cannibal ox wrote:
Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle) Forum
- desiballa21
- Posts: 446
- Joined: Sat Sep 25, 2010 10:33 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
- Mojosodope
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
WokeUpInACar wrote:Oh get fucked buddy. This is not remotely surprising considering that he EDed and 170+ scores are pretty damn tough to come by for non t14 schools. I ended up with a ~60% scholly (of in-state) last cycle with the same LSAT score and a well below 25th GPA.grungy89 wrote:Whatever you say, elvis costello. Nobody here can verify it anyway. Congrats on your admission to UT.ScottRiqui wrote:The 2.6/170 is me. I guess Texas *is* "median gaming" in the sense that the only reason they took me with a sub-25th GPA is that I also come with an over-75th LSAT. And don't forget that once you're below the 25th, it doesn't matter to their medians how FAR you are below the 25th.grungy89 wrote: If that's the case, I call BS on that person..... or median gaming. Would a T20 really auto admit someone who was lucky to graduate college like some savant tommy boy? Like really?
Lastly, my uGPA is is almost twenty years old at this point, and since then I've gotten a master's in physics with a MUCH better GPA, and have been in the Navy for almost twenty years. Perhaps all the "holistic review" and "looking beyond the numbers" stuff isn't all BS?
You'd just have to be pure stupid to think this guy was lying. Coming in to shit on his parade was very helpful, kudos.
Just saw you are the same moron who likes Dallas but hates Houston and Austin. Glad to know that I'll never have to run into your dumb ass at my school.
/late-night memo editing rage.
Edit: Oh my god you are one of those idiot reverse splitters who refuses to retake and now you are bitter that they admitted him while your tiny pink LSAT couldn't get in. I hate everything about the person you choose to be.

- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
cannibal ox wrote:

-
- Posts: 1213
- Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2012 1:10 am
- grungy89
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 1:05 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
yeah, it's pure stupidity to be skeptical of a statistical outlier on an anonymous online forum.....WokeUpInACar wrote:Oh get fucked buddy. This is not remotely surprising considering that he EDed and 170+ scores are pretty damn tough to come by for non t14 schools. I ended up with a ~60% scholly (of in-state) last cycle with the same LSAT score and a well below 25th GPA.grungy89 wrote:Whatever you say, elvis costello. Nobody here can verify it anyway. Congrats on your admission to UT.ScottRiqui wrote:The 2.6/170 is me. I guess Texas *is* "median gaming" in the sense that the only reason they took me with a sub-25th GPA is that I also come with an over-75th LSAT. And don't forget that once you're below the 25th, it doesn't matter to their medians how FAR you are below the 25th.grungy89 wrote: If that's the case, I call BS on that person..... or median gaming. Would a T20 really auto admit someone who was lucky to graduate college like some savant tommy boy? Like really?
Lastly, my uGPA is is almost twenty years old at this point, and since then I've gotten a master's in physics with a MUCH better GPA, and have been in the Navy for almost twenty years. Perhaps all the "holistic review" and "looking beyond the numbers" stuff isn't all BS?
You'd just have to be pure stupid to think this guy was lying. Coming in to shit on his parade was very helpful, kudos.
Just saw you are the same moron who likes Dallas but hates Houston and Austin. Glad to know that I'll never have to run into your dumb ass at my school.
/late-night memo editing rage.
Edit: Oh my god you are one of those idiot reverse splitters who refuses to retake and now you are bitter that they admitted him while your tiny pink LSAT couldn't get in. I hate everything about the person you choose to be.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- WokeUpInACar
- Posts: 5542
- Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:11 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Someone with almost 3000 posts who would barely be considered an outlier? Yup.grungy89 wrote:
yeah, it's pure stupidity to be skeptical of a statistical outlier on an anonymous online forum.....
Also I wouldn't have even noticed your post if you hadn't called him out in the most douchetastic way possible. "lucky to graduate college like some savant tommy boy" Go fuck yourself for judging someone else without ANY FUCKING CLUE of the circumstances that led to their GPA. All because you conveniently believe GPA should be more important due to being too lazy and/or stupid to get a LSAT score that would get you into a school worth attending.
In b4 PEOPLE WITH 3K POSTS CAN BE LIARS TOO
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
It's difficult to defend the "statistical outlier" theory because this, I believe, is the first year Texas has a binding ED. There simply aren't enough data to be making such encompassing statements.
-
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 3:47 am
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
.
Last edited by NYC2012 on Mon Dec 25, 2017 1:06 am, edited 1 time in total.
- grungy89
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sat Jul 13, 2013 1:05 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I had also mentioned median gaming, which nobody referenced because you all are too naive to turn away from a complete stranger with a good story. Whether the poster's lying or not, how can you defend them so vehemently? How did you survive childhood eating up others' stories? Did you wake up in a car this morning....oh, wait.WokeUpInACar wrote:Someone with almost 3000 posts who would barely be considered an outlier? Yup.grungy89 wrote:
yeah, it's pure stupidity to be skeptical of a statistical outlier on an anonymous online forum.....
Also I wouldn't have even noticed your post if you hadn't called him out in the most douchetastic way possible. "lucky to graduate college like some savant tommy boy" Go fuck yourself for judging someone else without ANY FUCKING CLUE of the circumstances that led to their GPA. All because you conveniently believe GPA should be more important due to being too lazy and/or stupid to get a LSAT score that would get you into a school worth attending.
In b4 PEOPLE WITH 3K POSTS CAN BE LIARS TOO
- cynthia rose
- Posts: 203
- Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2010 11:42 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Of course it's median gaming, even if it is just a little bit. Splitters wouldn't have a chance at any decent school if some of them did not use that tactic. You're not going to get a pat on the head for spotting what everyone else already knows. Also, calling you out for having your head up your ass =/= defending someone else so you can get off your flawed-assumptions/ad hominem attacks high horse. HTH if you ever decide to retake and get that LR score upgrungy89 wrote:I had also mentioned median gaming, which nobody referenced because you all are too naive to turn away from a complete stranger with a good story. Whether the poster's lying or not, how can you defend them so vehemently? How did you survive childhood eating up others' stories? Did you wake up in a car this morning....oh, wait.WokeUpInACar wrote:Someone with almost 3000 posts who would barely be considered an outlier? Yup.grungy89 wrote:
yeah, it's pure stupidity to be skeptical of a statistical outlier on an anonymous online forum.....
Also I wouldn't have even noticed your post if you hadn't called him out in the most douchetastic way possible. "lucky to graduate college like some savant tommy boy" Go fuck yourself for judging someone else without ANY FUCKING CLUE of the circumstances that led to their GPA. All because you conveniently believe GPA should be more important due to being too lazy and/or stupid to get a LSAT score that would get you into a school worth attending.
In b4 PEOPLE WITH 3K POSTS CAN BE LIARS TOO
- lhanvt13
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
- JazzOne
- Posts: 2979
- Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2008 11:04 am
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Retake. 160 sucks. HTH.grungy89 wrote:If that's the case, I call BS on that person..... or median gaming. Would a T20 really auto admit someone who was lucky to graduate college like some savant tommy boy? Like really?
- Attax
- Posts: 3589
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Submitted: 11/30
Now I wait!
Now I wait!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bound
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:49 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
In less than 24 hours, this thread became insanely more interesting.
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Anything can happen at TLS, that's the beauty of it.Austinbound wrote:In less than 24 hours, this thread became insanely more interesting.
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Wewt, classified as resident for tuition purposes!
- ScottRiqui
- Posts: 3633
- Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 8:09 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Great! Glad they finally got you sorted out.HYSenberg wrote:Wewt, classified as resident for tuition purposes!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2013 8:10 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Thanks breh. The more I think about it, the more I want to attend UT even over various T14s. Good chance I join you here next year!ScottRiqui wrote:Great! Glad they finally got you sorted out.HYSenberg wrote:Wewt, classified as resident for tuition purposes!
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
When you get there make sure to check Scott's ug transcripts so you can verify his gpa for grungy.HYSenberg wrote:Thanks breh. The more I think about it, the more I want to attend UT even over various T14s. Good chance I join you here next year!ScottRiqui wrote:Great! Glad they finally got you sorted out.HYSenberg wrote:Wewt, classified as resident for tuition purposes!
- Attax
- Posts: 3589
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
I love living here in Austin and sure don't want to leave! I didn't ED here, but if I get in this is my second choice after my ED!HYSenberg wrote: Thanks breh. The more I think about it, the more I want to attend UT even over various T14s. Good chance I join you here next year!
- Mojosodope
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
In with $$$!
Last edited by Mojosodope on Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Wow! Nice!Mojosodope wrote:In with $$$!
Last edited by TheJanitor6203 on Mon Dec 02, 2013 9:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- lhanvt13
- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Mojosodope wrote:In with $$$!

-
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 4:51 pm
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Congrats!! How did they inform you?Mojosodope wrote:In with $$$!
- Mojosodope
- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Texas c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 cycle)
Phone Callteenybean wrote:Congrats!! How did they inform you?Mojosodope wrote:In with $$$!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login