You put in a good word for me, right??ruskapoo wrote:Got a call from Dean Chemerinsky today!
UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- gitguy

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:01 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
vishwanath15

- Posts: 13
- Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2012 10:08 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
hey.. i also got in a while back.... been trying to figure out since then, why to give an edge to UC Irvine over Boston college (another acceptance i have in hand)... priority big law. ( patent law firm if possible)
- andres

- Posts: 94
- Joined: Fri Dec 07, 2012 5:20 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1 (in the same boat)vishwanath15 wrote:hey.. i also got in a while back.... been trying to figure out since then, why to give an edge to UC Irvine over Boston college (another acceptance i have in hand)... priority big law. ( patent law firm if possible)
- teiswei

- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Off the top of my head, location. It really depends where you want to practice. If you want east coast, stick with BC, but that JD from BC may have trouble landing you anywhere west of Chicago. Similarly, UC Irvine is likely going to limit you to California (not a bad thing if you ask me) and have potential to eventually get into the T25 and have a little bit more of a national reach.andres wrote:+1 (in the same boat)vishwanath15 wrote:hey.. i also got in a while back.... been trying to figure out since then, why to give an edge to UC Irvine over Boston college (another acceptance i have in hand)... priority big law. ( patent law firm if possible)
Honestly, visit both and your gut will tell you what's right.
- scretcher

- Posts: 70
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 1:54 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just got my acceptance email! 166/3.55
Good luck everyone
Good luck everyone
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bananasplit19

- Posts: 687
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:53 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Your avatar gave me the lulz.scretcher wrote:Just got my acceptance email! 166/3.55
Good luck everyone
- scretcher

- Posts: 70
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 1:54 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
bananasplit19 wrote:Your avatar gave me the lulz.scretcher wrote:Just got my acceptance email! 166/3.55
Good luck everyone
lol. Your avatar made me eat the pb&j I packed for lunch at 9 am.
- b123

- Posts: 183
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:32 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
For anyone that received a scholarship: did your original acceptance email mention scholly info or a forthcoming packet or anything? Mine hasn't mentioned anything regarding that.
Thanks!
Thanks!
-
MJLE16

- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2012 5:54 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Mine came with the letterb123 wrote:For anyone that received a scholarship: did your original acceptance email mention scholly info or a forthcoming packet or anything? Mine hasn't mentioned anything regarding that.
Thanks!
-
eleventhnight

- Posts: 25
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 11:20 am
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
As a current student (c/o 2015), I wanted to give a heads up to those considering UCI's scholarship packages.
I've been informed that need-based funding (5k, no matter who you are if you qualify, I believe) will not be continued for 2Ls and 3Ls. I'm assuming that they will be continuing this for incoming 1Ls. I based my decision largely on the financial aid package, and I'm saddened that I turned down UCLA/USC/Cornell largely based on getting more money from UCI. As it stands, I actually would have received more in merit scholarship from USC.
I don't blame the school, since it's my fault for not having asked whether the need-based grant was guaranteed for all 3 years. I hope that you guys do not make the same mistakes I did! If they do offer the 5k grant, be sure to ask whether it'll be guaranteed, and keep in mind that it might not continue for all 3 years.
The school itself is good. I don't hate it, although I don't love it either. What more can you ask from law school?
Good luck to you all!
I've been informed that need-based funding (5k, no matter who you are if you qualify, I believe) will not be continued for 2Ls and 3Ls. I'm assuming that they will be continuing this for incoming 1Ls. I based my decision largely on the financial aid package, and I'm saddened that I turned down UCLA/USC/Cornell largely based on getting more money from UCI. As it stands, I actually would have received more in merit scholarship from USC.
I don't blame the school, since it's my fault for not having asked whether the need-based grant was guaranteed for all 3 years. I hope that you guys do not make the same mistakes I did! If they do offer the 5k grant, be sure to ask whether it'll be guaranteed, and keep in mind that it might not continue for all 3 years.
The school itself is good. I don't hate it, although I don't love it either. What more can you ask from law school?
Good luck to you all!
- teiswei

- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Care to elaborate? Any real feedback helps.eleventhnight wrote:The school itself is good. I don't hate it, although I don't love it either. What more can you ask from law school?
- bananasplit19

- Posts: 687
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:53 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1teiswei wrote:Care to elaborate? Any real feedback helps.eleventhnight wrote:The school itself is good. I don't hate it, although I don't love it either. What more can you ask from law school?
-
eleventhnight

- Posts: 25
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 11:20 am
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
In terms of atmosphere, I would say that it is slightly less competitive than what other people are feeling at other schools. It's a smaller class size; I know most of people from my section, as well as several others from the other section (we're divided into Mod A and Mod B). I would say that the comparably smaller class size is good for building social bonds, if you are willing to put yourself out there. But if you want to be quiet, they leave you alone and let you be!teiswei wrote:Care to elaborate? Any real feedback helps.eleventhnight wrote:The school itself is good. I don't hate it, although I don't love it either. What more can you ask from law school?
In terms of classes, it gets a bit weirder. We do things slightly differently. For example, we don't have property as a first year course and instead we have "International Legal Analysis." The new semester just began, so I can't really comment on how this particular course is going to be like. I have to say that if some law schools aim to produce "book-smart" students, we're probably more focused on producing "street-smart" students. Some people did not like particular professors we have had for the first semester, but you're always going to have professors that you dislike.
I'm a lowly 1L, so I can't exactly comment on what the job situation is at the moment. I spoke to a 2L who said there were "ample" opportunities during OCI, although he only got one callback. We have a generous curve: B+ is the median for first year classes. Grades come out quite late, and we aren't expecting to receive first semester grades until at least next weekend.
I have friends spread out around the nation at various law schools: Cornell, Harvard, UCLA, and UC Hastings. So when I talk about "atmosphere," I was comparing to what my friends have told me at those respective schools. Also, our professors do seem a bit more "friendly" and approachable compared to what my friends have said.
If you plan to practice in SoCal, I think UCI is a very respectable choice outside of T14. I'm from the area, and I didn't want to live in LA (one of the reasons, aside from money, that I turned down UCLA and USC). Sorry, I tried to give a broad overview. So please feel free to follow up with a PM or a reply here. I'll try to check back.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- bettercallsaul91

- Posts: 188
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:23 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
That was helpful! Thanks! I appreciate iteleventhnight wrote: In terms of atmosphere, I would say that it is slightly less competitive than what other people are feeling at other schools. It's a smaller class size; I know most of people from my section, as well as several others from the other section (we're divided into Mod A and Mod B). I would say that the comparably smaller class size is good for building social bonds, if you are willing to put yourself out there. But if you want to be quiet, they leave you alone and let you be!
In terms of classes, it gets a bit weirder. We do things slightly differently. For example, we don't have property as a first year course and instead we have "International Legal Analysis." The new semester just began, so I can't really comment on how this particular course is going to be like. I have to say that if some law schools aim to produce "book-smart" students, we're probably more focused on producing "street-smart" students. Some people did not like particular professors we have had for the first semester, but you're always going to have professors that you dislike.
I'm a lowly 1L, so I can't exactly comment on what the job situation is at the moment. I spoke to a 2L who said there were "ample" opportunities during OCI, although he only got one callback. We have a generous curve: B+ is the median for first year classes. Grades come out quite late, and we aren't expecting to receive first semester grades until at least next weekend.
I have friends spread out around the nation at various law schools: Cornell, Harvard, UCLA, and UC Hastings. So when I talk about "atmosphere," I was comparing to what my friends have told me at those respective schools. Also, our professors do seem a bit more "friendly" and approachable compared to what my friends have said.
If you plan to practice in SoCal, I think UCI is a very respectable choice outside of T14. I'm from the area, and I didn't want to live in LA (one of the reasons, aside from money, that I turned down UCLA and USC). Sorry, I tried to give a broad overview. So please feel free to follow up with a PM or a reply here. I'll try to check back.
- bne

- Posts: 59
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 1:45 am
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checking in late, but sent my app in on the 3rd. Born and raised in Orange County and attended UCI as an undergrad. Any questions (about the area, university, etc.) feel free to ask!
-
Jonathk1

- Posts: 112
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:56 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Does anyone know if UCI requires parent's information on the FAFSA application? Could not find that information on LSAC nor the UCI Law website itself.
Any help is appreciated.
Any help is appreciated.
-
username101

- Posts: 41
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:28 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yes, they do if you want to be considered for need-based grants.Jonathk1 wrote:Does anyone know if UCI requires parent's information on the FAFSA application? Could not find that information on LSAC nor the UCI Law website itself.
Any help is appreciated.
"March 4 is the priority filing date for the FAFSA application. Parental Income and asset information are required to be considered for need-based grants."
http://www.law.uci.edu/financial_aid/Fi ... cklist.pdf
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Jonathk1

- Posts: 112
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2012 6:56 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thanks!username101 wrote:Yes, they do if you want to be considered for need-based grants.Jonathk1 wrote:Does anyone know if UCI requires parent's information on the FAFSA application? Could not find that information on LSAC nor the UCI Law website itself.
Any help is appreciated.
"March 4 is the priority filing date for the FAFSA application. Parental Income and asset information are required to be considered for need-based grants."
http://www.law.uci.edu/financial_aid/Fi ... cklist.pdf
-
LSTfan

- Posts: 81
- Joined: Sat Nov 03, 2012 3:05 am
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by LSTfan on Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
- bettercallsaul91

- Posts: 188
- Joined: Thu Oct 04, 2012 6:23 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Got my acceptance packet today. I live in CA. Accepted via email Dec 20th.
- lrslayer

- Posts: 576
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 10:38 am
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just a quick FYI.. just to be fair.. I just checked my 'need based grant' wording and it clearly says that "This grant has been provided to assist you in meeting your first year cost of tuition and fees.".. Again, not a cheerleader for UCI, just wanted to toss a little truth into the equation.LSTfan wrote:In addition to pushing for more transparency on job placement stats, we need to also start pushing for more transparency on scholarship and aid stats. So many schools play these games where they offer up-front money for the first-year, then find some way to cut it after that. I would be pretty livid if ended up paying more in the end to go to a lower ranked school.eleventhnight wrote: I've been informed that need-based funding (5k, no matter who you are if you qualify, I believe) will not be continued for 2Ls and 3Ls. I'm assuming that they will be continuing this for incoming 1Ls. I based my decision largely on the financial aid package, and I'm saddened that I turned down UCLA/USC/Cornell largely based on getting more money from UCI. As it stands, I actually would have received more in merit scholarship from USC.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- gitguy

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:01 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
To everyone still waiting on a decision: I got ambitious and wrote an email to the assistant dean of admissions, whom I had met with in person early in the app cycle, inquiring about when I might expect a decision. He replied that they are still reviewing apps and we can expect to hear back within a few weeks. So, nothing much there.
-
countmein

- Posts: 33
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:24 am
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Does anyone know what is the income threshold that will disqualify a student from need based grants?
- gitguy

- Posts: 264
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 2:01 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I'm going to go out on a limb here, but I think they are sitting on a lot of applications. I know that LSN is a small sampling of applicants, but I can't help but opine that applications are down significantly for UCI. Most people that applied as early as I did last year had already received a decision by this time, and more had applied.
Perhaps some of the new law school shine is wearing off, and UCI is falling victim to the falling application numbers in their primary range?
Feel free to pick apart my logic.
Perhaps some of the new law school shine is wearing off, and UCI is falling victim to the falling application numbers in their primary range?
Feel free to pick apart my logic.
-
Wishfulthinker

- Posts: 20
- Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2011 2:51 pm
Re: UC Irvine c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
gitguy wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here, but I think they are sitting on a lot of applications. I know that LSN is a small sampling of applicants, but I can't help but opine that applications are down significantly for UCI. Most people that applied as early as I did last year had already received a decision by this time, and more had applied.
Perhaps some of the new law school shine is wearing off, and UCI is falling victim to the falling application numbers in their primary range?
Feel free to pick apart my logic.
From the looks of it, I think that may be the case. Did anyone else receive an invitation email yesterday to apply?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login