BC Law 2010 Forum

amichig · Post by **amichig** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:48 pm

AlanShore wrote:the people have DR 1/20.. what are your numbers?

mine 167, 3.5-3.6

160, 3.5 URM...do you think I'm in?

H. E. Pennypacker · Post by **H. E. Pennypacker** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:48 pm

AlanShore wrote:dr today..................

Good luck!!

AlanShore · Post by **AlanShore** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:50 pm

amichig wrote:
AlanShore wrote:the people have DR 1/20.. what are your numbers?

mine 167, 3.5-3.6

160, 3.5 URM...do you think I'm in?

I honestly dont have a good grasp of URM but i would say yes.

lfgsuperman · Post by **lfgsuperman** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:51 pm

Does anybody know why BC is Rejecting more people than Wash U is this cycle even though Wash U is higher ranked? Or, is it that Wash U is more friendly to URMs than BC is?

gator06 · Post by **gator06** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:53 pm

lfgsuperman wrote:Does anybody know why BC is Rejecting more people than Wash U is this cycle even though Wash U is higher ranked? Or, is it that Wash U is more friendly to URMs than BC is?

Don't ever use a preposition to end a sentence with!

lfgsuperman · Post by **lfgsuperman** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:54 pm

gator06 wrote:
lfgsuperman wrote:Does anybody know why BC is Rejecting more people than Wash U is this cycle even though Wash U is higher ranked? Or, is it that Wash U is more friendly to URMs than BC is?
Don't ever use a preposition to end a sentence with!

sorry mental blurb

lietx3 · Post by **lietx3** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:36 pm

goingoingone wrote:I would like to make this assumption, but I have my doubts. I'm in the DR 1/19 group too, and I'm only 161/3.94. I could be wrong about my chances, as some people with similar numbers have already gotten in, but I'm not holding my breath. (I am crossing my fingers, though, for all of us.)

DR 1/19 as well 164/3.8 not as solid as those damn 170'ers. In Boston also so hopefully I get it soon.

robin600 · Post by **robin600** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:51 pm

For all those who just went DR when did y'all go complete, I'm still waiting and I've been complete since 11/8 just curious to how much longer the wait will be for me

JusticeHarlan · Post by **JusticeHarlan** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:54 pm

robin600 wrote:For all those who just went DR when did y'all go complete, I'm still waiting and I've been complete since 11/8 just curious to how much longer the wait will be for me

Complete 11/20, DR 1/19

NancyBotwin · Post by **NancyBotwin** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:59 pm

robin600 wrote:For all those who just went DR when did y'all go complete, I'm still waiting and I've been complete since 11/8 just curious to how much longer the wait will be for me

Complete 11/12, DR 1/19.

antler · Post by **antler** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:02 pm

JusticeHarlan wrote:
robin600 wrote:For all those who just went DR when did y'all go complete, I'm still waiting and I've been complete since 11/8 just curious to how much longer the wait will be for me
Complete 11/20, DR 1/19

+1

J-tow10 · Post by **J-tow10** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:21 pm

Has anyone visited BC yet this cycle? I'm planning on visiting at the beginning of next month and was wondering how other peoples' visits went.

H. E. Pennypacker · Post by **H. E. Pennypacker** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:23 pm

have people's statuses been changing throughout the day or all around the same time?

statuscheckerssuck · Post by **statuscheckerssuck** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:24 pm

Decision rendered today

stats 3.8/166

Has BC been sending out the same type of decision in batches? Is it likely that all those DR today have the same decision whether it be admit/WL/ding?

lfgsuperman · Post by **lfgsuperman** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:28 pm

statuscheckerssuck wrote:Decision rendered today

stats 3.8/166

Has BC been sending out the same type of decision in batches? Is it likely that all those DR today have the same decision whether it be admit/WL/ding?

UFMatt wrote: It looks like (unlike Vanderbilt) BC sends out mixed decisions if LSN is to be believed.

lfgsuperman wrote: How do you know that Vandy sends out their decisions in batches?

UFMatt wrote: Everyone who had a decision mailed 1/12 at Vandy was WL or reject. Everyone on the 14th was accepted. Its def in batches.

statuscheckerssuck · Post by **statuscheckerssuck** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:32 pm

lfgsuperman wrote:
statuscheckerssuck wrote:Decision rendered today

stats 3.8/166

Has BC been sending out the same type of decision in batches? Is it likely that all those DR today have the same decision whether it be admit/WL/ding?

UFMatt wrote: It looks like (unlike Vanderbilt) BC sends out mixed decisions if LSN is to be believed.

lfgsuperman wrote: How do you know that Vandy sends out their decisions in batches?

UFMatt wrote: Everyone who had a decision mailed 1/12 at Vandy was WL or reject. Everyone on the 14th was accepted. Its def in batches.

Thanks. I was one of the Waitlist batch at Vandy, but it was nice to kind of know what to expect ahead of time. Guess that will not be the case here.

lfgsuperman · Post by **lfgsuperman** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:34 pm

statuscheckerssuck wrote:
lfgsuperman wrote:
statuscheckerssuck wrote:Decision rendered today

stats 3.8/166

Has BC been sending out the same type of decision in batches? Is it likely that all those DR today have the same decision whether it be admit/WL/ding?

UFMatt wrote: It looks like (unlike Vanderbilt) BC sends out mixed decisions if LSN is to be believed.

lfgsuperman wrote: How do you know that Vandy sends out their decisions in batches?

UFMatt wrote: Everyone who had a decision mailed 1/12 at Vandy was WL or reject. Everyone on the 14th was accepted. Its def in batches.
Thanks. I was one of the Waitlist batch at Vandy, but it was nice to kind of know what to expect ahead of time. Guess that will not be the case here.

Probably not man. Good luck!

lawyerlover · Post by **lawyerlover** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:40 pm

AlanShore wrote:
amichig wrote:
AlanShore wrote:the people have DR 1/20.. what are your numbers?

mine 167, 3.5-3.6

160, 3.5 URM...do you think I'm in?
I honestly dont have a good grasp of URM but i would say yes.

I dont know what to tell you i got waitlisted and I am a URM 164 3.4 top 20 undergrad.... i fear all bets are off this year.

lfgsuperman · Post by **lfgsuperman** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:43 pm

lawyerlover wrote:
AlanShore wrote:
amichig wrote:
AlanShore wrote:the people have DR 1/20.. what are your numbers?

mine 167, 3.5-3.6

160, 3.5 URM...do you think I'm in?
I honestly dont have a good grasp of URM but i would say yes.

I dont know what to tell you i got waitlisted and I am a URM 164 3.4 top 20 undergrad.... i fear all bets are off this year.

With your stats I can pretty much bank on my BC letter being a rejection.

Oh well, I still have 6 schools I'm waiting on.

sirchristaylor · Post by **sirchristaylor** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:52 pm

Have hope. I was accepted with a 3.95, 161.

Veritas · Post by **Veritas** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:53 pm

have any held people heard back?

dnesto01 · Post by **dnesto01** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:54 pm

Went DR 1/19. In nyc, anyone have any idea how long it will take to get the letter?

AlanShore · Post by **AlanShore** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:55 pm

statuscheckerssuck wrote:Decision rendered today

stats 3.8/166

Has BC been sending out the same type of decision in batches? Is it likely that all those DR today have the same decision whether it be admit/WL/ding?

similar stats to you. based on LSN, bc doesnt send in batches. looks like it could be wl, ding, or acceptance.

H. E. Pennypacker · Post by **H. E. Pennypacker** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:13 pm

just went DR with date 1/21. If today was all acceptances, not feeling good about tomorrow. It was a reach anyhow.

Also, I'm sure it's been discussed before, but what type of envelopes do acceptances / WLs / rejections come in?

Cupidity · Post by **Cupidity** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:16 pm

DR, 166, 3.87 +nice softs. Complete on or about 11/15

BC Law 2010 Forum

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010

Re: BC Law 2010