USC 2011 Forum

swimmergirl1303 · Post by **swimmergirl1303** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:40 pm

is anyone else stuck on a december review date?

WarioLaw · Post by **WarioLaw** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:41 pm

Yep. 12/21

Top14Hope · Post by **Top14Hope** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:42 pm

Gotti wrote:
stlisforlovers wrote:That picture does not bode well for us UR 11/22 people.
STL, if i'm in, you're in lol. & I think the DF 2/7'ers are in...unless I'm being overly cocky.

Anyone who is the same pile as me should be the opposite of cocky

However, looking at all the beautiful LSAT scores that are also in the pile, makes me think it's a mixed batch or all WL.

Gotti · Post by **Gotti** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:43 pm

Top14Hope wrote:
Gotti wrote:
stlisforlovers wrote:That picture does not bode well for us UR 11/22 people.
STL, if i'm in, you're in lol. & I think the DF 2/7'ers are in...unless I'm being overly cocky.
Anyone who is the same pile as me should be the opposite of cocky

However, looking at all the beautiful LSAT scores that are also in the pile, makes me think it's a mixed batch or all WL.

What's your LSAT? I'm below median for LSAT but above 75th GPA and LSP had me as an Admit (78%)

mr_toad · Post by **mr_toad** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:44 pm

That picture means nothing for this year. If you'll notice, they're so far behind that picture it's not even funny.

LockBox · Post by **LockBox** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:49 pm

Could the DF be a WL? Hadn't even occurred to me. I'm a 2/7 DF but both my numbers are <25% so i'm assuming it's a ding even though i'm an alum. Oh well, it's a great campus for anyone headed to SC....

Cade McNown · Post by **Cade McNown** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:50 pm

eecs wrote:
melamine wrote:
SMA22 wrote:Late December applicant--DF this morning. Ohhhhh, I think it's a ding with my UGPA, but I can hope, right!?
had DF this morning as well. Applied early January (post december LSAT score receipt). I take it the only way to find out is just to wait for snail mail?
Wait... whaaaat? I applied in November and I'm still sitting at complete 11/22.

That's what happens when you're an auto-admit.

letsdoit · Post by **letsdoit** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:51 pm

Gotti wrote:
Top14Hope wrote:
Gotti wrote:
stlisforlovers wrote:That picture does not bode well for us UR 11/22 people.
STL, if i'm in, you're in lol. & I think the DF 2/7'ers are in...unless I'm being overly cocky.
Anyone who is the same pile as me should be the opposite of cocky

However, looking at all the beautiful LSAT scores that are also in the pile, makes me think it's a mixed batch or all WL.
What's your LSAT? I'm below median for LSAT but above 75th GPA and LSP had me as an Admit (78%)

I'm in the same boat- 25th LSAT and pretty substantially above 75th GPA. But I'm complete 11/1 still... :/

r6_philly · Post by **r6_philly** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:51 pm

Cade McNown wrote:
That's what happens when you're an auto-admit.

QFT

Top14Hope · Post by **Top14Hope** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:52 pm

mycousinvinny56 · Post by **mycousinvinny56** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:54 pm

I am at DF 2/7 but haven't received any emails. Any idea what this means? Has anyone from that DF batch gotten anything?

Gotti · Post by **Gotti** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:54 pm

Top14Hope wrote:Below LSAT 25% / Above GPA 75%

Not URM

There is also a bunch of reasons for my score being low, and I told them that through an addendum. My PS was rock solid, with a touch of reach to it.

I would have bet every dollar I had on not getting in though, so I'm really confused about this one. Not to say that I don't deserve it, because in my eyes I do. It's just the stupid LSAT!

Same situation as me, then. LSP has been pretty accurate for me, though...and it puts me at 78%. So who knows! Not having USC would make my decision SO much easier (the bf got into NYU and is most likely attending & I got into Fordham).

swimgirl · Post by **swimgirl** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:58 pm

Why are so many of you assuming that the 2/7 DF batch are all in? Just wondering. I'm in that batch and hoping you are correct.

LockBox · Post by **LockBox** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 1:59 pm

swimgirl wrote:Why are so many of you assuming that the 2/7 DF batch are all in? Just wondering. I'm in that batch and hoping you are correct.

Like I said, I'm in the 2/7 DF batch and i'm assuming (but hoping otherwise) that i'm a ding.

Top14Hope · Post by **Top14Hope** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:00 pm

LockBox wrote:
swimgirl wrote:Why are so many of you assuming that the 2/7 DF batch are all in? Just wondering. I'm in that batch and hoping you are correct.
Like I said, I'm in the 2/7 DF batch and i'm assuming (but hoping otherwise) that i'm a ding.

+1

Gotti · Post by **Gotti** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:00 pm

swimgirl wrote:Why are so many of you assuming that the 2/7 DF batch are all in? Just wondering. I'm in that batch and hoping you are correct.

we all generally have relatively competitive numbers/applications

Top14Hope · Post by **Top14Hope** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:04 pm

I will never understand why all decisions aren't just first sent through e-mail, or no status checker, and just use the mail. Why the hell would a person want to know that a decision has been made if you can't know what the decision is? It's ridiculous. They could easily e-mail it, and put it on the status checker!

You hear that USC? It's soooooo siiiiimple!

STOP BEING DOUCHES!

Ratchet Jackson · Post by **Ratchet Jackson** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:16 pm

Top14Hope wrote:I will never understand why all decisions aren't just first sent through e-mail, or no status checker, and just use the mail. Why the hell would a person want to know that a decision has been made if you can't know what the decision is? It's ridiculous. They could easily e-mail it, and put it on the status checker!

You hear that USC? It's soooooo siiiiimple!

STOP BEING DOUCHES!

It's an attempt to maintain further control on your life.

lucylove · Post by **lucylove** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:27 pm

This might be a bad idea, but has anyone who went df yesterday or today thought of calling the admissions office and asking? Thats what I did for Stanford, and they were really nice about it!

Just sayin

LockBox · Post by **LockBox** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:36 pm

Another question: if you live in southern california, do you guys know how long it should take for the snail mail to arrive?

WonkyPanda · Post by **WonkyPanda** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:41 pm

LockBox wrote:Another question: if you live in southern california, do you guys know how long it should take for the snail mail to arrive?

typically 2-3 days

rsd16 · Post by **rsd16** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:41 pm

Hey all,

Fellow USC applicant. First time on this thread.

Question:

What do people mean when they say "DF 2/7" and other acronym/dates? How do I find out mines?

Excuse my ignorance *puts on flame suit*

Guicciardini · Post by **Guicciardini** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:52 pm

rsd16 wrote:Hey all,

Fellow USC applicant. First time on this thread.

Question:

What do people mean when they say "DF 2/7" and other acronym/dates? How do I find out mines?

Excuse my ignorance *puts on flame suit*

Decision finalized.

And don't worry about the acronyms. They're a little intimidating, and frankly people here use them more often than the Pentagon.

From a social perspective, it delineates all of us TLS applicants from the masses, but it can be bitching confusing before you figure out what all of them mean.

Redsgomarchingon · Post by **Redsgomarchingon** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:53 pm

rsd16 wrote:Hey all,

Fellow USC applicant. First time on this thread.

Question:

What do people mean when they say "DF 2/7" and other acronym/dates? How do I find out mines?

Excuse my ignorance *puts on flame suit*

decision finalized.

Anybody else go DF after this morning?

JJDancer · Post by **JJDancer** » Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:45 pm

I'm thinking the 2/7 batch is mixed at worst.

Definitely not all ding or WL.

USC 2011 Forum

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011

Re: USC 2011