
UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
- Micdiddy

- Posts: 2231
- Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 3:38 pm
- NoodleyOne

- Posts: 2326
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 7:32 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Y'all are nerds.
-
jym_dawg

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Tue Aug 07, 2012 10:09 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Clearly you haven't seen the last few pages of the Columbia threadNoodleyOne wrote:Y'all are nerds.
- Eichörnchen

- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:51 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
This.NoodleyOne wrote:Y'all are nerds.
I don't speak a dialect, only regular ol' hochdeutsch. I checked my standard dictionary and it only has Eistute listed. While I enjoy getting way too specific and geeky about German I won't do it here as I doubt 99.988777 percent of people here would appreciate us clogging up the thread with it.
- VeeD101

- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 9:49 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Very little movement today is making people crazy on several threadsEichörnchen wrote:This.NoodleyOne wrote:Y'all are nerds.
I don't speak a dialect, only regular ol' hochdeutsch. I checked my standard dictionary and it only has Eistute listed. While I enjoy getting way too specific and geeky about German I won't do it here as I doubt 99.988777 percent of people here would appreciate us clogging up the thread with it.
-
grapefruits

- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:13 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Seconded. We don't need Columbia Pt. IIEichörnchen wrote:This.NoodleyOne wrote:Y'all are nerds.
I don't speak a dialect, only regular ol' hochdeutsch. I checked my standard dictionary and it only has Eistute listed. While I enjoy getting way too specific and geeky about German I won't do it here as I doubt 99.988777 percent of people here would appreciate us clogging up the thread with it.
- Mr. Elshal

- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I am loving the last few pages of the Columbia thread. I wish every thread could turn into all-out tangental conversations about video gamesjym_dawg wrote:Clearly you haven't seen the last few pages of the Columbia threadNoodleyOne wrote:Y'all are nerds.
- pedestrian

- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:38 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Well they can't. Some threads have to be about other threads that are about video games.Mr. Elshal wrote:I am loving the last few pages of the Columbia thread. I wish every thread could turn into all-out tangental conversations about video gamesjym_dawg wrote:Clearly you haven't seen the last few pages of the Columbia threadNoodleyOne wrote:Y'all are nerds.
- wert3813

- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
173pedestrian wrote:Well they can't. Some threads have to be about other threads that are about video games.Mr. Elshal wrote:I am loving the last few pages of the Columbia thread. I wish every thread could turn into all-out tangental conversations about video gamesjym_dawg wrote:Clearly you haven't seen the last few pages of the Columbia threadNoodleyOne wrote:Y'all are nerds.
- pedestrian

- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:38 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Retake.wert3813 wrote:173pedestrian wrote:Well they can't. Some threads have to be about other threads that are about video games.Mr. Elshal wrote:I am loving the last few pages of the Columbia thread. I wish every thread could turn into all-out tangental conversations about video gamesjym_dawg wrote:
Clearly you haven't seen the last few pages of the Columbia thread
-
grapefruits

- Posts: 180
- Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2013 7:13 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I hope some brainwashingly good game comes out late this summer, and absorbs the rest of you for your respective first years.
- Mr. Elshal

- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Super Smash Lawyers, with new characters including Lavitz and Banjo. Coming soon to a GameStop near your law schoolgrapefruits wrote:I hope some brainwashingly good game comes out late this summer, and absorbs the rest of you for your respective first years.
-
clasico2012

- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 10:19 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
First time posting here in this thread, but I guess I count as a reverse splitter. I submitted 1/3 and went complete about a week later. Last week (1/17) I got an email telling me to call Admissions to discuss my application. I called back Friday morning (1/18) and got in and received a $60k scholarship! My numbers weren't all that great: 168 highest LSAT (average: 164), 3.9 GPA, Virginia resident. Good luck and Godspeed to everyone else still waiting.
- twinkletoes16

- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
so I'm looking on LSN right now, and recognized a pattern- almost every person who is 173+ who submitted 12/1 or later (including myself) hasn't heard back (the few that have are splitters). There's lots of other profiles who have quick turnarounds, oftentimes with a lot of $. Are they holding these 173+ers to wait and see if they withdraw or possibly doing some sort of YP scheme?
I didn't submit a Why UVA and have zero ties to the region- just not sure if I should start groveling with a LOCI if it looks like I'm heading for the WL or what.
ETA: I think law school admissions is making me bust out my tinfoil conspiracy hat; rereading this I realize I sound crazy. I just don't know what is taking so long!
I didn't submit a Why UVA and have zero ties to the region- just not sure if I should start groveling with a LOCI if it looks like I'm heading for the WL or what.
ETA: I think law school admissions is making me bust out my tinfoil conspiracy hat; rereading this I realize I sound crazy. I just don't know what is taking so long!
-
az21833

- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Yeah think you might be a little high for uva tbhtwinkletoes16 wrote:so I'm looking on LSN right now, and recognized a pattern- almost every person who is 173+ who submitted 12/1 or later (including myself) hasn't heard back (the few that have are splitters). There's lots of other profiles who have quick turnarounds, oftentimes with a lot of $. Are they holding these 173+ers to wait and see if they withdraw or possibly doing some sort of YP scheme?
I didn't submit a Why UVA and have zero ties to the region- just not sure if I should start groveling with a LOCI if it looks like I'm heading for the WL or what.
ETA: I think law school admissions is making me bust out my tinfoil conspiracy hat; rereading this I realize I sound crazy. I just don't know what is taking so long!
- twinkletoes16

- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
az21833 wrote:Yeah think you might be a little high for uva tbhtwinkletoes16 wrote:so I'm looking on LSN right now, and recognized a pattern- almost every person who is 173+ who submitted 12/1 or later (including myself) hasn't heard back (the few that have are splitters). There's lots of other profiles who have quick turnarounds, oftentimes with a lot of $. Are they holding these 173+ers to wait and see if they withdraw or possibly doing some sort of YP scheme?
I didn't submit a Why UVA and have zero ties to the region- just not sure if I should start groveling with a LOCI if it looks like I'm heading for the WL or what.
ETA: I think law school admissions is making me bust out my tinfoil conspiracy hat; rereading this I realize I sound crazy. I just don't know what is taking so long!
high like numbers?
-
az21833

- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Right. Your theory makes sense to me. I think 171 172 is prime for uva
- twinkletoes16

- Posts: 1317
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
az21833 wrote:Right. Your theory makes sense to me. I think 171 172 is prime for uva
Ah i see. yeah, I gotta say, LSN really helps to see the fairly cut-and-dry pattern most law schools use. I would've liked to get in to UVA but I think it's too late for me to fire off a why UVA at this point.
-
az21833

- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I still would. Im just saying 174 and no ties or why uva makes it look like you just clicked a few buttons for the hell of it, hence the wl. Write a well researched sincere page on uva and you will get in.
- Audeamus

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Checking in
-
LRGhost

- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
It's YP. Of all the schools, UVA has a very transparent admissions process.twinkletoes16 wrote:az21833 wrote:Right. Your theory makes sense to me. I think 171 172 is prime for uva
Ah i see. yeah, I gotta say, LSN really helps to see the fairly cut-and-dry pattern most law schools use. I would've liked to get in to UVA but I think it's too late for me to fire off a why UVA at this point.
- Crowing

- Posts: 2631
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Does UVA ever offer $ off the WL? If not I'm probably just going to withdraw.
-
Philosophizer

- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Jul 15, 2012 2:17 am
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Just a check in here. I am a serious splitter, (177/3.37). I was hoping for some love from UVA, but I have been complete and in limbo since mid-October.
Any advice?
Any advice?
-
LRGhost

- Posts: 1869
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 6:49 pm
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Wait it out.
-
Wahoos

- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu May 10, 2012 11:16 am
Re: UVA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Check your PMCrowing wrote:Does UVA ever offer $ off the WL? If not I'm probably just going to withdraw.
Short answer: YES. A lot of people UVA takes from the waitlist are not near the 'bottom' of the class that they put together in terms of GPA/ LSAT