I... want... thisclouded.memory wrote:I haven't checked this thread in awhile, so I don't know if this has already been mentioned (and my apologies, if it has), but after withdrawing yesterday, I received a call from the Admissions Office notifying me that my application was with the Scholarship Committee and under consideration for merit aid. They asked me how much I was looking for, but I turned them down. Anyways, I thought this information might be helpful to those of you admits who were admitted earlier, but haven't heard anything about merit aid yet.
UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
bruin91

- Posts: 237
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:09 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- boblawlob

- Posts: 519
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 7:29 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yes you can.AKsnow wrote:Could you sign it and scan it and e-mail it back as a PDF?chadbrochill wrote:Congrats ht, thats a great scholly offer!ht2988 wrote:I think I'm ready to commit to UCLA!!! Unless a miracle happens and I get into Columbia or off the WL at Chicago, I'm pretty excited to say that I'll be in Westwood this fallcongrats to everyone who got in. And to those who didn't, I applied with a score of 161 in the 2010-2011 cycle and was not surprisingly rejected. I studied my ass off last summer and retook and scored 173 and now I'm in with $120k. Don't sell yourselves short - if u aren't getting into the schools you'd like to attend, change your study plan and retake!
Also I have a question to others who have been waitlisted? Did you fax the form to remain on the WL or is there some way to fill out the pdf using a computer? It asks for a signature so are they expecting it through fax?
- TheMostDangerousLG

- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Heard back about my request for merit aid info. They told me to let them know what other offers I have...
Really? You couldn't try to flatter me with a nice offer and *then* negotiate based on my other offers? You want to lowball me as soon as possible? Pretty disappointing. I'm a late applicant, so I only have one other offer so far- an okay amount of money from WUSTL.. It hardly even seems worth replying. Even if they match that offer, it still wouldn't be enough to justify me attending.
Should I respond right away with my one offer, or wait for some more offers to roll in first to hopefully gain some more leverage? Or is "I can't afford to attend your law school if you don't beat this offer" leverage enough? Ugh. X\
Really? You couldn't try to flatter me with a nice offer and *then* negotiate based on my other offers? You want to lowball me as soon as possible? Pretty disappointing. I'm a late applicant, so I only have one other offer so far- an okay amount of money from WUSTL.. It hardly even seems worth replying. Even if they match that offer, it still wouldn't be enough to justify me attending.
Should I respond right away with my one offer, or wait for some more offers to roll in first to hopefully gain some more leverage? Or is "I can't afford to attend your law school if you don't beat this offer" leverage enough? Ugh. X\
-
JohnMarshall17

- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:52 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
....well I don't think you have much time left to wait. It looks like you're experiencing the woes of a late applicant. I would send the offer. Saying you can't afford it alone isn't really leverage. They have a waitlist for a reason and they'll need a better reason than "it costs too much" for them to shell out money so that you'll attend their school.TheMostDangerousLG wrote:Heard back about my request for merit aid info. They told me to let them know what other offers I have...
Really? You couldn't try to flatter me with a nice offer and *then* negotiate based on my other offers? You want to lowball me as soon as possible? Pretty disappointing. I'm a late applicant, so I only have one other offer so far- an okay amount of money from WUSTL.. It hardly even seems worth replying. Even if they match that offer, it still wouldn't be enough to justify me attending.
Should I respond right away with my one offer, or wait for some more offers to roll in first to hopefully gain some more leverage? Or is "I can't afford to attend your law school if you don't beat this offer" leverage enough? Ugh. X\
- TheMostDangerousLG

- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yep, in a pretty crappy position. *sigh* Thanks for your advice.JohnMarshall17 wrote:....well I don't think you have much time left to wait. It looks like you're experiencing the woes of a late applicant. I would send the offer. Saying you can't afford it alone isn't really leverage. They have a waitlist for a reason and they'll need a better reason than "it costs too much" for them to shell out money so that you'll attend their school.TheMostDangerousLG wrote:Heard back about my request for merit aid info. They told me to let them know what other offers I have...
Really? You couldn't try to flatter me with a nice offer and *then* negotiate based on my other offers? You want to lowball me as soon as possible? Pretty disappointing. I'm a late applicant, so I only have one other offer so far- an okay amount of money from WUSTL.. It hardly even seems worth replying. Even if they match that offer, it still wouldn't be enough to justify me attending.
Should I respond right away with my one offer, or wait for some more offers to roll in first to hopefully gain some more leverage? Or is "I can't afford to attend your law school if you don't beat this offer" leverage enough? Ugh. X\
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
CourCour

- Posts: 161
- Joined: Wed Apr 03, 2013 10:59 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Send them this offer and then you can renegotiate when new offers roll in. But don't hold your breath too much. I showed them my WUSTL for $25k a year and they came back with $10k.
- yodamiked

- Posts: 186
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 4:07 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
PM'd youTheMostDangerousLG wrote:Yep, in a pretty crappy position. *sigh* Thanks for your advice.JohnMarshall17 wrote:....well I don't think you have much time left to wait. It looks like you're experiencing the woes of a late applicant. I would send the offer. Saying you can't afford it alone isn't really leverage. They have a waitlist for a reason and they'll need a better reason than "it costs too much" for them to shell out money so that you'll attend their school.TheMostDangerousLG wrote:Heard back about my request for merit aid info. They told me to let them know what other offers I have...
Really? You couldn't try to flatter me with a nice offer and *then* negotiate based on my other offers? You want to lowball me as soon as possible? Pretty disappointing. I'm a late applicant, so I only have one other offer so far- an okay amount of money from WUSTL.. It hardly even seems worth replying. Even if they match that offer, it still wouldn't be enough to justify me attending.
Should I respond right away with my one offer, or wait for some more offers to roll in first to hopefully gain some more leverage? Or is "I can't afford to attend your law school if you don't beat this offer" leverage enough? Ugh. X\
- violettre

- Posts: 16
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:44 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Reread the email they sent when they notified me that my application was complete:
dying over here.
Is it considered the end of April yet?We will make admission decisions through the end of April. Admission decisions will be sent through email, so please let us know if your email address changes.
-
Hrun

- Posts: 78
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:51 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
When did you apply?violettre wrote:Reread the email they sent when they notified me that my application was complete:
Is it considered the end of April yet?We will make admission decisions through the end of April. Admission decisions will be sent through email, so please let us know if your email address changes.dying over here.
- AKsnow

- Posts: 167
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 4:41 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I was more proposing an idea than asking if I actually could haha.boblawlob wrote:Yes you can.AKsnow wrote:Could you sign it and scan it and e-mail it back as a PDF?chadbrochill wrote:Congrats ht, thats a great scholly offer!ht2988 wrote:I think I'm ready to commit to UCLA!!! Unless a miracle happens and I get into Columbia or off the WL at Chicago, I'm pretty excited to say that I'll be in Westwood this fallcongrats to everyone who got in. And to those who didn't, I applied with a score of 161 in the 2010-2011 cycle and was not surprisingly rejected. I studied my ass off last summer and retook and scored 173 and now I'm in with $120k. Don't sell yourselves short - if u aren't getting into the schools you'd like to attend, change your study plan and retake!
Also I have a question to others who have been waitlisted? Did you fax the form to remain on the WL or is there some way to fill out the pdf using a computer? It asks for a signature so are they expecting it through fax?
- violettre

- Posts: 16
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 4:44 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Went complete on 1/28Hrun wrote:When did you apply?violettre wrote:Reread the email they sent when they notified me that my application was complete:
Is it considered the end of April yet?We will make admission decisions through the end of April. Admission decisions will be sent through email, so please let us know if your email address changes.dying over here.
-
Hrun

- Posts: 78
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 4:51 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I went complete around the same time. UCLA is killing me with the waiting as well.violettre wrote:Went complete on 1/28Hrun wrote:When did you apply?violettre wrote:Reread the email they sent when they notified me that my application was complete:
Is it considered the end of April yet?We will make admission decisions through the end of April. Admission decisions will be sent through email, so please let us know if your email address changes.dying over here.
- yodamiked

- Posts: 186
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 4:07 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
What are people's thoughts on UCLA not ranking its students? In one way, if you're hanging around median it helps you out, but if you manage to kick butt and make it into the top 10%, my concern is that you're not going to get the same opportunities you would at a school that ranks its students. Seems like it lowers your risks, but puts everyone (even those who may not deserve it) at more equal footing. Thoughts?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
KingFish

- Posts: 334
- Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
If you get good enough grades to be top 10%, the employers will be able to tell just from looking at your transcript and seeing all the A's. Maybe a current Bruin can answer, but I doubt it hurts students at all. Most top schools don't rank right?yodamiked wrote:What are people's thoughts on UCLA not ranking its students? In one way, if you're hanging around median it helps you out, but if you manage to kick butt and make it into the top 10%, my concern is that you're not going to get the same opportunities you would at a school that ranks its students. Seems like it lowers your risks, but puts everyone (even those who may not deserve it) at more equal footing. Thoughts?
- b123

- Posts: 183
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:32 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Quick question: am I the only one still waiting since late November?
- yupyup

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:00 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Waiting since early Nov. here.b123 wrote:Quick question: am I the only one still waiting since late November?
-
leximex21

- Posts: 49
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 10:09 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Amen. Called last friday, complete 12/16, said they still hadn't made a decision on my application..violettre wrote:Reread the email they sent when they notified me that my application was complete:
Is it considered the end of April yet?We will make admission decisions through the end of April. Admission decisions will be sent through email, so please let us know if your email address changes.dying over here.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
mac2016

- Posts: 13
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 4:23 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Adding to this, mine was complete in early February (haven't waited as long and you all so I'm sorry for your wait) and has yet to be decided on. Sent a LOCI and got a quick response but it does feel like the window is quickly closing.leximex21 wrote:Amen. Called last friday, complete 12/16, said they still hadn't made a decision on my application..violettre wrote:Reread the email they sent when they notified me that my application was complete:
Is it considered the end of April yet?We will make admission decisions through the end of April. Admission decisions will be sent through email, so please let us know if your email address changes.dying over here.
-
atomist

- Posts: 35
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 2:09 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
hey guys, I have a question about need based aid.
I was admitted back in february and received my need based award in march. although I said that I was an independent on need access, my award is extremely small: 8k/year in grants. if I attend UCLA in the fall I'll have to borrow upwards of 60k in federal loans.
I called financial aid today and was told that even though I regard myself as an independent (I just finished a master's which I paid for myself) I don't actually count because my parents helped pay my way through college, and it hasn't been 6 years yet since I was a dependent (6 years being the minimum time required to be regarded as independent).
I also did not receive a merit based award on admission. is there anything I can do at this stage to make a decision to enroll in the fall more rational? I was told to appeal to dean shwartz, but I don't have money elsewhere that I can negotiate with.
is my award unusually low? I was expecting way more in need based aid, just given the fact that I've been independent in effect since I finished college in 2010.
I was admitted back in february and received my need based award in march. although I said that I was an independent on need access, my award is extremely small: 8k/year in grants. if I attend UCLA in the fall I'll have to borrow upwards of 60k in federal loans.
I called financial aid today and was told that even though I regard myself as an independent (I just finished a master's which I paid for myself) I don't actually count because my parents helped pay my way through college, and it hasn't been 6 years yet since I was a dependent (6 years being the minimum time required to be regarded as independent).
I also did not receive a merit based award on admission. is there anything I can do at this stage to make a decision to enroll in the fall more rational? I was told to appeal to dean shwartz, but I don't have money elsewhere that I can negotiate with.
is my award unusually low? I was expecting way more in need based aid, just given the fact that I've been independent in effect since I finished college in 2010.
- syd625

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 11:36 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I don't think 8k is that low for a need-based award. I'm poor, my family is as well, and I received 10k. I did get a merit scholly, though.atomist wrote:hey guys, I have a question about need based aid.
I was admitted back in february and received my need based award in march. although I said that I was an independent on need access, my award is extremely small: 8k/year in grants. if I attend UCLA in the fall I'll have to borrow upwards of 60k in federal loans.
I called financial aid today and was told that even though I regard myself as an independent (I just finished a master's which I paid for myself) I don't actually count because my parents helped pay my way through college, and it hasn't been 6 years yet since I was a dependent (6 years being the minimum time required to be regarded as independent).
I also did not receive a merit based award on admission. is there anything I can do at this stage to make a decision to enroll in the fall more rational? I was told to appeal to dean shwartz, but I don't have money elsewhere that I can negotiate with.
is my award unusually low? I was expecting way more in need based aid, just given the fact that I've been independent in effect since I finished college in 2010.
- yodamiked

- Posts: 186
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 4:07 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Pm'd youatomist wrote:hey guys, I have a question about need based aid.
I was admitted back in february and received my need based award in march. although I said that I was an independent on need access, my award is extremely small: 8k/year in grants. if I attend UCLA in the fall I'll have to borrow upwards of 60k in federal loans.
I called financial aid today and was told that even though I regard myself as an independent (I just finished a master's which I paid for myself) I don't actually count because my parents helped pay my way through college, and it hasn't been 6 years yet since I was a dependent (6 years being the minimum time required to be regarded as independent).
I also did not receive a merit based award on admission. is there anything I can do at this stage to make a decision to enroll in the fall more rational? I was told to appeal to dean shwartz, but I don't have money elsewhere that I can negotiate with.
is my award unusually low? I was expecting way more in need based aid, just given the fact that I've been independent in effect since I finished college in 2010.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
maxiguess

- Posts: 166
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2012 12:04 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I do qualify as an independent and was only awarded 8k for need.atomist wrote:hey guys, I have a question about need based aid.
I was admitted back in february and received my need based award in march. although I said that I was an independent on need access, my award is extremely small: 8k/year in grants. if I attend UCLA in the fall I'll have to borrow upwards of 60k in federal loans.
I called financial aid today and was told that even though I regard myself as an independent (I just finished a master's which I paid for myself) I don't actually count because my parents helped pay my way through college, and it hasn't been 6 years yet since I was a dependent (6 years being the minimum time required to be regarded as independent).
I also did not receive a merit based award on admission. is there anything I can do at this stage to make a decision to enroll in the fall more rational? I was told to appeal to dean shwartz, but I don't have money elsewhere that I can negotiate with.
is my award unusually low? I was expecting way more in need based aid, just given the fact that I've been independent in effect since I finished college in 2010.
- yodamiked

- Posts: 186
- Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 4:07 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Anyone know how long it takes to hear back from ULCA housing?
-
onionskin

- Posts: 161
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Is UCLA accepting June LSATs?Golden Bear 11 wrote:Retake in June. Get a higher score and get admitted off WL with a scholarshiparak wrote:I got wait listed at UCLA a few days ago. Any advice? This is basically my dream school.
-
Nari Rina

- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:59 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Complete on 1/11. Also sent a LOCI and got a quick response (just to say that its added in the file).mac2016 wrote:Adding to this, mine was complete in early February (haven't waited as long and you all so I'm sorry for your wait) and has yet to be decided on. Sent a LOCI and got a quick response but it does feel like the window is quickly closing.leximex21 wrote:Amen. Called last friday, complete 12/16, said they still hadn't made a decision on my application..violettre wrote:Reread the email they sent when they notified me that my application was complete:
Is it considered the end of April yet?We will make admission decisions through the end of April. Admission decisions will be sent through email, so please let us know if your email address changes.dying over here.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login