it was just people applying earlier or more people or what. he also said that during the last recession they ended up with too many students and did not have enough room for them. They are trying to avoid that this year!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
I don't think it was an IT mistake. What makes you say that? I looked at the old thread and I don't see where it says that.SHARK WEEK! wrote:That blurb was an IT mistake, no? So, I wouldn't count on it.march319 wrote:Are people expecting status check acceptances to be like last year where there is a blurb about the admitted students site underneath your decision? Or is the status checker simply going to say "Decision" and then you find out what the decision is 10-14 days later by mail.
sounds like they will probably be trying to raise their #s too if they really do have that many more applicants. interesting, thanks for this info!swc65 wrote:So i had my interview with Cornell today and it went well.
I also spoke the dean of admissions about all this deferral business. He explained that there has been a significant uptick in applications (16%). he also said that they were not sure if it was just people applying earlier or more people or what. he also said that during the last recession they ended up with too many students and did not have enough room for them. They are trying to avoid that this year!
From last year, in the old thread:march319 wrote:I don't think it was an IT mistake. What makes you say that? I looked at the old thread and I don't see where it says that.SHARK WEEK! wrote:That blurb was an IT mistake, no? So, I wouldn't count on it.march319 wrote:Are people expecting status check acceptances to be like last year where there is a blurb about the admitted students site underneath your decision? Or is the status checker simply going to say "Decision" and then you find out what the decision is 10-14 days later by mail.
sentinal5656 wrote:toplawapp wrote:So, if there's no mention of an admitted student website and my status checker says "decision", does it mean I'm rejected?
no. they fixed the admitted students site glitch.
you are still in the running. GL
Yeah, but still. Deferring a 175/3.7? I mean what are they waiting for?tintin wrote:sounds like they will probably be trying to raise their #s too if they really do have that many more applicants. interesting, thanks for this info!swc65 wrote:So i had my interview with Cornell today and it went well.
I also spoke the dean of admissions about all this deferral business. He explained that there has been a significant uptick in applications (16%). he also said that they were not sure if it was just people applying earlier or more people or what. he also said that during the last recession they ended up with too many students and did not have enough room for them. They are trying to avoid that this year!
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login