Reading too much into things. I guess I'm an official TLSer nowChampagnePapi wrote:Makes no differenceMayBJack426 wrote:Hm..mine says the same thing. I just checked 2 other status checkers that are also complete, and this is not included. again, hmmm...Kionaltski wrote:Hey, I noticed something funny. In my status checker, there's a new line under the Applicant Fee which says "class deposit"...0.00... .00 Is this just something that happens when you go complete? I was already complete for some time...
Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
- Kionaltski

- Posts: 74
- Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2012 5:23 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
- lsacqueen

- Posts: 255
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 4:03 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checking in. App went complete as of 10/2. Best of luck, all!
- sean21

- Posts: 84
- Joined: Tue Aug 28, 2012 1:45 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
checking in
-
JohnMarshall17

- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:52 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checking in
-
TunnelVision

- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 4:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
How did you guys list the number of hours per week for each activity you were involved in, on your resume? VP of X Org (2 hours per week)??? For many of my extracurricular activities my involvement is somewhat inconsistent; we will have a big 5 hour event one week and then do almost nothing for the next two weeks. I'm sure I am not alone on this one.
- spicyyoda17

- Posts: 320
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I averaged my hours out over the bulk of the semester. So if it was 5 hours one week, a few more here and there, and altogether maybe 15 hours/semester, I just wrote 1 hr/wk.TunnelVision wrote:How did you guys list the number of hours per week for each activity you were involved in, on your resume? VP of X Org (2 hours per week)??? For many of my extracurricular activities my involvement is somewhat inconsistent; we will have a big 5 hour event one week and then do almost nothing for the next two weeks. I'm sure I am not alone on this one.
- 2014

- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I didn't list hours at all. I figured if they were curious they would ask, but the important thing is that I did the activity.TunnelVision wrote:How did you guys list the number of hours per week for each activity you were involved in, on your resume? VP of X Org (2 hours per week)??? For many of my extracurricular activities my involvement is somewhat inconsistent; we will have a big 5 hour event one week and then do almost nothing for the next two weeks. I'm sure I am not alone on this one.
- Yukos

- Posts: 1774
- Joined: Fri Jul 29, 2011 12:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
The resume instructions said to list hours.
I approximated, though there was one activity that is just too inconsistent to even try to approximate so I wrote something like "hours vary."
I approximated, though there was one activity that is just too inconsistent to even try to approximate so I wrote something like "hours vary."
- WhiteyCakes

- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Status updated to 10/29. Application Under Review. Submitted day 1
- Lavitz

- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same. Submitted Sept. 6th.WhiteyCakes wrote:Status updated to 10/29. Application Under Review. Submitted day 1
- tyler.durden

- Posts: 287
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:12 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same, submitted day 1Lavitz wrote:Same. Submitted Sept. 6th.WhiteyCakes wrote:Status updated to 10/29. Application Under Review. Submitted day 1
- WhiteyCakes

- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
The sad part is that even with the update, I know that Chicago isn't going to send out decisions anytime soon. Why I randomly checked the status today is beyond metyler.durden wrote:Same, submitted day 1Lavitz wrote:Same. Submitted Sept. 6th.WhiteyCakes wrote:Status updated to 10/29. Application Under Review. Submitted day 1
- danitt

- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1.WhiteyCakes wrote:Status updated to 10/29. Application Under Review. Submitted day 1
I'm so convinced that I won't get in that I actually forgot that I applied here.
-
kthoma23

- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same. Also was submitted and was complete first day.
- Rahviveh

- Posts: 2333
- Joined: Mon Aug 06, 2012 12:02 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Also 10/29 UR. Still considering ED.
- helix23

- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
- banjo

- Posts: 1351
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 8:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I forgot my password, requested a new one on the web site, then got nervous/excited about receiving an email from Chicago literally two seconds later. I apparently have NO short term memory. Also, UR 10/29.
- helix23

- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
+1. I sent myself an email, then got excited and thought it was JS1...banjo wrote:I forgot my password, requested a new one on the web site, then got nervous/excited about receiving an email from Chicago literally two seconds later. I apparently have NO short term memory. Also, UR 10/29.
- skers

- Posts: 5230
- Joined: Thu Jun 03, 2010 12:33 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
With your numbers EDing is retarded, especially since a bunch of people got off the WL this year with $$ChampagnePapi wrote:Also 10/29 UR. Still considering ED.
- 2014

- Posts: 6028
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 3:53 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I said the same thing but he convinced me otherwise after a PM convo, just to not thoroughly discredit his judgmentTemporarySaint wrote:With your numbers EDing is retarded, especially since a bunch of people got off the WL this year with $$ChampagnePapi wrote:Also 10/29 UR. Still considering ED.
- bernaldiaz

- Posts: 1674
- Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 12:51 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Took a nice month and a half TLS break. Good (?) to be back.bernaldiaz wrote: LOL sorry will bow out for a while. Frankly, I'm annoying myself.
- helix23

- Posts: 1807
- Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2012 3:18 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Welcome backbernaldiaz wrote:Took a nice month and a half TLS break. Good (?) to be back.bernaldiaz wrote: LOL sorry will bow out for a while. Frankly, I'm annoying myself.
- sabanist

- Posts: 574
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:48 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checking in!
- twenty

- Posts: 3189
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Just submitted. Good luck all. :)
- Mr. Elshal

- Posts: 611
- Joined: Thu Sep 20, 2012 11:30 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Checking in.