Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply

Next JS2 wave(s) will be...

Monday 3/27
2
2%
Tuesday 3/28
18
17%
Wednesday 3/29
35
32%
Thursday 3/30
13
12%
Friday 3/31
30
28%
Saturday 4/1
10
9%
 
Total votes: 108

User avatar
azaleafire

Bronze
Posts: 350
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 3:37 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by azaleafire » Sat Jan 28, 2017 11:57 pm

calpolisci2016 wrote:For URMs who got a JS1, did you feel like your interview questions were focused on those URM aspects of your personal statement/application?
Nope

xnsch

Bronze
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by xnsch » Sun Jan 29, 2017 1:06 am

azaleafire wrote:
calpolisci2016 wrote:For URMs who got a JS1, did you feel like your interview questions were focused on those URM aspects of your personal statement/application?
Nope
Not at all. Didn't even come up

crookedsmile

Bronze
Posts: 295
Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2016 2:02 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by crookedsmile » Sun Jan 29, 2017 2:06 am

xnsch wrote:
azaleafire wrote:
calpolisci2016 wrote:For URMs who got a JS1, did you feel like your interview questions were focused on those URM aspects of your personal statement/application?
Nope
Not at all. Didn't even come up
+1, never came up.

AJ1010

Bronze
Posts: 150
Joined: Mon Nov 14, 2016 1:32 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by AJ1010 » Sun Jan 29, 2017 2:15 pm

calpolisci2016 wrote:For URMs who got a JS1, did you feel like your interview questions were focused on those URM aspects of your personal statement/application?
I am a URM and KJD, and my interview was way more focused on the KJD aspect of my application. I didn't feel like I got any "URM" questions.

Javalin0650

New
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2016 12:38 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Javalin0650 » Sun Jan 29, 2017 4:01 pm

calpolisci2016 wrote:For URMs who got a JS1, did you feel like your interview questions were focused on those URM aspects of your personal statement/application?
I'm URM who interviewed on 12/5. And not at all. I was asked questions about my international experience and my academic interests in undergrad, but not once did anything feel like it had to do with being URM.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
appind

Gold
Posts: 2266
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:07 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by appind » Sun Jan 29, 2017 7:13 pm

azaleafire wrote:
calpolisci2016 wrote:For URMs who got a JS1, did you feel like your interview questions were focused on those URM aspects of your personal statement/application?
Nope
imo there is reason adcomm wouldn't try to focus on URM aspect. i think adcomm like to think of them as nice people and they want to avoid offending anyone inadvertently or issues that can stem from regulation or appearance of bias in admissions.

xnsch

Bronze
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by xnsch » Sun Jan 29, 2017 7:56 pm

appind wrote:
azaleafire wrote:
calpolisci2016 wrote:For URMs who got a JS1, did you feel like your interview questions were focused on those URM aspects of your personal statement/application?
Nope
imo there is reason adcomm wouldn't try to focus on URM aspect. i think adcomm like to think of them as nice people and they want to avoid offending anyone inadvertently or issues that can stem from regulation or appearance of bias in admissions.
I would imagine this is part of what they're thinking. Honestly I don't even see how bringing up URM status or topics in an interview would be helpful in the least.

I actually had a kind of weird experience with my Columbia interview that left me with a bad taste. My interviewer specifically pointed out that I "checked a lot of boxes" (for reference Im a gay urm from a pretty poor family). I know she probably didn't mean it in a bad way but it felt awfully dismissive and rude, as though my experiences were being seen as a number to them. So I can see why this is a topic that doesn't come up often.

ood

New
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 4:27 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by ood » Sun Jan 29, 2017 10:08 pm

Guys I have my JS1 this week, any words of advice before the big day?

I'm below all medians, but that's okay. I'm buying some crest white-strips!

Mackgal

Bronze
Posts: 107
Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2016 9:13 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Mackgal » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:08 am

xnsch wrote:
appind wrote:
azaleafire wrote:
calpolisci2016 wrote:For URMs who got a JS1, did you feel like your interview questions were focused on those URM aspects of your personal statement/application?
Nope
imo there is reason adcomm wouldn't try to focus on URM aspect. i think adcomm like to think of them as nice people and they want to avoid offending anyone inadvertently or issues that can stem from regulation or appearance of bias in admissions.
I would imagine this is part of what they're thinking. Honestly I don't even see how bringing up URM status or topics in an interview would be helpful in the least.

I actually had a kind of weird experience with my Columbia interview that left me with a bad taste. My interviewer specifically pointed out that I "checked a lot of boxes" (for reference Im a gay urm from a pretty poor family). I know she probably didn't mean it in a bad way but it felt awfully dismissive and rude, as though my experiences were being seen as a number to them. So I can see why this is a topic that doesn't come up often.
I had a similar experience, Harvard's interview was great and didn't touch on my URM status at all. Columbia on the other hand only talked about my URM status and questioned me on its validity - left a bad taste that made me drop them a few rankings in terms of potential schools.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
Kinch08

Bronze
Posts: 309
Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Kinch08 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:14 am

ood wrote:Guys I have my JS1 this week, any words of advice before the big day?

I'm below all medians, but that's okay. I'm buying some crest white-strips!
Good luck!

User avatar
hellohalo

Silver
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:53 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by hellohalo » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:33 am

xnsch wrote: I actually had a kind of weird experience with my Columbia interview that left me with a bad taste. My interviewer specifically pointed out that I "checked a lot of boxes" (for reference Im a gay urm from a pretty poor family). I know she probably didn't mean it in a bad way but it felt awfully dismissive and rude, as though my experiences were being seen as a number to them. So I can see why this is a topic that doesn't come up often.
Out of curiosity, does identifying as gay help/hurt your applications in any way you think? I'm gay, but I really think my personal sexual orientation has nothing to do with my profession, so I didn't disclose that info. I'm truly curious. Thanks. Good luck.

User avatar
azaleafire

Bronze
Posts: 350
Joined: Sun Feb 07, 2016 3:37 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by azaleafire » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:43 am

Mackgal wrote:
I had a similar experience, Harvard's interview was great and didn't touch on my URM status at all. Columbia on the other hand only talked about my URM status and questioned me on its validity - left a bad taste that made me drop them a few rankings in terms of potential schools.
My Columbia interview also didn't really mention it at all. Maybe after my diversity statement they felt like they didn't really need to?

xnsch

Bronze
Posts: 160
Joined: Wed Jul 08, 2015 8:31 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by xnsch » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:49 am

hellohalo wrote:
xnsch wrote: I actually had a kind of weird experience with my Columbia interview that left me with a bad taste. My interviewer specifically pointed out that I "checked a lot of boxes" (for reference Im a gay urm from a pretty poor family). I know she probably didn't mean it in a bad way but it felt awfully dismissive and rude, as though my experiences were being seen as a number to them. So I can see why this is a topic that doesn't come up often.
Out of curiosity, does identifying as gay help/hurt your applications in any way you think? I'm gay, but I really think my personal sexual orientation has nothing to do with my profession, so I didn't disclose that info. I'm truly curious. Thanks. Good luck.
I don't think there's any way it could hurt you and if there is any benefit I'm sure it'd be marginal. I addressed it in my diversity statement as part of a broader theme of using my personal experiences to help inform my career choice (wanting to work in public policy). So I explained how my being gay gave me the unique experience of seeing the effects of discrimination firsthand

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
jjcorvino

Silver
Posts: 1459
Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by jjcorvino » Mon Jan 30, 2017 9:36 am

Let's get a JS1 wave going H!

User avatar
texteach

Bronze
Posts: 161
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:49 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by texteach » Mon Jan 30, 2017 9:50 am

.
Last edited by texteach on Sun Mar 05, 2017 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ashrice13

Gold
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by ashrice13 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 11:04 am

jjcorvino wrote:Let's get a JS1 wave going H!
+1

Pozzo

Gold
Posts: 1918
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Pozzo » Mon Jan 30, 2017 11:33 am

.
Last edited by Pozzo on Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
Future Ex-Engineer

Silver
Posts: 1430
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2016 3:20 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Future Ex-Engineer » Mon Jan 30, 2017 11:39 am

Pozzo wrote:
ashrice13 wrote:
jjcorvino wrote:Let's get a JS1 wave going H!
+1

User avatar
ashrice13

Gold
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by ashrice13 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 11:48 am

mrgstephe wrote:
Pozzo wrote:
ashrice13 wrote:
jjcorvino wrote:Let's get a JS1 wave going H!
+1
If enough people re-quote this on TLS they have to do it, right?

Pozzo

Gold
Posts: 1918
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Pozzo » Mon Jan 30, 2017 11:53 am

.
Last edited by Pozzo on Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Pozzo

Gold
Posts: 1918
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by Pozzo » Mon Jan 30, 2017 11:54 am

.
Last edited by Pozzo on Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
pretzeltime

Gold
Posts: 1993
Joined: Sat May 07, 2016 6:57 pm

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by pretzeltime » Mon Jan 30, 2017 11:55 am

Pozzo wrote:
Pozzo wrote:
ashrice13 wrote:
mrgstephe wrote:
Pozzo wrote:
ashrice13 wrote:
jjcorvino wrote:Let's get a JS1 wave going H!
+1
If enough people re-quote this on TLS they have to do it, right?
Especially if you re-quote yourself. That's an auto-JS1.
JS1!

No fucking joke!
gahahah this is amazing. congrats!

User avatar
ashrice13

Gold
Posts: 1793
Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by ashrice13 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 11:57 am

Pozzo wrote:
Pozzo wrote:
ashrice13 wrote:
mrgstephe wrote:
Pozzo wrote:
ashrice13 wrote:
jjcorvino wrote:Let's get a JS1 wave going H!
+1
If enough people re-quote this on TLS they have to do it, right?
Especially if you re-quote yourself. That's an auto-JS1.
JS1!

No fucking joke!
IT WORKED :!:

Edit: Well, not for me. but it worked for Pozzo. that's a 50% success rate on a JS1. I'll take those odds any day.

anrf1225

New
Posts: 84
Joined: Sat Nov 28, 2015 12:19 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by anrf1225 » Mon Jan 30, 2017 11:58 am

.
Last edited by anrf1225 on Thu Feb 16, 2017 10:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

VapidP

Bronze
Posts: 244
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:11 am

Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)

Post by VapidP » Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:02 pm

JS1 today
Last edited by VapidP on Mon Jan 30, 2017 12:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”