Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle) Forum
- CMHCLT
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 9:48 am
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Complete 12/7
DLS: 3/26
Leaving from work today to drive across the country... poorly timed mailing :/
DLS: 3/26
Leaving from work today to drive across the country... poorly timed mailing :/
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Well, shoot. Has Vandy been taking this long with generally everyone?CMHCLT wrote:Complete 12/7
DLS: 3/26
- marbellie
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:37 am
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
JXander wrote:Well, shoot. Has Vandy been taking this long with generally everyone?CMHCLT wrote:Complete 12/7
DLS: 3/26
I'm not sure...I went to the last ASW (March 15th) and most of the people I spoke with there heard back within a month and were praising Vandy's efficiency/expediency. I heard back in a week..I'm a reverse splitter so I was pretty surprised but do have strong softs. As far as I can tell the only pattern is if the decision is given quickly it's a yes and longer ones are toss ups.
That's just my observation, any thoughts? (Good luck to those still waiting!)
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Ah, interesting. I am wondering if they are similar to some of the other schools that are desperate to snag the URMs pretty quickly, but take longer for everyone else.marbellie wrote:JXander wrote:Well, shoot. Has Vandy been taking this long with generally everyone?CMHCLT wrote:Complete 12/7
DLS: 3/26
I'm not sure...I went to the last ASW (March 15th) and most of the people I spoke with there heard back within a month and were praising Vandy's efficiency/expediency. I heard back in a week..I'm a reverse splitter so I was pretty surprised but do have strong softs. As far as I can tell the only pattern is if the decision is given quickly it's a yes and longer ones are toss ups.
That's just my observation, any thoughts? (Good luck to those still waiting!)
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Come on Vandy, I need an answer from you more than anyone. Complete since 1/28
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CMHCLT
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Thu Nov 08, 2012 9:48 am
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
JXander wrote:Ah, interesting. I am wondering if they are similar to some of the other schools that are desperate to snag the URMs pretty quickly, but take longer for everyone else.marbellie wrote:JXander wrote:Well, shoot. Has Vandy been taking this long with generally everyone?CMHCLT wrote:Complete 12/7
DLS: 3/26
I'm not sure...I went to the last ASW (March 15th) and most of the people I spoke with there heard back within a month and were praising Vandy's efficiency/expediency. I heard back in a week..I'm a reverse splitter so I was pretty surprised but do have strong softs. As far as I can tell the only pattern is if the decision is given quickly it's a yes and longer ones are toss ups.
That's just my observation, any thoughts? (Good luck to those still waiting!)
Not an URM, but do have solid softs. I am also below both medians...
Good luck to everyone! I'm not really expecting an acceptance, if I'm realistic
- marbellie
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Wed Jan 30, 2013 10:37 am
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Yeah that might be it, but only two of the people that talked about it were minorities haha. Who knows the method to their madnessJXander wrote:Ah, interesting. I am wondering if they are similar to some of the other schools that are desperate to snag the URMs pretty quickly, but take longer for everyone else.marbellie wrote:JXander wrote:Well, shoot. Has Vandy been taking this long with generally everyone?CMHCLT wrote:Complete 12/7
DLS: 3/26
I'm not sure...I went to the last ASW (March 15th) and most of the people I spoke with there heard back within a month and were praising Vandy's efficiency/expediency. I heard back in a week..I'm a reverse splitter so I was pretty surprised but do have strong softs. As far as I can tell the only pattern is if the decision is given quickly it's a yes and longer ones are toss ups.
That's just my observation, any thoughts? (Good luck to those still waiting!)

- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
I think I am in the group of low numbers URM with impressive softs that are put aside to see what URM depositsmarbellie wrote:Yeah that might be it, but only two of the people that talked about it were minorities haha. Who knows the method to their madnessJXander wrote:Ah, interesting. I am wondering if they are similar to some of the other schools that are desperate to snag the URMs pretty quickly, but take longer for everyone else.marbellie wrote:JXander wrote: Well, shoot. Has Vandy been taking this long with generally everyone?
I'm not sure...I went to the last ASW (March 15th) and most of the people I spoke with there heard back within a month and were praising Vandy's efficiency/expediency. I heard back in a week..I'm a reverse splitter so I was pretty surprised but do have strong softs. As far as I can tell the only pattern is if the decision is given quickly it's a yes and longer ones are toss ups.
That's just my observation, any thoughts? (Good luck to those still waiting!)
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:40 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Visited yesterday, sat in on a class, talked to Christina...
I want to go to there. Wow.
I want to go to there. Wow.
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Can you give an overall impression of the school, students, housing, culture, etc?iamsupergrover wrote:Visited yesterday, sat in on a class, talked to Christina...
I want to go to there. Wow.
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
I feel like this is the word of the day. Even after visiting some schools I still don't get how people get an opinion about the culture. Plus I really don't understand the real meaning of culture in the context of LS.ironbmike wrote:Can you give an overall impression of the school, students, housing, culture, etc?iamsupergrover wrote:Visited yesterday, sat in on a class, talked to Christina...
I want to go to there. Wow.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
So...negotiating with Vanderbilt? Lolno, not even worth a shot? Everyone who has tried has been shot down, correct?
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
You don't think different schools have different cultures?JayJones78 wrote:I feel like this is the word of the day. Even after visiting some schools I still don't get how people get an opinion about the culture. Plus I really don't understand the real meaning of culture in the context of LS.ironbmike wrote:Can you give an overall impression of the school, students, housing, culture, etc?iamsupergrover wrote:Visited yesterday, sat in on a class, talked to Christina...
I want to go to there. Wow.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- alwayssunnyinfl
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
There's not cost in emailing, so you might as well. But yeah, it seems like they do not negotiate.BigZuck wrote:So...negotiating with Vanderbilt? Lolno, not even worth a shot? Everyone who has tried has been shot down, correct?
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 12:53 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
This. But one of the 3Ls at the March ASW student panel said that negotiations have happened in the past. Some schools seem to be giving out money to more people than before, less likely to up individual scholarship amounts.alwayssunnyinfl wrote:There's not cost in emailing, so you might as well. But yeah, it seems like they do not negotiate.BigZuck wrote:So...negotiating with Vanderbilt? Lolno, not even worth a shot? Everyone who has tried has been shot down, correct?
- JayJones78
- Posts: 2025
- Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
They most certainly do, I just don't know how a visitor can observe this from a visit or even ASW.ironbmike wrote:You don't think different schools have different cultures?JayJones78 wrote:I feel like this is the word of the day. Even after visiting some schools I still don't get how people get an opinion about the culture. Plus I really don't understand the real meaning of culture in the context of LS.ironbmike wrote:Can you give an overall impression of the school, students, housing, culture, etc?iamsupergrover wrote:Visited yesterday, sat in on a class, talked to Christina...
I want to go to there. Wow.
-
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Wed Jun 27, 2012 12:31 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
True, but sometimes it's easy to pick up on big differences just by talking to people.JayJones78 wrote:They most certainly do, I just don't know how a visitor can observe this from a visit or even ASW.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 10:40 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
I sat in on a 1st year class, and it was the only school i've visited where random students came up, chatted, seemed genuinely excited to talk to a prospective student. It seemed far less competitive than another school I had visited the day before, in terms of the way students treated each other. Hard to describe exactly, just a feeling. The building has a nice aura to it. I spent the rest of my time in town farting around Nashville, and the area really appealed to me. Having gone to UCSB, any housing is an improvement over Isla Vista's housing situation (in terms of cost and demand). The admissions dept also didn't give me a hard sell, which was a nice change. (Although that probably has something to do with the fact that I'm accepted at the other schools; this is the only one I've visited that I'm waitlisted at.)ironbmike wrote: Can you give an overall impression of the school, students, housing, culture, etc?
That being said, I hope you admitted students hate it, and if you haven't visited, it's horrible, you definitely should NOT go there.

Last edited by iamsupergrover on Thu Mar 28, 2013 11:57 am, edited 1 time in total.
- alwayssunnyinfl
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
My favorite part was how often everyone reinforced the idea that the small class size means you can't really afford to be a jerk. I've put up with so many jerks at my giant Anonymous State U that I'm really looking forward to an environment where reputation and shame keep people in line.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
alwayssunnyinfl wrote:My favorite part was how often everyone reinforced the idea that the small class size means you can't really afford to be a jerk. I've put up with so many jerks at my giant Anonymous State U that I'm really looking forward to an environment where reputation and shame keep people in line.

-
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 7:04 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
To be clear, they rarely negotiate, but it does certainly happen. In any case, Sunny is right. It takes so little effort on your part to negotiate that there is absolutely no good reason not to try. You're already accepted so the worst that can happen is that they don't give you any more money.alwayssunnyinfl wrote:There's not cost in emailing, so you might as well. But yeah, it seems like they do not negotiate.BigZuck wrote:So...negotiating with Vanderbilt? Lolno, not even worth a shot? Everyone who has tried has been shot down, correct?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TheMostDangerousLG
- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Question: application submit and received, and I got the email about the virtual whatever. Registered, filled out my profile with LSAC number, and tried to view my application status.. but it says that I "haven't submit an application or haven't added my LSAC number" (paraphrasing). Anyone know what's up? How do I get the status checker to work?
Help would be appreciated!
Help would be appreciated!
-
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2011 7:04 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
Figuring out the "culture" of a law school can be tricky. I suggest keeping your eyes open for the following: When you visit, are students open and welcoming? What do they say about the school? How about professors? Do they bother talking to prospective students? What type of student goes to that school? (Yes, it can be hard to generalize w/r/t this last question, but I can say from personal experience that students at different schools I visited often shared similar characteristics).JayJones78 wrote:I feel like this is the word of the day. Even after visiting some schools I still don't get how people get an opinion about the culture. Plus I really don't understand the real meaning of culture in the context of LS.ironbmike wrote:Can you give an overall impression of the school, students, housing, culture, etc?iamsupergrover wrote:Visited yesterday, sat in on a class, talked to Christina...
I want to go to there. Wow.
Also, I think the general vibe you get about a school speaks directly to its culture (ex. laid-back, uptight, outgoing, bookish, collegial, competitive, etc.) There is a huge spectrum of things to consider, but when you combine them all I think that's the culture you get.
- teiswei
- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
It takes a few days for the systems to sync. It'll come up in a day or two. If not, email.TheMostDangerousLG wrote:Question: application submit and received, and I got the email about the virtual whatever. Registered, filled out my profile with LSAC number, and tried to view my application status.. but it says that I "haven't submit an application or haven't added my LSAC number" (paraphrasing). Anyone know what's up? How do I get the status checker to work?
Help would be appreciated!
-
- Posts: 5319
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Re: Vanderbilt c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 Cycle)
GUISE I really loved Vandy and wish I could be thurr.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login