You put in a good word for me, right??ruskapoo wrote:Got a call from Dean Chemerinsky today!

You put in a good word for me, right??ruskapoo wrote:Got a call from Dean Chemerinsky today!
+1 (in the same boat)vishwanath15 wrote:hey.. i also got in a while back.... been trying to figure out since then, why to give an edge to UC Irvine over Boston college (another acceptance i have in hand)... priority big law. ( patent law firm if possible)
Off the top of my head, location. It really depends where you want to practice. If you want east coast, stick with BC, but that JD from BC may have trouble landing you anywhere west of Chicago. Similarly, UC Irvine is likely going to limit you to California (not a bad thing if you ask me) and have potential to eventually get into the T25 and have a little bit more of a national reach.andres wrote:+1 (in the same boat)vishwanath15 wrote:hey.. i also got in a while back.... been trying to figure out since then, why to give an edge to UC Irvine over Boston college (another acceptance i have in hand)... priority big law. ( patent law firm if possible)
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Your avatar gave me the lulz.scretcher wrote:Just got my acceptance email! 166/3.55
Good luck everyone
bananasplit19 wrote:Your avatar gave me the lulz.scretcher wrote:Just got my acceptance email! 166/3.55
Good luck everyone
Mine came with the letterb123 wrote:For anyone that received a scholarship: did your original acceptance email mention scholly info or a forthcoming packet or anything? Mine hasn't mentioned anything regarding that.
Thanks!
Care to elaborate? Any real feedback helps.eleventhnight wrote:The school itself is good. I don't hate it, although I don't love it either. What more can you ask from law school?
+1teiswei wrote:Care to elaborate? Any real feedback helps.eleventhnight wrote:The school itself is good. I don't hate it, although I don't love it either. What more can you ask from law school?
In terms of atmosphere, I would say that it is slightly less competitive than what other people are feeling at other schools. It's a smaller class size; I know most of people from my section, as well as several others from the other section (we're divided into Mod A and Mod B). I would say that the comparably smaller class size is good for building social bonds, if you are willing to put yourself out there. But if you want to be quiet, they leave you alone and let you be!teiswei wrote:Care to elaborate? Any real feedback helps.eleventhnight wrote:The school itself is good. I don't hate it, although I don't love it either. What more can you ask from law school?
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
That was helpful! Thanks! I appreciate iteleventhnight wrote: In terms of atmosphere, I would say that it is slightly less competitive than what other people are feeling at other schools. It's a smaller class size; I know most of people from my section, as well as several others from the other section (we're divided into Mod A and Mod B). I would say that the comparably smaller class size is good for building social bonds, if you are willing to put yourself out there. But if you want to be quiet, they leave you alone and let you be!
In terms of classes, it gets a bit weirder. We do things slightly differently. For example, we don't have property as a first year course and instead we have "International Legal Analysis." The new semester just began, so I can't really comment on how this particular course is going to be like. I have to say that if some law schools aim to produce "book-smart" students, we're probably more focused on producing "street-smart" students. Some people did not like particular professors we have had for the first semester, but you're always going to have professors that you dislike.
I'm a lowly 1L, so I can't exactly comment on what the job situation is at the moment. I spoke to a 2L who said there were "ample" opportunities during OCI, although he only got one callback. We have a generous curve: B+ is the median for first year classes. Grades come out quite late, and we aren't expecting to receive first semester grades until at least next weekend.
I have friends spread out around the nation at various law schools: Cornell, Harvard, UCLA, and UC Hastings. So when I talk about "atmosphere," I was comparing to what my friends have told me at those respective schools. Also, our professors do seem a bit more "friendly" and approachable compared to what my friends have said.
If you plan to practice in SoCal, I think UCI is a very respectable choice outside of T14. I'm from the area, and I didn't want to live in LA (one of the reasons, aside from money, that I turned down UCLA and USC). Sorry, I tried to give a broad overview. So please feel free to follow up with a PM or a reply here. I'll try to check back.
Yes, they do if you want to be considered for need-based grants.Jonathk1 wrote:Does anyone know if UCI requires parent's information on the FAFSA application? Could not find that information on LSAC nor the UCI Law website itself.
Any help is appreciated.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Thanks!username101 wrote:Yes, they do if you want to be considered for need-based grants.Jonathk1 wrote:Does anyone know if UCI requires parent's information on the FAFSA application? Could not find that information on LSAC nor the UCI Law website itself.
Any help is appreciated.
"March 4 is the priority filing date for the FAFSA application. Parental Income and asset information are required to be considered for need-based grants."
http://www.law.uci.edu/financial_aid/Fi ... cklist.pdf
Just a quick FYI.. just to be fair.. I just checked my 'need based grant' wording and it clearly says that "This grant has been provided to assist you in meeting your first year cost of tuition and fees.".. Again, not a cheerleader for UCI, just wanted to toss a little truth into the equation.LSTfan wrote:In addition to pushing for more transparency on job placement stats, we need to also start pushing for more transparency on scholarship and aid stats. So many schools play these games where they offer up-front money for the first-year, then find some way to cut it after that. I would be pretty livid if ended up paying more in the end to go to a lower ranked school.eleventhnight wrote: I've been informed that need-based funding (5k, no matter who you are if you qualify, I believe) will not be continued for 2Ls and 3Ls. I'm assuming that they will be continuing this for incoming 1Ls. I based my decision largely on the financial aid package, and I'm saddened that I turned down UCLA/USC/Cornell largely based on getting more money from UCI. As it stands, I actually would have received more in merit scholarship from USC.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
gitguy wrote:I'm going to go out on a limb here, but I think they are sitting on a lot of applications. I know that LSN is a small sampling of applicants, but I can't help but opine that applications are down significantly for UCI. Most people that applied as early as I did last year had already received a decision by this time, and more had applied.
Perhaps some of the new law school shine is wearing off, and UCI is falling victim to the falling application numbers in their primary range?
Feel free to pick apart my logic.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login